These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Announcement From Scott Bacon

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Mike Adoulin
Happys Happy Hamster Hunting Club
#41 - 2015-01-03 21:38:21 UTC
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:
I don't understand this point of making threads. When someone does something I don't like I shoot them. Then I ask myself are they still doing it? If yes, keep shooting. What's the problem?



You, sir, are genius.

*gives him a cookie*

Everything in EVE is a trap.

And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)

You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.

Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
412nv Yaken
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#42 - 2015-01-03 21:47:53 UTC  |  Edited by: 412nv Yaken
Cool opinions bro.

To bad they are wrong and saying everyone one should have e honour and is doesn't deserve your wall of tears.

Please edit to say. Tldr I still think ganking is real life bullying and ccp must change their mechanics because I am un happy with how some people choose to play their game and the big bad meanies might get me. Also Maximum Q for a corp name, should really be changed to maximum QQ


Edit
CCP Falcon wrote:
Why should CCP provide protection for your haulage in high sec?

CONCORD offer a level of deterrent just the same as any law enforcement agency, but as with any police for they're reactive and punitive rather than proactive.

If you want your haulage to be safer, bring the guns. If you don't have any guns, sacrifice some of your profit margin and hire someone who has them to escort you.

Welcome to New Eden, you just learned a very valuable lesson in being prepared and covering your back.



Please direct all future tear sessions to ccp through the ingame ticketing system.

A True Champion of High Security Space
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#43 - 2015-01-04 00:51:29 UTC
personally the only "toxic" behavior i've seen in AG is from code alts. Vast majority of people in AG just want to enjoy the game in peace...not looking for conflict.
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#44 - 2015-01-04 00:56:50 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
personally the only "toxic" behavior i've seen in AG is from code alts. Vast majority of people in AG just want to enjoy the game in peace...not looking for conflict.


Stop trolling. EVE is intended to be full of conflict and you know it.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#45 - 2015-01-04 01:01:16 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
personally the only "toxic" behavior i've seen in AG is from code alts. Vast majority of people in AG just want to enjoy the game in peace...not looking for conflict.


Stop trolling. EVE is intended to be full of conflict and you know it.


Nonsense. Solo gameplay is an absolute fact of life for a tremendous number of people in highsec. They go out, do pve, earn iskies, and buy stuff. They have minimal interaction with other players, and certainly no ship to ship conflict. The game absolutely supports that playstyle, and that is a reality of Eve. That you don't like solo players doesn't make them cease to exist or make their playstyle invalid.
Concord Guy's Cousin
Doomheim
#46 - 2015-01-04 01:01:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Concord Guy's Cousin
Veers Belvar wrote:
personally the only "toxic" behavior i've seen in AG is from code alts.
Roll Some of the AG crowd go out of their way to denigrate and ban anybody that dares to question the gospel of antiganking or suggest that people should take steps to protect themselves against gankers.

Quote:
Vast majority of people in AG just want to enjoy the game in peace...not looking for conflict.
Eve is all about conflict, the whole game and its mechanics are designed around it, the whole economy is conflict/destruction driven.

Peace is certainly an option, but it's not a very good one if it leads to people not acknowledging that Eve is, at its heart, entirely driven by conflict.

ISD LackOfFaith ~ "Your Catalyst was a hamster, and your Retriever smelt of elderberries"

NPC Forum Alt, because reasons.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#47 - 2015-01-04 01:05:13 UTC
Concord Guy's Cousin wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
personally the only "toxic" behavior i've seen in AG is from code alts.
Roll Some of the AG crowd go out of their way to denigrate and ban anybody that dares to question the gospel of antiganking or suggest that people should take steps to protect themselves against gankers.

Quote:
Vast majority of people in AG just want to enjoy the game in peace...not looking for conflict.
Eve is all about conflict, the whole game and its mechanics are designed around it, the whole economy is conflict/destruction driven.

Peace is certainly an option, but it's not a very good one if it leads to people not acknowledging that Eve is at its heart driven by conflict.


