These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Does ramming count as harassment? I heard it does

First post
Author
Smelly Boyhehe
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2014-12-09 17:27:58 UTC
I'm attempting to sit outside a station in my ship sniping off suspect and such and a neutral player keeps ramming me and throwing me km's off the station, is this allowed?

I read somewhere it counted as harassment.
Dirritat'z Demblin
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2014-12-09 17:32:14 UTC
IIRC it only counts as harrasment when it is done for a longer time and without any other reason than to anoy you, even after you tried to move away and/or evade the bumper. However, CCP also did say that they will decide this on a chase by chase basis. Bumping in itself is not considered harrasment.
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#3 - 2014-12-09 17:39:06 UTC
GM Response On Bumping

tldr;

- ramming/bumping by itself is not harassment

- ramming/bumping is a legitimate tactic (for war, ganking, and general mayhem)

- it only becomes harassment when you focus your attention on a single person for an unreasonable amount of time (say, more than 15 minutes or so) for no reason other than "just because."

Cannibal Kane
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2014-12-09 17:42:24 UTC
In their case... they have just cause. If your shooting suspects they might be trying to bump your pansy ass away from docking range.

You know... so they can kill you before you can dock.

"Kane is the End Boss of Highsec." -Psychotic Monk

ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#5 - 2014-12-09 20:30:53 UTC
While responses from players are helpful, if you believe you are being harassed, you may file a support ticket to draw a GM's attention to it.

As indicated by above posters, though, bumping in and of itself is a perfectly valid mechanic, same as shooting someone. Just like any other action becomes harassment when it's done specifically targeted to you, repeatedly and insistently, for no reason and accomplishing nothing outside of making you not be able to play. All of those need to apply. In your case, it sounds like you're facing blowback from people upset you're shooting them, which is normal gameplay.

ISD LackOfFaith

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to Eve Mail or anything other than the forums.

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2014-12-09 20:36:14 UTC
ShahFluffers wrote:
GM Response On Bumping

tldr;

- ramming/bumping by itself is not harassment

- ramming/bumping is a legitimate tactic (for war, ganking, and general mayhem)

- it only becomes harassment when you focus your attention on a single person for an unreasonable amount of time (say, more than 15 minutes or so) for no reason other than "just because."


ill still never understand why it isnt harassment/exploit, i mean, your circumventing aggression mechanics to prevent warp of a target for an indefinite period of time for your gank crew to figure out what exactly they need to fly 10 jumps over to kill a ship with no chance of saving itself

that isnt exactly risk/reward for the victim there, its more of a "lul you got picked, your ******, deal with it", hell, they cant even defend themselves without sacrificing their ship to concord.

just seems a little silly
Adrie Atticus
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#7 - 2014-12-09 20:48:29 UTC
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
ShahFluffers wrote:
GM Response On Bumping

tldr;

- ramming/bumping by itself is not harassment

- ramming/bumping is a legitimate tactic (for war, ganking, and general mayhem)

- it only becomes harassment when you focus your attention on a single person for an unreasonable amount of time (say, more than 15 minutes or so) for no reason other than "just because."


ill still never understand why it isnt harassment/exploit, i mean, your circumventing aggression mechanics to prevent warp of a target for an indefinite period of time for your gank crew to figure out what exactly they need to fly 10 jumps over to kill a ship with no chance of saving itself

that isnt exactly risk/reward for the victim there, its more of a "lul you got picked, your ******, deal with it", hell, they cant even defend themselves without sacrificing their ship to concord.

just seems a little silly


Well you can just log off in that case.

If the group is also using suicide noob ships to keep your capsuleer aggression timer up for an extended period of time, then you might have a case, but that means extended. Not 10 minutes.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#8 - 2014-12-09 20:55:33 UTC  |  Edited by: J'Poll
Smelly Boyhehe wrote:
I'm attempting to sit outside a station in my ship sniping off suspect and such and a neutral player keeps ramming me and throwing me km's off the station, is this allowed?

I read somewhere it counted as harassment.


Aaah.

U mad. And heads up, making up a source wont help you.

I heard that people that shiptoast on the forums get permabanned from the game.
Even though it should be like that, it isnt... The same thing with your "I heard bumping is harrasment"... it is not true


Bumping is and will likely be a valid gameplay...so deal with it.

And keep this crap in GD.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#9 - 2014-12-09 20:58:11 UTC
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
ShahFluffers wrote:
GM Response On Bumping

tldr;

- ramming/bumping by itself is not harassment

- ramming/bumping is a legitimate tactic (for war, ganking, and general mayhem)

- it only becomes harassment when you focus your attention on a single person for an unreasonable amount of time (say, more than 15 minutes or so) for no reason other than "just because."


ill still never understand why it isnt harassment/exploit, i mean, your circumventing aggression mechanics to prevent warp of a target for an indefinite period of time for your gank crew to figure out what exactly they need to fly 10 jumps over to kill a ship with no chance of saving itself

that isnt exactly risk/reward for the victim there, its more of a "lul you got picked, your ******, deal with it", hell, they cant even defend themselves without sacrificing their ship to concord.

just seems a little silly


Yeah there is no way to insta warp a ship with a couple of webs......oh wait.



Never mind.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Jack Hayson
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2014-12-09 22:04:55 UTC
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
hell, they cant even defend themselves without sacrificing their ship to concord.


Highsec is scary.
So many people everywhere that could do something bad to you at any second and you can't just preemptively shoot them without exploding yourself.
How do you people manage to live there without getting super paranoid?! Shocked
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#11 - 2014-12-09 22:07:09 UTC
It's really simple, if you do it for "no reason whatsoever" then it can be classed as harassment and a GM might want to have a word with you, but if it's used as a means to an end (like a ransom) then it's fine. So "I'll bump you till you pay me" is perfectly fine.
Justin Zaine
#12 - 2014-12-10 05:30:02 UTC
Cannibal Kane wrote:
In their case... they have just cause. If your shooting suspects they might be trying to bump your pansy ass away from docking range.

You know... so they can kill you before you can dock.


You look sexy in that new leather jacket, Kane.

He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight.

He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared.

Evei Shard
Shard Industries
#13 - 2014-12-10 16:29:56 UTC
Smelly Boyhehe wrote:
I'm attempting to sit outside a station in my ship sniping off suspect and such and a neutral player keeps ramming me and throwing me km's off the station, is this allowed?

I read somewhere it counted as harassment.


With Eve Online, you pretty much have to accept that short of showing up on your doorstep in RL with a shotgun, players in the game can do whatever they please without repercussions from CCP.

Profit favors the prepared

Cara Forelli
State War Academy
Caldari State
#14 - 2014-12-10 17:11:29 UTC
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
that isnt exactly risk/reward for the victim there, its more of a "lul you got picked, your ******, deal with it", hell, they cant even defend themselves without sacrificing their ship to concord.

just seems a little silly

High sec is a silly place. People can also refit to stabs off an orca at no risk whatsoever to the orca. My only recourse is to bump it for the next 30 minutes for it's blatant E-dishonor.

Want to talk? Join my channel in game: House Forelli

Titan's Lament

Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
#15 - 2014-12-10 17:18:12 UTC
As far as I know 'bumping' is acceptable as long as you don't follow them into another system and continue to 'bump' them. Following from belt/location to belt/location in the same/one system is acceptable.
Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
#16 - 2014-12-10 17:23:50 UTC
Nariya Kentaya wrote:
ShahFluffers wrote:
GM Response On Bumping

tldr;

- ramming/bumping by itself is not harassment

- ramming/bumping is a legitimate tactic (for war, ganking, and general mayhem)

- it only becomes harassment when you focus your attention on a single person for an unreasonable amount of time (say, more than 15 minutes or so) for no reason other than "just because."


ill still never understand why it isnt harassment/exploit, i mean, your circumventing aggression mechanics to prevent warp of a target for an indefinite period of time for your gank crew to figure out what exactly they need to fly 10 jumps over to kill a ship with no chance of saving itself

that isnt exactly risk/reward for the victim there, its more of a "lul you got picked, your ******, deal with it", hell, they cant even defend themselves without sacrificing their ship to concord.

just seems a little silly


That is a standard tactic that is used to trap freighters/industrials prior to them being suicide ganked. It can be subverted by someone else 'bumping' the bumper or by you having an escort to check the path ahead or to web your freighter to enable a faster warp away.

Personally I use bumping to 'encourage' large scale & destructive mining operations from one system. I invariably would not follow them into an adjacent system unless they were being really indignant or taking the ****.
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Doomheim
#17 - 2014-12-12 18:06:03 UTC
In times like this we should perhaps turn to time-honored posterity of what has gone before. Let us read from the book of James315, chapter 'bumping', verse 'htfu'...

"Q. You can't bump me! This is harassment and against the EULA.

It's a common misconception that bumping players in highsec is automatically harassment. Since the rules are not publicly viewable in a central location, EVE players tend to be led astray by rumors and unsourced wikis. I, on the other hand, have been in direct contact with the people who actually enforce the EULA, to ensure that my business is in full compliance.

In this case, my bumping of miners is not random harassment; rather, it is an activity conducted in the course of business. In the event of an audit, I have ample evidence to support the reasonable expectation of profit. Prior to this announcement, I gathered game logs, chat logs, and screenshots of wallet journals, transactions, evemails, and other materials from my time in Arvasaras. During my brief bumping campaign there, I was able to accumulate over 100 million isk in profit, all of which is fully substantiated by the aforementioned evidence. The profit came not only from ransoms, but also from the sale of modules--taken from the wrecks of disgruntled miners who got themselves blown up trying to stop me. Since bumping requires no ammunition, my only expense was a 9,000 isk secure container (used to announce a warning to miners) that I failed to refresh while I was out orca hunting. I also have copious logs and screenshots of my conversations with the GMs on this matter, for my reference and theirs."

So, when we don space-laywer robes and dildo of office, one could extrapolate that it is the issuing of a ransom request to a bumpee in pursuit of ISK, that insulates the bumper from falling from grey zone into blackness.

F
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#18 - 2014-12-12 18:20:28 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
In times like this we should perhaps turn to time-honored posterity of what has gone before. Let us read from the book of James315, chapter 'bumping', verse 'htfu'...

"Q. You can't bump me! This is harassment and against the EULA.

It's a common misconception that bumping players in highsec is automatically harassment. Since the rules are not publicly viewable in a central location, EVE players tend to be led astray by rumors and unsourced wikis. I, on the other hand, have been in direct contact with the people who actually enforce the EULA, to ensure that my business is in full compliance.

In this case, my bumping of miners is not random harassment; rather, it is an activity conducted in the course of business. In the event of an audit, I have ample evidence to support the reasonable expectation of profit. Prior to this announcement, I gathered game logs, chat logs, and screenshots of wallet journals, transactions, evemails, and other materials from my time in Arvasaras. During my brief bumping campaign there, I was able to accumulate over 100 million isk in profit, all of which is fully substantiated by the aforementioned evidence. The profit came not only from ransoms, but also from the sale of modules--taken from the wrecks of disgruntled miners who got themselves blown up trying to stop me. Since bumping requires no ammunition, my only expense was a 9,000 isk secure container (used to announce a warning to miners) that I failed to refresh while I was out orca hunting. I also have copious logs and screenshots of my conversations with the GMs on this matter, for my reference and theirs."

So, when we don space-laywer robes and dildo of office, one could extrapolate that it is the issuing of a ransom request to a bumpee in pursuit of ISK, that insulates the bumper from falling from grey zone into blackness.

F


Amen, brother. Amen.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Doomheim
#19 - 2014-12-12 18:32:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
..this of course does not preclude someone from bumping another for their jollies, as substantiated in this original GM ruling thread; but like donning condom instead of rolling dice, issuing a ransom request can provide extra protections against bear-aids.

"CCP considers the act of bumping a normal game mechanic, and does not class the bumping of another player’s ship as an exploit. However, persistent targeting of a player with bumping by following them around after they have made an effort to move on to another location can be classified as harassment, and this will be judged on a case by case basis."

Here it was the 'following around' (to another belt, system, etc), that was the defining test...

Albeit not defining, because lets get real, these guys are making up the rules on this as they go.

F