These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Concord Fraud Department - Anti scam idea

Author
Adjal Kardjaval
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2015-01-02 05:33:36 UTC
Thus far this is ONLY a idea, it is NOT that well thought out, please feel free to add to adn critique as you want.

Here is my idea, Create a new branch of the Concord who'se focus is on Fraud and Scams.

The Basic idea behind this is to punish those who scam, or somehow inconveniance them,

My idea for the punishments are as follows
Light scammers(oh so many reports within a given time frame) anytime someone attempts to give isk, or complete a contract issued by this scammer they are warned by concord (like a DED complex warning popup) that the player is a KNOWN Fraud, and to confirm if they still want to continue with their action.

Heavy scammer (so many scam reports within a given time frame) Security rating loss, and possible repercussion to either chat privileged, or market interactions.

The way i like to think of how it works is players have a hidden "health" system, lets say they have 500 health, every time they are reported as a scammer, they take a hit of 5 points, when they reach ZERO health they are flagged as a light scammer, there will be no criminal tag, or anything, the only things this means is anytime someone goes to give them isk, or accept a contract from their, there is a additional warning stating they are a known fraud and to cofnirm if they still want to go on.

If the player reaches -500 health they are flag as a heavy scammer, (they get flagged every time they hit -500) every time they hit that they will receive a small sec status hit, and i was thinking lost of access to the market (maybe "freeze" their bank accounts while "under investigation" while under investigation they will no longer receive negative hits if reported but again their assets are frozen so they can't scam during this time either as they won't have the funds for contract escrow and can't receive incoming funds either)) player heal at a rate of 1 point every hour (real time) if they are under investigation, the investigation ends (and assets are unfrozen) when they recover 250 health the investigation ends (give them a warning saying teh investiagation was not able to find credible proof as such asset have been unfrozen)


To prevent griefing, add a filing charge (of just a few thousand isk) to insure the report, and make it based on unique unaffiliated reporters (by unaffiliated i mean they must be separate player, if 10 people are in the same corp (barring npc corps) and they all issue a report it ONLY counts as a single report, this would prevent greifing raids made by corporations of large numbers.
Thus far this is ONLY a idea, it is NOT that well thought out, please feel free to add to and critique as you want.

Well what do you think, this won't prevent scamming, but it should make the obvious scams that clutter up local chats, far less recurrent, and i think it might help make teh game a little better for newbies to get into.
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#2 - 2015-01-02 05:40:12 UTC
*covers up smile with hand*

Ummm... why is this necessary?


Scamming has been allowed since the beginning of the game. Several of the greatest feats performed by players have been scams.
And almost all scams can be avoided by either doing research, taking precautions, or following the rule "if it looks too good to be true, it probably is."
Adjal Kardjaval
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2015-01-02 05:55:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Adjal Kardjaval
ShahFluffers wrote:
*covers up smile with hand*

Ummm... why is this necessary?


Scamming has been allowed since the beginning of the game. Several of the greatest feats performed by players have been scams.
And almost all scams can be avoided by either doing research, taking precautions, or following the rule "if it looks too good to be true, it probably is."

It WOULD still be allowed and possible, this will help cut back frankly, on the spamming scams that are annoying as hell. furthermore, it would help the actual common victims (newbs) in prevent em for falling for some of the stupid scams (they aren't even scams they are hey give me money i promise to give you money BS) if it cuts down on the obvious scams SPAM i'm for anything that will help, or if they don't want to do this, just allow me to get a chat addon that BLOCK all the scammer automatically.

furthermore, this doesn't stop well though out scams, corp thefts, or all the things that makes eve great. it merely cleans out the gutters a little.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#4 - 2015-01-02 05:58:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Daichi Yamato
minimize jita local.

noobs dont have much to fear from scammers. what are they going to do? lose their 5000 starter isk? trade their free ibis for a less powerful ship?

and if they are so obvious, no one has to worry about players falling for them.

edit-

and going for the 'wont somebody think of the children' argument just looks bad.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Komi Toran
Perkone
Caldari State
#5 - 2015-01-02 06:03:30 UTC
Wait wait wait. So, if I get the names of my competition in Jita, I can use all of my NPC/1-man corp alts to report them as scammers, and hurt their market privileges? No, this won't be abused at all.

