These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why I don't go to lowsec.

First post
Author
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#341 - 2014-11-13 13:23:49 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
So I'm about to go balls deep into a capital tower op in lowsec in my Ishkur leading a small frigate wing in what is possible going to be one hell of a **** fight. Way more fun than PVE since nothing our enemy is going to do is predictable. Beats the hell out of incursion running, especially in high sec. Killed a Chimera in the Ishkur earlier today too, you don't get to do that in high sec. It's been a fun thread (cough) but I'm afraid I have to bid you all adieu.


Seriously. I have gotten into the Ishkur myself thanks to joining Devils, and that ship is so very, very good. Best Assault Frigate by miles.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#342 - 2014-11-13 13:39:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
So I'm about to go balls deep into a capital tower op in lowsec in my Ishkur leading a small frigate wing in what is possible going to be one hell of a **** fight. Way more fun than PVE since nothing our enemy is going to do is predictable. Beats the hell out of incursion running, especially in high sec. Killed a Chimera in the Ishkur earlier today too, you don't get to do that in high sec. It's been a fun thread (cough) but I'm afraid I have to bid you all adieu.


Seriously. I have gotten into the Ishkur myself thanks to joining Devils, and that ship is so very, very good. Best Assault Frigate by miles.


I disagree with best. Most versatile, yes, but what's actually best would depend on what you're doing with it.

I personally think the Ishkur is a very underrated ship in bigger circles though, but I have all max skills for all racial assault frigates and I have found, flying literally all of them, that each one has its unique strengths and weaknesses. I'm in a Hawk at the moment with a 360dps tank thanks to dual MASB and it can hit a little under 3km/s, excellent for killing frigs but to get that tank and speed you lose some potential dps, and i'm only getting 165 with Scourge Furies so against cruisers and stuff, sure it'll work as heavy fast tackle that can probably tank your target, but you may need more dps on the field if you hope to kill it.

The Jag is also one of my favourites. I tended to find that against other assault frigates, the Ishkur came up a bit short, and the Jag really fills that hole nicely. Again, dual ASB but use dual smalls and you can fit 150mms and neut with a damage control and fill your lows with gyros, MWD fit with scram and you can put some real hurt on other assault frigs. I used one in a cap battle some time ago against BL when I was flying with SYJ, and lead a small wing of four frigates total, mixed bag. Our role was killing drones, and I couldn't say how many I killed but it was a lot. After there were no more drones to kill, myself and another in my wing hero tackled a moros trying to make it back to a pos shield, and he got stomped, followed by a napoc and ishtar that we also hero tackled. The rest made it to shield.

At one point during the battle, I noticed I was taking damage from something but not more than running one ASB could handle. What was weird to me at the time was, I couldn't see ANYTHING red boxing me. It wasn't till after the battle that I remembered flying close to a Maelstrom, and BNI who had been at the battle in a large gang of interceptors had landed at zero on it, and all died almost instantly to his smartbombs. That's when I learned how capable a shield tanked Jag really is - it survived a smartbombing maelstrom, which i was orbiting close to stay under guns (cuz i expected it to have guns). Pretty wicked little ship.

All the others have uses as well, but there are plenty of times when I'll use something more appropriate in certain circumstances. A fleet fight we had against an NC. blops fleet the other day... I'm not skilled for Ishtars, but they called for an Ishtar fleet. Not many of us were skilled for ishtars, actually, so we had to wing it. Knowing their bait carrier was a trap, I opted for not taking an assault frigate this time around, and chose a Bellicose with dual paints to give Ishtar sentries a boost.

End of the day, it all comes down to what's right for the job. But as long as I can find a purpose for an assault frigate, that's probably what i'll be in.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#343 - 2014-11-13 13:48:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Ralph King-Griffin
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

Seriously. I have gotten into the Ishkur myself thanks to joining Devils, and that ship is so very, very good. Best Assault Frigate by miles.


I disagree with best. Most versatile, yes, but what's actually best would depend on what you're doing with it.


relevant
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#344 - 2014-11-13 13:56:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

Seriously. I have gotten into the Ishkur myself thanks to joining Devils, and that ship is so very, very good. Best Assault Frigate by miles.


I disagree with best. Most versatile, yes, but what's actually best would depend on what you're doing with it.


relevant


ENYO!!! I named my cockatiel Enyo cuz I'm a nerd...

I edited my post above btw with some further thoughts. I know it's an essay but it was on my mind so I just wrote it.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#345 - 2014-11-13 14:23:10 UTC
I once had a cockatiel, we taught it to whistle the Mario Brothers and Tetris theme songs.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#346 - 2014-11-13 15:24:13 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
I once had a cockatiel, we taught it to whistle the Mario Brothers and Tetris theme songs.


