These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

ribbon prices

Author
umnikar
Fishbone Industries
#1 - 2014-12-08 09:23:56 UTC
What's happening?
Kupena
Xenophobics Asylum
#2 - 2014-12-08 10:40:15 UTC
Doesn't look like there much happening to them right this moment -> http://www.eve-markets.net/detail?typeid=30259#history
Borsek
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2014-12-08 11:14:17 UTC
Huh?
Amak Boma
Dragon Factory
xX SERENITY Xx
#4 - 2014-12-08 11:19:45 UTC
prices just went up very little , no big difference but it should go hiiigher
Winthorp
#5 - 2014-12-08 12:44:41 UTC
If you were smart you would look to be huffing gas at the moment at every chance you got.
Phoenix Jones
Small-Arms Fire
#6 - 2014-12-08 14:04:47 UTC
Winthorp wrote:
If you were smart you would look to be huffing gas at the moment at every chance you got.


Nanoribbons, stable at around 3 to 4 mil.

Low End Gasses, up 100% to 700%.

Yaay!!!!

Hannah Flex
#7 - 2014-12-08 14:22:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Hannah Flex
.
Jez Amatin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2014-12-08 14:32:11 UTC
Phoenix Jones wrote:

Low End Gasses, up 100% to 700%.


Shocked
Phoenix Jones
Small-Arms Fire
#9 - 2014-12-08 19:50:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Phoenix Jones
I can give everybody a bit of speculation.

Gasses will remain high, but not as high as they are currently (this is mostly market pvp stuff going on atm). Rough destroyer cost should be around 80 million for roughly a month, then drop down to about 50 to 60 million till either (saturation) or more likely the next destroyer (caldari) is released.

Nanoribbon prices will jump up but take a huge drop once t3 balancing occurs. This Is mostly due also to market pvp, and the redrawing of subsystem worth. The t3 destroyers should balance out the price drop though so they should stabilize at around 4 to 4.5 million, maybe 5 depending on demand and nerfage. This is variable though mainly because the t3 destroyer takes so few of them to build.

Low end gasses will stay relatively high for about the next year due to the new releases of destroyers (which will be destroyed a lot).

Depending on construction, the value of data and relic sleeper sites may increase a bit. This all depends on how the bpc for t3 destroyers are created.

Tl:dr. Gas prices go up. Low end salvage goes up. There is now value in things besides nanoribbons and c6 gas.

I wouldn't worry too much though, as when they do the adjustment to t3's, they'll probably put in a new addition. This is pure speculation though, which is what is driving the current market. I would not hold your stock atm unless you are a builder. If you are a builder, you'll be making bank very soon.

The thing people don't realize is that you can mark a lot of lowsec gas pretty quickly in a pos and convert it vs the c6 gasses because they are much smaller in volume (1 to 1.5 m3 vs 5 to 10m3). So what would take a farm to convert c6 gasses you can do in a much simpler setup, which can process for much longer with less freighter loads. The problem is mostly perception. People don't run low end gas sites because of how low they've been on volume. That'll change soon enough.

Yaay!!!!

Shilalasar
Dead Sky Inc.
#10 - 2014-12-08 20:08:26 UTC
And I will so laugh my ass off if the droprate of D3 blueprints is so low it is the acual bottleneck and the marketplayers sit on billions of useless gas. Twisted
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#11 - 2014-12-08 21:02:14 UTC
Winthorp wrote:
If you were smart you would look to be huffing gas at the moment at every chance you got.

sure, if you enjoy hating life

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

umnikar
Fishbone Industries
#12 - 2014-12-08 23:39:44 UTC
I mean they went over 4 for a moment, people leaving wormholes etc... so I'm wondering who's feeding the market. ;)

I'm not playing alot these days, but is it that c2/3 peeps went to c4? I had 1 c4 static last month worth to run - it's all occupied!
Phoenix Jones
Small-Arms Fire
#13 - 2014-12-09 15:14:13 UTC
umnikar wrote:
I mean they went over 4 for a moment, people leaving wormholes etc... so I'm wondering who's feeding the market. ;)

I'm not playing alot these days, but is it that c2/3 peeps went to c4? I had 1 c4 static last month worth to run - it's all occupied!


They went over six when the confessor was announced.

The wormhole markets looking to balance out atm. People are returning to Wspace more than leaving far as I can see atm. It's just a lot of bears behind pos shields :-).

Wormholes have a cap on the amount of people they can support. Yes you can have an army in there but it will be a very bored army.

The new holes will bring some extra boom into eve.

Yaay!!!!

Jez Amatin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2014-12-09 17:54:17 UTC
add onto that the null relic and data which have been a magnet for the more adventurous explorer. defo been busier than post-hyperion...
Kupena
Xenophobics Asylum
#15 - 2014-12-10 00:46:22 UTC
Jez Amatin wrote:
add onto that the null relic and data which have been a magnet for the more adventurous explorer. defo been busier than post-hyperion...


add onto that the increased sisters probe launcher drop rate from the more adventurous explorer. defo been busier than post-hyperion...

ftfy
Soldarius
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#16 - 2014-12-11 15:31:30 UTC
Some of the low-end w-space gases have been profitable for a long time. This time last year c-50 was great and C-72 was crap. Now they've swapped places.

http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY