These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Hate to Miners

First post
Author
Sri Nova
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#101 - 2014-12-15 04:11:22 UTC
Kinda look at it like this ,

every one hates Sony .

yet they watch Sony movies
listen to Sony music
watch Sony tv
play Sony games on their sony computers , game consoles, portables etc etc etc,

so your kinda like Sony maybe a lil less evil but im not sure about that .
Hannibal Carlisle
Relapse Anonymous
Sedition.
#102 - 2014-12-15 04:34:53 UTC
I like miners. There would not be much eve without them. I do in fact have a mining alt, and mine a good amount. It's just that sometimes I am completely unable to resist the urge to see if I can make a mining ship go 'pop' before the police arrive. I generally have a hauler on standby in case there is undamaged wares/ore in the wreck, so it's not even a completely senseless act of random violence. Pirate
Jenshae Chiroptera
#103 - 2014-12-15 04:55:03 UTC
Tear Jar wrote:
Zedutchman wrote:
It has nothing to do with how you play the game. It has nothing to do with "hate", and it SURE as hell has nothing to do with "CODE" and there ridiculous manifesto.

Actually most of our funding comes from people who like stories on minerbumping or watching exploits in local chat.

Code is like Marmite, a name with a lot of ineffectual players. Yes they blow some ships up but if you look at the ISK they get, the pilots involved and just how ineffectual they really are then you do nothing but laugh.
As an example, go have a look at Marmite. War after war with 0-5 kills and no renewals. They fear anything organised.

baltec1 wrote:
Suddenly wormholes.

Seldom organised, also worried about what is on the other side. Don't open the ones that spawn in your system and then drop a cloaked ship into theirs. Think they have a camp? Interceptor with a regular cloak and probe launcher goes a long way.

Bubble your side, have eyes on the worm hole and drone boats in the belt with you to kill their interceptors.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Ned Thomas
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#104 - 2014-12-15 05:01:12 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Ned Thomas wrote:
I mine quite a bit and have never felt hated by anyone.


I also don't ***** about (and actually enjoy) the fact that you can shoot other people anywhere in this game. That may have something to do with it.


And that, sir, makes you a real (and adult) EVE Online player. I do a lot of PVE of various types, I've also never felt any hate because of that.

Now, coming onto the forum and advocating self-reliance, intelligence and a sense personal responsibility while calling out whiny entitled juveniles who should have never chosen a game like this in the 1st place? Yea, you do get a lot of hate for that Twisted


Eh, I dunno. I'd advocate working with a group to ensure safety and better ensure your own success. But I get what you're going for here.

And yeah, telling folks they have to work together when all they want to do is be solo....that'll get you some hate. F*** those people.
Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#105 - 2014-12-15 06:10:37 UTC

Capt Starfox wrote:
I don't hate miners; I enjoy profiteering off their exploded spaceships.


A bit like squeezing blood out of a turnip, isn't it?

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#106 - 2014-12-15 10:39:54 UTC
It makes no sense to truly hate somebody for whatever he does in the game. I don't even hate my immediate enemies. That emotion is reserved for real ********* in real life, like politicians and sectarian warmongers. I do have a strong dislike for certain personality traits that happen to be most prevalent in clueless highsec players.

I once FC-ed a T1 cruiser roam which was open to blues and this guy comes on TS, whom I had never met. His first question? 'Do I get paid for being on this fleet?' I tell him that's not the case and he says 'ok I'll go mining then'. Good grief. Sure, go mine before you lose a ship your corp won't reimburse, god forbid you lose a Vexor. Do you want reimbursement with that?

It's a certain attitude people find annoying, and not the act of mining in and of itself. If you can mine without turning into a clueless AFKer all power to you.
Senyu Takashi
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#107 - 2014-12-15 10:57:55 UTC
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
It makes no sense to truly hate somebody for whatever he does in the game. I don't even hate my immediate enemies. That emotion is reserved for real ********* in real life, like politicians and sectarian warmongers. I do have a strong dislike for certain personality traits that happen to be most prevalent in clueless highsec players.

I once FC-ed a T1 cruiser roam which was open to blues and this guy comes on TS, whom I had never met. His first question? 'Do I get paid for being on this fleet?' I tell him that's not the case and he says 'ok I'll go mining then'. Good grief. Sure, go mine before you lose a ship your corp won't reimburse, god forbid you lose a Vexor. Do you want reimbursement with that?

It's a certain attitude people find annoying, and not the act of mining in and of itself. If you can mine without turning into a clueless AFKer all power to you.