Mine's a girl, girl cockatiel's will imitate but they are much less likely to. Enyo tweets and squawks from time to time, especially when she's demanding attention. But she'll sit on my shoulder and preen my beard while I play EVE. If she gets bored of that, she'll jump down and start exploring my desk. So I hide sunflower seeds around on it, under bits of paper and CDs and stuff, and she moves the stuff to get to it.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#347 - 2014-11-13 15:36:03 UTC
Tristans are pretty good and they look so innocent. Got an Orca because they thought me scrub Pirate
Komodo Askold
Strategic Exploration and Development Corp
Silent Company
#348 - 2014-11-13 16:44:42 UTC
To the OP:

Don't get depressed for being killed a few times! Learn from your mistakes and from advices, practice, don't fly what you can't afford to lose, and eventually you'll laugh at those gatecamps and you'll get those A-Types :)

And if you really like being out there, consider migrating to "permanently" live in Lowsec and bring some friends (or make them there).

Go for it, don't be depressed ;)
BoBoZoBo
MGroup9
#349 - 2014-11-13 21:17:52 UTC
Doc Fury wrote:
tl;dr.

Not prepared to go to lowsec
Goes to lowsec anyway.
grr lowsec content.




Win - End of thread.

Primary Test Subject • SmackTalker Elite

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#350 - 2014-11-13 21:22:05 UTC
And yes, if you haven't guessed. Remiel... challenge accepted. Poasts I may have made prior to reading this thread notwithstanding. I shall refrain. I shall engage my SEP field at 150% effectiveness. I've actually echoed your sentiments in regards to this matter before, but by the grace of the Flying Spaghetti Monster... I just haven't been able to stop chasing that damned red dot. I could blame the booze, but that would be a weak excuse when we both know it's the enormous amount of WRONG that draws the attention and demands the response. Yes, I know it may very well go away if simply ignored, but restraining that urge to verbally stomp it into the ground like Homer Simpson in the episode with the Screamapillar is a herculean effort at times.
I shall embrace the spirit of restraint and do what I can. I'll call it a win if I can make it 24 hours. I'll consider myself nearly as awesome as he does if I can make it a week. If I make it the distance I shall consider myself the incarnation of the god of restraint in mortal flesh.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

J'mee Leggs
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#351 - 2014-11-14 00:51:02 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:

This means pvp players in low/null, and pve players in high.


Greetings Mr. Belvar.

I hope this missive finds you in good health and fortune. We here at RvB value input from all of our potential consumers and were thoroughly intrigued by your suggestion to remove pvp from hi sec altogether. I'm embarassed to admit that this idea, as simple and elegant as it is, simply never occured to us.

Now many corps, when finding themselves in a situation such as this, would simply release a pre-written statement carefully formed to remain neutral in the face of what is sure to be a controversial issue when you decide to go forward with implementing it. RvB holds itself to a higher standard than most corps however. We firmly believe that the personal touch is what makes us the unique and successful organization we are. Indeed, we encourage all members of RvB, whether in the employ of the Glorious Red Federation or working for the perfectly adequate Blue Republic, to get out there and personally touch as many denizens of New Eden as possible on a daily basis. Why, with all the touching its a bit of a miracle we ever manage to get any work done at all.

However, when we receive a potentially game changing suggestion, especially from someone as important as yourself, we make the time. We began by opening up a forum so all members could voice any opinions or concerns. We then formed a committee to take all of that raw data and collate it into a manageable set of bullet points that covered all of the foreseeable pros and cons of this suggestion as it relates to us. These bullet points were then discussed in a series of round table debates. After we felt we had gathered enough information to accurately represent our members' desires in this matter our upper management retired to the boardroom to decide what our official response would be. They returned not only with a counter proposal, but also an official finding to be recorded in alliance logs so that all future members could be appropriately enlightened. An interesting side note here is that both the counter proposal and the official finding were unanimously supported by RvB in its entirety, a very rare thing for any corporation, as I'm sure you can imagine.

In light of all this it is with no small amount of pride that I, J'mee Leggs, on this day, in accordance with the responsibilities of my assigned role and on behalf of RvB as a whole, would like to kindly invite you to go stick your head in a trout. Furthermore, we have determined that you are the stupidest piece of excrement to ever extrude from the internet and deposit itself on these forums.

Thank you for your support and as always, if you have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact us.

