These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Does this game need a PvP Arena?

First post
Author
Apollo-Moor
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#41 - 2011-09-13 13:33:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Apollo-Moor
[quote=Jade Constantine]I actually think the game does need some PvP "arenas" but they need to be integrated into the setting and concept of New Eden.

Consequence-free though? Screw that.

What I'd see would be organized fights in Arena deadspace areas across space that allow certain classes of shps in to fights to the death. These would be real ships, with real equipment that explode and leave real loot. Only thing that the arena principle would allow would be guarentee of non-involvement of 3rd party interference and a way of fighting without concord involvement in low/hisec /quote]


This place you speak of.. it exist ... It is called. NULL.. Ffs man have you forgotten that a zero consequence no holds bar arena is waiting in over 3000 separate systems.. for real tho, get ya pussass out of hi sec.. leave the cushy basenett of concordium.. cut the cord

YOU CAN DO IT..!! You just go to your nearest .01 system that connects to one of those little red boxes on your waypoints and click jump-jump-jump.. yea that's where you are asking to be...

There's no real need for a total separate arena mechanic other than what the AT is supposed to be..

I agree it'd be awesome to wager on matches of 1v1, 2v2 and etc, but in That type of thing should be player run.. find some dead 0.0 system where people who were serious could meet just outside lo-sec to avoid too many ganks..

To give a whole new PvP area inside a so-called PvP area (hisec more so than lo) is silly and is just more oppurtunity for those in hi-sec to pussy foot around actual "fair/no concord games" PvP.. be real to yaselves.. that's all hisec PvP is.. a bunch of pussyfooting
Name Family Name
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#42 - 2011-09-13 13:41:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Name Family Name
Apollo-Moor wrote:
...



I wonder how you plan to enforce the 'no third party interference' in 0.0 - have 300 supercaps guard the site 23.5/7?

Also flying there and getting ganked on the way sounds like fun...
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#43 - 2011-09-13 13:50:21 UTC
An arena would be a great idea, but it would have to be bring your own ship. If it wasn't it would be ridiculous..

And instead of an arena, how about just fixing FW first?

And another feature that would be nice to have in the arena would be betting on the fights in establishments. However EvE players have already demonstrated that they aren't ready for that through the bounty system and the last tournament.

lets call it "Almost a good idea and then only if you have to bring your own ship".

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Apollo-Moor
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#44 - 2011-09-13 13:54:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Apollo-Moor
Name Family Name wrote:
Apollo-Moor wrote:
...



I wonder how you plan to enforce the 'no third party interference' in 0.0 - have 300 supercaps guard the site 23.5/7?

Also flying there and getting ganked on the way sounds like fun...


What you are asking for is silly.. ayou are asking for an entirely new game mechanic for something that already exist.. your telling me that a corp could not spearhead this? With some monthly arena ran by the playerbase ... weekly may be too much.. bi-weekly maybe..maybe doable?

With the isk that'd be wagered proper "security" forces should be in place, but they should be players.. not CCP and definitely not your babysitter concord..

You want real cut throat, to the death arena matches cool.. I know you pod enough in hi sec to have a bounty.. so put one on both contestants heads and there's ya payout till the death lol..

You shouldn't need Concord to hold your hand your ENTIRE EvE career.. CCP didn't make a babysittin game they made a game where you take chances and the biggest ones have the greatest rewards.. Ala Nullsec compared to what ever it is you call pvping there in .05 and up..

Btw: Wouldn't an arena be almost seen as barbarian to hold such bloodsport in hi-sec I would see Nullsec as the naturalbplace for arenas.. no laws all forms of brutality.. so yes to arena games.. only put the arenas in - .0-someshit
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#45 - 2011-09-13 14:05:00 UTC
CCP did try to put arenas into Eve a couple of years ago, but the idea is so awful that the code rejected it.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Name Family Name
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#46 - 2011-09-13 14:16:12 UTC
Apollo-Moor wrote:
Name Family Name wrote:
Apollo-Moor wrote:
...



I wonder how you plan to enforce the 'no third party interference' in 0.0 - have 300 supercaps guard the site 23.5/7?

Also flying there and getting ganked on the way sounds like fun...


What you are asking for is silly.. ayou are asking for an entirely new game mechanic for something that already exist.. your telling me that a corp could not spearhead this? With some monthly arena ran by the playerbase ... weekly may be too much.. bi-weekly maybe..maybe doable?


*cough*

Name Family Name wrote:
[
So why don't you implement something like that yourself?
Have people sign up for a fee, have them drop cans and a referee with a shipscanner in case there's fitting restrictions have them fleet up with him (to prevent fleetbooster alts).

Winner takes the loot and pot (minus a small fee for the referee)...

I'd rather see that than another possible business model removed by some NPC mechanic.


Quote:
With the isk that'd be wagered proper "security" forces should be in place, but they should be players.. not CCP and definitely not your babysitter concord..



I doubt it would even be profitable for the guy acting as referee or third party - 'securing' it would never work - the more people you put into securing it, the more gatecamps and hotdrops you attract - unless of course you use 300 supers...

If something like that should work, it would have to be right next to a trade hub for convenient and quick refitting.
People who would partake in something like that are too scared to go into lowsec/0.0 in the first place - that's why they ask for something like this.
They will certainly love fitting their ship, flying xx jumps to whatever backwater system this takes place in, get podded in a bubblecamp before arriving there and fly there all over again in a new ship...
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#47 - 2011-09-13 14:16:40 UTC
Jade Constantine wrote:
I actually think the game does need some PvP "arenas" but they need to be integrated into the setting and concept of New Eden.

Consequence-free though? Screw that.

What I'd see would be organized fights in Arena deadspace areas across space that allow certain classes of shps in to fights to the death. These would be real ships, with real equipment that explode and leave real loot. Only thing that the arena principle would allow would be guarentee of non-involvement of 3rd party interference and a way of fighting without concord involvement in low/hisec.



I agree the no consequence is horrible. I also agree some arena concepts would work. I like your idea but I would say they should be a little more player controled.

Alliances could buy arenas. They would have to be manufactured though. They could be erected in null or possibly low sec. High sec would consider it too barbaric. The alliance putting the arena up would be able to upgrade it to put in sentry towers that could ecm or shoot any improper third party interferer. But just like a college football game can be interrupted with a streaker the arena battle could be interupted with a third party.(this is eve) It would be up to the host to give the best protection through upgrading the arena or even having other ships standing guard.

If an alliance did a good job providing protection then their events would gain notoriety and winning them would be something players would feel was an accomplishment. Maybe alliances would work together to put on an olympics of sorts. I really have no idea.

The arenas could have different concepts on how to win.

But before all this is done I think the best way to give casual players a fix for pvp is to fix the faction war plexing mechanics. That would be a *huge* boost to casual player pvp. And it wouldn't be arranged pvp.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Rellik B00n
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2011-09-13 14:19:04 UTC
I had an idea for a TV show once, its called "Not on my doorstep!"

what happens is hidden cameras find people that let their pets crap in the street without cleaning up the mess.

They then tail the offender home.

Then they get someone (ideally the person who's house was crapped outside of, or someone from the street) and they have them take a massive dump on the pet owners doorstep.

They then film the result and then Ashton Kutcher comes out and says "you've been pooped!" and great justice is done.

[Of a request for change ask: Who Benefits?](https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=199765)
SpaceSquirrels
#49 - 2011-09-13 14:20:17 UTC  |  Edited by: SpaceSquirrels
Taiwanistan wrote:
i say yes to this something similar to world of tanks quick match, as fights are not going on all day, quite hard to find
except you still have to buy and fit your ships from the regular market
the arena would take place at a certain system in hisec making it like a thunderdome
and smart traders would haul all sorts of FOTM ships and mods to that system

it would be like an alliance tournament every half hour everyday
and it would be frigates only at dome 1
cruisers only at dome 2 and so on
and each match costs another 10m isk or 50m (depending on which dome u choose) to be paid towards the pot to be distributed by the 5 or 10 men team that wins it
but no spectators betting because everybody should get in and get dirty

@spacesquirrels "Something about not loosing ships...Which doesn't make sense." are you that dense? it is detrimental to eve when stuff is given out of thin air, granted that is what ratting bounties are but for the most part the lion king circle of life needs to be preserved.




You missed my point. People automatically jump to the conclusion that arena == not losing ships or such. I dont see why they jump to this conclusion. (Well I do they just think instanced ___ insert other MMO here___) In which case no one ever stated that they want it risk free or where the hell in all of EVE have you ever seen risk free pvp...ever?

So no I did not suggest magical poof instanced arena of wonderment. Rather people's fears of it are unfounded. Which is also funny because the Devs state that they dont want an arena in eve (aside from the alliance tournament)
Cyprus Black
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#50 - 2011-09-13 14:20:30 UTC
Please just go back to WoW.

The mere fact that you suggested this terrible idea demonstrates you know absolutely nothing about this game.

Summary of EvEs last four expansions: http://imgur.com/ZL5SM33

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#51 - 2011-09-13 14:28:14 UTC
Name Family Name wrote:
Jade Constantine wrote:
...



So why don't you implement something like that yourself?
Have people sign up for a fee, have them drop cans and a referee with a shipscanner in case there's fitting restrictions have them fleet up with him (to prevent fleetbooster alts).

Winner takes the loot and pot (minus a small fee for the referee)...

I'd rather see that than another possible business model removed by some NPC mechanic.


Of course we have done this many times in the past.

Problem is its a right royal pain in the ass. Can flagging mechanics is amazingly clumsy is such a pain that we don't even run such tournaments much within our same alliance. Sure, it would be possible if we could define a fleet (free pvp no concord or something) but as things stand at the moment its simply too much a pain to do it with any regularity.

I think at some point we need to accept that CCP should be delivering us content to empower players to do these things. Its an eight year old game and has a huge potential if only the developers give us some tools to make it happen in a fluid and entertaining way.


The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Othran
Route One
#52 - 2011-09-13 14:37:32 UTC
Mmmm but if you "protect" the participants then you introduce instancing.

There's no reason good enough to do that on a single shard server.

None.
Raid'En
#53 - 2011-09-13 14:45:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Raid'En
from what we have saw, it seems only a fraction of eve's player pvp

so question : do you want to continue shooting sitting duck, or do you prefer them to learn a bit and be more hard to kill ?

if a way to get on a fair fight exist, i'm pretty sure more people will try the pvp you like later.

of course to get something where people can't abuse the system it would need a lot of work, but i honestly like the idea.
... even if i'm pretty sure it will never happen as it would be too complicated to do.
Dorian Wylde
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#54 - 2011-09-13 14:48:11 UTC
Mail Order Bride wrote:
I'm not totally against the idea of having 1 system that has been taken over by some futuristic mega corp and is now a permanant tournament venue pitting simular ships together in sporting action for others amusement with betting etc being held on such events. But there would have to be consequences such as insurance wont pay out if your ship is used in this way, like my car insurance would'nt pay out if i used it for racing.



This is a good response, in contrast to all the "wow is that way!" morons.

The fact that regular pvp is central to the game has no bearing on the question at hand. The Alliance Tournament is proof enough that not only do a lot of people like this style of pvp, but that CCP likes it too.

Test server is a good arena already though, I'm not sure if tranq itself needs anything.
Alundil
Rolled Out
#55 - 2011-09-13 14:49:42 UTC
Tashi Neruu wrote:
Does this game need an Arena where players can PvP without consequence?

Perhaps levying an entry fee so that 'regular' pvp is not abandoned? Or making it cost less if you are in a player owned corp.

I think this game does need an option for casual pvp, not just frig battles.



That would be a resounding no!

I'm right behind you

Cyniac
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#56 - 2011-09-13 15:50:54 UTC
Well if I was running this as a player I'd use a wormhole.

All contestants would be asked to be at a given highsec system (heck why not?) and then they would receive a contract with the entry bookmark to the WH.

Last one out alive of the place wins ;-)


It needs to be developed somewhat sure... but hey its a thought right? If wormhole dwellers are home and get miffed that just counts as extra difficulty.
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#57 - 2011-09-13 15:57:12 UTC
Cyniac wrote:
Well if I was running this as a player I'd use a wormhole.

All contestants would be asked to be at a given highsec system (heck why not?) and then they would receive a contract with the entry bookmark to the WH.

Last one out alive of the place wins ;-)


It needs to be developed somewhat sure... but hey its a thought right? If wormhole dwellers are home and get miffed that just counts as extra difficulty.



Which would work really well until someone signs up as a competitor and then passes the bookmark to their buddies who then attack the contest.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Kinta Huron
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#58 - 2011-09-13 16:07:22 UTC
I use the test sever if i want to pvp because it's cheap cheap cheap! And because of that pvp there is a blast! But I think adding a pvp arena to this game would seriously muck it up.
Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#59 - 2011-09-13 16:26:58 UTC
Cyprus Black wrote:
Please just go back to WoW.

The mere fact that you suggested this terrible idea demonstrates you know absolutely nothing about this game.


What has WoW have to do with providing a platform for Eve players to fight with 0 risk? There aren't any negative impacts on PVP in the wilds (losec, null, w-space). NONE. It doesn't even impact PVP in hs since technically there isn't non-consensual PVP in hs other than from the manipulation of game mechanics and wars which are still there.

Your dislike for WoW seriously affects your judgment.

Don't ban me, bro!

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#60 - 2011-09-13 16:57:01 UTC
There was a suggestion i made before for combat simulators inside stations. Could have rankings for different ship classes and types of battles (1v1 5v5 etc.), and it would allow new players or 'carebears' to get more comfortable with PvP.

Would still be based on what ships you can actually fly, and what mods you can use, but there would be no penalty aside from a loss in your rankings.

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi