These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation

First post First post First post
Author
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1861 - 2014-11-29 10:50:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Nolak Ataru wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I don't need your pity, but you will have to accept the rule change.


Again, why is it that multiboxers are somehow exempt from being able to argue against a change that affects them?

You go to any other subforum with a CCP post about a change, and you will not see someone say "You are not allowed to discuss this even if it affects you."


Again, multiboxers aren't the problem. No one should have to repeat themselves like this so much unless they're training canines.

This affects everyone, not just multiboxers. It balances the game better in favour of more equal opportunity across the board for all players, removing the advantage afforded by the ability to click once to send the same command to more than one ship.

And before you say, "anyone can do it!", no one should have to just to keep up and enjoy the game.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Darth Schweinebacke
Wings of Fury.
#1862 - 2014-11-29 11:48:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Schweinebacke
Nolak Ataru wrote:

You're failing to take into account the literal hours of effort that goes into setting up ISBoxer and making sure nothing is off by a single pixel. ISBoxer is not something you can "plug and play". Any variation in your windows or settings will cause problems with anything you do. If we take the hours taken to set up ISBoxer and "convert" it into raw hours of experience and playtime for each player, then we'd probably see the gap narrow by a significant margin.


I hardly believe that it takes hours to set it up. And any variation to window positions can easily be prevented.

Use the function to reset all window positions, which is built into eve. Then repesoition the windows on all your clients at once -> done. Sure that takes 5 hours to do right?

Also the amount of workload to built in a cheat does not justify the use of it.

To go with my previous example of aimbots. Just because it is surely not an easy task to actually programm your own aimbot, it does not justify the use of it. (Before you read something wrong into it: I am talking about programming it yourself, not installing a script).
kraken11 jensen
ROOKS AND KRAKENS
#1863 - 2014-11-29 13:39:54 UTC  |  Edited by: kraken11 jensen
Darth Schweinebacke wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:

You're failing to take into account the literal hours of effort that goes into setting up ISBoxer and making sure nothing is off by a single pixel. ISBoxer is not something you can "plug and play". Any variation in your windows or settings will cause problems with anything you do. If we take the hours taken to set up ISBoxer and "convert" it into raw hours of experience and playtime for each player, then we'd probably see the gap narrow by a significant margin.


I hardly believe that it takes hours to set it up. And any variation to window positions can easily be prevented.

Use the function to reset all window positions, which is built into eve. Then repesoition the windows on all your clients at once -> done. Sure that takes 5 hours to do right?

Also the amount of workload to built in a cheat does not justify the use of it.

To go with my previous example of aimbots. Just because it is surely not an easy task to actually programm your own aimbot, it does not justify the use of it. (Before you read something wrong into it: I am talking about programming it yourself, not installing a script).


setup on some hours = not very good setup. People do use weeks, or even months (or years) to optimize their setups. so Yeah. and i bet if you only would've used 5 hours on setup. your would've gotten Your ships whooped, and the same With Your pods. :)


(Proably) (but who knows)
Darth Schweinebacke
Wings of Fury.
#1864 - 2014-11-29 14:29:46 UTC
kraken11 jensen wrote:
Darth Schweinebacke wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:

You're failing to take into account the literal hours of effort that goes into setting up ISBoxer and making sure nothing is off by a single pixel. ISBoxer is not something you can "plug and play". Any variation in your windows or settings will cause problems with anything you do. If we take the hours taken to set up ISBoxer and "convert" it into raw hours of experience and playtime for each player, then we'd probably see the gap narrow by a significant margin.


I hardly believe that it takes hours to set it up. And any variation to window positions can easily be prevented.

Use the function to reset all window positions, which is built into eve. Then repesoition the windows on all your clients at once -> done. Sure that takes 5 hours to do right?

Also the amount of workload to built in a cheat does not justify the use of it.

To go with my previous example of aimbots. Just because it is surely not an easy task to actually programm your own aimbot, it does not justify the use of it. (Before you read something wrong into it: I am talking about programming it yourself, not installing a script).


setup on some hours = not very good setup. People do use weeks, or even months (or years) to optimize their setups. so Yeah. and i bet if you only would've used 5 hours on setup. your would've gotten Your ships whooped, and the same With Your pods. :)


(Proably) (but who knows)


I was targetting the comment I am bolding in the quote in this reply, and I can hardly imagine that with the described method that takes long.