This type of personality is not restricted to miners. Ive met my own share of "Not getting paid? Then Ill go ratting." players in the few 0.0 corps I was in.

Hating on miners because some of them just want to go for ISK/h is like hating 0.0 ratters because some of them refuse to fleet up if its not reimbursed or just keep ratting without even expressing care about fleet pings.
Decaneos
Casalt Corp
CAStabouts
#108 - 2014-12-15 14:18:37 UTC
There are people that hate anyone doing pve, why because they think they have everything already and can't understand why everyone else does not.

But lets take this to its logical conclusion.

All mining stops. what happens the existing minerals on the market go through the roof , massively increasing the prices of the ships pvpers use, making them very risk adverse, thus slowing active pvp down a lot.

Now one step more. ah yes Missions/ incusions/sites and Ratting now must stop as...oh yer hate on pve.

No more income and no more minerals added to the market, making existing ships and modules skyrocket in price.

If you stop PVE you will have no more PVP unless you enjoy running around trying to dodge swarms of velators.

Sol Project
Shitt Outta Luck - GANKING4GOOD
#109 - 2014-12-15 14:21:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Sol Project
Decaneos wrote:
There are people that hate anyone doing pve, why because they think they have everything already and can't understand why everyone else does not.

But lets take this to its logical conclusion.

All mining stops. what happens the existing minerals on the market go through the roof , massively increasing the prices of the ships pvpers use, making them very risk adverse, thus slowing active pvp down a lot.

Now one step more. ah yes Missions/ incusions/sites and Ratting now must stop as...oh yer hate on pve.

No more income and no more minerals added to the market, making existing ships and modules skyrocket in price.

If you stop PVE you will have no more PVP unless you enjoy running around trying to dodge swarms of velators.


See my post on the first page regarding what happens if miners stopped. *

Nothing.


*edit: specifically those who do nothing else, play afk and don't tank.
In any case, we do not live in a society that has roles for each individual.
The idea of people only ever doing one thing and nothing else is dumb.

Welcome to the world of supply and demand. I understand that this concelt
mjst be foreign to you, as much as the idea that people would start mining
if mineral prices went up ... so I am glad you learned something.

Ladies of New Eden YC 117 by Indahmawar Fazmarai

Warning: NSFW! Barely legal girls in underwear!

Diana Kim > AND THIS IS WHY THE FEDERATION MUST BE DESTROYED!!

Vaako Omaristos
Doomheim
#110 - 2014-12-15 14:39:37 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:

Nobody hates miners. Some argue that mining is very boring because it's monotonous, but then again so is hauling, so is 0.01 ISKing on the market, so is waiting in a gatecamp, so is staring at a gate waiting to bump someone, so is a myriad of other things in this often-slow paced rubbish game like EVE (and we all love playing it).

What people dislike though, are those who fail to understand that EVE is fundamentally a player vs. player game (in its broadest definition). Quite often, the people who don't get that and complain the loudest are those who choose to mine as a primary profession. The low barrier of entry + low effort combination makes mining something a lot of people get into, quite possibly many who are effort averse and risk averse.

A complainer, a lazy player, a risk averse player: if you are not any of these, then don't worry about it.

Source: I'm a miner.


I mine too, and sure i get ganked at times, but i don't think that player hates me or what i do. Eve is the ultimate game of Opportunity Knocks. Eve is practically all PvP jsut to different degrees of destruction.

Trader, industrialist and thinker. Follow my progress on my 141 trading challenge here

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#111 - 2014-12-15 14:41:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Senyu Takashi wrote:
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:
It makes no sense to truly hate somebody for whatever he does in the game. I don't even hate my immediate enemies. That emotion is reserved for real ********* in real life, like politicians and sectarian warmongers. I do have a strong dislike for certain personality traits that happen to be most prevalent in clueless highsec players.

I once FC-ed a T1 cruiser roam which was open to blues and this guy comes on TS, whom I had never met. His first question? 'Do I get paid for being on this fleet?' I tell him that's not the case and he says 'ok I'll go mining then'. Good grief. Sure, go mine before you lose a ship your corp won't reimburse, god forbid you lose a Vexor. Do you want reimbursement with that?

It's a certain attitude people find annoying, and not the act of mining in and of itself. If you can mine without turning into a clueless AFKer all power to you.


This type of personality is not restricted to miners. Ive met my own share of "Not getting paid? Then Ill go ratting." players in the few 0.0 corps I was in.

Hating on miners because some of them just want to go for ISK/h is like hating 0.0 ratters because some of them refuse to fleet up if its not reimbursed or just keep ratting without even expressing care about fleet pings.


