These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Evictions, good for w-space?

First post
Author
RudinV
Sons Of Mother's Friend
Can i bring my Drake...
#61 - 2014-10-30 20:19:37 UTC
ok let me clarify it a bit. first of all its not related no HK/EXP official politic, its my own opinion.
corbexx im glad that u pointed me this question.
When i was in BU i heard about some kind of this ideas, but as long as ive never been interested in any kind of politics stuff, or serious bznz movements, and ive never been in management level of any Eve online organisation, i didnt pay attention, so im most probably far from real ideas and purposes of this ally, but as MaxDel mentioned above its prolly just a bunch of indy/carebears trying to find their place in this wild space, and as long as my general income is from trading/hauling stuff im not against this kind of peeps, most probably opposite (if they sell stuff cheap ofc^^)
but lets back to subj.
should they be evicted? Dont think that comparisions between no-name carebearing ally and NoHo are well placed, there is not so much common things.. i see only that they are ally and they live in w-space. Thats all, but if u want to know my personal opinion, no, they should not be evicted. Not becouse they are "just indy carebears" who wanna play game safe and blablabla, not cose of that. They should not be evicted only becouse they dont chestbeating themselves "omfg top pvp ally" while farming red crosses 90% of the time (i dont care what u guys do, and dont think im greedy for stuff)
You are good at forumes(NoHo), awesome with public relations, and i have to admit im personally very impressed what u do as CSM, but srsly guys, your reaction at our attack is quite....like 12yo bully kid who didnt loose his nose just by chance start to chestbeating-hey look, im fck awesome.
Yes we lost the fight, we did some mistakes, u won it, u did good job, but this **** wave here/at fhc is just a prove, that u are stronger with killing red crosses and forum pvp than with big balls PvP stuff.
Take your time, carebear another bunch of capitals, ask your muppets to help and they will come, but as long as you call yourself main wh pvp entity while being biggest carebears u cant be safe, we will come and kill you all, just because u cant seat on two chairs. One is for Us.

ps: corbexx, i see that you personally want to bring content to w-space, and thats good thing, i like it, but the problem is, your ally and muppetos company wants opposite. chilly jewy paradise and this is not good thing.
Nero Pantera
Whale Girth
Touched by the Tism
#62 - 2014-10-30 20:23:36 UTC
RudinV wrote:
ok let me clarify it a bit. first of all its not related no HK/EXP official politic, its my own opinion.
corbexx im glad that u pointed me this question.
When i was in BU i heard about some kind of this ideas, but as long as ive never been interested in any kind of politics stuff, or serious bznz movements, and ive never been in management level of any Eve online organisation, i didnt pay attention, so im most probably far from real ideas and purposes of this ally, but as MaxDel mentioned above its prolly just a bunch of indy/carebears trying to find their place in this wild space, and as long as my general income is from trading/hauling stuff im not against this kind of peeps, most probably opposite (if they sell stuff cheap ofc^^)
but lets back to subj.
should they be evicted? Dont think that comparisions between no-name carebearing ally and NoHo are well placed, there is not so much common things.. i see only that they are ally and they live in w-space. Thats all, but if u want to know my personal opinion, no, they should not be evicted. Not becouse they are "just indy carebears" who wanna play game safe and blablabla, not cose of that. They should not be evicted only becouse they dont chestbeating themselves "omfg top pvp ally" while farming red crosses 90% of the time (i dont care what u guys do, and dont think im greedy for stuff)
You are good at forumes(NoHo), awesome with public relations, and i have to admit im personally very impressed what u do as CSM, but srsly guys, your reaction at our attack is quite....like 12yo bully kid who didnt loose his nose just by chance start to chestbeating-hey look, im fck awesome.
Yes we lost the fight, we did some mistakes, u won it, u did good job, but this **** wave here/at fhc is just a prove, that u are stronger with killing red crosses and forum pvp than with big balls PvP stuff.
Take your time, carebear another bunch of capitals, ask your muppets to help and they will come, but as long as you call yourself main wh pvp entity while being biggest carebears u cant be safe, we will come and kill you all, just because u cant seat on two chairs. One is for Us.

ps: corbexx, i see that you personally want to bring content to w-space, and thats good thing, i like it, but the problem is, your ally and muppetos company wants opposite. chilly jewy paradise and this is not good thing.


What?
Winthorp
#63 - 2014-10-30 20:27:36 UTC
Maxim DELETE wrote:
corbexx wrote:
RudinV wrote:
23/7 carebearing as content is not good for w-space.


taking your words what do you think of these.

http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/W-Space_Citizen/corporations

these all seem to carebear 23/7 should they be evicted?


LOL, Corbexx, I see you is uncomfortable existence of the alliance who just lives in the WH. Just live.