Eve is at its heart driven by WHATEVER THE HECK YOU WANT. You can spend your entire ever career pressing F1 on rocks, and that is fine. No one is compelled to seek conflict, and there is no reason to consider that the fundamental gameplay in Eve. It's a free range simulation, not a WoT FPS.
Concord Guy's Cousin
Doomheim
#48 - 2015-01-04 01:06:35 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Concord Guy's Cousin wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
personally the only "toxic" behavior i've seen in AG is from code alts.
Roll Some of the AG crowd go out of their way to denigrate and ban anybody that dares to question the gospel of antiganking or suggest that people should take steps to protect themselves against gankers.

Quote:
Vast majority of people in AG just want to enjoy the game in peace...not looking for conflict.
Eve is all about conflict, the whole game and its mechanics are designed around it, the whole economy is conflict/destruction driven.

Peace is certainly an option, but it's not a very good one if it leads to people not acknowledging that Eve is at its heart driven by conflict.


Eve is at its heart driven by WHATEVER THE HECK YOU WANT. You can spend your entire ever career pressing F1 on rocks, and that is fine. No one is compelled to seek conflict, and there is no reason to consider that the fundamental gameplay in Eve. It's a free range simulation, not a WoT FPS.
You do realise that pressing F1 and nomming on rocks is in itself a conflict driver, by virtue of depriving another player the chance of nomming on those rocks?

ISD LackOfFaith ~ "Your Catalyst was a hamster, and your Retriever smelt of elderberries"

NPC Forum Alt, because reasons.
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#49 - 2015-01-04 01:10:12 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
personally the only "toxic" behavior i've seen in AG is from code alts. Vast majority of people in AG just want to enjoy the game in peace...not looking for conflict.


Stop trolling. EVE is intended to be full of conflict and you know it.


Nonsense. Solo gameplay is an absolute fact of life for a tremendous number of people in highsec. They go out, do pve, earn iskies, and buy stuff. They have minimal interaction with other players, and certainly no ship to ship conflict. The game absolutely supports that playstyle, and that is a reality of Eve. That you don't like solo players doesn't make them cease to exist or make their playstyle invalid.


Stop trolling. No ship to ship contact? Wrong game.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#50 - 2015-01-04 01:13:11 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
personally the only "toxic" behavior i've seen in AG is from code alts. Vast majority of people in AG just want to enjoy the game in peace...not looking for conflict.


Stop trolling. EVE is intended to be full of conflict and you know it.


Nonsense. Solo gameplay is an absolute fact of life for a tremendous number of people in highsec. They go out, do pve, earn iskies, and buy stuff. They have minimal interaction with other players, and certainly no ship to ship conflict. The game absolutely supports that playstyle, and that is a reality of Eve. That you don't like solo players doesn't make them cease to exist or make their playstyle invalid.


Stop trolling. No ship to ship contact? Wrong game.



I guess highsec miners and mission runners who spend all of their time engaging with npcs and not other capsuleer ships are all trolls now? Do you just make this stuff up on your own or do you use talking points from code?
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#51 - 2015-01-04 01:19:19 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
personally the only "toxic" behavior i've seen in AG is from code alts. Vast majority of people in AG just want to enjoy the game in peace...not looking for conflict.


Stop trolling. EVE is intended to be full of conflict and you know it.


Nonsense. Solo gameplay is an absolute fact of life for a tremendous number of people in highsec. They go out, do pve, earn iskies, and buy stuff. They have minimal interaction with other players, and certainly no ship to ship conflict. The game absolutely supports that playstyle, and that is a reality of Eve. That you don't like solo players doesn't make them cease to exist or make their playstyle invalid.


Stop trolling. No ship to ship contact? Wrong game.



I guess highsec miners and mission runners who spend all of their time engaging with npcs and not other capsuleer ships are all trolls now? Do you just make this stuff up on your own or do you use talking points from code?


