CSM Campaigns

I fully endorse this person and/or service.

Seriously, how could anyone not vote for this handsome bearded gentleman, covered in furs and standing next to a wolf?
Great dude, and would certainly make for an excellent CSM.

sweet i would love to chat to you, when is best for you.

What do you want to do, what would be your idea plays if you would do anything.

whats your idea for hisec lowsec null and w-space

will you listen to people??

Catch me in game, or pm your comms info and I can come by to chat.

Let me turn that around and ask you what you would like me to do? I am not skilled enough to be a game designer, so I won't even try that. But I can listen to what you have to say.

RLML's were nerfed a little bit too hard, HML's need either an application or range buff since they are currently pretty useless for pvp purposes.

How about a CSM representative who actually knows how to play eve?


FISTY 4 CSM

First of all, how do I pronounce your new name? The English or the French way?

Secondly, what do you think is the most important issue facing the playerbase today, and how do you believe it should be addressed?

New player retention is indeed an issue facing Eve so to expand on that I have a few questions. The first experience of many new players is the recruitment efforts of highsec corps near the starter system. While many of these corps mean well, a large fraction of them are run by CEO's with an incomplete understanding of Eve mechanics, who let's face it, run less-than-stellar organizations that are not capable of properly supporting and teaching new players about the game. New players ending up in these lackluster corporations will have a more frustrating initial experience in the game than if they ended up in a better corporation, and might quit the game altogether.

This problem is set to become worse with the recent changes allowing the spamming of corporation invitations, and the proposed removal of intra-corp agression in highsec which will remove a major disincentive to "farm" new players for income (that is the possibility of highsec awoxing).

With that in mind, I have three questions:

1) What do you think the best approach would be to get new players into quality corporations with the real interest and capability to train new players, not just in highsec, but also in low, null and wormhole space?

2) Do you agree with the proposed removal of intra-corp aggression in highsec?

3) Do you think that a "social corp" mechanism - that is a new tier of corporation that is immune to wardecs and awoxing, but has none of the current advantages of a player corporation is a good idea to increase new player retention?

Improving corporations is a good start, and I am anxiously waiting to see what CCP will do with that. There will always be 'non quality' corporations that actively recruit new players, there is nothing you can or should do about that in a sandbox. But information for new players is extremely important, increasing the amount of game knowledge gained from the New Player Experience. The tutorial needs to constantly be improved and updated. I would personally LOVE to have a new pvp tutorial for new players that sends them out into Low-Sec or 0.0 to get fights.






High sec intra-corp aggression is mostly used as a griefing mechanic. If you want to **** over your corporation there are still plenty of ways to do it. If you want to practice pvp then you can duel a corp mate.



A social corp mechanism would just be abused to avoid high-sec wars. I have done incursions and the community seems to function fine even though many of the players who fly with bling are wardecced.

Hi Fisty

What is your position on fighter assignment? For example a Nyx assigns fighters from the edge of a POS to a T1 frigate which is somewhere else in the system.

with kind regards
l0rd carlos

Is your campaign based on just small group roams and being a representative of Camel? You know that most of CSM have to pay for themselves to go to Iceland now?