These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Rhea] The Confessor (T3 Destroyer #1)

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Century 2100
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#41 - 2014-11-27 03:20:19 UTC
Just found a new "questionable" feature. Right now on sisi you can change modes with out breaking gate cloak. Betting this is an error tied with the not changing states/bonus problems but passing it on as appropriate.
Cannibal Kane
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#42 - 2014-11-27 06:28:05 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
CCP Lebowski wrote:

  • One bonus is missing from the traits window (95% reduction to Probe Launcher CPU needs)

    • ShockedOh my, that's interesting.


    Oh wow.

    I cannot wait to see this in action. A ship that can probe down prey and take it on.

    I look forward to fleeting up with five or ten of these in highsec mission hubs, all of us probing people down hunting for wartargets, and when someone finds one, scram the mark in the tankier mode while the others fly in in sniper mode.

    THINK ABOUT IT... it has a bonus to sig tanking...sig tanking AND probing....i foresee many many uses for thisBig smile*

    *there are no emotes with a grin big enough for this, lets get those bonuses appliedBig smileBig smileBig smileBig smileBig smileBig smile


    I am starting to think the future re-balance of T3's cruiser will also have this ability modes. If that is the case... oh wow.

    "Kane is the End Boss of Highsec." -Psychotic Monk
    Xindi Kraid
    Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
    Arataka Research Consortium
    #43 - 2014-11-27 07:27:58 UTC
    CCP Fozzie wrote:
    Omnathious Deninard wrote:
    I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also.

    Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers?


    We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another.

    So what you're saying is maybe at some point we might see Strategic Destroyers and Tactical Cruisers?
    Ralph King-Griffin
    New Eden Tech Support
    #44 - 2014-11-27 11:22:51 UTC
    Cannibal Kane wrote:


    I am starting to think the future re-balance of T3's cruiser will also have this ability modes. If that is the case... oh wow.

    Yeah, I'm wondering how they will handle the subsystems though.

    Murderers of Negotiable Motivations

    =]|[=
    Artassaut
    Native Freshfood
    Minmatar Republic
    #45 - 2014-11-27 12:37:31 UTC
    Xindi Kraid wrote:
    So what you're saying is maybe at some point we might see Strategic Destroyers and Tactical Cruisers?

    They should combine them both.

    Subsystems that add tactical modes.
    Nagarythe Tinurandir
    Einheit X-6
    #46 - 2014-11-27 13:48:08 UTC
    Artassaut wrote:
    Xindi Kraid wrote:
    So what you're saying is maybe at some point we might see Strategic Destroyers and Tactical Cruisers?

    They should combine them both.

    Subsystems that add tactical modes.


    please let them refrain from that. I'd rather see every class of T3 (destroyer, cruiser, frig?) have it's own unique mechanic. why more fun.
    CCP Lebowski
    C C P
    C C P Alliance
    #47 - 2014-11-27 13:56:00 UTC
    Thanks for all the comments so far everyone. I've updated the known issues in the OP for today's Singularity build

    CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0

    @CCP_Lebowski

    Salpun
    Global Telstar Federation Offices
    Masters of Flying Objects
    #48 - 2014-11-27 14:01:21 UTC
    ISIS does not show the Confessor yet probably included in the industry not complete line item.

    If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide

    See you around the universe.
    Arthur Aihaken
    CODE.d
    #49 - 2014-11-27 14:04:48 UTC
    The Confessor design doesn't seem very 'Amarr'-like. The prow on the front seems more like something that would be present on a Minmatar or Caldari ship. I hope the other three designs for tactical destroyers lend themselves more towards their respective races.

    I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
    Gosti Kahanid
    Red Sky Morning
    The Amarr Militia.
    #50 - 2014-11-27 14:23:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Gosti Kahanid
    Arthur Aihaken wrote:
    The Confessor design doesn't seem very 'Amarr'-like. The prow on the front seems more like something that would be present on a Minmatar or Caldari ship. I hope the other three designs for tactical destroyers lend themselves more towards their respective races.

    http://i.imgur.com/QkR8QZb.png
    this is the conzept of the Caldari-Destroyer
    Titus Tallang
    EVE University
    Ivy League
    #51 - 2014-11-27 14:45:43 UTC
    Confessors are currently not visible to combat probes. They don't show in any of the presets (including "show all"), and do not have an entry in the "edit probe filter" menu.

    Feature or bug?

    Director of Education - EVE University - http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/
    CCP Lebowski
    C C P
    C C P Alliance
    #52 - 2014-11-27 14:49:27 UTC
    Titus Tallang wrote:
    Confessors are currently not visible to combat probes. They don't show in any of the presets (including "show all"), and do not have an entry in the "edit probe filter" menu.