Basically, you want to impose a system on all players to protect the drunk, the gullible, and the greedy. I really don't see why the player base needs to be punished to cater to those.
Adjal Kardjaval
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2015-01-02 06:09:07 UTC
Komi Toran wrote:
Wait wait wait. So, if I get the names of my competition in Jita, I can use all of my NPC/1-man corp alts to report them as scammers, and hurt their market privileges? No, this won't be abused at all.

Basically, you want to impose a system on all players to protect the drunk, the gullible, and the greedy. I really don't see why the player base needs to be punished to cater to those.



You have 200 alts?

thats how many player reports it would take to take someone from 500, down to -500, and thats at 5 points per report, take it down to 1 report per report and it would take 1000 alts.
Furthermore, the asset freeze is only a idea, one which can be adjusted pretty easily, or simply ignored, i mean the WARNING will be enough to make alert the majority of scam victims and prevent them from falling prey to scammers.
James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#7 - 2015-01-02 06:22:36 UTC
Adjal Kardjaval wrote:
Komi Toran wrote:
Wait wait wait. So, if I get the names of my competition in Jita, I can use all of my NPC/1-man corp alts to report them as scammers, and hurt their market privileges? No, this won't be abused at all.

Basically, you want to impose a system on all players to protect the drunk, the gullible, and the greedy. I really don't see why the player base needs to be punished to cater to those.



You have 200 alts?

thats how many player reports it would take to take someone from 500, down to -500, and thats at 5 points per report, take it down to 1 report per report and it would take 1000 alts.
Furthermore, the asset freeze is only a idea, one which can be adjusted pretty easily, or simply ignored, i mean the WARNING will be enough to make alert the majority of scam victims and prevent them from falling prey to scammers.

So someone with a soapbox, like a bloc fc tells their minions to repprt someone for the lulz. Yey.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

Adjal Kardjaval
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2015-01-02 06:30:49 UTC
James Baboli wrote:
Adjal Kardjaval wrote:
Komi Toran wrote:
Wait wait wait. So, if I get the names of my competition in Jita, I can use all of my NPC/1-man corp alts to report them as scammers, and hurt their market privileges? No, this won't be abused at all.

Basically, you want to impose a system on all players to protect the drunk, the gullible, and the greedy. I really don't see why the player base needs to be punished to cater to those.



You have 200 alts?

thats how many player reports it would take to take someone from 500, down to -500, and thats at 5 points per report, take it down to 1 report per report and it would take 1000 alts.
Furthermore, the asset freeze is only a idea, one which can be adjusted pretty easily, or simply ignored, i mean the WARNING will be enough to make alert the majority of scam victims and prevent them from falling prey to scammers.

So someone with a soapbox, like a bloc fc tells their minions to repprt someone for the lulz. Yey.



and those characters must all be unaffiliated (meaning not in the same corp, or alliance)
Anhenka
The New Federation
Sigma Grindset
#9 - 2015-01-02 06:40:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Anhenka
Adjal Kardjaval wrote:

And those characters must all be unaffiliated (meaning not in the same corp, or alliance)


That's a mighty complicated system your are proposing in the interest of EVE gene pool muddification. (yes, that's a word as of now)


Especially when you consider the following (My best Bill Nye impression).


1: Market scammers don't undock, so they don't care about their sec status.
2: Market scamming spammers are frequently not the character who has the actual scam contract/margin order, so losing market ability matters not one whit.
3: Market scams using contracts take absolutely no player SP at all beyond the starting, so they can constantly reroll characters if gagged, and have quite a few scam contracts up with the purchase of a few thousand isk Contracting skill book.
4: Margin scams take a character all of three days to train up from a perfectly blank character, and all you need is that one skill to run a Margin scam.
5: Trade window scam can be run from any character, with no skills whatsoever.


TLDR: Your proposal does nothing. People will be bad. They will be scammed. As long as scamming is allowed (and it should stay allowed), there is nothing in your proposal that does anything to hamper scammers in the slightest.
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#10 - 2015-01-02 06:40:48 UTC  |  Edited by: ShahFluffers
Adjal Kardjaval wrote:
this will help cut back frankly, on the spamming scams that are annoying as hell.