Warmest regards,
J'mee Leggs
RvB Department of Public Relations (intern)
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#352 - 2014-11-14 01:06:58 UTC
J'mee Leggs wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:

This means pvp players in low/null, and pve players in high.


Greetings Mr. Belvar.

I hope this missive finds you in good health and fortune. We here at RvB value input from all of our potential consumers and were thoroughly intrigued by your suggestion to remove pvp from hi sec altogether. I'm embarassed to admit that this idea, as simple and elegant as it is, simply never occured to us.

Now many corps, when finding themselves in a situation such as this, would simply release a pre-written statement carefully formed to remain neutral in the face of what is sure to be a controversial issue when you decide to go forward with implementing it. RvB holds itself to a higher standard than most corps however. We firmly believe that the personal touch is what makes us the unique and successful organization we are. Indeed, we encourage all members of RvB, whether in the employ of the Glorious Red Federation or working for the perfectly adequate Blue Republic, to get out there and personally touch as many denizens of New Eden as possible on a daily basis. Why, with all the touching its a bit of a miracle we ever manage to get any work done at all.

However, when we receive a potentially game changing suggestion, especially from someone as important as yourself, we make the time. We began by opening up a forum so all members could voice any opinions or concerns. We then formed a committee to take all of that raw data and collate it into a manageable set of bullet points that covered all of the foreseeable pros and cons of this suggestion as it relates to us. These bullet points were then discussed in a series of round table debates. After we felt we had gathered enough information to accurately represent our members' desires in this matter our upper management retired to the boardroom to decide what our official response would be. They returned not only with a counter proposal, but also an official finding to be recorded in alliance logs so that all future members could be appropriately enlightened. An interesting side note here is that both the counter proposal and the official finding were unanimously supported by RvB in its entirety, a very rare thing for any corporation, as I'm sure you can imagine.

In light of all this it is with no small amount of pride that I, J'mee Leggs, on this day, in accordance with the responsibilities of my assigned role and on behalf of RvB as a whole, would like to kindly invite you to go stick your head in a trout. Furthermore, we have determined that you are the stupidest piece of excrement to ever extrude from the internet and deposit itself on these forums.

Thank you for your support and as always, if you have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact us.

Warmest regards,
J'mee Leggs
RvB Department of Public Relations (intern)



RollShocked

RvB doesn't like me????? Oh no....what's next? Will the grand Eve Uni not be my friend either????

Honestly I could care less what you guys think about me....I happen to believe that given the current awoxxing/wardeccs/theft mechanics highsec corps are essentially useless....but obviously you are entitled to disagree. I don't really have issues with your (consensual) PvP in highsec....and I'm more than happy for you to continue it unimpeded (though the awoxxing changes may crimp your play).

I would probably take your analysis more seriously if I felt that the average RvB player was capable of reading through this thread and understanding the issues...but of course I do not....so please do carry on.

Yours,

Veers

The True Savior of Highsec
J'mee Leggs
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#353 - 2014-11-14 01:24:07 UTC  |  Edited by: J'mee Leggs
Veers Belvar wrote:

I would probably take your analysis more seriously if I felt that the average RvB player was capable of reading through this thread and understanding the issues...but of course I do not....so please do carry on.


Let's see: We were smart enough to look at the blue donut and say no thanks but instead of sperging on the forums FIX IT CCP! we took existing game mechanics and created our own little corner of the sandbox to play in. Five years later and our numbers have only steadily increased - real evidence of player support as opposed to some nebulous "silent majority". Arguably the most active hi sec alliance in the game. And I can promise you we've helped more new players along than you and your silly little quixotic crusade for the lowest form of bottom feeder could ever dream of doing.

Guess we'll just add RvB to the rapidly expanding list of things you are completely clueless about.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#354 - 2014-11-14 01:28:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Veers Belvar
J'mee Leggs wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:

I would probably take your analysis more seriously if I felt that the average RvB player was capable of reading through this thread and understanding the issues...but of course I do not....so please do carry on.


Let's see: We were smart enough to look at the blue donut and say no thanks but instead of sperging on the forums FIX IT CCP! we took existing game mechanics and created our own little corner of the sandbox to play in. Five years later and our numbers have only steadily increased - real evidence of player support as opposed to some nebulous "silent majority". Arguably the most active hi sec corp in the game. And I can promise you we've helped more new players along than you and your silly little quixotic crusade for the lowest form of bottom feeder could ever dream of doing.

Guess we'll just add RvB to the rapidly expanding list of things you are completely clueless about.


