These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation

First post First post First post
Author
Hallvardr
#2661 - 2014-12-17 23:18:32 UTC
I was going to stay out of this because .. well I could care less about isboxer .. I'm not a user.

But I felt that I needed to toss my comment into the fray.

I've been in since 2009 with one character (primary) and ~6 months later a second (secondary) and did so to supplement my primaries activities. Although it has since taken on a life of its own.
I've done mining for myself when I need to make something. I've done missioning with the secondary as a RR or supporting fire for the primary and have switched those roles from time to time. Hell, I've even carried on two way conversations between the two in the presence of others because 1) I thought it was funny especially given some of the topics and arguments, 2) to further the illusion that they were not both me.

I've done this all manually, alt tabbing between two clients. I would never do a dual PVP encounter because I realize that there is a limit to human task switching like this. And I'd have serious concerns of a fleet op with both toons where others were relying on one or the other's full focus.

Do isboxers affect me? .. it has and can still. As a professional (RL) I have limited time to play ~ 1-3 hrs max per night.. 3-4 nights per week. If I'm in a position where I need to mine or mine "X" ore to produce something, a 30 man robocrew can **** all the belts in a given system(s) with little effort. That would not happen normally without the ability to multibox. I can say that because for the most part it doesn't and I don't encounter boxers. And if I did and it hampered my progress, I'd adapt. I'd move my FBO or wait a week(s) and sign in again and try again. Or a host of other activities. My point is, you can humanly multi-client with limits and multiboxing does give you a inhuman ability and therefore advantage.

And if you say there is nothing preventing me from getting that same "inhuman ability", my response is, then why "play"? Why set the number of players to zero and sit back and watch the game play itself ? Turn your boxer off and see if you can still control that 30 man robocrew with your fingers and do it for more than an hour. Then I'll believe the rhetoric of it just makes a repetitive task I could do with my hands, easier.

[steps off soapbox and walks away]
Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#2662 - 2014-12-18 00:11:47 UTC
Hallvardr wrote:
a 30 man robocrew can **** all the belts in a given system(s) with little effort. That would not happen normally without the ability to multibox. I can say that because for the most part it doesn't and I don't encounter boxers. And if I did and it hampered my progress, I'd adapt. I'd move my FBO or wait a week(s) and sign in again and try again. Or a host of other activities. My point is, you can humanly multi-client with limits and multiboxing does give you a inhuman ability and therefore advantage.

And if you say there is nothing preventing me from getting that same "inhuman ability", my response is, then why "play"? Why set the number of players to zero and sit back and watch the game play itself ? Turn your boxer off and see if you can still control that 30 man robocrew with your fingers and do it for more than an hour. Then I'll believe the rhetoric of it just makes a repetitive task I could do with my hands, easier.


Boxxed miners have been running massive numbers even without the use of ISBoxer or similar programs.
Even if we did ban ISBoxer and similar programs, you'd still have the mining fleets, the gatecamp fleets (though the new meta would be domis or snakes with an inty), and my friend would still be doing solo C5 escalations.

I'm reminded of this comic especially. People will not be satisfied until CCP restricts everyone to mining in 1.0 systems with a single account limited to a certain number of hours a day per human being.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#2663 - 2014-12-18 07:41:44 UTC
Hallvardr wrote:
a 30 man robocrew can **** all the belts in a given system(s) with little effort. That would not happen normally without the ability to multibox.
You realise that 20 characters can be controlled for mining manually with ease, because there's so few clicks that mining requires, right. I've not seen 30 done manually, but honestly I doubt it would be too tough.

And the thing is, the belts get stripped because they are tiny in highsec. There's like 600-800m total in a whole ice belt. Even if multiboxing were completely banished, they would still get stripped down in no time, you'd just be complaining about the corporation full of boosted miners that did it instead.

At the end of the day, what it boils down to is you don't do it therefore nobody else should be allowed.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Drago Shouna
Doomheim
#2664 - 2014-12-18 13:21:28 UTC
Rubbish...

The only reason these stupid sized fleets exist is because of outside programmes in the first place.

Take those programmes away and I honestly can't see anyone in their right mind spending half their game time logging every single one on manually, resizing and organizing every individual client manually then undocking, warping to a belt, scanning with every single ship and then targeting 20 or 30 individual rocks.

As for those that can only seem to rely on outside programmes....happy new year.

May the bans commence.

Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..." " They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."

Welcome to EVE.

James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#2665 - 2014-12-18 13:33:21 UTC  |  Edited by: James Baboli
Drago Shouna wrote:
Rubbish...