... (snip)...

SPAM i'm for anything that will help, or if they don't want to do this, just allow me to get a chat addon that BLOCK all the scammer automatically.

Don't look at local while in a trade hub?

I mean that seriously. There was a rather long discussion about this a few years ago. Someone even ran a program to ID people who were using bots to spam their messages in trade hubs.
CCP took no action because, and I'm paraphrasing here, "we don't see a problem, they are not putting any significant strain on the system (server) and if people fall for it, that is their own stupidity. And we do not stop people from being stupid. That is just part of the game."


Furthermore... how can any mechanized system differentiate between someone who is trying to get more visibility for his/her contract and another who is trying to scam?
They are literally using the same mechanics. The only difference lies in intent. And no computer can reliably discern intent.


Adjal Kardjaval wrote:
furthermore, it would help the actual common victims (newbs) in prevent em for falling for some of the stupid scams (they aren't even scams they are hey give me money i promise to give you money BS) if it cuts down on the obvious scams.

True newbies don't have any worthwhile money/assets to be scammed for (scamming requires a person have substantial money/assets in the first place)...

Unless they buy a PLEX. In which case I do not consider a player to be a "newbie" anymore because they are using an advanced mechanic to bypass "normal" gameplay and "get ahead." Those players are fair game to me.

Quote:
You have 200 alts?

thats how many player reports it would take to take someone from 500, down to -500, and thats at 5 points per report, take it down to 1 report per report and it would take 1000 alts.
Furthermore, the asset freeze is only a idea, one which can be adjusted pretty easily, or simply ignored, i mean the WARNING will be enough to make alert the majority of scam victims and prevent them from falling prey to scammers.

I know a little under 100 different people (excluding my own corporation and alliance). And many of them have alt accounts (some of them have 2 or 3). And each of those accounts have up to 3 unaffiliated characters on them.

It would be easy to "freeze the assets" of anyone I did not like. Hell... I could even make a business out of it!

"Give me 100 million ISK and I'll have everyone I know report some poor guy as a scammer/spammer."
Then I'll share the profits with everyone.
Sure... 1 million ISK per person doesn't seem like much... but if I get enough customers then the margins will improve!

OOO... and the characters I scam with (or used to anyways)... they have no skills. So I could always delete them and roll a fresh character! After all... it does not require skillpoints to scam anyone. Merely knowledge of the game mechanics and some brainpower.
Komi Toran
Perkone
Caldari State
#11 - 2015-01-02 07:06:02 UTC
Adjal Kardjaval wrote:
You have 200 alts?

thats how many player reports it would take to take someone from 500, down to -500, and thats at 5 points per report, take it down to 1 report per report and it would take 1000 alts.
Furthermore, the asset freeze is only a idea, one which can be adjusted pretty easily, or simply ignored, i mean the WARNING will be enough to make alert the majority of scam victims and prevent them from falling prey to scammers.

Congratulations. I think you have invented a system that's only purpose is to be gamed, because you sure as heck aren't going to get anyone flagged as anything any other way if you're waiting for individual people from 200 different corps/alliances to click a button without organization.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#12 - 2015-01-02 07:08:29 UTC
No, bad idea.

Falls straight into the category of: I have a problem, CCP please fix.

The fix for scamming is other players getting even or getting wise and not falling for scams. It doesn't need CCP to intervene and create an npc mechanic.

You lose something, be more careful next time.
Adjal Kardjaval
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2015-01-02 07:48:30 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
No, bad idea.

Falls straight into the category of: I have a problem, CCP please fix.

The fix for scamming is other players getting even or getting wise and not falling for scams. It doesn't need CCP to intervene and create an npc mechanic.

You lose something, be more careful next time.

sigh

i like how your all seem to think i've lost something and this is a kneejerk reaction. or that it's unneccessary

new ship designs are unnecesary, warp and jumpgate animation affect are unnecessary

Or that its easy to simply make a new character to perpetuate scams.


1. in reference to the system being overly complex, or abusable by large groups of people to lock out competition out of market transactions, we can EASILY simplify it to JUST the warning system, or make the unaffiliated requirement more stringent (a simple check system would EASILY work, character in same alliance, character in same coproration, character is alt, or character is contact of, if true would negate the penalty hit.