You would be better off in the blue donut than in lame T1 frig battles around Jita. Brave Newbies (another group I have little regard for) at least realized how pointless corporations in highsec are and moved to nullsec....now they weren't competent enough to take down Provibloc...but at least they get an A for effort.

The great RvB spends their time engaging in T1 frigs around Jita....WOW....CAN I HOPE TO BE LIKE YOU SOMEDAY?????? Big smileShockedWhat?CoolLolPRollBlinkIdeaUgh

And your last sentence isn't even coherent.... "and I can promise you we've helped more new players along than you and your silly little quixotic crusade for the lowest form of bottom feeder could ever dream of doing."

Huh? That's the problem with arguing with RvB...they can't even understand the issues sufficiently to make a point, much less express themselves in coherent English. It's like trying to debate a musty shoebox....all you get is a cough and a headache....

So move along...and go kill a T1 frig in Jita for me.

Veers
ggodhsup
relocation LLC.
#355 - 2014-11-14 01:40:15 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
J'mee Leggs wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:

This means pvp players in low/null, and pve players in high.


Greetings Mr. Belvar.

I hope this missive finds you in good health and fortune. We here at RvB value input from all of our potential consumers and were thoroughly intrigued by your suggestion to remove pvp from hi sec altogether. I'm embarassed to admit that this idea, as simple and elegant as it is, simply never occured to us.

Now many corps, when finding themselves in a situation such as this, would simply release a pre-written statement carefully formed to remain neutral in the face of what is sure to be a controversial issue when you decide to go forward with implementing it. RvB holds itself to a higher standard than most corps however. We firmly believe that the personal touch is what makes us the unique and successful organization we are. Indeed, we encourage all members of RvB, whether in the employ of the Glorious Red Federation or working for the perfectly adequate Blue Republic, to get out there and personally touch as many denizens of New Eden as possible on a daily basis. Why, with all the touching its a bit of a miracle we ever manage to get any work done at all.

However, when we receive a potentially game changing suggestion, especially from someone as important as yourself, we make the time. We began by opening up a forum so all members could voice any opinions or concerns. We then formed a committee to take all of that raw data and collate it into a manageable set of bullet points that covered all of the foreseeable pros and cons of this suggestion as it relates to us. These bullet points were then discussed in a series of round table debates. After we felt we had gathered enough information to accurately represent our members' desires in this matter our upper management retired to the boardroom to decide what our official response would be. They returned not only with a counter proposal, but also an official finding to be recorded in alliance logs so that all future members could be appropriately enlightened. An interesting side note here is that both the counter proposal and the official finding were unanimously supported by RvB in its entirety, a very rare thing for any corporation, as I'm sure you can imagine.

In light of all this it is with no small amount of pride that I, J'mee Leggs, on this day, in accordance with the responsibilities of my assigned role and on behalf of RvB as a whole, would like to kindly invite you to go stick your head in a trout. Furthermore, we have determined that you are the stupidest piece of excrement to ever extrude from the internet and deposit itself on these forums.

Thank you for your support and as always, if you have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact us.

Warmest regards,
J'mee Leggs
RvB Department of Public Relations (intern)



RollShocked

RvB doesn't like me????? Oh no....what's next? Will the grand Eve Uni not be my friend either????

Honestly I could care less what you guys think about me....I happen to believe that given the current awoxxing/wardeccs/theft mechanics highsec corps are essentially useless....but obviously you are entitled to disagree. I don't really have issues with your (consensual) PvP in highsec....and I'm more than happy for you to continue it unimpeded (though the awoxxing changes may crimp your play).

I would probably take your analysis more seriously if I felt that the average RvB player was capable of reading through this thread and understanding the issues...but of course I do not....so please do carry on.

Yours,

Veers

The True Savior of Highsec


i saw veers and needed to say something.....veers alot of people dont like you....your like a troll....with good intentions.....which is like that christian guy that corners you at work....

just. plain. annoying.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#356 - 2014-11-14 01:46:09 UTC
ggodhsup wrote:


i saw veers and needed to say something.....veers alot of people dont like you....your like a troll....with good intentions.....which is like that christian guy that corners you at work....

just. plain. annoying.


Do you know what the mature thing is to do when you find someone you don't like on the forums? Just ignore them.

If you pay attention, it's always the other folks who start with the name calling/personal/attacks/flame wars.

Obviously that's not going to deter me from advocating for a safer and more humane highsec...but I would definitely be in favor of a major forum crackdown on people who start with the name calling/personal attacking garbage. Don't get your hopes up though.....