Clarified. Many believe that it is my alliance, our alts, etc .. It is not. This alliance is primarily designed to make the lives of young russian WH-corporations. Who are not interested in pvp, are miners and manufacturers. They are interested in a relaxed lifestyle. Due to recent changes in W-Space (thanks CCP fozzie), many left the WH since they do not feel safe. The alliance - a way to unite people who have stayed in the WH, to small corporations are not afraid of each other.
For our part, we just help them. Among these corporations have a lot of people that we have repeatedly killed, evicted, but due to lack of API, a small interest in the game for me and some other factors, for us they are just friends.

Corbexx, you see never seen such alliances as Wormhole Holders, Hell Gate and others. These alliances have the same goals, and that this alliance, just you did not see them because you was too busy carebear at your home.

Let's talk about NoHo
This alliance of true carebears. They do not miss a single day of farming in home system. Constantly traveling in a system with a large number of anomalies and farming there.
So in this case is a NoHo alliance of carebears for which pvp - is 1-2 hours after compulsory farming anomalies.

Wondering who is more deserving of eviction?


How can you say it is not your alliance when the founder of the executor corp is QEX? Are your really going to say they are not paying you protection ISK?
Utari Onzo
Escalated.
OnlyFleets.
#64 - 2014-10-30 20:35:08 UTC
The thign that makes me laugh reading this thread is how things have escalated and convoluted beyond an original point made. Originally the rally cry for evictions was "If all they do is farm, they deserve to be evicted."

Now I see "If all they do is farm, but claim to be PVP, they deserve to be evicted. However, if all they do is farm but don't chest beat about PVP, they don't deserve to be evicted."

I for one am all up for evictions of any entity of any reason, they're as much part of eve as suicide ganking. However, what I don't believe in is hiding intentions towards evictions by trying to clutch at strawmen and ad hominum attacks when all you wanna do is generate some content. Don't like a group, or don't care and just wanna kick a nest to see what happens? Just go with that rather then some e-bushido convoluted narrative.

Also as an aside, I'm ok with the idea of renting wormhole space. If it means more feet in holes to potentially catch and kill, or perhaps eventually lead to these guys deciding to try and pvp, why not. If some group as the guns to deman/offer protection to these guys to fund their pvp habits, so be it. Just try not to mask it with words like 'just friends' and "they don't want to pvp"

"Face the enemy as a solid wall For faith is your armor And through it, the enemy will find no breach Wrap your arms around the enemy For faith is your fire And with it, burn away his evil"

ITS TOO BIG
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#65 - 2014-10-31 03:09:01 UTC
RudinV wrote:
nonsense


You say that NoHo chestbeats about stuff, have you seen qex corp description?
So because they don't use alt corps for bearing they are 'evil carrybears' ?
Do I need to start listing all qex carrybear alt corps?
You guys are the cancer of WH space, and you dont even know it, because you probably believe in the crap you are saying.
The only reason you tried evicting NoHo is because they are the biggest threat to the whole 'WH renting' idea you guys had, just admit it for once please and stop with the nonsense crap about 'evil carrybears with an agenda'.
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#66 - 2014-10-31 04:14:46 UTC
ITS TOO BIG wrote:
..

THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID!!!

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

RudinV
Sons Of Mother's Friend
Can i bring my Drake...
#67 - 2014-10-31 05:08:31 UTC
i dont know a lot about EXP renting ideas, if some1 buy something there is some1 to sell it, i dont count money in others pockets, have no idea why other do so, and if we start about cancer, for me forum alts are the bigger cancer than some ingame dudes...
Andrew Jester
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#68 - 2014-10-31 14:17:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Andrew Jester
Nero Pantera wrote:
RudinV wrote:
ok let me clarify it a bit. first of all its not related no HK/EXP official politic, its my own opinion.
corbexx im glad that u pointed me this question.
When i was in BU i heard about some kind of this ideas, but as long as ive never been interested in any kind of politics stuff, or serious bznz movements, and ive never been in management level of any Eve online organisation, i didnt pay attention, so im most probably far from real ideas and purposes of this ally, but as MaxDel mentioned above its prolly just a bunch of indy/carebears trying to find their place in this wild space, and as long as my general income is from trading/hauling stuff im not against this kind of peeps, most probably opposite (if they sell stuff cheap ofc^^)
but lets back to subj.
should they be evicted? Dont think that comparisions between no-name carebearing ally and NoHo are well placed, there is not so much common things.. i see only that they are ally and they live in w-space. Thats all, but if u want to know my personal opinion, no, they should not be evicted. Not becouse they are "just indy carebears" who wanna play game safe and blablabla, not cose of that. They should not be evicted only becouse they dont chestbeating themselves "omfg top pvp ally" while farming red crosses 90% of the time (i dont care what u guys do, and dont think im greedy for stuff)
You are good at forumes(NoHo), awesome with public relations, and i have to admit im personally very impressed what u do as CSM, but srsly guys, your reaction at our attack is quite....like 12yo bully kid who didnt loose his nose just by chance start to chestbeating-hey look, im fck awesome.
Yes we lost the fight, we did some mistakes, u won it, u did good job, but this **** wave here/at fhc is just a prove, that u are stronger with killing red crosses and forum pvp than with big balls PvP stuff.
Take your time, carebear another bunch of capitals, ask your muppets to help and they will come, but as long as you call yourself main wh pvp entity while being biggest carebears u cant be safe, we will come and kill you all, just because u cant seat on two chairs. One is for Us.

ps: corbexx, i see that you personally want to bring content to w-space, and thats good thing, i like it, but the problem is, your ally and muppetos company wants opposite. chilly jewy paradise and this is not good thing.