The only reason these stupid sized fleets exist is because of outside programmes in the first place.

Take those programmes away and I honestly can't see anyone in their right mind spending half their game time logging every single one on manually, resizing and organizing every individual client manually then undocking, warping to a belt, scanning with every single ship and then targeting 20 or 30 individual rocks.

As for those that can only seem to rely on outside programmes....happy new year.

May the bans commence.

At the outside, with only a fairly standard gaming keyboard:

copypasta a standard password: 10s per character, tops.
Pre-setup overview: 0s/ character
Lock rocks using a keybind for alt tab and ctrl click (normal hardware support and in-game shortcut): 7+.5s per character
f1+ bound single key for alt tab: 2s+.2s per character.

Means you can no almost completely AFK it, and lose slightly more efficiency compared to a broadcasting boxer. Doesn't require any IS boxed functions.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#2666 - 2014-12-18 13:53:41 UTC
Drago Shouna wrote:
Rubbish...

The only reason these stupid sized fleets exist is because of outside programmes in the first place.

Take those programmes away and I honestly can't see anyone in their right mind spending half their game time logging every single one on manually, resizing and organizing every individual client manually then undocking, warping to a belt, scanning with every single ship and then targeting 20 or 30 individual rocks.

As for those that can only seem to rely on outside programmes....happy new year.

May the bans commence.
Well then you are obviously quite new. Before ISBoxer was as popular as it is, people used to run 20+ man fleets manually. And generally you didn't need to alter the client layout much and certainly not more than once (and it was possible to change one, then copy paste the setup to the others without a tool). It definitely takes longer to set up a decent ISBoxer with VFX setup than setting up your client window layouts.

On top of that, ISBoxer isn't being banned. You can still even broadcast to log in at the same time (seriously, check the OP).

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Giribaldi
State War Academy
Caldari State
#2667 - 2014-12-19 15:59:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Giribaldi
CCP Falcon wrote:

Input Broadcasting & Input Multiplexing

Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing refer to the multiplication of inputs, actions and events to multiple instances of the game.

Going Forward

As of 15th of March 2013 we have been policing input automation based on a two-strike policy

• 1st strike for input automation is a 30 day ban
• 2nd strike for input automation is a permanent ban

Input Automation remains strictly prohibited, and is policed under our suspension and ban policy.

Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing of actions with consequences in the EVE universe, are prohibited and will be policed in the same manner as Input Automation.

This includes, but isn’t limited to:

• Activation and control of ships and modules
• Navigation and movement within the EVE universe
• Movement of assets and items within the EVE universe
• Interaction with other characters


R.I.P ISBoxing HQ, AS, and VG fleets. I for see a great deal of skilled incursions alts going on sale. Aswell as plex prices going down i.e. supply and demand. Demand going down supply thus goino up. I honestly would rather CCP focus on the more important things like fixing cloaky camping. Make cloak scanner probes that can find cloaked ships. And make a bomb like discovery probe that travels X amount of distance and declines anything within 10 to 15 km of the discovery probe. Thus a fix to cloak camping. Also it's Essie to probe cloaked ships versus non cloakies, when using the cloakies probe scanner.
Giribaldi
State War Academy
Caldari State
#2668 - 2014-12-19 16:07:33 UTC
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Hallvardr wrote:
a 30 man robocrew can **** all the belts in a given system(s) with little effort. That would not happen normally without the ability to multibox. I can say that because for the most part it doesn't and I don't encounter boxers. And if I did and it hampered my progress, I'd adapt. I'd move my FBO or wait a week(s) and sign in again and try again. Or a host of other activities. My point is, you can humanly multi-client with limits and multiboxing does give you a inhuman ability and therefore advantage.

And if you say there is nothing preventing me from getting that same "inhuman ability", my response is, then why "play"? Why set the number of players to zero and sit back and watch the game play itself ? Turn your boxer off and see if you can still control that 30 man robocrew with your fingers and do it for more than an hour. Then I'll believe the rhetoric of it just makes a repetitive task I could do with my hands, easier.


Boxxed miners have been running massive numbers even without the use of ISBoxer or similar programs.
Even if we did ban ISBoxer and similar programs, you'd still have the mining fleets, the gatecamp fleets (though the new meta would be domis or snakes with an inty), and my friend would still be doing solo C5 escalations.

I'm reminded of this comic especially. People will not be satisfied until CCP restricts everyone to mining in 1.0 systems with a single account limited to a certain number of hours a day per human being.



