These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

For the Warmongers

Author
Gwen Ikiryo
Alexylva Paradox
#41 - 2014-11-02 07:30:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Gwen Ikiryo
Pieter,

You've obviously never tried actually mixing tea and Quafe - Depending on the brand, it can taste fairly nice, and is very soothing for your throat and gut. It was originally a medicinal drink, you know.

While it is true that the largest population centers on the planet are technically under Caldari control, I would remind you that, under the present status quo, that hardly means that what it usually does. The planet is very much in a state of flux, and still recovering economically and socially from the upheaval of Heth's regime and the conflict/massive ecological damage that followed - People are probably wondering more about where they're going to get their next meal then who exactly is ruling over them. Most of it's income is probably coming from outside aid then anything else. And of course, it still has an entirely third-party police force. It remains to be seen what final form it will take when the handover is complete, especially in regard to areas that identify themselves primarily as Gallentean.

In any case, I'm going to be blunt with you: I, personally, find the idea that Caldari Prime not should, but can exist as any other State world does to be extremely unfeasible. The planet is literally right in the middle of Federal space, and will always be exposed to a fantastically greater degree of Gallentean cultural influence then any in the main four districts - It will be cheaper to ship to for the Federation, cheaper to emigrate to for the Federation, and cheaper to develop on for the Federation.

When Gallentean companies are looking to test their products under Caldari market conditions, they will go there first. When Federals are out of work and looking for employment extranationally, they will go there first. When Caldari find they do not fit in with the megacorporate system, they will find it fantastically easy to emigrate away, and fall into the far warmer and conventionally comfortable embrace of the Gallentean lifestyle. And that's not even mentioning the huge amount of Gallenteans who live there already, who rebelled and took control of the planet a couple years ago, the last time the State tried to force them to conform to it's system completely or leave.

You cannot keep the world in a bubble and pretend it lies in the heart of The Forge, as Tibus Heth hoped and failed in doing. If the bubble is too thin, it will pop itself from the cultural osmosis, and if it is too thick, it will make the Federation feel once again that it's peoples well-being is being endangered, and they will pop it themselves. And make no mistake that they are more then capable of doing so - While the State, just barely, held the majority of the planet during the Gallentean assault, orbital superiority will always beat ground superiority in the long, (though bloody) run, and the Caldari Navy is far away, and with several Federal stargates that they can shut down at their discretion between it and the planet.

Caldari Prime is being returned (largely by virtue of the Senates good graces), but unless there is a radical change of national borders, it will always, even under State rule, be subject to it in part. You cannot drop a stone in a pool of water and expect it to not get wet. Rather then fighting this, would it not be better to accept it? To have it serve as a monument to how the two systems and cultures can exist in peace and profit mutually from one another, rather then only ever cause uncomfortable conflict?

I'm aware this is not a popular opinion, but to me, it still seems the most logical. I'm not, as mister Trees'ent is saying, suggesting the Caldari should "share" the planet, but merely to make a few concessions while ruling it.

Also, you make a lot of assumptions with your statement that the megacorporations will soon be building orbitals, as the Federation has so far permitted no such thing. For all the progress that has been miraculously made in the direction of diplomacy over the course of the past year or two, the memory of the State literally holding some of the most populous core federal worlds at effective gunpoint is still extremely fresh in most peoples minds. They will likely not allow any of their warships - Or anything that might be used to build warships - within a thousand astronomical units of the Luminaire system for a very, very long time.

The State will be fortunate if it even gets stargate. Extremely fortunate.

Edit: I should add - Since, uh, I sort of got so carried away writing all that that I sort of let myself forget some of the actual content of your post - That if States system would truly implode simply by being exposed closely to the Federal one, then perhaps something should be done to improve it so this is no longer the case. In addition, the Federation already manages to cope with hundreds of worlds with vastly different legal systems with only a few things in common. I'm sure their people could cope in this instance, as well.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#42 - 2014-11-02 08:09:42 UTC
I have to echo Ms. Ikiryo's statements. The only possibility of a lasting peace is one that both sides can be happy with - this means that both sides are going to have to make concessions.

For the Federation, these concessions will have to be full political and civilian control and ownership of the planet being turned over to the State. Caldari Prime cannot and will not be a Federal world merely administrated by the State - it must be a fully State-owned and State-administrated exclave. The Federation must guarantee full access to the planet for any non-criminal member of the State regardless of corporate affiliation, and allow free passage of civilian and trade traffic between Caldari Prime and State territory proper. They must agree to allow space out to at least high planetary orbit to be administed by State security forces.