The difference is that those guys in null are part of a player group and routinely get kicked out. Every time I've been in a corp/alliance that had CTAs, I've seen people get kicked for doing what you describe. So in null, actions (or inactions) have consequences.

No one can kick the npc corp guy who is afk mining in high sec. That's where gankers come in, they restore the natural and proper order of things lol. Miners, more than any other type of player, display the "I'm not hurting anyone so i should be totally left alone" mentality that is 100% incompatible with the reality of the game we are playing.

What I personally find annoying, whether in game or in real life, is how people choose to utterly ignore the realities of a situation and then get super angry at everyone else when that reality bits them in the arse parts. Not annoying enough to stop shooting red Xs, but annoying enough lol. The reality of EVE is "other people are playing too" and as a pve player I don't just understand that, I embrace it and make it a part of my game play, which is why gankers and such tend to leave me alone.
Basil Pupkin
Republic Military School
#112 - 2014-12-15 14:49:39 UTC
Sol Project wrote:

This has been for years. Many, many years.
I don't really know and could only guesstimate.

And my guesstimation is actually a pretty good one.


.) Most miners don't play the game.
No, watching youtube while having the client running does not mean one is playing the game.


.) Many miners are outright liars.
Saying that one is enjoying mining is a lie. Watching youtube while having the client open
does not - in any way or form - have anything to do with enjoying mining.

One can not enjoy mining. It's not a thing one can do, unless one enjoys staring at the lasers,
enjoys watching the cycletimer, enjoys seeing rocks drop into the cargo-/ore-hold.
As this literally equals watching paint drying, one can safely say that mining can not be enjoyed.

One could enjoy watching local and checking d-scan constantly, yes. One could enjoy being social
while mining, yes. One could enjoy watching youtube while mining, yes ...

... but all of these have nothing to do with mining per se.

.) Many miners don't really understand the game.
While certainly the amount of crybaby threads from weak minds who think they should be allowed
to mine in peace have diminished ... someone who mines for the ISK and max yield has no clue
wtf he is doing.

.) Many miners are clueless beyond measurement.
Every time a miner says "What would you do if it wasn't for us miners?" I wonder how this person
actually deals with his everyday-life. Why? Because people are flexible. If those who mined right now
stopped doing it, nobody would bat an eye. If, in the rare case that indeed nobody mined for an extended
period of time, mineral prices actually went up because supply dried out, other people would simply start
mining because it would be actually worth it ... which brings me to the next point ...

... .) Many miners are clueless beyond measurement.
People who whine that mining isn't worth it because mineral prices are too low, have no understanding
of how the market works. Almost everything is built from minerals that are being mined, (ore->refine->minerals)
which means that the price of goods built with minerals is connected to the price of minerals themselves.

That means that, when mineral prices rise, the price of almost everything in the game goes up as well.
Not instantly of course, no, but over time it does. From the perspective of relative value, miners pretty
much always earn the same, no matter how high or low the number is.



I'm sure I forgot one or two insulting points and I sincerely apologise to all those miners who actually aren't
clueless beyond measurement, tank their ships, don't mine afk or simply are smart enough not to
mine in systems near tradehubs/-routes.

So ... sorry, Dave Stark and Sibyyl, I really didn't mean to insult you.



Not all miners are equal, but the majority of them is just not worth the entries in the database.



I hope that cleared it up for you. :)


.) Most miners play a more active game than you do prancing around looking for fights.
Try mining in a proper fleet with a Covetor/Hulk (supposedly good for fleet ops, downright suck at it, but that's not the point) - your ore hold overflows more often than you can spew a can, rocks pop like candy, and you have to constantly monitor local for clueless characters like you. It's a game I personally can't keep up with for more than 1 hour without breaks, it's like tetris - routine but constant challenge. And it gets faster as you work through the bigger rocks and only the small number of small ones remain.

.) Enjoying mining is the same as enjoying any other minigame. Some like the hacking one. Some like opening the loot pinatas. Saying fleet mining cannot be enjoyable is wrong. It's a game where you work with other people, watch mineral scans to break the cycle at the right time, avoid rocks someone else is drilling, avoid ore hold overflows, and remember that under proper booster cycles are a lot faster than a guy clueless about mining might think. Maximum youtube breaks are about 30 seconds if you're managing ONE miner. Most do more.

.) Mining for ISK died once Odyssey aka DUMBING DOWN MINING GANK UPDATE rolled out, which opened gravimetric sites for bot fleets and thus ruined the last source of ISK for miner. Also it dumbed down the miner ganking to the point it became the easies activity in all Eve, and clueless people who were previously failing at everything could now become CODE. and have 50% proficiency at this 100% fool-proof pastime.

cross-point: People who solo mine watching youtube are getting an income which is currently under 10m/hour. I suggest leaving them alone. They are already punished by Odyssey and Crius enough.