Sir, bragging about your friend soloing C5 escalations is no great feet. 2 dreads 2 triage carriers and 2 loris or bhaalghorns. And I do that by myself and I assure you its a ******* easy feet to achieve. I'd like to see your friend solo 20 to 30 man fleets with 6 guys like I do. Put 6 manually controlled accounts into a chaotic and ever changing fight = incredibly difficult my friend.
Khao Tulin
Flat Earth Believers
#2669 - 2014-12-19 16:16:53 UTC
Just to clarify does this mean taking to another window on an alt to salvage is fine? Or is that a bannable just want to check
Neo Kathura
Doomheim
#2670 - 2014-12-19 16:23:10 UTC
No alts allowed.
MrBowers
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2671 - 2014-12-19 16:24:04 UTC
Khao Tulin wrote:
Just to clarify does this mean taking to another window on an alt to salvage is fine? Or is that a bannable just want to check



You can't broadcast your mouse over all your screens at once. Other functions of isboxer are ok.
Loki's Curse
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#2672 - 2014-12-19 16:49:18 UTC
to ccp

why not tack on the side of 1 of your up and coming patches that we get plenty of now, in game multi boxing options like mass char loading positionable fixed window mode and so on, it would make sense as you heavily promote multi accounts it only seems natural that you would then supply and support the ability to use them
Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#2673 - 2014-12-19 19:09:09 UTC
Giribaldi wrote:
Sir, bragging about your friend soloing C5 escalations is no great feet. 2 dreads 2 triage carriers and 2 loris or bhaalghorns. And I do that by myself and I assure you its a ******* easy feet to achieve. I'd like to see your friend solo 20 to 30 man fleets with 6 guys like I do. Put 6 manually controlled accounts into a chaotic and ever changing fight = incredibly difficult my friend.


I was merely attempting to point out other ways to make ISK with relatively few accounts for the butthurt people going "hurr need 50 accounts to make money". For those who complain because someone put the time, effort, and in some cases, real life cash, for multiple accounts, multiple accounts is encouraged by CCP and is practically required in order to be competitive in certain industries in EVE. Stop complaining because you didn't want to put effort into your game. Also, I only know of two VG boxers who are giving up boxing VGs, not including myself, out of a group of 10 VG boxers or so. The multibox-heavy community of DIN isn't worried about this, so that should tell you something.

As for your ridiculous statement regarding PLEX, it dipped to, what, 950, maybe 920, right after the announcement? If ISBoxing was the main cause of inflation, it should have theoretically dropped to the 6-700 levels. Don't come crying to the forums when it breaks 1b again, because you can't blame ISBoxers. You got the market speculators and hoarders to thank for that.
ashley Eoner
#2674 - 2014-12-19 21:24:51 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Giribaldi wrote:
Sir, bragging about your friend soloing C5 escalations is no great feet. 2 dreads 2 triage carriers and 2 loris or bhaalghorns. And I do that by myself and I assure you its a ******* easy feet to achieve. I'd like to see your friend solo 20 to 30 man fleets with 6 guys like I do. Put 6 manually controlled accounts into a chaotic and ever changing fight = incredibly difficult my friend.


I was merely attempting to point out other ways to make ISK with relatively few accounts for the butthurt people going "hurr need 50 accounts to make money". For those who complain because someone put the time, effort, and in some cases, real life cash, for multiple accounts, multiple accounts is encouraged by CCP and is practically required in order to be competitive in certain industries in EVE. Stop complaining because you didn't want to put effort into your game. Also, I only know of two VG boxers who are giving up boxing VGs, not including myself, out of a group of 10 VG boxers or so. The multibox-heavy community of DIN isn't worried about this, so that should tell you something.

As for your ridiculous statement regarding PLEX, it dipped to, what, 950, maybe 920, right after the announcement? If ISBoxing was the main cause of inflation, it should have theoretically dropped to the 6-700 levels. Don't come crying to the forums when it breaks 1b again, because you can't blame ISBoxers. You got the market speculators and hoarders to thank for that.

My post jan 1st VG fleet is already set to go. I don't even need to run isboxer or any program to make it happen now.

I also know that this won't effect most of the mid sized ice/roid farmers. The guys with like 50 accounts MIGHT stop running so many but I wouldn't bet on it.

So what's going to happen next is the rabble is going to move on to multiboxing in general. I can't wait till we're limited to number of accounts per IP or something similarly stupid because people can't handle the fact that someone somewhere might be earning isk slightly faster/easier then them..
ashley Eoner
#2675 - 2014-12-19 22:10:57 UTC
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Drago Shouna wrote:
CCP, just ban every outside programme that can interact in any way with the client and end this farce. This is a perfect example of why it should happen.