The State, however, must also make concessions. They will have to accept that the system of Luminaire itself will remain entirely under Federation control. They will have to accept limits - probably severe ones - on the amount of military forces they can commit to the planet's orbit. They will have to guarantee rights of Federal citizens who wish to remain on the planet. They will probably have to concede to asking the approval of the Senate and Federal Administration for construction of large-scale orbital infrastructure, especially for stations on the scale of those capsuleers are generally used to using. They would probably have to accept some level of security checks on certain shipments.

I've put a little thought into how such an agreement would work. I've toyed with the idea of having an official Caldari Prime liason to the Senate - there comes the question of who gets that role, but ideally that's a question for the CEP. A joint State/Federal security task-force for Luminaire aerospace would be an excellent show of co-operation towards a common goal, although I suspect residents of both homeworlds would have some initial misgivings. The idea of a stargate directly connecting Caldari Prime to Caldari territory is... enticing, from some perspectives, but if it were to exist I can't imagine it would exist under any other authority except the Federation's.

The implementation of a lasting peace between our people is not a simple or straightforward matter - but nothing worth doing ever is.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#43 - 2014-11-02 08:51:10 UTC
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:

I'm curious. If you were ordered to cease hostilities against Gallentian forces from your chain of command, would you follow those orders?

When you aren't agree with given order, you have right to arrest your superior officer and claim this position. After the operation, though, you both will be presented to the tribunal and one of you will be executed, depending on tribunal's decision.

This only applies to unlawful or immoral orders orders correct? Or does that apply to any order you happen to disagree with? Are you saying that if you received a lawful order from your chain of command to cease hostilities against Gallente forces, in the event of a cease-fire or peace treaty, you would arrest your superior officer and continue fighting?

It applies to all orders, Mr. Trees'ent, as in the field you must take decisions fast, there is no time to check if orders are moral or lawful. Let it the tribunal decide.

And if it will be lawful order and the tribunal will decide that you should have followed it and your arrest of superior officer wasn't in the interest of the State, then it is you, who will be executed. By not following the order, you show, that you put your life on the line because of this order.

Of course, provided you want to try to defend your position in the tribunal. If you don't want both to defend yourself in tribunal and to follow the order, you can always just drink your final tea. Or you can use your sword or your sidegun to leave the chain of command permanently, so someone else can take your place.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#44 - 2014-11-02 09:00:25 UTC
Gwen Ikiryo wrote:

So why not embrace it? Let the people living there still be Federal citizens if they began as such, with the associated privileges. In fact, why not draw up a new charter specifically for the planet, which would offer everyone - Including State citizens - The legislated rights assured by the Federation, but with some Caldari values imbued in it as well?

Because it would be stepping on the same rake again, that already hit foreheads of our ancestors, Ms. Ikiryo.
And it is the same rake, that even our greatest hero Tibus Heth stepped on, when he signed treaty with Federation that our world will be ours, and believed they would follow it.

No, Ms. Ikiryo, this won't work. To bring peace to our people and our Home we must ensure physically that no attempts on that would be made.

Don't trust gallenteans, don't sign anything with them.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#45 - 2014-11-02 09:07:06 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I look forward to the day when there is no reason to respond to them.


For there to be no reason I'd have to be devoid of my bitterness.

That will be a cold day in Hell.

-Eran
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#46 - 2014-11-02 09:14:15 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:

Ragnar STS wrote:
Now, appealing to the greed of the Caldari, perhaps we could compare 702 vs 994. Currently Caldari Navy pets are told to engage on sight all Minmatar and Gallente militia pilots. CONCORD will not let them fire on regular civilian capsuleers...but you know deep down they want to. What if the Caldari just stopped their alliance with their current biggest customer - Amarr....and instead considered all of humanity their customer. If 'all of humanity' was considered one would get 1696 systems waiting for their products and services. Even at worst, leaving out those slavers entirely one would still realize 994 instead of 702.


The alliance between the Amarr and the Caldari is a chimerical construct born of the weird alchemy caused by the relationship between your own Republic and the Federation. The Caldari are naturally isolationists and would like nothing more than to retreat within our borders, coming out only for mutually beneficial trade, research and cultural exchange. Sadly the Republic leaped into bed with the Federation, forcing us to ally with the Amarr out of self-preservation.

