CSM Campaigns

Tora U will have my vote. I used to fly with u guys a while back as P42ALPHA. You have a very good understanding of the game, when I have spoke with you in TS-Even when I would do some things to really set you off(break the rules I agreed to when I joined Marmite) You were very level headed and talked it out. And as a leader of a alliance like the one you have, you were very personable, and from what I could see you enjoyed and took in everyones opinion equally. Was refreshing coming from 0.0, learned a lot about Eve leadership from you. TY



I hope the best for You. If you do get elected to the CSM, I feel you will be a great benefit to EVE online. Tell Blades I say hello, another good dude in Marmite!

Though as small as we are, and all ex-Marmite players our corp will be voting for u. But we will still be WD'ing u guys FOR-EVER-er:)

07 Tora!!

The more you write, the more people laugh at you. At you, not with you. It's important that you're able to recognize the difference if you expect to be taken seriously. This is as true for Saeger1737 as it is for you, Lucas.

Perhaps try to restrict your comments to topics where individuals who haven't hurt you are posting? That way you'll be less inclined to post emotionally and hopefully your words will deserve consideration as opposed to derision.

Brain farts by Sweet Trader (founder of Marmites) :

* An Autopsy Skill that gives you a chance of recovering implants from corpses. yes/no, why ?

* A shared inventory for all characters/alts on linked accounts (purchased by the same individual). No more trading or shuffling **** back and forth from an office. yes/no, why ?

Brain farts indeed... read lovingly crafted suggestions. The second one is a pure quality of life feature... we all know what multiboxers do, so why make their existence such an unnecessary clickfest? If you are in a station with stuff that belongs to any of your accounts/alts it should be in the same hangar.

Tora all the way. Some think he's a character... some think he has character. I'm in the second group.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgxACD-rL5c

Hello,

Thank you for having the same passion that many of us share playing this game.

I do not agree with you revised ganking procedure, EVE is not a safe place, not even "high security" systems, ganking should not be revised. i suggest inserting a new item, Secure passworded containers, items that only capital ships can carry that have an encryption level based on a skill, also a decryption skill would be needed in order for them to be opened and it would take say 15 days for a lv 5 decryptor to hack a lv 5 encrypted container.

People should not be more baby treated, they should organize themselves when transporting valuables in high sec and not afk freight 15 billions of stuff, simple as that.

Plus the "stations will spit you out" if you gank is just pointless. Stations have always been and always should be the only safe place for pods and ships (maybe not characters?).

i do not agree on a afk timer for cloackers but we need a system to counter macro/botting, this should be not done through change in ingame mechanics but should be adressed by ccp internally with some monitor program.

The mining boredom is a problem, i would make it more profitable but more challenging, changing the mining ships in a way that requires them to be dynamically managed, adding content, making mining belts casinos

People that want to avoid wardecks can stay in npc corp, the current system ensures only the best business models survive, generating stronger more coordinated and cohese entities. The current wardeck system works just fine.

People should not be forced in leaving npc corp, it is a good aggregator and many people use them for various purposes.

The industry changes i approve of

Empire POSes should simply have a limitation on defences that are possible to fit

Sorry but you do not have my vote, especially because of the changes you propose to high sec.

R

I knew I took a risk here, as Marmites isnt the most loved alliance in game. But people who know me well, also know that I can set aside my personal issues and go for the bigger picture.

I don't see why you can't log off after you timer has run out ?

I think you're confusing multiboxing to having more then one character active (which can happen on the same account)

...

Either you log off cloaked, ewarp, and your ship sits in space uncloaked and probable for--I can't remember, 30 seconds or a minute? when I was in w-space I always safe logged--or you safe log off, which involves deactivating all modules, including your cloak, and sitting there while the timer runs down.

In the former case, active hunters with probes out can likely pin you and blow up your ship once you've left the game. In the latter case, you're basically spamming d-scan hoping that you don't see 4 or more combat probes before your timer ticks down--it's 30 seconds, so any good prober in system, with probes out, is going to catch you--and cloaking up and bouncing safes if you do see probes, in which case you have to start over again at 30 seconds.

Or you can just cloak up and wait.

The net effect of this change would be that less people would gank with implants (whatever) while you have more people getting complacent and hauling even more loot. It won't reduce ganking for profit and podkills are essentially meaningless without implants being destroyed.

Less loot anywhere in fighting sucks.

People afk cloak in systems to prevent ISBoxer people from 1 button warping 25 mining ships into a area and again 1 button pressing all the locking and mining.
Furthermore, the broken mechanic of being able to see everyone in local in null sec reinforces this.

Funny though, your from null sec and NOT ONE mention of it? Really?
What you have to offer is little to nothing.