These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Elite: Dangerous v EVE

First post
Author
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#141 - 2014-11-17 14:47:05 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
So I'm reading all the articles and that MASSIVE threadnaught on the forums about this and I'm wondering: Is ED still gonna kill EVE? Twisted


Not as a game that could be played without a permanent Internet connection. Blink
Commissar Kate
Kesukka
#142 - 2014-11-17 15:58:51 UTC
Meh, that sucks for people with ****** internet but it does not surprise me in this day and age that the devs would want to do something like have a constant internet connection.
Mharius Skjem
Guardians of the Underworld
#143 - 2014-11-17 19:17:34 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
So I'm reading all the articles and that MASSIVE threadnaught on the forums about this and I'm wondering: Is ED still gonna kill EVE? Twisted


Eve Cannot Be Killed.

There will always be an Eve.

Despite recent attempts to change her, Eve's character remains brutal and harsh, I pay every month to get abused. I like it.

A recovering btter vet,  with a fresh toon and a determination to like everything that CCP does to Eve...

Don't take me too seriously though, I like to tease a bit on the forums, but that's only because I love you...

Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#144 - 2014-11-17 19:28:21 UTC
Commissar Kate wrote:
Meh, that sucks for people with ****** internet but it does not surprise me in this day and age that the devs would want to do something like have a constant internet connection.


I'm not surprised that nobody wanted the hassle of doing what amounts to a live database merge every time some offline player decides to go online again.

The only sort of offline gameplay they could make work without killing themselves is to have the offline game be some kind of virtual/holodeck thing, so that you get the gameplay but with zero impact on the persistent world. Even then, as another poster in that threadnought noted, you're still asking for a baked-in client/server architecture, or else a whole new application. Both have severe disadvantages.

Frontier are dumb for promising it in the first place, but everyone makes mistakes. IMO their best bet is to pull a Bethesda and release the MMO as a separate game from the standalone offline games. So ship Elite: Dangerous, set up support and new content development teams, and then start on the offline-only Elite 4, or whatever they want to call it.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#145 - 2014-11-18 05:34:53 UTC
Elite is making a CCP-esque mistake by using short quips to explain a major technical decision like offline mode.

What they should have done was explain things in very technical terms, including cost figures and development times, so that smart people within the player base could be the informed voices of reason.

article here.
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#146 - 2014-11-18 07:40:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Indahmawar Fazmarai
Rain6637 wrote:
Elite is making a CCP-esque mistake by using short quips to explain a major technical decision like offline mode.

What they should have done was explain things in very technical terms, including cost figures and development times, so that smart people within the player base could be the informed voices of reason.

article here.


Backlash is quite impressive, with over 7,000 comments at the 465+ pages (and growing) thread. Dunno if someone is ever keeping track of that monster full of disappointment, but the tone is quite civil at this point and apparently the discussion revolves around refunds to people who will not be able to play the game.

And IMO they have a moral case, obviously some people without a reliable Internet connection would not have backuped a online-only game, yet that was not what Frontier told them...
Commissar Kate
Kesukka
#147 - 2014-11-18 20:07:45 UTC
This has found its way onto the BBC now.


I just really hope this incident does not end up harming the game too much.
Kaaeliaa
Tyrannos Sunset
#148 - 2014-11-18 20:27:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaaeliaa
Commissar Kate wrote:
This has found its way onto the BBC now.


I just really hope this incident does not end up harming the game too much.


I doubt it.

Complainers tanked Ubisuck's stock by almost 10% and yet I'm sure AC Unity still sold like hotcakes. Now the gaming subreddits are filled with garbage like, "herp derp how do I get AC Unity to run better?" Instead of, you know, not buying an obvious turd shat out by the one of the most anti-consumer publishers in gaming.

I doubt it will affect E:D's sales much. ;D

"Do not lift the veil. Do not show the door. Do not split the dream."

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#149 - 2014-11-18 20:50:19 UTC
Commissar Kate wrote:
This has found its way onto the BBC now.


I just really hope this incident does not end up harming the game too much.


Well, in terms of trust, Frontier shares have gone down the sink. And that game exists because of 9 million pounds of trust.
Commissar Kate
Kesukka
#150 - 2014-11-18 20:58:33 UTC
Well if something does happen to Elite I'll be really sad.

Star Citizen is utter crap right now IMO.

CCP please dont **** up. You look like gold compared to the other two big space games right now.
Mharius Skjem
Guardians of the Underworld
#151 - 2014-11-18 21:48:36 UTC
Commissar Kate wrote:
Well if something does happen to Elite I'll be really sad.

Star Citizen is utter crap right now IMO.

CCP please dont **** up. You look like gold compared to the other two big space games right now.


I personally think that ccp is in the process of ******* up right now, by making eve too noob friendly and easy mode. There's a big market out there full of players that want to be challenged with an mmo that punishes failure harshly.

A recovering btter vet,  with a fresh toon and a determination to like everything that CCP does to Eve...

Don't take me too seriously though, I like to tease a bit on the forums, but that's only because I love you...

Commissar Kate
Kesukka
#152 - 2014-11-18 22:41:32 UTC
Mharius Skjem wrote:
Commissar Kate wrote:
Well if something does happen to Elite I'll be really sad.

Star Citizen is utter crap right now IMO.

CCP please dont **** up. You look like gold compared to the other two big space games right now.


I personally think that ccp is in the process of ******* up right now, by making eve too noob friendly and easy mode. There's a big market out there full of players that want to be challenged with an mmo that punishes failure harshly.


