Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Support it in the client. By making it native to EVE and available to everyone, providing EVE support is a waste of time for ISBoxer especially when it can be done better.

This would also make fleet leadership something revered, and

Fleet / Wing/ Squad commands you need available to commanders are:

align to
approach
warp (at distance)
keep at range
orbit at range
jump
dock

...lock
activate DPS (another option is tying the fleet / wing / squad's guns to the commander's)

activate mining module (from a command orca or rorqual with survey scanner, this would be beautiful)

and allow fleet members to flag themselves exempt from each control command.

objection from people who don't fleet, incoming.

don't be cagey. what does it do that EVE could do better

Toasting in a droll bread.

Why would CCP go out of its way to support AFK gameplay when they're intentionally taking steps to making it less rewarding? If anything fleet combat should be moved in the exact opposite direction by making it more involved and active when possible.

ISBoxer doesn't require CCP to do anything and doesn't cost them anything. All CCP cares about is whether or not it breaks any rules and currently it does not. If you're jealous about its capabilities, feel free to get it for yourself.

So ask your very own front running woman to ask for you. Do you not communicate with each other?

Who me?

yeah that's fine too, imo.

uh. or support it, giving everyone the same capabilities. the keyword is synchronized. and a lot of effort went into each ship being in fleet. SP, ISK, irl commitment.

you'd still have to manage drugs and heat, prop mods, cap, etc. what about more space technology is so hard to accept?

lol. there's that, and those certain individuals whose killboards reveal they spend their time shooting notprimaries.

there's an upper limit to the number of ships that can be ISBoxed, compared to fleet.

this means the EVE client FC is in fact more powerful than an ISBoxer could be. hands down, would win an engagement with equal numbers every time. am I the only one who gets tingles from the thought of it?

iirc, the reasons for keeping ISBoxer are for things like login, and window arrangement.

sure, the ISBoxer will have added macromanagement support, but the individually-manned fleet will also have the advantage of more responsiveness.

plus if you start running even 10, 20, 30, 50 clients on the same rig, you're going to have problems, and then there's the single point of failure in the internet connection.

you mean because of multiboxing? which isn't a thing. can you multibox 250 accounts? I can't.

things like the stealth nerf wouldn't become a giant tinfoil party, of 'us vs them.' in fact 'us' would do it better.