These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Gorski Car for CSM X

First post
Author
Gorski Car
#21 - 2014-12-15 14:57:01 UTC
l0rd carlos wrote:
Thank you for your earlier response.

What is your position on fighter assignment? For example a Nyx assigns fighters from the edge of a POS to a T1 frigate which is somewhere else in the system.

with kind regards
l0rd carlos


It is no secret that assigned fighters are way to strong and they don't have any risk at all involved in using them. You can set your carrier up at a offlined POS and just online it as soon as anyone drops you. I have no idea why fighters even can warp or receives bonuses from DDAs, Omnis and drone nav comps while the carrier is not even on grid.

Two of my friends run stiletto + hyena with assigned fighters and the stuff you can kill when you have 4k extra dps provided from off grid is insane. It's like the old gila/worm drone damage exploit except not an exploit. I know there are many things in eve that are not fair or fun for the hostile party but this really is one that needs to be looked at by CCP.

Collect this post

Jim Jams
Perkone
Caldari State
#22 - 2014-12-23 16:45:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Jim Jams
Gorski you're a really cool guy in your own weird ways :-) You had my vote last time and you'll have it again. There's something about you that is very easy to dislike on autopilot, but I get the feeling that when push comes to shove you are able to put on your serious face and do some real good for the game.

I don't know what you did in CSM thus far, and I probably won't have a clue what you'll be doing if you'll make CSM again, my involvement in Eve never went that deep. Which is why I think its important to have at least one pilot who really know solo/smallgang PvP in CSM, to carry the torch for the rest of us.

If I'm not mistaken, you often fly with links. I know many people have issues with OGB, but I like the fact that you really know what it means, to fight a linked ship when you don't have them yourself, the difference it makes. Many pilots just complain about links, but have no idea what it really means. I really liked the way Logan described links in one of his videos "Used and Abused" which is a fine balance. Without links some aspects of smallgang/solo PvP would be destroyed, just as links themselves can destroy the experience for an unlinked solo PvPer. So that fine balanced needs to be addressed by someone who knows both sides of the scale inside out. If some highsec ganker who makes CSM (nothing personal against anyone, I don't even know who else is running) even touches a links-rebalance issue thinking he/she know what links are, without ever having flown a 5 pilots smallgang w/links deep into null doing gurilla warfare against 100 locals, not understanding what links mean to those 5 in such a situation, then just like that - CSM will fail small scale PvPers instantly. And the same can apply to various other issues.

I'll write something else now, that I think is good to just put out there. I feel that CCP fail to give a proper platform to PvP video makers. They are just beginning to understand the "power" of videos, but they are still babies when it comes to this point.

Personally I got plenty attention, views, criticism, feedback for my videos. But I throughout the years I have seen dozens and doznes of solo/smallgang PvP videos that were literally much better than mine, go almost completely unnoticed, and fade away with only a couple hundred views. CCP fail to understand the influence that a good Solo PvP can have on bringing new players into the game. I got more messages through youtube than I could count, of people that never played the game having seen my videos, asking me questions about if they should begin playing, and how... It would be to the incredible benefit of CCP to create some sort of platform for PvP videos to be seen in an "official" capacity.

To take it out of the "elite/myeve/out-of-reach" mindset (that's basically an illusion anyway) niche it got to become, where experienced pilots brag to the other 10 experienced pilots who roam the same subforum, and rarely get seen by the other 99.9% population of New Eden, and more importantly, the population of people who haven't created an account yet, but would have access to see those videos in one way or another if such a platform would be created. Eve has the outside world's curiosity, it always had, it always will. And there are few better examples of the beauty of Eve than solo/smallgang PvP. Anyone can feel the pure fun of the player when watching a good smallgang pvp video, even people that never played the game can sense it. I don't think CCP realize how many subscriptions they got.. say in the last 3 years.. from people running into random solo/smallgang PvP videos in youtube.