And I would like to add this, that as Amarr became our allies, it would be extremely dishonorable to betray them.
My experience with minmatars is limited only to my capsuleer age, as I have never ever saw an alive minmatar before I became a capsuleer. From what I have learned about minmatars now, is that in majority they are dishonorable, they don't follow their words, especially given to foreigners, and one shouldn't expect following allied obligations from a minmatar.

If for minmatar simply stopping ally relations because your ally does on its territory what you don't like, is quite normal, for Caldari it is disgracing atrocity. Thus no talks about stopping the alliance just because the Empire uses slaver labor that is prohibited in the State should be made, as the slavery is the problem of the Empire only, it doesn't affect the State and they don't bring it into our borders.

On other hand, Imperials value honor as well, and if we would be offered to choose best allies between the Empire and Republic again, without any history and relations between us in the past, and only by measuring their merits, I believe that we would choose the Empire again without even giving slight chance to Republic.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Zecthah Trees'ent
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2014-11-02 09:17:21 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:

I'm curious. If you were ordered to cease hostilities against Gallentian forces from your chain of command, would you follow those orders?

When you aren't agree with given order, you have right to arrest your superior officer and claim this position. After the operation, though, you both will be presented to the tribunal and one of you will be executed, depending on tribunal's decision.

This only applies to unlawful or immoral orders orders correct? Or does that apply to any order you happen to disagree with? Are you saying that if you received a lawful order from your chain of command to cease hostilities against Gallente forces, in the event of a cease-fire or peace treaty, you would arrest your superior officer and continue fighting?

It applies to all orders, Mr. Trees'ent, as in the field you must take decisions fast, there is no time to check if orders are moral or lawful. Let it the tribunal decide.

And if it will be lawful order and the tribunal will decide that you should have followed it and your arrest of superior officer wasn't in the interest of the State, then it is you, who will be executed. By not following the order, you show, that you put your life on the line because of this order.

Of course, provided you want to try to defend your position in the tribunal. If you don't want both to defend yourself in tribunal and to follow the order, you can always just drink your final tea. Or you can use your sword or your sidegun to leave the chain of command permanently, so someone else can take your place.

I see. One must be told what is and isn't moral and isn't capable of making that decision quickly on their own? Your military force doesn't have a secure communications network capable of disseminating secure orders while in combat so each and every command needs to be verified? That sounds completely ridiculous and leaves too much room for a soldier to do as they please during an operation. And if you disagree with an order you must arrest your superior, which takes you and possibly others out of the fight, which puts the entire mission in jeopardy. That is a foolish and undisciplined way to conduct military operations.
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#48 - 2014-11-02 09:23:40 UTC
Gwen Ikiryo wrote:

You cannot keep the world in a bubble and pretend it lies in the heart of The Forge, as Tibus Heth hoped and failed in doing. If the bubble is too thin, it will pop itself from the cultural osmosis, and if it is too thick, it will make the Federation feel once again that it's peoples well-being is being endangered, and they will pop it themselves. And make no mistake that they are more then capable of doing so - While the State, just barely, held the majority of the planet during the Gallentean assault, orbital superiority will always beat ground superiority in the long, (though bloody) run, and the Caldari Navy is far away, and with several Federal stargates that they can shut down at their discretion between it and the planet.

Caldari Prime is being returned (largely by virtue of the Senates good graces), but unless there is a radical change of national borders, it will always, even under State rule, be subject to it in part. You cannot drop a stone in a pool of water and expect it to not get wet. Rather then fighting this, would it not be better to accept it? To have it serve as a monument to how the two systems and cultures can exist in peace and profit mutually from one another, rather then only ever cause uncomfortable conflict?

Exactly, Ms. Ikiryo!

The signing of the Federation charter has trapped our homeworld. To exist in peace with other culture, we must ensure this culture won't try to dominate us ever again. And for this, the Federation charter must be undone.

Before it was signed, we were just two cultures coexisting in the same system. But after gallenteans has pulled this trick, creating the GALLENTE federation, they started to claim right on our planet and the whole Luminaire system. This is not Gallente system. This is not Caldari system. This is OUR shared system. But Federation charter allows them claim this system, and this must end.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#49 - 2014-11-02 09:27:57 UTC
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:

I see. One must be told what is and isn't moral and isn't capable of making that decision quickly on their own? Your military force doesn't have a secure communications network capable of disseminating secure orders while in combat so each and every command needs to be verified? That sounds completely ridiculous and leaves too much room for a soldier to do as they please during an operation. And if you disagree with an order you must arrest your superior, which takes you and possibly others out of the fight, which puts the entire mission in jeopardy. That is a foolish and undisciplined way to conduct military operations.