    Feature or bug?
    Yep this has not yet been implemented, adding to the known issues, thanks!

    CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0

    @CCP_Lebowski

    CCP Lebowski
    C C P
    C C P Alliance
    #53 - 2014-11-27 16:48:11 UTC
    Century 2100 wrote:
    Just found a new "questionable" feature. Right now on sisi you can change modes with out breaking gate cloak. Betting this is an error tied with the not changing states/bonus problems but passing it on as appropriate.
    I checked this out and this is by design actually. Modes aren't a module, so there's no precedent for them being disabled by a cloak.

    Plus, on a personal note, seeing a cloaked ship transform is pretty awesome Bear

    CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0

    @CCP_Lebowski

    Ralph King-Griffin
    New Eden Tech Support
    #54 - 2014-11-27 17:27:42 UTC
    dam, dat probe bonus.
    love these things, im not getting any of the bonuses in sisi but its maaaaaaaaaad fun regardless.

    must login the boosting alt and see what that will do for itTwisted

    Murderers of Negotiable Motivations

    =]|[=
    Lil' Brudder Too
    Pistols for Pandas
    #55 - 2014-11-27 17:44:20 UTC
    How soon will be be able to test whether or not we can actually build these...you know...before it hits TQ and everyone has to wait a day because you (CCP) forgot to actually attempt an invent job on them...?

    New Icon SiSi feedback thread that got wholly ignored!

    An example of that a good ship icon set looks like.
    CCP Fozzie
    C C P
    C C P Alliance
    #56 - 2014-11-27 17:45:53 UTC
    Lil' Brudder Too wrote:
    How soon will be be able to test whether or not we can actually build these...you know...before it hits TQ and everyone has to wait a day because you (CCP) forgot to actually attempt an invent job on them...?


    You'll be able to build them in the next SISI update. Currently the only thing holding you back on SISI is the fact that the Self-Assembling Nanolattice blueprint isn't on the market.

    Game Designer | Team Five-0

    Twitter: @CCP_Fozzie
    Twitch chat: ccp_fozzie
    Lil' Brudder Too
    Pistols for Pandas
    #57 - 2014-11-27 17:56:03 UTC
    CCP Fozzie wrote:
    Lil' Brudder Too wrote:
    How soon will be be able to test whether or not we can actually build these...you know...before it hits TQ and everyone has to wait a day because you (CCP) forgot to actually attempt an invent job on them...?


    You'll be able to build them in the next SISI update. Currently the only thing holding you back on SISI is the fact that the Self-Assembling Nanolattice blueprint isn't on the market.

    Soo, what Relic is flagged for reverse engineering this? because currently the Confessor is not listed as an outcome on any of them...(that are currently listed on the SiSi market)

    New Icon SiSi feedback thread that got wholly ignored!

    An example of that a good ship icon set looks like.
    CCP Fozzie
    C C P
    C C P Alliance
    #58 - 2014-11-27 18:02:38 UTC
    Lil' Brudder Too wrote:
    CCP Fozzie wrote:
    Lil' Brudder Too wrote:
    How soon will be be able to test whether or not we can actually build these...you know...before it hits TQ and everyone has to wait a day because you (CCP) forgot to actually attempt an invent job on them...?


    You'll be able to build them in the next SISI update. Currently the only thing holding you back on SISI is the fact that the Self-Assembling Nanolattice blueprint isn't on the market.

    Soo, what Relic is flagged for reverse engineering this? because currently the Confessor is not listed as an outcome on any of them...(that are currently listed on the SiSi market)


    That would be the Small Intact Hull Section, Small Malfunctioning Hull Section and Small Wrecked Hull Section. They'll be on the market on SISI tomorrow, and they're actually accessible on SISI now through the old fashioned "hack a talocan wreck" method.

    Game Designer | Team Five-0

    Twitter: @CCP_Fozzie
    Twitch chat: ccp_fozzie
    Noxisia Arkana
    Deadspace Knights
    #59 - 2014-11-27 18:21:29 UTC
    CCP Fozzie wrote:
    Omnathious Deninard wrote:
    I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also.

    Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers?


    We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another.


    That is actually the coolest thing I have heard CCP say. T3s with subs or a more tactical T3. Way to not shirk from the subsystem balance/usefulness issues.
    Ralph King-Griffin
    New Eden Tech Support
    #60 - 2014-11-27 18:35:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Ralph King-Griffin
    Shocked....ok, the confessor isnt showing on combat probes. please let that be a bugWhat?

    Murderers of Negotiable Motivations

    =]|[=