2. in reference to this Being CCP policing scam actions, how so, the reports are initiated by a significant user base, the penalty are carried out IN GAME, and the penalty only affect the character in game, how is this any different from concord turning someone ship into dust in highsec?

3. this system won't STOP scams, but it WILL inconvenience the scammers, for those who say "oh i can just delete my character and make a new one" unless i'm mistaken their is a 10 hours timer for deleting a character, it may be true that a sec hit won't effect a trade scammer who never undocks BUT it will inconvenance him if his is shoot on sight cause his sec status is so lon he will be trap inside the single station.

and again, this is a RAW idea, it could use significant improvement, but punishing scammers (as in in game punish) is NOT the same as CCP punishing them, this is, in effect no different then getting concorded for a illegal action in high sec, and because this is from concord it also will NOT happen in null, or lowsec due to the lacking presence of concord.
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2015-01-02 08:55:41 UTC
System that is based on someone reporting someone else is heavily abusable and will do more harm than good even if we consider for a moment that "good" means "working as intended".

So yeah, stopped reading at "reports", huge t-down.
Iain Cariaba
#15 - 2015-01-02 18:19:15 UTC
Adjal Kardjaval wrote:
James Baboli wrote:
Adjal Kardjaval wrote:
Komi Toran wrote:
Wait wait wait. So, if I get the names of my competition in Jita, I can use all of my NPC/1-man corp alts to report them as scammers, and hurt their market privileges? No, this won't be abused at all.

Basically, you want to impose a system on all players to protect the drunk, the gullible, and the greedy. I really don't see why the player base needs to be punished to cater to those.



You have 200 alts?

thats how many player reports it would take to take someone from 500, down to -500, and thats at 5 points per report, take it down to 1 report per report and it would take 1000 alts.
Furthermore, the asset freeze is only a idea, one which can be adjusted pretty easily, or simply ignored, i mean the WARNING will be enough to make alert the majority of scam victims and prevent them from falling prey to scammers.

So someone with a soapbox, like a bloc fc tells their minions to repprt someone for the lulz. Yey.



and those characters must all be unaffiliated (meaning not in the same corp, or alliance)

nullbloc overlord tells his minions to all start a single alt, put it in 1 man corp, and report a list of players as scammers... if just one half of one percent of his minions do as ordered, there's your 200 unaffiliated reports.
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#16 - 2015-01-02 18:41:46 UTC
Scams are what give CCP their best ad material. Why would they do this?

Furthermore, ship redesigns and warp/jumpgate animations improve the atmosphere of the game and thus the game as a whole by making it more enjoyable to play. Specifically in the case of redesigns, it keeps the ships which are the most visible aspect of the game looking up-to-date.

Your idea, meanwhile, does nothing to improve the atmosphere of the game (unless you're from WoW) and in fact kills a significant portion of it.

Go away.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#17 - 2015-01-02 19:46:24 UTC
Oh good lord no. Want to stop spam? Close local chat.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#18 - 2015-01-02 19:57:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Adjal Kardjaval wrote:
i like how your all seem to think i've lost something and this is a kneejerk reaction. or that it's unneccessary

Don't take it so personal. 'You' can be used in a collective sense too.

Quote:
this is, in effect no different then getting concorded for a illegal action in high sec, and because this is from concord it also will NOT happen in null, or lowsec due to the lacking presence of concord.

Except that scammers aren't doing anything illegal.

If you (collective) want to punish someone, punish the fools that continue to fall for scams because they are greedy. Scams are driven by greed. If characters weren't greedy for the easy buck, scams wouldn't exist.

Everything is already there for players to punish scammers. Don't fall for scams (in the general collective sense).
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#19 - 2015-01-02 20:04:30 UTC
Oh good Lord no.

Why?
Jdsaf
The Nocturnal Syndicate
#20 - 2015-01-02 22:53:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Jdsaf
Got scammed in my second week, with money from a PLEX sale Oops. Learned a lesson, won't happen again. Scamming is essential for the "gritty" atmosphere of eve where content is player driven. -1
12Next page