Player Features and Ideas Discussion

I repeat.

I know it can support 80
I do not expect thousands confined to one system.

Is this more of your attempts to "bury" me like you have done to "better forumites" Oh, mighty forum warrior?



I do not think there are any permanent solutions. That is why there is balancing and re-balancing. The game is in constant flux. If you think I am trying to spite null sec, you are sorely mistaken.

I live in null sec.

Now can you, stop following me around like a bad smell just because you couldn't keep my CSM thread locked? It looks rather sulky.

10 guys running solo and taking their sweet time.

Edit:

http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/those-anomaly-changes-in-full/

It comes down to rate. The quicker you clear sites the quicker you spawn more.

Don't know what you are doing wrong. There is a change in OP before this page of threads saying that there probably needs to be a change to it anyway.

*Shrugs*

Edit: Wait. Are you clearing absolutely every site? Might like worm holes that you need to leave two junk anomolies to spawn others faster.

Although I disagree with you, I shall quote you to the OP. I do agree that it needs an increase, especially if this thread's change were to be implemented.

Edit: It seems to be a running concern, shared by quite a few. So if the average need it improved quite drastically then there we have it.

noe EASY destruction, just easier to destroy than capture, because these are afterall assets better kept alive for reuse, so that should be the difficult thing to do

Destructible stations I am all so against.. Now don't get me wrong.. I live in null.. this has nothing to do with losing a station.. Or losing what I have inside of it... I am all for losing my station to an enemy.. ( I will fight to keep that bastard tho) But I do believe the current station META is broke and game breaking in my eyes.

If Pl/goons/provi/solar/MOA/RIM whoever suddenly Take a system over.. then Capture the station.. it should be like taking over someones Storage Facility.. They lost it.. the Contents get shifted over to the new owner... Not have this super secret Tight Locker combination that no one can break and they can diplo all their assets back.

If I blow up a POS... I get its contents on a random Scale.. I'm not blowing up a POS.. I am seizing control of a outpost from its owners. It's contents in my eyes should immediately become a new form of loot to the new Corp/alliance that took over it. It's prize for winning that fight. In my eyes... that will bring your Hell fights to SOV real quick especially over station systems. Instead of going.. we will just wait for the right time.. take it back and you will have your stuff back. If I kidnap a ship from someone because they ejected and ran away.. I get the contents.. if a alliance abandons its station because the forces it faced is to strong.. well then those contents should be the victors.. nevermind watching a new explosion scene added to the game. Give the loot to the victor.

As for anoming etc, it needs a major rework if VOLT wants its plan to go into place. I live in provi with you dudes. I rip through sites how Baltec1 mentions, often times I am waiting on sites because the other sites are either taken up or are in respawn timers. This can also happen in the surrounded areas where I live usually sending me to go do indy things or tool around in a hangar ship spinning and BSing on coms. That's not even with a Pimp fit ship.. thats just a t2 fit BS and good skills and knowing how to work rats.

If you are going to have more pilots come into the systems the spawn rates of anoms has to be at least tripled or more. We are not even capital ratting like the big boys do in deeper null due to "politics". Adding more anoms isn't the best of things either. That is just adding more of the same systems that exist today and adding more of the click repeat action we all suffer from now. The system in its whole needs a rework. Either tougher sites with Fatter rewards but push corporations to work together as groups in sites, similiar to wormholes, or more dynamic action hitting Nullsec areas. The cure isn't more of the same.. Its more of the NEW. Get more play out for the soloist, Get more dynamic sites out for the group building mechanics, Get the null AI into a tougher AI that us nullbears are going to be challenged with. Take that Burner AI or Incursion AI and drop it into a new form of sites and dump them all over Null, make the loot worth it, and put a decent randomizer on them so they are not just wiki'd overnight.

But these are changes that will take time.. and we have to wait to see if CCP goes Occupancy based SOV which in the minutes they seems against, or SOVless, which they seemed for.. I also am for. Ditch SOV all together and if you feel like moving.. just effing move. If you want a station Brawl for it and take that area over by force. But eff all those timers and mechanics.. get the corp/alliances/coalitions actually needing to work correctly to fill in all the time zone gaps and become more efficient at what they do.
This is EVE.. were not supposed to be easy mode. You want to keep it.. hold it.. work for it.. and defend it. If you stagnate..because you got comfortable.. then you deserve to lose it.

how does Mining updates come into play with ratting.. He is talking about what the bulk of must nullseccers do.. which is rat.. me being and Industrialist even knows this. You will not find many at all PVPers willing to hop into a mining ship. Provi where we live is an entirely different mentality. Where he lives.. not gonna happen.. toss the mining upgrades out of the window. What he is speaking is true.

Getting the impression that Null Sec is too safe in some places and maybe shrinking means more alliances can fit out in Null. Meaning more friction and more conflict.

Big blocks will be as long as timers and wining them requires it.