When a Solo PvPer roams endlessly (time-wise), against the odds, through the blob losses, and records. Then edits a video, which can be a time consuming effort in itself... And finally releases it, only to recieve 400 views and a bunch of criticism from elitists (because more or less only the experienced pilots get to see his video, rather than a whole bunch of "cool!" from less experienced pilots), then it's very easy to give up on ever doing it again, and even resent the game for it. CCP don't see that those pilots are offering them gold for free. They do things like this contest for video makers, to make a new trailer "This Is Eve" style, which is a cool idea, but it can even do some intentional harm. Think about all those that created videos and never got a second look, they don't have the amazing editing skills that CCP want for that grand prize, what they have is skills, understanding of the game, and patience to roam until they find those rare fights, +record them, and edit them the best they can, into their own little PvP masterpiece. It will never be a top edit piece of cinematic, but it will have the true essence of Eve inside of it. The spirit of the PvPer. They don't need some 100 PLEX. Heck even 1 PLEX through a buddy link in their video description, or a donation from a viewer, can be infinitely more substantial for them than some grand prize. Give those pilots a new platform, that can be "theirs", and just watch how much life is injected into smallscale PvP. It can be an alliance tournament level excitement all year round.

It is very easy to overlook solo and smallgang PvP, because on the surface it seems like a small part of a big game. But it is not so. First and foremost Eve is a PvP game. And a true PvP game without the possibility of a healthy Solo PvP aspect... is a dead game!

Make small scale PvPers happy, and you'll see the effects on the entire game. More players, more activity in previously dead systems/constellations, more videos, more creativity, more general understanding of mechanics, more fit discussions, more everything. It will leak to every other aspect of the game. It won't be noticeable that the things are connected, it'll be hard to connect the dots. But the connection is there, in the very core of the sandbox.

Don't have questions for you. Just a thumbs up :-)
Memory Fades
State War Academy
Caldari State
#23 - 2014-12-24 22:54:14 UTC
Gorski, you did some solo pvp streaming right? and when u streamed u put a small cyno icon to help avoid stream sniping?

CCP tried to make more ppl stream, even creating a new ingame twitch support. But it didn't work. The number of streamers stays very small. Compared to other MMOs Eve is one of the weakest in pvp streaming.

I know a few ppl that are very good at pvp and would like to stream, but gave up on it. the reasons are that Eve is already so hard to find good fights in, solo, duo, trio or small gangs, becoz u always find blobs more than anything. Then to add on top of that the risk of getting stream sniped is just too much hassle. They tell me it feels like they are working for CCP when they stream. Can u relate to that statement?

What do u think, if anything? can be done to make eve more streaming friendly? or is eve just really unrepairable bad for pvp streaming?
Gorski Car
#24 - 2014-12-25 01:03:49 UTC
Memory Fades wrote:
Gorski, you did some solo pvp streaming right? and when u streamed u put a small cyno icon to help avoid stream sniping?

CCP tried to make more ppl stream, even creating a new ingame twitch support. But it didn't work. The number of streamers stays very small. Compared to other MMOs Eve is one of the weakest in pvp streaming.

I know a few ppl that are very good at pvp and would like to stream, but gave up on it. the reasons are that Eve is already so hard to find good fights in, solo, duo, trio or small gangs, becoz u always find blobs more than anything. Then to add on top of that the risk of getting stream sniped is just too much hassle. They tell me it feels like they are working for CCP when they stream. Can u relate to that statement?

What do u think, if anything? can be done to make eve more streaming friendly? or is eve just really unrepairable bad for pvp streaming?



Yes I do indeed stream at twitch.tv/hkarn. When I was in pandemic legion I put a badly photosho...painted image of a cyno as overlay it was mostly as a joke. I streamed without any delay or anything blocking my screen. I actually very rarely got streamsniped :( I would welcome it most of the time since it's a fight at least. I understand that streaming sometimes can get a bit frustrating in a intel intensive game as eve but it's your own choice. Some like it some don't. I think eve is decent for pvp streams there are a couple of semi big ones and ppl can have success doing it.


And Jimmy Jams/Aldap: Thanks for your support. I actually sold my link alt recently and I would love ccp to support movie makers more but there is also stuff you players can do in form of rewards (think one man crew) or sponsorships.

Collect this post

Nashh Kadavr
Hostile.
#25 - 2015-01-05 11:54:20 UTC
+1
Lanctharus Onzo
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#26 - 2015-01-12 08:48:36 UTC
Lanctharus Onzo wrote:
Well hello there!

