These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A formal request for a CSM summit regarding EVE and multiboxing

First post
Author
ShadowandLight
Trigger Happy Capsuleers
#1 - 2014-11-26 20:48:04 UTC  |  Edited by: ShadowandLight
(I believe LordServants started working on this behind the scenes already, so let's keep that ball rolling)

There is a lot of drama, misinformation, slander, name calling and anger from both users and haters of multiboxing.

I posted my thoughts in multiple locations but I have a fairly condensed post here

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5242995#post5242995

One nagging question I have is internally what has happened that CCP has done a 180 in how it treats multiboxing and why they are taking such a dramatic stance now (with a 30 day and then permanent ban on a 2nd infraction).

I'm asking that the CSM hold a formal meeting / town hall / round table on the situation.

It's my hope that players, CSMs and perhaps CCP Dev's can sit down and discuss this issue together.
NinjaTurtle
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2014-11-26 20:56:46 UTC  |  Edited by: NinjaTurtle
Your synonymous use of the words "multiboxing" and "automated input" are quite disingenuous. The "dramatic stance" you're describing has been as such for botting (read: automating input) infractions for a while now; isboxer 'slipping under the radar' was really more CCP turning a willingly blind-eye towards it. While it would be interesting to know what prompted the internal discussion, let's not act like this is some major shift in what CCP views acceptable and unacceptable.
ShadowandLight
Trigger Happy Capsuleers
#3 - 2014-11-26 21:05:44 UTC
NinjaTurtle wrote:
Your synonymous use of the words "multiboxing" and "automated input" are quite disingenuous. The "dramatic stance" you're describing has been as such for botting (read: automating input) infractions for a while now; isboxer 'slipping under the radar' was really more CCP turning a willingly blind-eye towards it. While it would be interesting to know what prompted the internal discussion, let's not act like this is some major shift in what CCP views acceptable and unacceptable.


I disagree, for years multiboxing ment using one mouse and keyboard to be able to control multiple toons at the same time.

CCP is trying to walk back 7? Years of confirmation that this was ok, while providing little explanation or taking into account the half dozen work arounds to accomplish the same thing without much downside to the Multiboxers.

Today, right now, I could easily implement a very simple change in isboxer and get around 90% of the mouse and keyboard duplication ban with zero hassle, the other 10% will simple take me a few more button presses to achieve.

So instead of arguing among our selves i would like to speak directly to CCP and to show them the errors of their policy and to also dig into what really their issues are.

Whatever they hope to fix will not go away, people will still be able to multibox with little difficulty, only some inconveniences.
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#4 - 2014-11-26 21:08:56 UTC
No discussion is required, and most of the CSM in the past have believed that isboxers ability to clone commands needed to go. You can still multibox just fine, hell I do with three alts everyday. You just can't broadcast to the three characters, not that difficult to understand. IMO no discussion is needed. This is a good rule.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#5 - 2014-11-26 21:10:30 UTC
ShadowandLight wrote:
NinjaTurtle wrote:
Your synonymous use of the words "multiboxing" and "automated input" are quite disingenuous. The "dramatic stance" you're describing has been as such for botting (read: automating input) infractions for a while now; isboxer 'slipping under the radar' was really more CCP turning a willingly blind-eye towards it. While it would be interesting to know what prompted the internal discussion, let's not act like this is some major shift in what CCP views acceptable and unacceptable.


I disagree, for years multiboxing ment using one mouse and keyboard to be able to control multiple toons at the same time.

CCP is trying to walk back 7? Years of confirmation that this was ok, while providing little explanation or taking into account the half dozen work arounds to accomplish the same thing without much downside to the Multiboxers.

Today, right now, I could easily implement a very simple change in isboxer and get around 90% of the mouse and keyboard duplication ban with zero hassle, the other 10% will simple take me a few more button presses to achieve.

So instead of arguing among our selves i would like to speak directly to CCP and to show them the errors of their policy and to also dig into what really their issues are.

Whatever they hope to fix will not go away, people will still be able to multibox with little difficulty, only some inconveniences.



What error? you want them to roll back the ruling or completely ban isboxer and other things, which have other benefits. And if you can get around the ruling then why are you complaining?

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#6 - 2014-11-27 12:48:14 UTC
ShadowandLight wrote:
Whatever they hope to fix will not go away, people will still be able to multibox with little difficulty, only some inconveniences.


If this is true why is all your drama necessary?

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#7 - 2014-11-27 13:16:01 UTC
It should be noted that we talked about input multiplexing at the summer summit.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#8 - 2014-11-27 14:26:29 UTC
It's extremely clear.

Using ISBoxer to control multiple clients simultaneously is now finally illegal.

Alt tabbing is not.

The end.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#9 - 2014-11-27 23:36:11 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
It's extremely clear.

Using ISBoxer to control multiple clients simultaneously is now finally illegal.

Alt tabbing is not.

The end.

No.

Using IsBoxer, or any other hard- or software, to send one click or keypress to more than one client is now finally illegal.
(except for out of game stuff like login and settings).

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

Alundil
Rolled Out
#10 - 2014-11-28 01:28:37 UTC
ShadowandLight wrote:
for years multiboxing ment using one mouse and keyboard to be able to control multiple toons at the same time.

Its definition has not changed. Multiboxing is still using one kb/m for several clients/toons. That hasn't changed.
ShadowandLight wrote:
CCP is trying to walk back 7? Years of confirmation that this was ok,

No they aren't. It's a change in how they view input broadcasting. It has nothing to do with their stance on "multiboxing".

I'm right behind you

Sylphy
TSOE Po1ice
TSOE Consortium
#11 - 2014-12-02 12:05:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Sylphy
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
It's extremely clear.

Using ISBoxer to control multiple clients simultaneously is now finally illegal.

Alt tabbing is not.

The end.


The problem is CCP is well known to fire shots without checking the target first. I wonder what the ban count on this change is actually going to be for people that actually alt-tab between accounts like you and me. To some people, when they mine in same clusters as I do, they think the lasers firing up is simultaneous on all accounts even if there's that small time between clicking each EVE window in the bottom bar and pressing F1-F3 on all of them at the same time.

Personally, I was never bothered by ISboxer or keystroke multiplication/sending. It didn't bother anyone for years. Until ISBoxer controlled bomber wings started wreaking havoc upon the dogs of war. Or massive fleets mining the shiznit in high-sec space.
Up until that became a widespread common thing, nobody gave a rats ass about Multiboxers using ISBoxer or Logitech G7 keyboards or Keyclone utility software.

The character does not represent the views/opinions of its Corporation or Alliance.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#12 - 2014-12-02 19:24:04 UTC
I just wanted to personally thank the OP for creating this thread.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016