And the people who don't "like" me here are the 1% who get their thrills from making PvE highsec players rage and cry. Which is fine, if these people liked me, then I would be concerned.
Good Posting Reloaded
My Real Mind
#357 - 2014-11-14 01:48:18 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:


And the people who don't "like" me here are the 1% who get their thrills from making PvE highsec players rage and cry. Which is fine, if these people liked me, then I would be concerned.


Well said.
ggodhsup
relocation LLC.
#358 - 2014-11-14 01:53:18 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
ggodhsup wrote:


i saw veers and needed to say something.....veers alot of people dont like you....your like a troll....with good intentions.....which is like that christian guy that corners you at work....

just. plain. annoying.


Do you know what the mature thing is to do when you find someone you don't like on the forums? Just ignore them.

If you pay attention, it's always the other folks who start with the name calling/personal/attacks/flame wars.

Obviously that's not going to deter me from advocating for a safer and more humane highsec...but I would definitely be in favor of a major forum crackdown on people who start with the name calling/personal attacking garbage. Don't get your hopes up though.....

And the people who don't "like" me here are the 1% who get their thrills from making PvE highsec players rage and cry. Which is fine, if these people liked me, then I would be concerned.


veers.....maturity is not a discussion im willing to endure....with that.....if you want high-sec to be the rogue encampment from diablo 2 then you should probably move on.....

oh yeah and your avatar is ugly.
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#359 - 2014-11-14 02:02:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Veers Belvar
ggodhsup wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
ggodhsup wrote:


i saw veers and needed to say something.....veers alot of people dont like you....your like a troll....with good intentions.....which is like that christian guy that corners you at work....

just. plain. annoying.


Do you know what the mature thing is to do when you find someone you don't like on the forums? Just ignore them.

If you pay attention, it's always the other folks who start with the name calling/personal/attacks/flame wars.

Obviously that's not going to deter me from advocating for a safer and more humane highsec...but I would definitely be in favor of a major forum crackdown on people who start with the name calling/personal attacking garbage. Don't get your hopes up though.....

And the people who don't "like" me here are the 1% who get their thrills from making PvE highsec players rage and cry. Which is fine, if these people liked me, then I would be concerned.


veers.....maturity is not a discussion im willing to endure....with that.....if you want high-sec to be the rogue encampment from diablo 2 then you should probably move on.....

oh yeah and your avatar is ugly.



No clue what "maturity is not a discussion im willing to endure" means. There isn't much to discuss when you can't coherently express a thought in English (have you considered joining RvB?).

I'm not looking to turn Eve into Diablo 2 - I would like to see the ability to bump industrial ships until downtime removed, and a real crackdown on -10s. I'd like a sufficiently beefed up CONCORD to deter all but high value crimes...and I'd like to see fewer empty ships and shuttles blown up for lolz. So no, I will be staying here and advocating for change, like the coming awoxx changes, not running away to a different game.

And my avatar rocks - not that I care what you think.

Anything else? Or can this painful back and forth end now?
ggodhsup
relocation LLC.
#360 - 2014-11-14 02:12:46 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
ggodhsup wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
ggodhsup wrote:


i saw veers and needed to say something.....veers alot of people dont like you....your like a troll....with good intentions.....which is like that christian guy that corners you at work....

just. plain. annoying.


Do you know what the mature thing is to do when you find someone you don't like on the forums? Just ignore them.

If you pay attention, it's always the other folks who start with the name calling/personal/attacks/flame wars.

Obviously that's not going to deter me from advocating for a safer and more humane highsec...but I would definitely be in favor of a major forum crackdown on people who start with the name calling/personal attacking garbage. Don't get your hopes up though.....

And the people who don't "like" me here are the 1% who get their thrills from making PvE highsec players rage and cry. Which is fine, if these people liked me, then I would be concerned.


veers.....maturity is not a discussion im willing to endure....with that.....if you want high-sec to be the rogue encampment from diablo 2 then you should probably move on.....

oh yeah and your avatar is ugly.



No clue what "maturity is not a discussion im willing to endure" means. There isn't much to discuss when you can't coherently express a thought in English (have you considered joining RvB?).

I'm not looking to turn Eve into Diablo 2 - I would like to see the ability to bump industrial ships until downtime removed, and a real crackdown on -10s. I'd like a sufficiently beefed up CONCORD to deter all but high value crimes...and I'd like to see fewer empty ships and shuttles blown up for lolz. So no, I will be staying here and advocating for change, like the coming awoxx changes, not running away to a different game.

And my avatar rocks - not that I care what you think.

Anything else? Or can this painful back and forth end now?


plenty more.....im lurking in all your posts.