These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

how would you feel about a tech 3 battleship?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sunomi Hakuli
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2014-11-22 04:24:01 UTC
Yes i know its ridiculous but it would be fun to see the ball rolling on this. Yes i know this will **** off a lot of people. The tech 2 are nice but pushing the limit but it would be a fun idea don't you think. What would you want to see in a tech 3 battle ship in eve. would you set any limitations or go all out?
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#2 - 2014-11-22 04:30:20 UTC

▬▬► Features & Ideas Discussion

┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│▓▓▓▓▓▒░ FuryBot™ ooh.89 ░▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓│
└──────────────────────────────────┘

☼

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#3 - 2014-11-22 04:36:16 UTC
T3 might be an interesting option for the day after they finally balance the T2 and faction ships.

Mr Epeen Cool
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#4 - 2014-11-22 04:47:46 UTC
Let's see if the new concept that Tech 3 Destroyers are introducing is viable.

Currently, Tech 3 Cruisers are a little borked in more than a few ways (too weak, too strong, steps on other ships' toes, and too few viable setups due to the min/maxing nature of players).

How did you Veterans start?
Shandra Manaya
Prision Break Inc.
#5 - 2014-11-22 05:07:17 UTC
i will be happy enought if they just replace the tractor beam bonus from the t2 BS for some more usefull bonus in this mobile tractor unit moment.
Sunomi Hakuli
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2014-11-22 06:00:46 UTC
true we got to see how the tech 3 destory works out. but i think it would be more flexibility then caps running around and organizing that chaos. I think a new ship that can take the fight in the new worm hole space with some fire power.
Warde Guildencrantz
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#7 - 2014-11-22 06:30:48 UTC
too expensive, would rather more unique options for battleship class hulls. Like the MJD. Reasons to use them in certain situations over other fleet comps (Already the case to an extent)

TunDraGon ~ Low sec piracy since 2003 ~ Youtube ~ Join Us
Gaming God
Gaming God Corporation
#8 - 2014-11-22 11:33:35 UTC
Great :)
Kalpel
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#9 - 2014-11-22 11:37:39 UTC
Do eeet ......Twisted

You failed to target nothing! ≡v≡ online ... (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
fudface
ACME-INC
#10 - 2014-11-22 11:52:58 UTC
bring on t3 bs.

you would think that once the t3 cruiser was developed the powers that be would be working on the battleship version, i mean the whole universe is everyone versus everyone. we are a universe at war, some of the greatest advances on how to kill peeps were developed during wars.

my 2 isk worth

my 2 isk worth
stoicfaux
#11 - 2014-11-22 12:43:33 UTC
T3 Bastion Module? I can haz?

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#12 - 2014-11-22 12:49:03 UTC
Wouldn't a T3 BS be rather cost prohibitive? Like something around 4-6 bil a pop. They would only be high-sec incursion ISK printing machines and never seen anywhere there could be a possible ship loss. Personally I don't see them fit into the current game balance without breaking too many things.

Sovereignty and Population

New Mining Mechanics
Commissar Kate
Kesukka
#13 - 2014-11-22 13:19:30 UTC
I'd feel great when I blow one up and get all that awesome loot off of it!

-k8

My Fanclub
RogueStrikeer
Doomheim
#14 - 2014-11-22 13:24:56 UTC
We be more lucky too see more capitals added before we see t3 BS.
UnknownEnemyCombatant
#15 - 2014-11-22 13:48:32 UTC
well these new destroyers are supposed to be t3 . but they arent even close
Deacon Abox
Black Eagle5
#16 - 2014-11-22 14:49:33 UTC
Your idea is not new or unique. Try resurrecting some other dead thread. Then also read the many dev replies as to why this will not and should not happen. Sorry I'm not going to be your search engine.

In short, No.Roll

CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, [u]please[/u] give us a persisting off button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals.

Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Get Off My Lawn
#17 - 2014-11-22 14:50:54 UTC
Sunomi Hakuli wrote:
Yes i know its ridiculous but it would be fun to see the ball rolling on this. Yes i know this will **** off a lot of people. The tech 2 are nice but pushing the limit but it would be a fun idea don't you think. What would you want to see in a tech 3 battle ship in eve. would you set any limitations or go all out?



Do you even play this game?

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Opertone
State War Academy
Caldari State
#18 - 2014-11-22 18:29:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Opertone
Actually, I have an idea

When Tech 3 Battleship losses all hp, it does not detonate... Instead it throws off the broken parts of the spacecraft, and carries on like shooting platform without much armor protection, canons and thrusters only.

When this BC glass cannon only platform is destroyed, only high speed thrusters remain available. So what is left is fast cruiser sized thing with BS class afterburner and a few back up drones. When this thing dies what is left is a shuttle with a cyno generator. So this shuttle calls in 
Jovian
Incursion Super Carrier and assumes control of it.

Isn't it a super idea?

This is why the elite work with DCM inc.

This post sums up why the 'best' work with DCM inc.

WARP DRIVE makes eve boring

really - add warping align time 300% on gun aggression and eve becomes great again
Jarod Garamonde
Jolly Codgers
Get Off My Lawn
#19 - 2014-11-22 20:19:28 UTC
..................................

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Serene Repose
#20 - 2014-11-22 20:47:44 UTC
I have a better idea. Let's get all five million accounts to suggest "just one thing" all at the same time!
(CCP might have to annex England just to obtain the work force!)

Now THERE'S an idea!!

We must accommodate the idiocracy.
123Next page