Well those players are certainly not flocking to Eve right now.
Kaaeliaa
Tyrannos Sunset
#153 - 2014-11-18 23:22:23 UTC
Mharius Skjem wrote:
Commissar Kate wrote:
Well if something does happen to Elite I'll be really sad.

Star Citizen is utter crap right now IMO.

CCP please dont **** up. You look like gold compared to the other two big space games right now.


I personally think that ccp is in the process of ******* up right now, by making eve too noob friendly and easy mode. There's a big market out there full of players that want to be challenged with an mmo that punishes failure harshly.


HAHA

Oh wait, you're serious. Let me laugh even harder.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Moron. GTFO, we won't miss you.

"Do not lift the veil. Do not show the door. Do not split the dream."

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#154 - 2014-11-18 23:23:45 UTC
Mharius Skjem wrote:
Commissar Kate wrote:
Well if something does happen to Elite I'll be really sad.

Star Citizen is utter crap right now IMO.

CCP please dont **** up. You look like gold compared to the other two big space games right now.


I personally think that ccp is in the process of ******* up right now, by making eve too noob friendly and easy mode. There's a big market out there full of players that want to be challenged with an mmo that punishes failure harshly.


And where were all those guys in the last 11 years? Roll

Get a clue, free of charge: EVE has hit a population cap. Now CCP is selling the game back to former and current subscribers... and that is a very short lived strategy.

Once you sold EVE to everyone interested on it (and CCP managed to consume in excess of 9 million unique users in the process, not a small feat), the only options are:

- sell another game (we know how that worked... twice!)
- call it a day and grow petunias in glasshouses
- sell EVE to (gasp!) people who never bought it in the past
Mharius Skjem
Guardians of the Underworld
#155 - 2014-11-18 23:40:34 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Mharius Skjem wrote:
Commissar Kate wrote:
Well if something does happen to Elite I'll be really sad.

Star Citizen is utter crap right now IMO.

CCP please dont **** up. You look like gold compared to the other two big space games right now.


I personally think that ccp is in the process of ******* up right now, by making eve too noob friendly and easy mode. There's a big market out there full of players that want to be challenged with an mmo that punishes failure harshly.


And where were all those guys in the last 11 years? Roll

Get a clue, free of charge: EVE has hit a population cap. Now CCP is selling the game back to former and current subscribers... and that is a very short lived strategy.

Once you sold EVE to everyone interested on it (and CCP managed to consume in excess of 9 million unique users in the process, not a small feat), the only options are:

- sell another game (we know how that worked... twice!)
- call it a day and grow petunias in glasshouses
- sell EVE to (gasp!) people who never bought it in the past


In order to gain mass market appeal ccp are taking away everything that made eve great in the first place. When in actual fact they should be capitalising on the hard core aspects of eve, subscription failure is simply a failure of marketing.

Subscriptions won't go up or be maintainable if eve becomes just another space game. They need to keep their USP.

A recovering btter vet,  with a fresh toon and a determination to like everything that CCP does to Eve...

Don't take me too seriously though, I like to tease a bit on the forums, but that's only because I love you...

Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#156 - 2014-11-19 02:15:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Dersen Lowery
Mharius Skjem wrote:
In order to gain mass market appeal ccp are taking away everything that made eve great in the first place. When in actual fact they should be capitalising on the hard core aspects of eve, subscription failure is simply a failure of marketing.

Subscriptions won't go up or be maintainable if eve becomes just another space game. They need to keep their USP.


HTFU can never fail, it can only be failed.

EVE doesn't suffer from a marketing problem. Lots of people try EVE. They don't stay. I personally know two people who wanted to try EVE for exactly what it is--Machiavellian, cutthroat, dystopIan--and they still didn't stay all the way through their trial periods.

EVE's problem is retaining people once they're here. I don't know where the idea comes from that retaining new players necessarily involves mollycoddling them, but it's stupid and it needs to go away. The simple fact is that, as it stands, EVE fails to get new players into the game. That's neither a marketing problem nor a problem with the game, necessarily (though: sov nullsec). It's a problem with the new player experience, and CCP needs to fix it.

Back on topic, I hope ElIte:Dangerous recovers from this gaffe as well, because it looks like a very well-executed game, and different enough from EVE to be its own thing with its own appeal.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#157 - 2014-11-19 07:52:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Indahmawar Fazmarai
8550+ messages, 570+ pages and the discussion still rages on.

David Braben answered to Eurogamer and he essentially said that offline mode is dead as they don't even plan to do it in the future becasue online mode is super cooler, and anyway refunds are subject to per-case and Terms and Conditions:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-11-18-david-braben-responds-to-outcry-over-elite-dangerous-ditched-offline-mode

It kinda sounds as a very British way to say "please, do enjoy yourself by introducing spiky objects into your lower digestive system". What?
Vudra Keerah
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#158 - 2014-11-19 16:56:39 UTC
There are a lot of features that are coming to ED that Eve does not have, a current system is manual flight into a station. I wonder if we might see this in Eve due to the WASD keys that are currently being tested?
DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#159 - 2014-11-19 17:49:22 UTC
Vudra Keerah wrote:
There are a lot of features that are coming to ED that Eve does not have, a current system is manual flight into a station. I wonder if we might see this in Eve due to the WASD keys that are currently being tested?


not without a complete rewrite of all mechanics you won't.

WASD is prolly a test for valk and eve integration.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#160 - 2014-11-19 17:58:43 UTC
I'll add, if E:D is having this much issue with canceling a feature for now, imagine the backlash that other game will get when they need to scrap huge sections of it.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.