.) Tanking your mining ship is STUPID. Yes, I mean it. Last time I dared leet peeveepee player to give me a tanked barge fit which didn't suck, he provided me with a Mackinaw fit worth 30mil in tank fittings, which could tank 2 destroyers if they are good, 3 destroyers of average undergrads, or 4 CODE. destroyers, while being almost exact match in yield to the Retriever (a bit below if you don't have Exhumers V, which is arguably a waste of a month). Minding the fact that you can replace 6-7 retrievers for the cost of that mack, I branded it as one of them ******** blings that never pays off and gives no real advantage where it matters, and to date I haven't seen any tanked barge fit actually worth flying over untanked one. The only ones who can mine tanked (read "mine ice") are the Procurer and the Skiff, and the latter takes 40 to 100 hours to pay off, which in my eyes make it a ******** bling as well. Thus, a conclusion to this debate is that there are no mining ships worth tanking. Because retriever, covetor, mackinaw and hulk can tank 1 extra destroyer at best (unless you bling-tank and ask for it), while Procurer and Skiff are more tanky than former without any yield sacrifice.

Being teh freightergankbear automatically puts you below missionbear and minerbear in carebear hierarchy.

If you're about to make "this will make eve un-eve" argument, odds are you are defending some utterly horrible mechanics against a good change.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#113 - 2014-12-15 14:55:37 UTC
Basil Pupkin wrote:
Because retriever, covetor, mackinaw and hulk can tank 1 extra destroyer at best (unless you bling-tank and ask for it), while Procurer and Skiff are more tanky than former without any yield sacrifice.


Well, that sounds unbalanced. Looks like we need to nerf the Proc and Skiff.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Basil Pupkin
Republic Military School
#114 - 2014-12-15 14:57:08 UTC
.) The mineral prices point didn't fit in previous post, so I put it here.

The point of ISK profit in mining is that when mineral prices are low, you get less money than professions that do not include minerals!

That means:
You get less than ratters. Currently they make at least 1mil/minute, top miner on top roid makes 500k/minute, minus logistics, compression pos, and hauling.
You get less than mission runners. Those are about 900k/minute in my estimate, and have a bit of downtime flying to mission spots.
You get less than incursion runners. No comments.
You get less than PI runners.
You get less than wh people, who sell blue loot to NPC.
You get less than FW people.
You get less than industrials.
You get less than traders.
You get less than red frog.
etc...

The real currency here are miner-hours. You produce them, you exchange them for isk. All the above people are not tied to them in any way, so when ISK mineral prices drop, miner-hour value drops, and you start getting less than all those people.

I dare to call anyone who does not understand that clueless.

Being teh freightergankbear automatically puts you below missionbear and minerbear in carebear hierarchy.

If you're about to make "this will make eve un-eve" argument, odds are you are defending some utterly horrible mechanics against a good change.

Basil Pupkin
Republic Military School
#115 - 2014-12-15 15:00:53 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Basil Pupkin wrote:
Because retriever, covetor, mackinaw and hulk can tank 1 extra destroyer at best (unless you bling-tank and ask for it), while Procurer and Skiff are more tanky than former without any yield sacrifice.


Well, that sounds unbalanced. Looks like we need to nerf the Proc and Skiff.


After we nerf grief decs. They are also severely unbalanced in favor of the grief deccer.

btw even if those nerfs happen they won't mean a **** - mining for profit is currently dead anyway, and mining for what you need is going to continue anyway, it's gonna be done in a max yield non-bling fit on the highest possible yield barge which isn't bling, because otherwise you'll be looking like one of those sad tossers ratting in pvp fit thinking it'll do something for them in case 12 gankbears drop on them.

Being teh freightergankbear automatically puts you below missionbear and minerbear in carebear hierarchy.

If you're about to make "this will make eve un-eve" argument, odds are you are defending some utterly horrible mechanics against a good change.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#116 - 2014-12-15 15:05:43 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
Basil Pupkin wrote:

After we nerf grief decs. They are also severely unbalanced in favor of the grief deccer.


Wardecs are not griefing by CCP's definition.

*Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Azov Rassau
Iron Destiny
#117 - 2014-12-15 15:14:32 UTC
Altirius Saldiaro wrote:

As a miner, you just have to adapt. Dont go afk. Pay attention to overview. Watch dscan. And always stay aligned. Warp the second anything potentially hostile shows up. And keep plenty of replacement ships in hangar.