The time needed to work out a good overall window arrangement and gathering the experience it takes to arrange things to wrok more efficiently also is not limited to people who are using ISboxer or other tools like that. The same also counts for people who are multiboxing without the help of 3rd party tools.

So I would not count that as a valid point as justification to use such programms.
Sentenced 1989
#1865 - 2014-11-29 14:37:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Sentenced 1989
Darth Schweinebacke wrote:


I was targetting the comment I am bolding in the quote in this reply, and I can hardly imagine that with the described method that takes long.

The time needed to work out a good overall window arrangement and gathering the experience it takes to arrange things to wrok more efficiently also is not limited to people who are using ISboxer or other tools like that. The same also counts for people who are multiboxing without the help of 3rd party tools.

So I would not count that as a valid point as justification to use such programms.


No, but you don't understand any of this. ISBoxer pilots spends hours and hours and days optimizing his setup, he spends isk and isk and isk or dollars and dollars and dollars on hit alts, and then his risks to lose everything by making one mistake, so it's ok for him to use it!

Sounds like:
Yes, your honorable Judge, I was driving 100 kmph in 60 kmph zone, but that's ok, I've spend hours modifying my car and if I crash there is higher chance I will die instantly, so its OK for me to go 100 while rest obey the 60 rule.

All in all, you will just end up with same broken record responses where ISBoxer or similar software is fine because //insert here whatever//, because rules that rest of us can follow don't apply to them for some reason.
FunGu Arsten
Ascendance
Goonswarm Federation
#1866 - 2014-11-29 14:58:23 UTC  |  Edited by: FunGu Arsten
Darth Schweinebacke wrote:
Nolak Ataru wrote:

stuff


I hardly believe that it takes hours to set it up. And any variation to window positions can easily be prevented.

more stuff


I multibox using broadcast, i love it too, i can do perfectly without. I like this game and have always played within the rules set by ccp.

I wasn't going to write in the thread because ccp statement is pefectly clear for me. But you sir, like to talk about a program, a function, a problem?... that you have little experience with. Most none isboxers seem to have no idea how it works, yet see what it "can" do and so the pitchforks come out - same as people crying about T3s beeing op, incursions beeing to much isk for highsec, there are a million things that will bring out the mob. But until ccp says it isn't allowed, it is allowed - this is the same case as the multibroadcasting function, ccp was informed by isbox users themselves this was not a secret,behind closed door thing...


So isboxer is not an easy setup, it takes more then repositioning windows and if you dont do it properly alot of things go wrong fast and you will need more then 5hrs to work these kinks out. I can honnestly say i have spend more the 100hrs digging into isboxer functions, because of interest.

Knowing what it can do, how to use it and what to avoid or figure out how to fix and reduce the effects of a derpmoment was fun. Finding the weakpoints and how to break multiboxer setups that i could encounter was challenging. All in the spirit of eve, knowing your enemy and fight the fights you can win... and it isn't that hard to win against most multiboxer setups if you know how they work...

But you have spend ZERO? hrs into this program and haven't bothered checking what it can do??? IF you had, you wouldn't be giving stupid statements like: "I hardly believe" because that just translates into "I'm making things up".


To add; you say cheat.. though ccp has said it was fine for years...and never taken actions against it because of it, moreover in some cases ccp said: It is fine to do this, we are not seeing this as an issue
It's also worth adding that most multiboxers have send petitions to make sure they did not break any game rule! During the last year and after previous statements by ccp about multiboxing with isboxer most of us have gotten the answer " you can use the functions until we say otherwise, we allow it, enjoy".
so ISboxer and/or multibroadcasting was not a cheat, not a violation and frankly it still isn't an issue to use until 1jan2015....

Broadcasting is offlimits by 1jan2015, thats how it is and most isboxer users have already adjusted. We all have to adapted to not break the rules, we are players who are dedicated to this game just like anyone else in here. We asked what was allowed and what was not, so your definition of a cheat wasn't shared by ccp. Until last week they said it that some functions would be a bannable offense because of reasons and thats it.
So, isboxer has been used for years and ccp knew this,isbox users themselve brought up the issues and asked ccp directly if they could use it. Most of the isboxer users wouldn't have used the program ( wich isn't free) if ccp said it wasn't allowed. Nobody is going to fork up 3years of subscription for a program when its going to get you banned... we still play this game to enjoy it...

Anyway, CCP changed their opinion and so we all have to adapt and not break game rules starting at 1jan2015 if people still use broadcasting with isboxer then ccp has everyright to ban them... the warning was send well in advance and this is appreciated.