You are quick to make conclusions that are completely wrong.
Maybe I shouldn't demand understanding from a civilian.
I don't know what to say now. Probably I could just tell you to try to get courses in SWA.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Zecthah Trees'ent
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#50 - 2014-11-02 09:41:22 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:

I see. One must be told what is and isn't moral and isn't capable of making that decision quickly on their own? Your military force doesn't have a secure communications network capable of disseminating secure orders while in combat so each and every command needs to be verified? That sounds completely ridiculous and leaves too much room for a soldier to do as they please during an operation. And if you disagree with an order you must arrest your superior, which takes you and possibly others out of the fight, which puts the entire mission in jeopardy. That is a foolish and undisciplined way to conduct military operations.

You are quick to make conclusions that are completely wrong.
Maybe I shouldn't demand understanding from a civilian.
I don't know what to say now. Probably I could just tell you to try to get courses in SWA.

No, I'm basing my conclusions on what you just told me. Which is that soldiers have free liberty to disobey any order they disagree with during an operation, they must arrest their superior officer which I'm only guessing has to be immediate so they can be free to continue with original, verified, orders. Doing that could ruin a mission. And then later, after they return to base, answer for their disobedience before a tribunal. How does that not sound undisciplined? I am asking genuinely because that makes no sense what-so-ever.
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#51 - 2014-11-02 09:51:20 UTC
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:

I see. One must be told what is and isn't moral and isn't capable of making that decision quickly on their own? Your military force doesn't have a secure communications network capable of disseminating secure orders while in combat so each and every command needs to be verified? That sounds completely ridiculous and leaves too much room for a soldier to do as they please during an operation. And if you disagree with an order you must arrest your superior, which takes you and possibly others out of the fight, which puts the entire mission in jeopardy. That is a foolish and undisciplined way to conduct military operations.

You are quick to make conclusions that are completely wrong.
Maybe I shouldn't demand understanding from a civilian.
I don't know what to say now. Probably I could just tell you to try to get courses in SWA.

No, I'm basing my conclusions on what you just told me. Which is that soldiers have free liberty to disobey any order they disagree with during an operation, they must arrest their superior officer which I'm only guessing has to be immediate so they can be free to continue with original, verified, orders. Doing that could ruin a mission. And then later, after they return to base, answer for their disobedience before a tribunal. How does that not sound undisciplined? I am asking genuinely because that makes no sense what-so-ever.

That IS actually a disobedience, and it WILL have consequences.
For this disobedience they will be put before the firing squad, and by default those, who have arrested the officer for the order will be considered guilty. This means it will be your duty to prove that this order was incorrect.

If that has ruined the mission, you will answer for this as well separately, as by arresting the officer you have claimed the command, and became responsible for the result of the mission.

You should not forget that it will be incredibly hard to prove that your actions were justified, and death by a firing squad is quite dishonorable.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Elmund Egivand
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#52 - 2014-11-02 10:12:23 UTC
Zecthah, by the spirits, just ignore Kim. She's just going to keep ramming the same points over and over and over again and utilise an army of strawmen to 'prove' that the 'Federation must be destroyed'. She's not interested in discussing compromises, concessions and solutions beyond 'extermination of the Federation'.

A Minmatar warship is like a rusting Beetle with 500 horsepower Cardillac engines in the rear, armour plating bolted to chassis and a M2 Browning stuck on top.

Zecthah Trees'ent
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2014-11-02 10:14:29 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:
Diana Kim wrote:
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:

I see. One must be told what is and isn't moral and isn't capable of making that decision quickly on their own? Your military force doesn't have a secure communications network capable of disseminating secure orders while in combat so each and every command needs to be verified? That sounds completely ridiculous and leaves too much room for a soldier to do as they please during an operation. And if you disagree with an order you must arrest your superior, which takes you and possibly others out of the fight, which puts the entire mission in jeopardy. That is a foolish and undisciplined way to conduct military operations.

You are quick to make conclusions that are completely wrong.
Maybe I shouldn't demand understanding from a civilian.
I don't know what to say now. Probably I could just tell you to try to get courses in SWA.

