EVE General Discussion

Sgt Ocker Your talking about Replicator?

Wait for Jan 1st to See if you are right and round robbin is not considerred AS illegal advantage. I heard so many Boxers want to use it to get around The other restrictions that i am sure it will be looked at again. Pressing 10x F1 and leaving the distribution of The key presses to a third Party software is faster and more efficient than doing it manually - clear break oft The New rules.

You are just operating in a grey zone hoping that The rules won't be looked at again if the first hit against this plague doesn't eleminate it.

Again, all we're asking is for CCP to balance and fix the game before scapegoating us. I will happily wait till Jan1, and I will be the first person in system local to **** myself laughing at all the whiners and QQers in local ranting and raving over the ISBoxer in the belt.

Please learn to read. Lucas and I addressed your concerns regarding the "distribution" issue about three or four pages ago, and, had you read the handy graphic by CCP Random, you would've seen that one action per client is allowed under the new law.

Time will not show who is right, only who has control of the game. Games change as they go on. Few could have predicted the mass exodus and "blue donuting" of WH space, yet here we are. Stop making random statements that have no relevance on what is currently happening.

Just to consider, it took one response of a GM to (inadvertently) declare the C6 Magnetar weapon viable. ISBoxers and Lax have always paid strict attention to the rules and the EULA and stayed within the guidelines set out by CCP. We have always agreed with CCP that the ability to go AFK or cease inputting actions and have it continue to perform actions would constitute botting, and Lax has (if I remember correctly) worked to remove the ability to turn ISBoxer into a botting program.
I put that in my signature in an effort to remind them, and the playerbase, that they made a promise/declaration that they are now breaking, and that I was asking them to reconsider this change.

I'm not "hoping" the hammer won't hit me. I've stopped boxing because I'm tired of getting buttfucked by an Avatar, so it'd be quite funny to find myself retroactively banned. But since a GM himself thinks that RR broadcasting would be allowed by the new interpretation, then it's so until CCP comes back from vacation and sits down with the multiboxers.

Until then, enjoy seeing the same miners in the belts! And have a merry XMas.

It's been talked about enough and raised in enough petitions, that I'm sure if CCP were going to ban it, they would have said so. I don't expect CCP would know full well that people are going to use round robin, then wait for it to be bannable before letting people know. Stop being ridiculous.

And even if they want to ban it, they couldn't without banning manual multiboxers in the precess, since its not something that can be detected.

I alt tab-ed 6 accounts on mac for 3 years and all I have to say is wtf is "isboxer"

so you're telling me if I have a hotkey other than alt tab to set focus to the next window, even completly without ISBoxer and then just spam those 2 buttons like x- F1 - x- F1 - x- F1 etc etc, this would be bannable in your eyes? what do you want to ban next? windows? And I'm sure this method will be fukin fast.

heres a quick video, more proof of concept, showing how isboxer mouseovers can be used to very quickly activate dozens of modules

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhAk7EMDjvE&feature=youtu.be

Quite frankly, I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. It's been established that multiboxing is not banned (yet). It has also been established (with no counter-evidence or counter-proof) that ISBoxing is anything but "simple" or "easy" so I don't know why you attempt to once again claim it's easy without proof or evidence to back up your claim.
Again, certain people will multibox or run multiple accounts easier than others. My friend runs solo C5 full escalations, and I'm 99% positive I can't do that yet, not without a lot of time training. I'm nowhere near the level that wheniaminspace or Oodell operate at. Hell, I still had trouble commanding 10 even after a year of flying them. I find it very disingenuous when people dare to lump every non-ISBoxer person into one catagory, and then lump every ISBoxer into another. This isn't a black-and-white community. This isn't something you can just "wave away" with a hand and make the baseless and evidence-lacking claim that somehow defending your gamestyle automatically means we're guilty. It's silly and it looks bad.
6 clients on a 15inch laptop? So you either have a powerful 2-core gaming rig, or a average/slightly above average 4-core laptop. Either way, you can arguably gain a marked advantage over another player who's using older stuff by running a single or two accounts and hitting 60 to 90 or even 120 FPS consistently in a small scale engagement, allowing you to react faster to the changes and have the game register your commands in a timely manner and transmit them to the server.
In your last paragraph, please define "effectively" and "human capacity". As stated earlier by others and myself, ISBoxer is not some plug-and-play software that runs itself. Please do some research on something you're going to decry on the forums, as we've heard the usual stuff spouted by Carl Crazycakes in system local and it's tiring at this point.
And finally, you tell us to join player corps, yet you completely missed 2 simple facts: 1) the general population of EVE would love nothing more than to find themselves in a player corporation of an ISBoxer, as awoxxing runs rampant in EVE and is at times encouraged. 2), it is a pain in the ass to transfer funds from 10+ accounts to one every day, so most players simply form a corp with 100% tax and call it a day. Not many are willing to be in a 100% tax corp, so ISBoxers are mostly alone.
edit: And as for your claim that it's simply cheating, how? Why? What part? Please, let us know.