So please stop making up bullshit about what is what and how it works and how to make it work. You just want to demonize other eve players who might have an addiction... or just enjoy the game more when using multiple clients at the same time... while they had the seal of approval by ccp. All functions that are not allowed as of 1jan2015 are going to be removed... simple... until ccp change their mind again ;)


It's easier to just all follow the rules set by ccp, and stop bitching about what you "believe" is allowed and what not. When something isn't clear, just write a petition with your question and ask for a direct answer -> we isboxer users did this multiple time and played the game within the rules at that time.
It makes for a more fun game, less shitforumpost and less misinformation.

I'll see you in space, while multiboxing
* bombing with 20 bombers not using multibroadcasting - F1 decloak F2 bomb *W*button to warp to preselected object -alt tab for next bomber.
* ganking with tornades shooting 1 sec apart cuz prelock from broadcast - F1 - alt tab for next
* mining with 20 skiffs and dragging cans every 20min on each client
* doing WH escalations using only my own alts and pull billions a week when no friends are online and pvp when they are...
* doing multiple carrier/ishtar/whatever ship available for anomolies in null
* etc etc..

O7 Fungu
John Wolfcastle
Mining and Industry Society.
#1867 - 2014-11-29 14:59:58 UTC
Oh new year will be a good year!
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1868 - 2014-11-29 15:07:40 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
This affects everyone, not just multiboxers. It balances the game better in favour of more equal opportunity across the board for all players, removing the advantage afforded by the ability to click once to send the same command to more than one ship.
Is it? Really? Do you honestly believe this is going to do anything for balance? Mining will still be peasant work, incursions will still be farmed and bombers will still be overpowered. The only thing that will changes is that a bunch of players that spends all day crying about how multiboxers are the reason they suck will now need to find a new excuse.

This fantasy that there will suddenly be ice belts a plenty for all of these solo players is wishful thinking from the uninformed.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1869 - 2014-11-29 15:11:30 UTC
FunGu Arsten wrote:
I'll see you in space, while multiboxing
* bombing with 20 bombers not using multibroadcasting - F1 decloak F2 bomb *W*button to warp to preselected object -alt tab for next bomber.
* ganking with tornades shooting 1 sec apart cuz prelock from broadcast - F1 - alt tab for next
* mining with 20 skiffs and dragging cans every 20min on each client
* doing WH escalations using only my own alts and pull billions a week when no friends are online and pvp when they are...
* doing multiple carrier/ishtar/whatever ship available for anomolies in null
* etc etc..

O7 Fungu
Just FYI, if you set up a windowing program with global hotkeys, you can set it up so you can use things like your numpad to auto switch to specific clients to save on alt tabbing time. That will still be within the rules.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

FunGu Arsten
Ascendance
Goonswarm Federation
#1870 - 2014-11-29 15:30:34 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
FunGu Arsten wrote:
I'll see you in space, while multiboxing
* bombing with 20 bombers not using multibroadcasting - F1 decloak F2 bomb *W*button to warp to preselected object -alt tab for next bomber.
* ganking with tornades shooting 1 sec apart cuz prelock from broadcast - F1 - alt tab for next
* mining with 20 skiffs and dragging cans every 20min on each client
* doing WH escalations using only my own alts and pull billions a week when no friends are online and pvp when they are...
* doing multiple carrier/ishtar/whatever ship available for anomolies in null
* etc etc..

O7 Fungu
Just FYI, if you set up a windowing program with global hotkeys, you can set it up so you can use things like your numpad to auto switch to specific clients to save on alt tabbing time. That will still be within the rules.


We are aware that these things are still going to happen, But these things are the reason why people "hate" isboxer and so.. we dont use the functions to show we dont need it to do the things people hate...

CCP allows things because this is ALT ONLINE - power of 2 ftw... why bother setting up the global hotkeys when the next pitchfork mob is going to demonize eve players just because they "believe" it is a cheating thing....