My name is Lanctharus Onzo and I an one of the co-host and writers of the Cap Stable Podcast.

In early 2014 our podcast interviewed a great majority of the candidates for CSM9 and we will be doing the same for CSM10.

Here is our announcement: http://capstable.net/2014/12/01/council-of-stellar-management-x-call-for-candidate-interviews/

As we stated in the announcement, you can contact us to schedule your one on one interview via any of the following methods:

Email: podcast@capstable.net
Twitter: @CapStable
Or via our contact form

We look forward to speaking to you about your particular skill set and expertise in EVE Online and we hope you success in your candidacy.

Sincerely,

Lanctharus Onzo
Co-host & Writer of the Cap Stable Podcast
Military Director, Alea Iacta Est Universal


Hello Gorski,

It's been awhile! I wanted to find out when you wanted to schedule your CSMX interview?

Executive Editor, CSM Watch || Writer, Co-host of the Cap Stable Podcast || Twitter: @Lanctharus

Gorski Car
#27 - 2015-01-13 07:47:05 UTC
Lanctharus Onzo wrote:
Lanctharus Onzo wrote:
Well hello there!

My name is Lanctharus Onzo and I an one of the co-host and writers of the Cap Stable Podcast.

In early 2014 our podcast interviewed a great majority of the candidates for CSM9 and we will be doing the same for CSM10.

Here is our announcement: http://capstable.net/2014/12/01/council-of-stellar-management-x-call-for-candidate-interviews/

As we stated in the announcement, you can contact us to schedule your one on one interview via any of the following methods:

Email: podcast@capstable.net
Twitter: @CapStable
Or via our contact form

We look forward to speaking to you about your particular skill set and expertise in EVE Online and we hope you success in your candidacy.

Sincerely,

Lanctharus Onzo
Co-host & Writer of the Cap Stable Podcast
Military Director, Alea Iacta Est Universal


Hello Gorski,

It's been awhile! I wanted to find out when you wanted to schedule your CSMX interview?


I have sent you a mail. Hope to hear back soon.

Collect this post

Bisu Deckryder
Definitely Not Cloaked LLC
#28 - 2015-01-15 22:42:33 UTC
So if you get re elected to the csm, what will you advocate for ways to introduce new players to solo and small gang pvp earlier? What would you change if any thing in regards to the way ships are balanced for small gang or solo pvp vs blob warfare?
Gorski Car
#29 - 2015-01-16 23:56:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Gorski Car
Bisu Deckryder wrote:
So if you get re elected to the csm, what will you advocate for ways to introduce new players to solo and small gang pvp earlier? What would you change if any thing in regards to the way ships are balanced for small gang or solo pvp vs blob warfare?


That first question is quite big and a really hard one to answer. I think that Faction warfare could be a great starting point for people wanting to do small gang pvp and then branch out into doing solo stuff during downtime/when no one else in your group are online.

The problem with solo pvp is that it is a isk sink for 99% of all players and people just don't like losing isk. This could be offset by doing a fw plex to pay for your ship pretty much. I honestly think that the best way and the way most people got into solo pvp was by watching pvp videos like Garmonation etc and thinking "I can do that". I would want ccp to promote good videos better and they are doing a bit better but there are still more to do.

One thing people need to understand with small gang is that you don't need to instantly jump into the endgame Orthrus + Machariel + snakes and links small gang fleets just to stay competitive. Running small cheap gangs such as just a bunch of cruisers with 1 logi or maybe remote rep tristans/vexors is a cheap way to get into pvp and a way to cause a lot of damage.

Same thing with solo pvp. i really think everyone should do buy 5-100 of a ship and t1 fit it + just go out and fight in faction warfare space. While you will die a lot you will learn what every ship can do and what your ship can do very well. This is a very useful skill that has uses for all types of warfare.

I don't think you can force people to go out and solo pvp and I don't think most people really care that their pvp is skill intensive or anything. It's more of a pressing f1 + bullshitting with your friends playing a social game. I do this sometimes because it's relaxing and fun to talk to your friends. If someone doesn't want to solo pvp they probably won't go into it with their full hear and maybe go lose a ship and have no fun at all.

