These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

You decide

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Renegade Heart
Doomheim
#81 - 2014-11-11 22:19:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Renegade Heart
I would scale PvE content in high sec such that there were longer concord response times in mission pockets in general, with level 3 missions having a longer response time than at level 1. And level 4 missions would have no concord in them at all, since you are dealing with a large force of mean NPC pirates after all, which concord allowed into high sec space!

DED sites would be similar too. No concord in a 4/10.
Cancel Align NOW
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#82 - 2014-11-11 22:25:53 UTC
Create an NPC bounty system that increases incrementally month on month.

1-3 months in an NPC Corp: 50mil
4-6 months in an NPC Corp: 120mil
7-9 months in an NPC Corp: 180mil
9-12 months in an NPC Corp: 250mil
For every additional month beyond 12 months the total bounty increases by 5%

Bounty is reset to 0 after a NPC pilots pod is destroyed.
Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#83 - 2014-11-11 22:46:38 UTC
I'd like stations to be as massive as they should be, up to and including everything from relatively quick and insecure docks to towing into deep storage, with services avaiable as ISK sinks (not just repair, but cap and shield recharge, too!). The current thing where you dock into a comically undersized station and into perfect security, a full cap and full shields is dumb.

If, eventually, the "huge station" included walking around, that would be fine too (why? it would be another way for them to become part of the game rather than being perfect invulnerability fields), but mostly I'd like docking in station to be more of a commitment, like a ship docking in a port. If you want something quick and dirty, pop out an anchorable or use a carrier/Orca. Then you're in space.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#84 - 2014-11-12 00:24:03 UTC
Removed an off topic comment.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department
Mark O'Helm
Fam. Zimin von Reizgenschwendt
#85 - 2014-11-12 00:30:50 UTC
Jvpiter wrote:
If the station itself rotated to simulate gravity in our CQs then ships would pop out at all kinds of angles. Simply keeping at a distance would cause you to miss ships that come out on the other end of the station. It would be even more interesting if stations had to constantly calibrate their rotation in terms of angular velocity and axis of rotation.
.

Isn't it the year 23000 something? I guess gravity generators are no problems to have for the stations, so u can have a static incoming path. And ships near station have the same orbital speed around the moon as the station. And does stations have more than one exit.
So would that make station camping really difficult? I think not. Btw actually planet/moon movement would be awesome. I would sacrifice instaundockbms for this.

"Frauenversteher wissen, was Frauen wollen. Aber Frauen wollen keine Frauenversteher. Weil Frauenversteher wissen, was Frauen wollen." (Ein Single)

"Wirklich coolen Leuten ist es egal, ob sie cool sind." (Einer, dem es egal ist)
Bullock Brawn
Doomheim
#86 - 2014-11-12 03:34:56 UTC
Add PVP Combat Arena's.
Bullock Brawn
Doomheim
#87 - 2014-11-12 03:37:51 UTC
Renegade Heart wrote:
I would scale PvE content in high sec such that there were longer concord response times in mission pockets in general, with level 3 missions having a longer response time than at level 1. And level 4 missions would have no concord in them at all, since you are dealing with a large force of mean NPC pirates after all, which concord allowed into high sec space!

DED sites would be similar too. No concord in a 4/10.



Why not allow Hot Drops as well from cloaked trial accounts in pods.
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#88 - 2014-11-12 03:37:58 UTC
Bombs / Bubbles in highsec.







Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#89 - 2014-11-12 04:27:27 UTC
Big Lynx wrote:
If CCP asks you to change one thing in EVE Online. What would it be?

they decided to remove clone grades, so it would have been that. now? make bounty one giant payout on death.

Help, I can't download EVE

President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub

PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
Lugia3
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#90 - 2014-11-12 05:39:22 UTC
Sansha vs EoM faction warfare. With new lowsec regions that stretch above and below the existing cluster.

