These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Amarr cruisers are gimped.

Author
Ares Desideratus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2014-11-29 04:34:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Ares Desideratus
Amarr cruisers are gimped.

My Crucifier has the same amount of mid-slots as my Arbitrator.

My Executioner has the same amount of mid-slots as my Omen or my Maller.

Amarr is the only race with this deficiency.
Persifonne
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2014-11-29 05:04:45 UTC
Armor tank baddie. Also arbitrtor is a badass cruiser. 1 med neut rest small neuts td scram big buffer and it can destroy anything frig-bs. Its sick. You need meds. Yarrrrbitrator best amarr cruiser and we demand a navy issue yarbi. L2cruise. YOLO!
Persifonne
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2014-11-29 05:05:57 UTC
But yeah wtf you need mids for? Prop, point, web and a utility one. Wtf you need more mids for ever???
Ares Desideratus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2014-11-29 05:19:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Ares Desideratus
The Arbitrator is a badass cruiser yet the Crucifier is actually better than the Arbitrator at their intended role (weapon disruption).

Ok so what does all of your BS post have to do with the fact that Amarr cruisers are gimped ?

We don't need mid slots you say ?

Well explain why the Thorax, Vexor, Rupture and Stabber, all arguably armor tanking ships, have 4 mid slots, while the Omen and Maller are sitting ducks with 3 mid slots.

Another problem that doesn't help, is the laser turret capacitor use bonus. The thorax, for instance, not only has 4 midslots, but a tracking bonus on top of all that, while the Omen is stuck with 3 mid slots and crapacitor... ahem, I mean a capacitor bonus for its lasers. Ugh
Odithia
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2014-11-29 11:05:01 UTC
Biggest problem I see with amarr cruisers is that the Maller and Omen are too much alike.
I don't like the capacitor gun bonus on the omen and would rather have it get a bigger capacitor and this bonus replaced with something cooler.

Or maybe have one turned into a drone boat like the Dragoon or Prophecy, but there is already the Arbitrator that isn't really a combat ship and not really an Ewar ship.

Amarr lineup need to be completely rewamped imo.
Odithia
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2014-11-29 11:09:04 UTC
Odithia wrote:
Biggest problem I see with amarr cruisers is that the Maller and Omen are too much alike.
I don't like the capacitor gun bonus on the omen and would rather have it get a bigger capacitor and this bonus replaced with something cooler.

Or maybe have one turned into a drone boat like the Dragoon or Prophecy, but there is already the Arbitrator that isn't really a combat ship and not really an Ewar ship.

Amarr lineup need to be completely rewamped imo.





Ares Desideratus wrote:

Another problem that doesn't help, is the laser turret capacitor use bonus. The thorax, for instance, not only has 4 midslots, but a tracking bonus on top of all that, while the Omen is stuck with 3 mid slots and crapacitor... ahem, I mean a capacitor bonus for its lasers. Ugh

That's because medium Beams are Straight up better than Railguns and need to be balanced with crazy cap drain and adequate ship bonus so you don't break the game by having double bonussed guns.
Wait...
Kalihira
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#7 - 2014-11-29 12:53:40 UTC
There is nothing wrong with the amarr cruisers. The only think that should be changed is upping the damage modifier on med pulses abit (and maybe tone done scorch M in the process to keep it balanced). The hulls themselves are pretty much fine
Kosetzu
The Black Crow Bandits
Northern Coalition.
#8 - 2014-11-29 13:00:00 UTC
So what you're saying is: Nerf diversity! Make all ships the same! Why doesn't all ships have the same slot layout!

Hate to tell you but that is what is good about the game. Not everything needs to have the same things.
Odithia
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2014-11-29 13:17:42 UTC
Kosetzu wrote:
So what you're saying is: Nerf diversity! Make all ships the same! Why doesn't all ships have the same slot layout!

Hate to tell you but that is what is good about the game. Not everything needs to have the same things.

Omen and Maller have the same slot layout and use the same weapon system.

Can't nerf diversity any more.
Kalihira
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#10 - 2014-11-29 13:36:15 UTC
Odithia wrote:
Kosetzu wrote:
So what you're saying is: Nerf diversity! Make all ships the same! Why doesn't all ships have the same slot layout!

Hate to tell you but that is what is good about the game. Not everything needs to have the same things.

Omen and Maller have the same slot layout and use the same weapon system.

Can't nerf diversity any more.


Yeah that totally makes them the same ship... Why this uninformed ranting? did you ever fly the amarr cruisers to begin with? The minmatar ones are in far worse shape tbh.
Ares Desideratus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#11 - 2014-11-29 13:36:17 UTC
And the Thorax, Vexor, Rupture and Stabber all have 4 mid slots and are all arguably armor tanking ships.

the Caldari versions all have 5 mid slots.

Now I wouldn't mind if Amarr ships actually had ways to work around this deficiency, but it seems to be that all the aforementioned cruisers simply out-class the Amarr versions.
Ares Desideratus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2014-11-29 13:38:17 UTC
Kahlira, his point is right.

There's barely any difference between Omen and Maller; one is slower and tankier; other than that they are literally exactly the same.
Syrias Bizniz
some random local shitlords
#13 - 2014-11-29 13:51:58 UTC
Have you actually, like in going into PvP in a 1v1 Cruiser duel or smilar, have you actually flown Amarr Cruisers?

If yes, why do you think they are in a bad shape?
I could understand that, if the Amarr Cruisers had 2 Mid-Slots, they'd be horrible.
But they have 3, or in the case of the Arbitrator, 4 midslots. Which is what you want. More mids would mean less lows.
Do you want less Lowslots on the Amarr Cruisers? I don't think so.

I can tell you that the Omen is currently one of the top-notch cruisers.
I can tell you that the Arbitrator has been and still is a good cruiser.

I can tell you that the only other Cruisers that can compare to the Omen are the Thorax and the Vexor, and this is not because of their midslots, but because of the sheer DPS they can potentially mount on such a cheap cruiser hull.
I'd actually LOVE the Thorax to have another Lowslot. This would very likely put it in a better Place than the Omen is right now.


Also, with your argument of 'Maller is like Omen, same thing, one's a bit tankier, one's a bit faster'

Well, Thorax and Vexor are the same, too. One's a bit more Hybrid DPS, one's a bit more Drone DPS.
The Rupture and the Stabber are the same, too. One sucks and is fast, the other sucks and is slow.
The only real diversity in T1 Cruiser hulls can be seen at the Caldari, because they're a mixed weapons race.




TL;DR

Omen is cool, touch it and i take a NOmen and shove it up your rear.
Ares Desideratus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2014-11-29 13:53:34 UTC
I mean I am not saying to "nerf diversity" that is a complete over-simplification of what's going on

There is nothing wrong with diversity but I don't think this ship class is working as it should be.

The amount of utility that you gain with a 4th mid slot is invaluable compared to the extra low slot that the Omen and Maller get

Do you really think an extra heat sink or nano on an Omen, or an extra adaptive nano plating on a Maller is really a worth while trade off for the utility that a 4th mid slot would entail ?

There is no utility high slot for a neut or anything, either (which the Minmatar cruisers are entitled to)

By all means give the ships 3 mid slots, but give them the power to work around this deficiency too.
Ares Desideratus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2014-11-29 14:01:51 UTC
I have flown all the Amarr cruisers in pvp.

I think that the Omen or Maller in a 1v1 situation stand next to no chance against a Thorax, Vexor or Rupture if the pilots are similarly skilled.

The first problem is the lack of range control. All the cruisers you will face have 1 more mid slots than you do. Basically, you can kiss your range control goodbye. They will either have more webs than you, or the same webs and a cap booster or whatever else.

On top of that you cannot reliably brawl against other cruisers, for one thing ships like the Stabber Rupture and Vexor all get utility high slots and often fit energy neutralizers. Well you can counter that with a cap booster but then you don't have a single web so again you are a sitting duck. You don't get a tracking bonus or anything with the Omen either, alll you get is capacitor use bonus so you are basically ******.

Scorch is the main thing keeping Amarr ships competitive.

The thing that mainly proves my point is when you look at ship progression. When you go from a frigate hull to a cruiser hull you should expect to gain more slots. With every other race if you go from frigate to cruiser, you gain a mid slot. Incursus to Thorax, 3 mids to 4. Tristan to Vexor, 3 mids to 4, rifter to rupture, 3 mids to 4, the Slasher is somehow a special case with 4 mid slots and then progressing to a Stabber which also has 4 mid slots.

I'm not saying that some Minmatar ships don't need to be tweaked either; I'm sure some of them probably need to be looked at.

But I think Amarr cruisers are gimped.
Grease PaYN
Payn Train
#16 - 2014-11-29 15:36:09 UTC
Amarr ships are generally not optimal for 1v1. That is, if you consider range control and unpredictability key factors for solo, which I do.

Still, you can make them work, I can.

Plug their weakness when you want to do solo and focus on their strengths when you want to gang up
Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#17 - 2014-11-29 15:38:15 UTC
Navy Omen, dead sexy. I say no more.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

To mare
Advanced Technology
#18 - 2014-11-29 18:05:02 UTC
Ares Desideratus wrote:
Kahlira, his point is right.

There's barely any difference between Omen and Maller; one is slower and tankier; other than that they are literally exactly the same.

lol, one is actually the best kiting T1 cruiser in the game while the other one is a short range brawler.
totally the same ship Roll
Ares Desideratus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#19 - 2014-11-29 18:18:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Ares Desideratus
To mare wrote:
Ares Desideratus wrote:
Kahlira, his point is right.

There's barely any difference between Omen and Maller; one is slower and tankier; other than that they are literally exactly the same.

lol, one is actually the best kiting T1 cruiser in the game while the other one is a short range brawler.
totally the same ship Roll

Those are not strictly their roles

Calling a laser ship a short range brawler simply because it has a resist bonus and is slow as **** with no range control ?

By the way, the Maller actually can't reliably brawl with the other cruisers because of **** range control and / or crap damage and projection / reliance on capacitor.

Calling the Omen the best kiting Tech 1 simply because Scorch is literally the only reason worth flying it ?

Hey, look, I can roll my eyes too! Roll
To mare
Advanced Technology
#20 - 2014-11-29 20:41:12 UTC
Ares Desideratus wrote:
To mare wrote:
Ares Desideratus wrote:
Kahlira, his point is right.

There's barely any difference between Omen and Maller; one is slower and tankier; other than that they are literally exactly the same.

lol, one is actually the best kiting T1 cruiser in the game while the other one is a short range brawler.
totally the same ship Roll

Those are not strictly their roles

Calling a laser ship a short range brawler simply because it has a resist bonus and is slow as **** with no range control ?

By the way, the Maller actually can't reliably brawl with the other cruisers because of **** range control and / or crap damage and projection / reliance on capacitor.

Calling the Omen the best kiting Tech 1 simply because Scorch is literally the only reason worth flying it ?

Hey, look, I can roll my eyes too! Roll

still they are not the same ship and they are not supposed to fit the same role they both work very well in their intended role.
they can be fitted almost in the same way and there will be not much difference between the 2, but if you fit them to use their strong points they feel and fly like 2 very different ships a maller would never be able to fly like a properly fit kite omen and an omen will never be able to have the staying power of properly fit maller.
they have totally different bonuses, different stats (HP, speed, agi, etc), different drone bays, calling them the same just because of the same slot layout its just dumb
123Next pageLast page