The thing is solo pvp isn't very rewarding most of the times. The more experienced you get the more you know what you can and can not attack and this turns roams into endless parts of either no people or people you just can't fight. I don't know if it is the bitter vet in me speaking but you turn more risk averse and then miss those fights where you couldn't win on paper just looking at what they have and what you have but when you actually go and do it you find out that they wasn't perfectly skilled with a perfect fit and you actually came out ontop. And this is where you really get the rewards of solo pvp, killng a bigger fleet or even a single upship kill is so rewarding and you know that it is all you.

For small gang pvp it's a matter of finding people that you like to fly with. If they are in anyway good they can be great with some practice/roaming and actually analyzing fits/battles. Or if you are a non casual you could just do a ton of research and study all mechanics/spend time in eft, theorycrafting a gang up and have a easier way of getting good. I think the new player experience needs to tell people about mechanics that are obvious to older guys but not really explained at all. Maneuvers such as slingshotting, getting under guns, manually piloting in combat and how to fly your ship to apply more damage by matching transversal. These things are easy to learn if you actually spend the time looking up youtube gudies but they are not really explained ingame.

So to sum things up: I would like ccp to promote solo/small gang pvp videos more. Tell more people about faction warfare and that you don't need 1b ships to win. Get people to join a pvp corp that promotes solo/small gang pvp. Make everyone understand that solo isn't going to be for everyone in a MMO it is a social game after all. It is also important that the older guys at least teach something to the new guys and accept that they are new and still learning.

I will answer the ship balance question tomorrow!

Collect this post

Grarr Dexx
Blue Canary
Watch This
#30 - 2015-01-24 23:22:49 UTC
In case you're going to vote for this guy, be sure to check out the CSM participation sheet:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ggvRK1hxnm6JM25JxbNT_IaKJBigsZAC5JqLlR6-llY/edit#gid=0
Finarfin
Cerulean Void
#31 - 2015-01-24 23:27:29 UTC
Grarr Dexx wrote:
In case you're going to vote for this guy, be sure to check out the CSM participation sheet:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ggvRK1hxnm6JM25JxbNT_IaKJBigsZAC5JqLlR6-llY/edit#gid=0



Any comment on this Gorski?
Tobin Risidan
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#32 - 2015-01-25 00:19:21 UTC
So as previously pointed out, you only attended 5 CSM meetings during the Winter Summit. Care to explain why we should vote for someone who doesn't attend?
Gorski Car
#33 - 2015-01-25 00:49:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Gorski Car
Tobin Risidan wrote:
So as previously pointed out, you only attended 5 CSM meetings during the Winter Summit. Care to explain why we should vote for someone who doesn't attend?



You should vote for someone who attend the meetings where he feels that he can actually contribute with stuff. Besides we get recordings and minutes that are not REDACTED and sometimes IRL work gets in front of spaceship politician work.

Collect this post

Jayne Fillon
#34 - 2015-01-25 01:03:21 UTC
Gorski Car wrote:
Tobin Risidan wrote:
So as previously pointed out, you only attended 5 CSM meetings during the Winter Summit. Care to explain why we should vote for someone who doesn't attend?

You should vote for someone who attend the meetings that are relevant to the game.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but am I supposed to interpret this as you considering the topics you chose not to attend as irrelevant and unimportant?

Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.

Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#35 - 2015-01-25 01:10:50 UTC
Gorski Car wrote:
Tobin Risidan wrote:
So as previously pointed out, you only attended 5 CSM meetings during the Winter Summit. Care to explain why we should vote for someone who doesn't attend?



You should vote for someone who attend the meetings that are relevant to the game.

Every meeting listed IS relevant to the game. Disappointed to hear you say that. I simply can't vote for someone this closed minded. Ugh
Hendrick Tallardar
Doomheim
#36 - 2015-01-25 01:11:40 UTC
Not to detract from the discussion of your involvement with the CSM's role at the summit meetings but I had a question for you Gorski.

As someone who has played the game with a wide variety of player groups, what are your thoughts on the New Player Experience in EVE in general? You are currently in RVB which is, to some, a solid starting area to learn the basics of how PVP works in EVE. What do you think can be improved upon and adjusted to better incentivize new players into venturing down the path of PVP and eventually subscribing?