I'm not a member of code, and no, they aren't trolls. You are trolling because its obvious that you only post this absolutely rediculous crap about EVE being "peaceful" to get a response. Your game is minor league.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#52 - 2015-01-04 01:27:58 UTC
Leto Thule wrote:


I'm not a member of code, and no, they aren't trolls. You are trolling because its obvious that you only post this absolutely rediculous crap about EVE being "peaceful" to get a response. Your game is minor league.


Honestly I could care less about a response. Feel free to not response. I post because thousands of highsec miners and mission runners play Eve this way....they are looking for solo play or collaboration, NOT ship to ship conflict. That you disparage them doesn't make them not exist. Get used to it.
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#53 - 2015-01-04 02:41:28 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Leto Thule wrote:


I'm not a member of code, and no, they aren't trolls. You are trolling because its obvious that you only post this absolutely rediculous crap about EVE being "peaceful" to get a response. Your game is minor league.


Honestly I could care less about a response. Feel free to not response. I post because thousands of highsec miners and mission runners play Eve this way....they are looking for solo play or collaboration, NOT ship to ship conflict. That you disparage them doesn't make them not exist. Get used to it.


I'm fine with it. Its them that needs to get used to it.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment
412nv Yaken
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#54 - 2015-01-04 03:06:51 UTC  |  Edited by: 412nv Yaken
Veers Belvar wrote:


Feel free to not response.


That "ivy" league law degree obviously didn't help with your engrish.

Veers Belvar wrote:


Eve is at its heart driven by WHATEVER THE HECK YOU WANT.


Exactly, so when we want to force PVP we can, so please for once take your own advise and stahhp

A True Champion of High Security Space
412nv Yaken
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#55 - 2015-01-04 03:12:50 UTC  |  Edited by: 412nv Yaken
------------snip---------------

Refer to above post

A True Champion of High Security Space
loyalanon
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#56 - 2015-01-04 03:21:06 UTC
more "PLEASE CCP HELP US"

instead of

"I should help myself in this game today by not being lazy/afk/want to play a single player game/all of the above"

I do love reading the attempts to get CCP to save you though.
loyalanon
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#57 - 2015-01-04 03:29:44 UTC
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:
I don't understand this point of making threads. When someone does something I don't like I shoot them. Then I ask myself are they still doing it? If yes, keep shooting. What's the problem?


The problem is the - CCP PLEASE SAVE MEEEEEEEEEEEEE attitude that Anti-gankers have.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#58 - 2015-01-04 03:30:47 UTC
loyalanon wrote:
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:
I don't understand this point of making threads. When someone does something I don't like I shoot them. Then I ask myself are they still doing it? If yes, keep shooting. What's the problem?


The problem is the - CCP PLEASE SAVE MEEEEEEEEEEEEE attitude that Anti-gankers have.


Lots of talk. How is the incursion ganking contest going? Oh wait...it failed. Easier to pick on helpless miners and haulers who can't shoot back, I suppose?
Lin Suizei
#59 - 2015-01-04 03:43:54 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Lots of talk. How is the incursion ganking contest going? Oh wait...it failed. Easier to pick on helpless miners and haulers who can't shoot back, I suppose?


Clearly, it is the elite combat skills of these hardened, veteran highsec pve experts, which prevents terrible, unskilled gankers from successfully popping highsec incursion runners.

Lol I can't delete my forum sig.
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#60 - 2015-01-04 07:37:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Leto Thule
Veers Belvar wrote:
loyalanon wrote:
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:
I don't understand this point of making threads. When someone does something I don't like I shoot them. Then I ask myself are they still doing it? If yes, keep shooting. What's the problem?


The problem is the - CCP PLEASE SAVE MEEEEEEEEEEEEE attitude that Anti-gankers have.


Lots of talk. How is the incursion ganking contest going? Oh wait...it failed. Easier to pick on helpless miners and haulers who can't shoot back, I suppose?


So what if it failed? The point of playing a game is to have fun. Offering up contests keeps players interested and working together to overcome obstacles, whatever they may be. If I would have known about it, I would have offered up a few kitsunes for logi jamming, just for the ******* sake of seeing what happens when the logi chain drops. Those would be some nasty loss mails.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment