Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Yeah and you used the one Pirate Cruiser as your example that has not been around. Cynabals with a falloff of 40km and not 35km are not going to break the game Baltec1. You are out of you f****** mind.

Feels like you dont play to this game....

Scythe is used by most of the welp fleets, as is the exequror, augoror is doing a pretty good job as the osprey but ppl dont use it over Guardian / basi as they are mostly looking for cap chain a solid ship.

In NS blob ppl will prefer Scythe Exeq because of rep effectivness over cap chain, is that hard to understand ?

but that's out of the subject...



I've already aswered to this earlier.

Because they do Baltec1. On hulls without a specific falloff bonus, Blasters absolutely overshadow auto-cannons.

Actually no. 10-15% buff is not going to undue the TE nerf buff. Remember when you said most minny ships fit TE's in their lows cause they have room? Its because a/c range was balanced around them. CCP nerfed the TE without modifying base a/c stats to prevent completely neutering them. But in typical heavy handed fashion, they are doing to a/c's what they did to heavy missiles, the cane, and the drake. TE's were nerfed 50% across the board, nothing done to base a/c fall-off to compensate (similar to scorch nerf you just saw recently).

I'm not denying they weren't over powered in the past, and that a nerf was due, but CCP over-nerfed it and now its floundering after hybrids were buffed.



Where? We've been saying from the beginning that a/c fall-off is not in a good spot. The cynabal is not flown solo as often as it used to be (it still see's use in gangs) due to this lack of applied damage at fall-off. Its sad my 200m pirate hull can't apply more than a frigates worth of dps at point range.

But you don't want to actually discuss the topic, just blather on about killboard and market data. Misdirecting, manipulating and otherwise just trying to sabotage the thread. I don't mind if you don't agree, but some of your posts are either blatantly trolling, or just flat out wrong. Like rax vs ruppy comparo, or that you think its difficult for 200mm rails to fit on a rax (its not).

Or my favorite "a/c's are good because they show up on matari turret based ships on the KB"... i mean.. really? That is revolutionary stuff right there, i see why the Goons hold you in such high regard.

They were nerfed by 10% because auto ships were overpowering everything. So yes, adding 10-15% would indeed undo the nerf that was very much needed.

Kinda nice how you breezed through that. Cherry picking as usual. Still assuming kb stats apply to solo and not reading the whole post.

You sure are trying really hard not to have acs intrude on your hybrid win button. Show us on the doll where the big bad ac's touched you. You know whats different this time? Hybrids were buffed too.

Because they were being crushed by everything else. Bringing back that 10% would return us to cynabals online. If hybrids are overpowered why do a/c ships get more kill than them?

Unlikely. Did you forget about drones? Ishtars/vexors online? Infact, acs would be a decent counter to those ships. Not a dunking, but a gf.

Also, looking at the old thread people were bitching about the talos more than minmatar stuff. A lot has been rebalanced since then.

Having lived though it it was the cynabals that dominated with the cane, vagabond, SFI and stabber close behind. You plan will bring that horrible age back.

Cool story, now there is RLML, OP drone boat and a **** tons of inty ...

So no cynabal / vagabond can't "rules".