These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

[Rhea] The Confessor (T3 Destroyer #1)

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
CCP Lebowski
C C P
C C P Alliance
#1 - 2014-11-26 15:49:56 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Lebowski
Hello again quality conscious capsuleers,

As of today's Singularity update the new Tech 3 Destroyer AKA the Confessor is available for testing!

The full market should now be seeded with the Confessor and the relevant skill book (Amarr Tactical Destroyers)

The feedback thread for this change can be found here.

As always, I will update this thread with a list of known issues.

Known/Reported Issues

  • Contracts display an item representing the ships current mode.
  • The fitting window displays the subsystem symbols.
  • Selecting the same mode twice causes the cooldown to begin

Happy testing!

CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0

@CCP_Lebowski

Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2014-11-26 16:01:20 UTC
I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also.

Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers?

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.
Querns
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#3 - 2014-11-26 16:17:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Querns
Is there a general feedback thread for the Confessor yet?

Nevermind. I will be patient. :)

This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
Yongtau Naskingar
Yongtau Naskingar Corporation
#4 - 2014-11-26 16:24:06 UTC
Price for the skillbook is still 1M (stingy I know). Confessor seems only available in Thera on a small sell order (10k).
Adri Kinsan
Dejobaan Mechatronic Industries
#5 - 2014-11-26 16:30:43 UTC
Can we get the ship preview window to swap modes, like subsystem selection on t3 cruisers?
AnimeHeretic
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2014-11-26 17:03:06 UTC
All the issues that i saw it looks like you covered. I would really like to get the bonuses working so i can test a proper fit.

Also a question, are the bonuses stacking penalized in any way? and if so, how?
CCP Lebowski
C C P
C C P Alliance
#7 - 2014-11-26 17:14:12 UTC
AnimeHeretic wrote:
All the issues that i saw it looks like you covered. I would really like to get the bonuses working so i can test a proper fit.

Also a question, are the bonuses stacking penalized in any way? and if so, how?
Its actually pretty frustrating, they were working in the previous build, we're investigating whats happened and we'll fix it as soon as we can.

As to stacking, the bonuses provided by the modes are not stacking penalized.

CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0

@CCP_Lebowski

CCP Lebowski
C C P
C C P Alliance
#8 - 2014-11-26 17:14:46 UTC
Adri Kinsan wrote:
Can we get the ship preview window to swap modes, like subsystem selection on t3 cruisers?
Thanks for the suggestion. Ill pass it on to the relevant people.

CCP Lebowski | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five-0

@CCP_Lebowski

CCP Fozzie
C C P
C C P Alliance
#9 - 2014-11-26 17:21:43 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also.

Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers?


We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another.

Game Designer | Team Five-0

Twitter: @CCP_Fozzie
Twitch chat: ccp_fozzie
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#10 - 2014-11-26 17:35:48 UTC
allow me to be the first to say..... Yeaaaay!!!!

Murderers of Negotiable Motivations

=]|[=
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#11 - 2014-11-26 17:38:33 UTC
unsure why on sniper mode it needs 100% sensor strength bonus?

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using
TheMercenaryKing
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#12 - 2014-11-26 17:39:45 UTC
CCP Lebowski wrote:
Adri Kinsan wrote:
Can we get the ship preview window to swap modes, like subsystem selection on t3 cruisers?
Thanks for the suggestion. Ill pass it on to the relevant people.


Should be done for all ships like Rorqual, Marauders, dreads, and anything else that changes like that.
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#13 - 2014-11-26 17:45:35 UTC
i like the T1 resist profile hope it carries on as the T3 default .. especially on the current cruisers...
btw 33.33% beside the odd .33 why so high a bonus combined with the sig it might outtank AF's?

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2014-11-26 17:51:05 UTC
CCP Fozzie wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also.

Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers?


We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another.

That is very pleasing to read, I believe the "Strategic" side of cruisers is something that has much potential for expansion once the balance pass has been hammered out.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#15 - 2014-11-26 17:54:57 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
CCP Fozzie wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also.

Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers?


We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another.

That is very pleasing to read, I believe the "Strategic" side of cruisers is something that has much potential for expansion once the balance pass has been hammered out.


strats . will need many changes before it works aswell as tactical ,
- remove rigs , completely kills flexibility and adds hefty price aswell on them ( 60mil ish)
- make subs cheap (few mil) so that its worth having lots of them in cargo too swap around
- remove T2 resists and nerf the HP/resist subs
- make all fittings/stats attached too the hull and make subs bonus only

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using
MidnightWyvern
Fukamichi Corporation
SAYR Galactic
#16 - 2014-11-26 18:15:21 UTC
CCP Lebowski wrote:
Hello again quality conscious capsuleers,

As of today's Singularity update the new Tech 3 Destroyer AKA the Confessor is available for testing!

[Please be aware that this ship is still very incomplete, and various changes and fixes will be hitting Sisi over the course this week]

The full market should now be seeded with the Confessor and the relevant skill book (Amarr Tactical Destroyers)

There will be a forum thread and dev blog with the full stats and details of the Confessor, stay tuned.

As always, I will update this thread with a list of known issues.

Known/Reported Issues
  • Mode bonuses not currently applying correctly.
  • The mode change animation doesn't work correctly in warp.
  • Contracts/View Contents/Ships Scanning/Killmails all display an item representing the ships current mode.
  • Industry for the Confessor is incomplete.
  • The cooldown for mode switching doesn't have its final message.
  • Overview icon is incorrect
  • The fitting window displays the subsystem symbols.
  • The mode buttons do not have icon or final tooltips.
  • One bonus is missing from the traits window (95% reduction to Probe Launcher CPU needs)
  • Traits tab is missing details of cooldown time (10 seconds)

Happy testing!

Just the animations by themselves are worth flying that baby around.

Rattati Senpai noticed us! See you in the next FPS!

Alts: Saray Wyvern, Mobius Wyvern (Dust 514)
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#17 - 2014-11-26 18:16:12 UTC
CCP Fozzie wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also.

Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers?


We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another.


any clue when you are working on T3 cruisers?

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using
Funzinnu BT
FUNZWIKI
#18 - 2014-11-26 18:18:54 UTC
The design is cool
I make a video

http://youtu.be/TAY4Ts-1wXA
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#19 - 2014-11-26 18:27:56 UTC  |  Edited by: War Kitten
Funzinnu BT wrote:
The design is cool
I make a video

http://youtu.be/TAY4Ts-1wXA


Nice, thanks.

So slots are 6/3/5, and speed mode didn't appear to speed things up any. (Already noted in mode bonuses not applying)

CCP Fozzie - we need moar stats! Maek Poast!

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
#20 - 2014-11-26 18:39:27 UTC
War Kitten wrote:
Funzinnu BT wrote:
The design is cool
I make a video

http://youtu.be/TAY4Ts-1wXA


Nice, thanks.

So slots are 6/3/5, and speed mode didn't appear to speed things up any. (Already noted in mode bonuses not applying)

CCP Fozzie - we need moar stats! Maek Poast!


a thread would be nice

T3's need to be versatile so no rigs are necessary ... they should not have OP dps and tank

ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 HS for droneboats

Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using
123Next pageLast page