And there goes EVEMon, EFT, EHQ, eve-central, siggy, PYFA, fuzzworks.....

Shall I continue?

Taking one post and immediately attributing it to every boxer out there requires a serious lack of either common sense, or intelligence.

Even worse he'd be banning whole operating systems. It would be completely impossible to play the game.
Mara Gus
Doomheim
#2676 - 2014-12-19 22:22:13 UTC
this post is not real on any Ice belt can see 999 retriver to dig one ice block and this noting new he will be no ban this is dust in eeye for ccp ca nsay to game is real no rulet be bots
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#2677 - 2014-12-19 22:58:15 UTC
But it isn't even 1 Jan 2015 yet

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Trakow
Beta Switch
#2678 - 2014-12-19 23:45:40 UTC
Hahaha oh the tears of all the angry ISBoxers LOL

Mad that now they have to actually Mine and PvP like they're supposed to. Mad cuz now they'll get their ass whooped flying solo. Mad because now they actually have to make friends and get into a corp that isn't made up of all their own accounts.

Keep bringing on the complaints and the tears guys, I'm loving it lol
Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#2679 - 2014-12-19 23:57:21 UTC
Trakow wrote:
Hahaha oh the tears of all the angry ISBoxers LOL

Mad that now they have to actually Mine and PvP like they're supposed to. Mad cuz now they'll get their ass whooped flying solo. Mad because now they actually have to make friends and get into a corp that isn't made up of all their own accounts.

Keep bringing on the complaints and the tears guys, I'm loving it lol


If you loved that, wait till you hear that ISBoxing will continue to happe. We'll still be running VGs, still run HQs, stilll mine ice, still mine ore.

A lot of us actually do have friends in the game who don't ISBox. We didn't start up EVE and instantly multibox. Nobody that I've encountered started EVE and ISBoxing at the same time. We have communities and groups that we hang out with, and we laugh and swap stories and have a good time while doing our thing.

Only tears I see are (to paraphrase from an old Tom Sawyer play) from the rabble who's coming after the scientist because they don't understand his work, and because he's different from them. Stop projecting your tears and rage onto us. 90% of us have already found a way to continue multiboxing.

Also, multiboxing does not make one unbeatable at PVP. I point you towards the video of the multiboxing Harbingers getting smacked down by a group of experienced, skilled, and well trained pilots using their heads and EWAR to turn the ISBoxer into nothing more than a nuisance at best.
Alkeli Dallocort
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2680 - 2014-12-20 00:13:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Alkeli Dallocort
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Trakow wrote:
Hahaha oh the tears of all the angry ISBoxers LOL

Mad that now they have to actually Mine and PvP like they're supposed to. Mad cuz now they'll get their ass whooped flying solo. Mad because now they actually have to make friends and get into a corp that isn't made up of all their own accounts.

Keep bringing on the complaints and the tears guys, I'm loving it lol


If you loved that, wait till you hear that ISBoxing will continue to happe. We'll still be running VGs, still run HQs, stilll mine ice, still mine ore.

A lot of us actually do have friends in the game who don't ISBox. We didn't start up EVE and instantly multibox. Nobody that I've encountered started EVE and ISBoxing at the same time. We have communities and groups that we hang out with, and we laugh and swap stories and have a good time while doing our thing.

Only tears I see are (to paraphrase from an old Tom Sawyer play) from the rabble who's coming after the scientist because they don't understand his work, and because he's different from them. Stop projecting your tears and rage onto us. 90% of us have already found a way to continue multiboxing.

Also, multiboxing does not make one unbeatable at PVP. I point you towards the video of the multiboxing Harbingers getting smacked down by a group of experienced, skilled, and well trained pilots using their heads and EWAR to turn the ISBoxer into nothing more than a nuisance at best.


Need a tissue bud? Love the part about the scientist like as if isboxers are all smart and wizardry compared to everyone else. Which is so false and deluded, but you probably believe that. The fact is, anyone can ISBox, you're not special, nor are the other ISBoxers. It's just lazy and cowardly, and now it's cheating hahaha. And yes, the way to multibox is to have multiple inputs, which is fine by me. At least now someone can't control 12+ toons at once. But input broadcasting will still be discovered by CCP. It's really not that hard to figure it out.

Oh and please do continue to ISBox so you get banned. More fun for the rest of us.