"CCP Dolan is full of shit." - CCP Bettik
Iyokus Patrouette
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#91 - 2014-11-12 06:17:39 UTC
Dear Santa,

If i could has one thing in teh HOLE wide world i would like local removed from all areas of space, Just like wormholes.

PS.

Milk and Cookies are under the tree.


love Iyokus.

---- Advocate for the initiation of purple coloured wormholes----

Jur Tissant
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#92 - 2014-11-12 06:31:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Jur Tissant
A 0.0 constellation accessible only by Ventures.

Cancel Align NOW wrote:
Create an NPC bounty system that increases incrementally month on month.

1-3 months in an NPC Corp: 50mil
4-6 months in an NPC Corp: 120mil
7-9 months in an NPC Corp: 180mil
9-12 months in an NPC Corp: 250mil
For every additional month beyond 12 months the total bounty increases by 5%

Bounty is reset to 0 after a NPC pilots pod is destroyed.


Yes, how dare those players want to play solo? We should punish them with a completely ineffective system.
Jvpiter
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#93 - 2014-11-12 06:38:35 UTC
Cancel Align NOW wrote:
Create an NPC bounty system that increases incrementally month on month.

1-3 months in an NPC Corp: 50mil
4-6 months in an NPC Corp: 120mil
7-9 months in an NPC Corp: 180mil
9-12 months in an NPC Corp: 250mil
For every additional month beyond 12 months the total bounty increases by 5%

Bounty is reset to 0 after a NPC pilots pod is destroyed.



NPC alt farming. What a marvelous idea for virtually unlimited, PVP-free, passive supplemental income.

Call me Joe.
ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#94 - 2014-11-12 16:35:34 UTC
Removed a personal attack.

ISD LackOfFaith

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to Eve Mail or anything other than the forums.
Mikhem
Taxisk Unlimited
#95 - 2014-11-22 14:22:41 UTC
Harrison Tato wrote:
More Cowbell

Here you go.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EM2O8RPZcuk

Mikhem

Link library to EVE music songs.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2014-11-22 14:34:02 UTC
If it were up to me, I'd remove cloaking altogether. How many people would be forced to learn PVP in this PVP game if they wanted to play as a result? Nevertheless, it's probably here to stay, so I put up with it. Caught a cloaky Orca today so they're not infallible.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#97 - 2014-11-22 14:46:30 UTC
In no particular order:

Remove Concord

Make neutral logi and boosters fair game for attack when they're boosting/healing a WT

For the carebears - Make missions pay more

Make members of NPC corps feel some kind of penalty in exchange for being immune to wardecs.



\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
Mharius Skjem
Guardians of the Underworld
#98 - 2014-11-22 20:55:51 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
In no particular order:

Remove Concord

Make neutral logi and boosters fair game for attack when they're boosting/healing a WT

For the carebears - Make missions pay more

Make members of NPC corps feel some kind of penalty in exchange for being immune to wardecs.





This,

especially the neutral logi bit.

A recovering btter vet,  with a fresh toon and a determination to like everything that CCP does to Eve...

Don't take me too seriously though, I like to tease a bit on the forums, but that's only because I love you...
Mharius Skjem
Guardians of the Underworld
#99 - 2014-11-22 20:58:07 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
If it were up to me, I'd remove cloaking altogether. How many people would be forced to learn PVP in this PVP game if they wanted to play as a result? Nevertheless, it's probably here to stay, so I put up with it. Caught a cloaky Orca today so they're not infallible.


It's in the constitution.

'You have the right to use a cloak in the service of a lawful militia. '

So no, out of my cold dead hands.

A recovering btter vet,  with a fresh toon and a determination to like everything that CCP does to Eve...

Don't take me too seriously though, I like to tease a bit on the forums, but that's only because I love you...
Aeryn Maricadie
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#100 - 2014-11-23 01:25:41 UTC
Remove Local Or at least allow people to opt out of it with some penalties. E.G. people not in local can't Dock/use gates.
I mean C'mon Pirates and the like should be able to choose to go off grid.

Local Makes the game too Easy