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#1871 - 2014-11-29 15:33:09 UTC
Removed some troll posts.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

Verde Minator
Crack And Cookies For Santa
#1872 - 2014-11-29 15:46:13 UTC
i wasn't trolling.

i wrote a nice poem, that took me like 5 or 10 minutes to write, and responded to people that had definitely instigated more annoyance in the eve universe than there could have possibly been since botting started in this game. albeit some might perceive what i wrote as trolling, it very much so was not.

i see the people constantly trying to tell us that this program or group of programs that allows them to pilot one ship and have it act like 15 to 80 ships is very much so within the realm of something feasable as more trolling than anything, it really is. they are trolling the crap out of us right now, and hence the 94 pages of it. the stuff is all over reddit, facebook, twitter, it's everywhere, they are upset. they can't pilot 15 ships and do it without the use of another program, and are now upset because the ruling has finally been passed down that is stopping what was merely a loophole that has now been closed.

again, a loophole that has been closed. this happens in law throughout many countries all over the world. the way the world perceives the law and how the law is handled are two different things. sometimes loopholes exist and until the laws are written properly, the loopholes are taken advantage of.

this would be considered one of those.

i guess ill have to save my poem somewhere else.. :(

and to the guy that asked me why i quoted him, it was because u were saying the same thing i was, i was talking to the other people you quoted in that quote, so don't get upset, it wasn't u i was talking to. u just quoted like 3 or 4 people and they needed to be addressed.

they are the trolls, the ones upset about this whole movement cloning loophole being closed finally. a cheat in other words that i would rather call it a cheat, botting basically, or scripting. a macro. anything that allows your computer to respond to commands or something you dont have to physically do multiple times that the game doesnt have it built in, that's where they are coming from and they had to figure out a way around it without being invasive to everyone's machines. they have figured out a server side way of doing it and a way to word it to close the loophole.

thank god.
Darth Schweinebacke
Wings of Fury.
#1873 - 2014-11-29 15:53:37 UTC
Verde Minator wrote:


and to the guy that asked me why i quoted him, it was because u were saying the same thing i was, i was talking to the other people you quoted in that quote, so don't get upset, it wasn't u i was talking to. u just quoted like 3 or 4 people and they needed to be addressed.

thank god.


I am not upset, the quoting just made it look like you were talking to me which was kinda confusing :).
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1874 - 2014-11-29 16:01:02 UTC
Verde Minator wrote:
i see the people constantly trying to tell us that this program or group of programs that allows them to pilot one ship and have it act like 15 to 80 ships is very much so within the realm of something feasable as more trolling than anything, it really is. they are trolling the crap out of us right now, and hence the 94 pages of it. the stuff is all over reddit, facebook, twitter, it's everywhere, they are upset. they can't pilot 15 ships and do it without the use of another program, and are now upset because the ruling has finally been passed down that is stopping what was merely a loophole that has now been closed.
You realise EVE is a low input game, right? Even without key broadcasting most multiboxers will continue to run exactly as they have done before. Controlling 20 miners manually isn't difficult. The hardest part is making them all run smoothly, which ISBoxer does by controlling their hardware usage when they are inactive, which will still be the main reason people continue to use ISBoxer (and is not a banned feature). I for one can't wait for January 1st to roll round and for you guys to still see massive fleets of 20-30 miners stripping out icebelts and watch you come crawling back here saying "it didn't work CCP!", complaining about whatever the next thing you want banned.

And no, this was not a "loophole". CCP have explicitly stated in the past that input broadcasting is not automation, and that as long as someone clicked once for one click, it didn't matter how many clients that even hit. So this is a rule change, not a closure of a loophole.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Nolak Ataru
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#1875 - 2014-11-29 16:06:21 UTC
Verde Minator wrote:
i see the people constantly trying to tell us that this program or group of programs that allows them to pilot one ship and have it act like 15 to 80 ships is very much so within the realm of something feasable as more trolling than anything, it really is. they are trolling the crap out of us right now, and hence the 94 pages of it. the stuff is all over reddit, facebook, twitter, it's everywhere, they are upset. they can't pilot 15 ships and do it without the use of another program, and are now upset because the ruling has finally been passed down that is stopping what was merely a loophole that has now been closed.

again, a loophole that has been closed. this happens in law throughout many countries all over the world. the way the world perceives the law and how the law is handled are two different things. sometimes loopholes exist and until the laws are written properly, the loopholes are taken advantage of.

and to the guy that asked me why i quoted him, it was because u were saying the same thing i was, i was talking to the other people you quoted in that quote, so don't get upset, it wasn't u i was talking to. u just quoted like 3 or 4 people and they needed to be addressed.

they are the trolls, the ones upset about this whole movement cloning loophole being closed finally. a cheat in other words that i would rather call it a cheat, botting basically, or scripting. a macro. anything that allows your computer to respond to commands or something you dont have to physically do multiple times that the game doesnt have it built in, that's where they are coming from and they had to figure out a way around it without being invasive to everyone's machines. they have figured out a server side way of doing it and a way to word it to close the loophole.