One point of contention I have with the tutorials is that it does a very poor job introducing and preparing players for the concept of permanent loss when undocked and attacked by other players (or when their ship is destroyed by NPCs). There is also the problem regularly stated that a new player "has no clue what there is to do" when starting out and simply runs missions and so forth as commented on by CCP Rise at EVE Vegas. It could be said this is because the "sandbox gameplay" doesn't open up for the player until several hours into the game and beginners tutorial is completed. Your thoughts?
Finarfin
Cerulean Void
#37 - 2015-01-25 01:58:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Finarfin
Gorski Car wrote:
You should vote for someone who attend the meetings that are relevant to the game.


Corporation: Verge of Collapse
WH CSM meeting scheduled in advance: Not relevant?

Guess that is all there is too know about this CSM X candidate.
Chessur
Full Broadside
Deepwater Hooligans
#38 - 2015-01-25 05:48:54 UTC
Having known gorski for some time, I just have this to say:

To me, small gang and solo PvP is everything in eve. I also strongly think that it is the genesis to 99% of the 'content' found here. The complexity, nuance,the tactical and strategic depth found in this amazing game are nothing short of jaw dropping. Sadly I feel that 99% of the eve playerbase (Including the CSM) doesn't see or understand this. Gorski is THE ONLY CSM candidate that I would fleet with. Having flown with him many times, I know for a fact that he understands. He, like me- can see the importance of solo / small gang and from what he has been doing with the CSM I strongly believe that gorski is our man.
Taris Murkon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#39 - 2015-01-25 05:57:46 UTC
Jayne Fillon wrote:
Gorski Car wrote:
Tobin Risidan wrote:
So as previously pointed out, you only attended 5 CSM meetings during the Winter Summit. Care to explain why we should vote for someone who doesn't attend?

You should vote for someone who attend the meetings that are relevant to the game.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but am I supposed to interpret this as you considering the topics you chose not to attend as irrelevant and unimportant?


You know Jayne I wanted to vote for you. Then you you did this. You took all that moronic stuff Seraph always spouts and tried to top it. How about you stay off other candidates threads and stand on your own?
Gorski Car
#40 - 2015-01-25 15:13:18 UTC
Hendrick Tallardar wrote:
Not to detract from the discussion of your involvement with the CSM's role at the summit meetings but I had a question for you Gorski.

As someone who has played the game with a wide variety of player groups, what are your thoughts on the New Player Experience in EVE in general? You are currently in RVB which is, to some, a solid starting area to learn the basics of how PVP works in EVE. What do you think can be improved upon and adjusted to better incentivize new players into venturing down the path of PVP and eventually subscribing?

One point of contention I have with the tutorials is that it does a very poor job introducing and preparing players for the concept of permanent loss when undocked and attacked by other players (or when their ship is destroyed by NPCs). There is also the problem regularly stated that a new player "has no clue what there is to do" when starting out and simply runs missions and so forth as commented on by CCP Rise at EVE Vegas. It could be said this is because the "sandbox gameplay" doesn't open up for the player until several hours into the game and beginners tutorial is completed. Your thoughts?


The new player experience is kinda lacking at the moment. I know ccp rise are working on it and I've seen some prototype images that look a bit better. Getting people into solo and small gang is harder though. This is a MMO and people want to be social and just shoot stuff while talking to their friends. Going out alone can also feel frightening since you dont have anyone holding your hands etc. In most cases you are also going to lose isk doing it with no srp that you get in bigger fights. Honestly I think that people who go out solo must want to do it themselves and get better at eve. I belive that things like Garmonation or any other pvp video made more people try solo pvp then any guide or tutorial will do.

The barrier of entry is not actually that high to solo but there are some things that the new player experience never teach. Manual piloting tactics such as slingshotting or moving to maximize tracking are never taught and those are learned by practice and searching youtube tutorials. I think ccp should push pvp videos a bit more and they are doing a great job by adding some in their devblogs.

I think ccp needs to push lowsec and faction warfare more for smaller scale and beginner level pvp. The problems right now with these is that either you lose sec status fast and is punished by not having access to highsec as a new player or your standings get ****** from faction warfare and that's even harder to fix.

Collect this post