I mine a lot when im not out hunting. I haven't lost a ship while mining since I was a noob back in 2010. Its not hard to avoid losing a ship. Just use common sense.

^ Doing it right. I respect this kind of miners.


Kestral Anneto wrote:

Hi All,

As a miner, i come across this all the time, but what i don't understand is, why so much hate towards miners?

Eve is a sandbox that every game wants to be, where people get to make there own stories, it's not whole PVP, PVE or whatever.

So why the hate?


As stated several times in this thread, what people mostly dislike is the AFK miners who complain incessantly after being ganked and then want CCP to remove the PvP possibilities in Highsec so that they can mine 1337% safely. Unfortunately, some of those AFK miners also end up RL threatening anybody who remind them (via ganking etc.) that PvP is also present in Highsec. As a miner myself, I dislike that kind of miners because I am one of the miners who always pay attention while mining and know how important vigilance is (D-Scan!) instead of insulting/RL threatening the people who bring action to Highsec in this dangerous, yet slow-paced Universe.

Generally, there isn't really 'hate' to miners except a few laughable fanatics who write manifestos about how they want to remove every single Highsec miner from the game. Smile
Most of the vigilant and alert miners have fun avoiding those fanatics and gankers who fail to do anything against them. I have some miner friends who still use their 2008-built Hulk. How? They play the game and protect their assets by paying attention. That kind of miners don't earn "hatred". In the contrary, they earn the respect of many people, including some gankers.

Btw you can totally ignore the Anti-PVE tough guys who say they "hate" miners; they "hate" everything (so don't confuse them for genuine gankers and other content generators who actually enjoy the game.) They often have the same mentality as the ones who insult haulers by calling them "brain-dead useful idiots". Fun fact: non-AFK, careful miners and vigilant haulers enjoy this game as well. Blink They are neither "brain-deads", nor "idiots". This is mainly a PvP game indeed, but PvE is not inexistent.

Be the change you want to see in Highsec.

Anti-Ganking Fun: www.gankerjamming.com

Josef Djugashvilis
#118 - 2014-12-15 15:21:30 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Basil Pupkin wrote:

After we nerf grief decs. They are also severely unbalanced in favor of the grief deccer.


Wardecs are not griefing by CCP's definition.

Oh, and crying about how profitable mining is, or is not, is really rather pointless considering the upcoming ban on ISBoxer. Now that you don't have all those cheaters driving down mineral prices, the whole equation changes.


ISboxers are not 'cheating' by CCP's definition until 15.01.15

Even then, many of them say that the new rules will have little impact on them.

This is not a signature.

Basil Pupkin
Republic Military School
#119 - 2014-12-15 15:22:41 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Ezwal
*Snip* Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.
*Snip* Removed a reply to an edited out part of the quoted post. ISD Ezwal.

As a former runner of a mining division of a corporation, I'd say we have no factors for mining to become profitable. Mineral prices have to increase for ~125% for mining to close on ratting, so even if we see a 100% increase, that will boost mining to less undesirable, but still not profitable profession. The reasons for that is that a major consumer of low-ends, null sec, is now self-sufficient for that, except one slightly under-supplied mineral, and hisec consumption has been plagued by reprocessing changes. Add here that barges has been shadow-nerfed considerably to the point where only Procurer is worth flying out of your mining space boonies to get an anom or ice anom, and you get a situation where even 100% raise is not enough to cover it for people who chose mining as the prime occupation. There are a number of changes to make to bring it back without mineral stupidity. It may be a buff to 5 bad barges to be on par with procurer at what they are supposed to do. It may be a buff to mineral amounts in low-ends. Instant upgrade of miner status would be taking anoms back to signatures. You may leave the ihub upgrade ones in null as anoms, because if they aren't, other sigs would be meaningful, but if they are anoms, it will make running gravimetric signatures meaningfull, both in high and null. I can go on, but that is pointless, the bottom line stays the same - rise of mineral prices, while making AFK mining more profitable, will not make mining profession itself profitable enough for prime occupation miners.

Being teh freightergankbear automatically puts you below missionbear and minerbear in carebear hierarchy.

If you're about to make "this will make eve un-eve" argument, odds are you are defending some utterly horrible mechanics against a good change.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#120 - 2014-12-15 15:23:26 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:

ISboxers are not 'cheating' by CCP's definition until 15.01.15


Yes, they are. CCP was just gracious enough to give them a cutoff point to cease their cheating.

Personally I'd have just perma banned them all out of the blue without warning, and left the reason box blank.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.