No, I'm basing my conclusions on what you just told me. Which is that soldiers have free liberty to disobey any order they disagree with during an operation, they must arrest their superior officer which I'm only guessing has to be immediate so they can be free to continue with original, verified, orders. Doing that could ruin a mission. And then later, after they return to base, answer for their disobedience before a tribunal. How does that not sound undisciplined? I am asking genuinely because that makes no sense what-so-ever.

That IS actually a disobedience, and it WILL have consequences.
For this disobedience they will be put before the firing squad, and by default those, who have arrested the officer for the order will be considered guilty. This means it will be your duty to prove that this order was incorrect.

If that has ruined the mission, you will answer for this as well separately, as by arresting the officer you have claimed the command, and became responsible for the result of the mission.

You should not forget that it will be incredibly hard to prove that your actions were justified, and death by a firing squad is quite dishonorable.

Are you sure you're not a politician? You're avoiding the question like one. I get that there are consequences for disobeying orders if you cannot prove that the order was erroneous. What I'm asking is how disobeying a direct order simply because you don't agree with it not a sign of an undisciplined fighting force?

The original question that brought this up was if you would obey an order to cease hostilities against Gallentean forces. You answered that by telling me
Diana Kim wrote:
When you aren't agree with given order, you have right to arrest your superior officer and claim this position. After the operation, though, you both will be presented to the tribunal and one of you will be executed, depending on tribunal's decision.

This is a sign of a severe lack of discipline making a military force more of a danger to itself than anyone else regardless of whether there are consequences or not.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2014-11-02 11:00:02 UTC
Elmund Egivand wrote:
Zecthah, by the spirits, just ignore Kim. She's just going to keep ramming the same points over and over and over again and utilise an army of strawmen to 'prove' that the 'Federation must be destroyed'. She's not interested in discussing compromises, concessions and solutions beyond 'extermination of the Federation'.

An aim impossible for the State to accomplish to begin with, nor one that the State is indeed even interested in at this point.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#55 - 2014-11-02 11:12:41 UTC
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:

Are you sure you're not a politician? You're avoiding the question like one. I get that there are consequences for disobeying orders if you cannot prove that the order was erroneous. What I'm asking is how disobeying a direct order simply because you don't agree with it not a sign of an undisciplined fighting force?

The original question that brought this up was if you would obey an order to cease hostilities against Gallentean forces. You answered that by telling me
Diana Kim wrote:
When you aren't agree with given order, you have right to arrest your superior officer and claim this position. After the operation, though, you both will be presented to the tribunal and one of you will be executed, depending on tribunal's decision.

This is a sign of a severe lack of discipline making a military force more of a danger to itself than anyone else regardless of whether there are consequences or not.

No, I am not and you should know it already.
And no, it isn't "sign of a severe lack of discipline".
You must obey and follow all orders as a solider, and disobeying with arresting the officer is extreme scenatio, that means that you can't even live with executing such order, and ready to sacrifice your own life to stand for your point. This is scenario, when the officer would want to commit something atrocious, that would shatter all ideals that your State and you stand for.

You should also be aware, that if other soldiers will consider your act illegal, you will be shot. As in the combat situation the officer can just shoot you, if you don't follow the order. This means you have to arrest the officer before saying you won't do this order. And other officers must be on your side, i.e. illegality of the order must be obvious.

I repeat one more time, if it wasn't obvious yet. This is extreme scenario, that will put you into dishonor and most likely death, if you choose it, and everyone involved would go through the tribunal.
So this isn't freaking "lack of discipline", civilian.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Zecthah Trees'ent
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#56 - 2014-11-02 11:16:36 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Zecthah, by the spirits, just ignore Kim. She's just going to keep ramming the same points over and over and over again and utilise an army of strawmen to 'prove' that the 'Federation must be destroyed'. She's not interested in discussing compromises, concessions and solutions beyond 'extermination of the Federation'.

For a little bit there I was hoping that I could learn more about her instead of just basing my opinion solely on posts she has made in other threads. I know now that there is little chance for discussion about anything resembling peace as far as she's concerned. I'm starting to believe that if there ever was a peace treaty she would form or join up with an extremist group to 'continue the just fight' against Gallente.

Elmund Egivand wrote:
An aim impossible for the State to accomplish to begin with, nor one that the State is indeed even interested in at this point.