TIL: Attempting to defend multiboxing is trolling. You've clearly not spent any effort in reading this thread. You just grabbed a pitchfork and rushed to the castle because the village idiot claims he saw dark magic going on when it was simply science.

Your continued attempts to compare multiboxing to botting is laughable at best, especially when CCP themselves have defined the two in the past in very clear words. You continue to believe that multiboxing software is "plug and play" when all it would take is two seconds of research on Youtube to see just how hard setting up ISBoxer is.

As for the other guy saying "herpderp reset windows", that does not always work, and has never been foolproof. There are always variations in clients when you use that, and if a player moved around his fleet window or overview on purpose to better set up ISBoxer he must now do that all over again for however many clients he has.
FunGu Arsten
Ascendance
Goonswarm Federation
#1876 - 2014-11-29 16:07:06 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Verde Minator wrote:
i see the people constantly trying to tell us that this program or group of programs that allows them to pilot one ship and have it act like 15 to 80 ships is very much so within the realm of something feasable as more trolling than anything, it really is. they are trolling the crap out of us right now, and hence the 94 pages of it. the stuff is all over reddit, facebook, twitter, it's everywhere, they are upset. they can't pilot 15 ships and do it without the use of another program, and are now upset because the ruling has finally been passed down that is stopping what was merely a loophole that has now been closed.
You realise EVE is a low input game, right? Even without key broadcasting most multiboxers will continue to run exactly as they have done before. Controlling 20 miners manually isn't difficult. The hardest part is making them all run smoothly, which ISBoxer does by controlling their hardware usage when they are inactive, which will still be the main reason people continue to use ISBoxer (and is not a banned feature). I for one can't wait for January 1st to roll round and for you guys to still see massive fleets of 20-30 miners stripping out icebelts and watch you come crawling back here saying "it didn't work CCP!", complaining about whatever the next thing you want banned.

And no, this was not a "loophole". CCP have explicitly stated in the past that input broadcasting is not automation, and that as long as someone clicked once for one click, it didn't matter how many clients that even hit. So this is a rule change, not a closure of a loophole.


You cant stop the pitchforks with logic and facts... but i will enjoy local rants and tears after 1jan2015 same as you ;)
Recyclers
Doomheim
#1877 - 2014-11-29 16:10:13 UTC
Im Done!
Feels good...
No one gets my stuff or tunes.
Thanks CPP.
U guys have fun bantering about my post. Don't care as once this post is done i will biomass this last character and get on with my life.

Characters Biomassed

Feels goooooood. Big smile
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1878 - 2014-11-29 17:09:37 UTC
Recyclers wrote:
Im Done!
Feels good...
No one gets my stuff or tunes.
Thanks CPP.
U guys have fun bantering about my post. Don't care as once this post is done i will biomass this last character and get on with my life.

Characters Biomassed

Feels goooooood. Big smile
More people need to have the balls to do this. Lately it really does seem that CCPs direction is "solve issues that whining carebears complain about" and it's completely understandable why people don't want to stick around to watch that trainwreck, but not enough people actually biomass and say "**** you CCP".

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Eryn Velasquez
#1879 - 2014-11-29 17:27:05 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Recyclers wrote:
Im Done!
Characters Biomassed

Feels goooooood. Big smile
More people need to have the balls to do this. Lately it really does seem that CCPs direction is "solve issues that whining carebears complain about" and it's completely understandable why people don't want to stick around to watch that trainwreck, but not enough people actually biomass and say "**** you CCP".


I totally agree. Would be nice if all those cheaters would.

_“A man's freedom consists in his being able to do whatever he wills, but that he should not, by any human power, be forced to do what is against his will.” ― Jean-Jacques Rousseau _

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1880 - 2014-11-29 17:33:37 UTC
Eryn Velasquez wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Recyclers wrote:
Im Done!
Characters Biomassed

Feels goooooood. Big smile
More people need to have the balls to do this. Lately it really does seem that CCPs direction is "solve issues that whining carebears complain about" and it's completely understandable why people don't want to stick around to watch that trainwreck, but not enough people actually biomass and say "**** you CCP".
I totally agree. Would be nice if all those cheaters would.
Using software confirmed by CCP explicitly as being within the rules is not cheating. No matter how many times you say it won't make it fact.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.