These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Rhea] The Confessor (T3 Destroyer #1)

First post First post
Author
CCP Fozzie
C C P
C C P Alliance
#61 - 2014-11-27 19:02:31 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Shocked....ok, the confessor isnt showing on combat probes. please let that be a bugWhat?


Yup this is a known issue.

Game Designer | Team Five-0

Twitter: @CCP_Fozzie
Twitch chat: ccp_fozzie

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#62 - 2014-11-27 19:10:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Ralph King-Griffin
CCP Fozzie wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Shocked....ok, the confessor isnt showing on combat probes. please let that be a bugWhat?


Yup this is a known issue.

grandso, i also lost control of one, like runaway train style, my pod "fell" out and it just rode off into the sunset.
Edit: that said i have just had my 4th closed socket this afternoon so i wouldn't be surprised if that's due to something on my end.
Joseph O'Neil
Sanctum Within
#63 - 2014-11-27 19:25:36 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
CCP Fozzie wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Shocked....ok, the confessor isnt showing on combat probes. please let that be a bugWhat?


Yup this is a known issue.

grandso, i also lost control of one, like runaway train style, my pod "fell" out and it just rode off into the sunset.
Edit: that said i have just had my 4th closed socket this afternoon so i wouldn't be surprised if that's due to something on my end.


^^ this would have been funny to see. Too bad you didn't fraps it for everyone else to see it in action :)
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#64 - 2014-11-27 20:57:03 UTC
CCP Fozzie wrote:


We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another.


So, when can we expect Tactical Battlecruisers and Strategic Battleships? Seems to me to be the next logical progressions in the T3 lineups.

Simply saying "in the next 2 years" would be enough to keep me going.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Tarpedo
Incursionista
#65 - 2014-11-27 21:37:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarpedo
Why does Amarrian ship use Minmatar design?
Arthur Aihaken
CODE.d
#66 - 2014-11-28 03:17:33 UTC
Gosti Kahanid wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/QkR8QZb.png
this is the conzept of the Caldari-Destroyer

Do I want to know which end is the front?

I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

prolix travail
Blue Mountain Trails
#67 - 2014-11-28 10:56:56 UTC
Did you find out why the bonuses weren't applying?
Armin Arraeb
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#68 - 2014-11-28 11:09:58 UTC
Hi All

First of all thx to CCP for the very nice looking and interesting Confessor.

I only have one issue to report:
If you put on all Turrets, there are still 4 empty Turret Hardpoints on the Model. Isn't it possible to just display (only graphical, on the Model) one Turret as three (instead of two, as normal), as you did that on the Hawk for example? I know it is not that important, but I like it when Ships look fully equipped and not half empty...
CCP Lebowski
C C P
C C P Alliance
#69 - 2014-11-28 13:50:41 UTC
Hey all, the known issues have been updated with todays build. The most important thing to note is that the bonuses should now all be working, so please feel free to report any problems you find with them.

Thanks!

CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0

@CCP_Lebowski

Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices
Masters of Flying Objects
#70 - 2014-11-28 14:03:33 UTC
Engine trails are not complete in speed mode. Missing the two that are covered in the other modes.

If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide

See you around the universe.

CCP Lebowski
C C P
C C P Alliance
#71 - 2014-11-28 16:17:07 UTC
Salpun wrote:
Engine trails are not complete in speed mode. Missing the two that are covered in the other modes.
Upgrades for the existing booster effect system are being explored and considered by Team TriLambda. For now, however, the Speed Mode boosters are displaying the appropriate effect.

CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0

@CCP_Lebowski

Sara Curtis
Curtis and friends
#72 - 2014-11-28 20:52:43 UTC
Why manufacture of confessor require "Amarr Starship Enginering" at V (The same as Legion). At the end it is only destroyer?
Seandals
Coalition of Fancy Sirs
#73 - 2014-11-28 21:23:38 UTC
Why couldn't we have the T3 Destroyer speed mode also include warp speed?
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#74 - 2014-11-29 00:14:52 UTC
Can you integrate some sort of option into the fitting window to toggle between the ship's modes? This would allow us to look at how the modes affect our ships while we're in station.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Phoenix Jones
Small-Arms Fire
#75 - 2014-11-29 01:21:25 UTC
Seandals wrote:
Why couldn't we have the T3 Destroyer speed mode also include warp speed?


Because they don't want you to be GOD in it.

Yaay!!!!

Alexa Coates
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#76 - 2014-11-29 02:53:25 UTC
confessor confirmed to have a tank of the gods. This thing rivals a heavy tanked cruiser.

That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers.

Nomistrav
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#77 - 2014-11-29 05:17:29 UTC
S'pretty nifty. Shame the Gallente did so poorly, I really want to see what the T3 Destroyer looks like for them.

"As long as space endures,

as long as sentient beings exist,

until then, may I too remain

and dispel the miseries of the world."

~ Vremaja Idama

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#78 - 2014-11-29 19:27:32 UTC
Nomistrav wrote:
S'pretty nifty. Shame the Gallente did so poorly, I really want to see what the T3 Destroyer looks like for them.

I'm really not happy they're not releasing the T3 destroyers at the same time. I think it was a very spiteful decision on CCP's part.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Lady Rift
His Majesty's Privateers
#79 - 2014-11-29 19:50:39 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Nomistrav wrote:
S'pretty nifty. Shame the Gallente did so poorly, I really want to see what the T3 Destroyer looks like for them.

I'm really not happy they're not releasing the T3 destroyers at the same time. I think it was a very spiteful decision on CCP's part.




well then be glad that expansions aren't once ever 6 months.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#80 - 2014-11-29 23:44:01 UTC
Lady Rift wrote:
well then be glad that expansions aren't once ever 6 months.

Unless they plan on releasing all three of the other destroyers in the next update, it means that Minmatar pilots will have to wait six weeks, Caldari pilots twelve and Gallente pilots eighteen weeks after the Rhea release to get their hands on the destroyers which should damn well have been released on the same day.

Like I said, downright spiteful behaviour by CCP.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.