I have to disagree. There was another Caldari posting in here earlier, Pieter Tuulinen, that had some things to say that he believed could lead to peace between the State and the Federation. Makoto Priano was another civil Caldari who did not state anything along the lines of 'death to the Federation'. I'm sure there are more that have posted in other threads and this leads me to believe that intelligent, rational discourse can be had between the two factions. At least between the capsuleers present on this forum. Thankfully it's easy to pinpoint the extremists.
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#57 - 2014-11-02 11:20:58 UTC
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:
Makoto Priano was another civil Caldari

Makoto Priano is a liar, who lost her honor.
Please do not insult us all by calling her Caldari.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Zecthah Trees'ent
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#58 - 2014-11-02 11:31:15 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:

Are you sure you're not a politician? You're avoiding the question like one. I get that there are consequences for disobeying orders if you cannot prove that the order was erroneous. What I'm asking is how disobeying a direct order simply because you don't agree with it not a sign of an undisciplined fighting force?

The original question that brought this up was if you would obey an order to cease hostilities against Gallentean forces. You answered that by telling me
Diana Kim wrote:
When you aren't agree with given order, you have right to arrest your superior officer and claim this position. After the operation, though, you both will be presented to the tribunal and one of you will be executed, depending on tribunal's decision.

This is a sign of a severe lack of discipline making a military force more of a danger to itself than anyone else regardless of whether there are consequences or not.

No, I am not and you should know it already.
And no, it isn't "sign of a severe lack of discipline".
You must obey and follow all orders as a solider, and disobeying with arresting the officer is extreme scenatio, that means that you can't even live with executing such order, and ready to sacrifice your own life to stand for your point. This is scenario, when the officer would want to commit something atrocious, that would shatter all ideals that your State and you stand for.

You should also be aware, that if other soldiers will consider your act illegal, you will be shot. As in the combat situation the officer can just shoot you, if you don't follow the order. This means you have to arrest the officer before saying you won't do this order. And other officers must be on your side, i.e. illegality of the order must be obvious.

I repeat one more time, if it wasn't obvious yet. This is extreme scenario, that will put you into dishonor and most likely death, if you choose it, and everyone involved would go through the tribunal.
So this isn't freaking "lack of discipline", civilian.

And you still refuse to answer the original question, but it doesn't matter because I have a feeling I already know what the answer is. The point of it all has apparently gone over your head as well. It doesn't matter though since I now know how you are as a person and as a soldier. Also, you using the term 'civilian' like that is both derogatory in nature and incorrect.

So I am through talking with you since there is nothing of value to be gained and I'm not interested in getting into futile debates with an extremist who has no interest or desire for a peaceful resolution to this conflict.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#59 - 2014-11-02 11:37:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Andreus Ixiris
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:
I have to disagree. There was another Caldari posting in here earlier, Pieter Tuulinen, that had some things to say that he believed could lead to peace between the State and the Federation. Makoto Priano was another civil Caldari who did not state anything along the lines of 'death to the Federation'. I'm sure there are more that have posted in other threads and this leads me to believe that intelligent, rational discourse can be had between the two factions. At least between the capsuleers present on this forum. Thankfully it's easy to pinpoint the extremists.

You seem to have misunderstood me. I'm saying that the destruction of the Federation isn't something the Caldari State at large is capable of or interested in attempting. Heth's laughable lack of understanding of contemporary geopolitics happened to be one of the many reasons he was extremely unpopular with the State's upper echelons, and one of the reasons the CEP couldn't wait to get rid of him.

Also, your quotes in your post name the wrong people.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Zecthah Trees'ent
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#60 - 2014-11-02 11:44:27 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Zecthah Trees'ent wrote:
I have to disagree. There was another Caldari posting in here earlier, Pieter Tuulinen, that had some things to say that he believed could lead to peace between the State and the Federation. Makoto Priano was another civil Caldari who did not state anything along the lines of 'death to the Federation'. I'm sure there are more that have posted in other threads and this leads me to believe that intelligent, rational discourse can be had between the two factions. At least between the capsuleers present on this forum. Thankfully it's easy to pinpoint the extremists.

You seem to have misunderstood me. I'm saying that the destruction of the Federation isn't something the Caldari State at large is capable of or interested in attempting. Heth's laughable lack of understanding of contemporary geopolitics happened to be one of the many reasons he was extremely unpopular with the State's upper echelons, and one of the reasons the CEP couldn't wait to get rid of him.

Also, your quotes in your post name the wrong people.

Ahh, ok. I did misunderstand. My mistake and apologies.

Sorry about that as well. I've been awake for far too long handling wretched paperwork and didn't proofread before I hit 'post'.