What?


His post was more sensible than literally 150% of what you post

RudinV wrote:
forum alts are the bigger cancer than some ingame dudes...


POST WITH YOUR MAINS PUSSIES #GETLIKEME

If thuggin' was a category I'd win a Grammy

Agent Ninety-Nine
Doomheim
#69 - 2014-10-31 15:26:51 UTC
Lots of interesting perspectives in this thread. There seems to be a valid counter argument for every position.

I don't see a problem with evictions to take over a hole. They have something you want and taking it, or trying to, is part of the game. Evicting a group because they won't give your fleet of t3's and command ships a fight at a player ratio of 10:1 does not create content. It's an ******* thing to do.

And along the same lines that 40 man blob of assholes who will attempt to evict you for not sacrificing your ships and pods to them turns tail and runs when a fleet 1/3 of the size using, ishtars, t3's, guardians, and a bhaal or neut geddon jump in on them. It seems most fleets/corps that want to force pointless troll evictions are the ones only interested in fights overwhelmingly in their favor.

On the subject of C6 renters I think it's ****** to do this to wspace and i hope it fails miserably.
Incindir Mauser
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#70 - 2014-11-01 06:18:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Incindir Mauser
Agent Ninety-Nine wrote:
Lots of interesting perspectives in this thread. There seems to be a valid counter argument for every position.

I don't see a problem with evictions to take over a hole. They have something you want and taking it, or trying to, is part of the game. Evicting a group because they won't give your fleet of t3's and command ships a fight at a player ratio of 10:1 does not create content. It's an ******* thing to do.

And along the same lines that 40 man blob of assholes who will attempt to evict you for not sacrificing your ships and pods to them turns tail and runs when a fleet 1/3 of the size using, ishtars, t3's, guardians, and a bhaal or neut geddon jump in on them. It seems most fleets/corps that want to force pointless troll evictions are the ones only interested in fights overwhelmingly in their favor.

On the subject of C6 renters I think it's ****** to do this to wspace and i hope it fails miserably.


Evictions are what they are. Justifications are just the butter on the popcorn.

Complaining about the current combat meta by providing one off "examples" of why one nameless group or another is a bunch of cowards is just as hypocritical as they are for chest beating about PvP prowess yet running like scattered rats in an empty grain shed until they can gather overwhelming force to crush your gang. Doesn't do anything to change the actual situation. If you're going to call someone out, call them out. If you think "Lazer Knocks Social Club" (or whatever other clever acronym you can come up with) is the cancer that's killing C5's say so. It's one thing to run from someone's gang, it's another thing to not have the fortitude to speak your mind on some silly forums. C5's were a barren wasteland when ADHC moved into one, it's not like anyone is responsible for kicking "everyone" out. It's always been this way.

I must apologize. Because those of us that are older WH entities are directly responsible for the way things are now. Back when we were #1 and sitting pretty with our title of "Killingest W-space Corporation" it never occurred to us that we would one day be languishing, our participation approaching zero, and an old frenemy seeding caps to give us a round of radiation and chemo to cure our cancer. Complacency and arrogance kills healthy corporations.

When you are playing king of the hill, and you are on top, there is only one place to go from there. Play long enough and you will eventually get dragged down to the bottom.
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#71 - 2014-11-01 11:54:54 UTC
tl;dr - No reason needed for evictions. Evictions are content. Content is good.

Agree with Incindir that evictions are simply evictions. The reasoning behind them is the entertainment. I have never been against evictions, personally, been involved in many, led a few, been at the receiving end of two. They can be fun, and people can hate the grind, but chillin for hours with friends, when you actually have a reason or goal in mind, can be a fun time. Really what it comes down to is the crew you are playing the game with...

Evictions are content, like many other things you can do in the game: scamming, thefts, espionage, diplomacy, every form of player v. player interaction. Randoms that say they have a problem with "chest-thumping" or are for the "e-bushido" stuff are bads. The call-out threads, the trolling, and all the trimmings are what make the forums and PVP more entertaining. Nearly every group or individual that complains of it has done it, and if you think you haven't, you're likely full of sh-t.

Hidden and Co's attempt on NoHo was entertaining from an oberservers perspective, and clearly from parties involved's perspective, and I don't fault them at all for giving it a shot. I also don't think for a second that had they succeeded, that NoHo would tuck tail and leave wormholes, just like Adhocracy will definitely return in some form. They provided content with NoHo, James and friends provided content with Adhoc, and those of us on the sidelines that watched this go down were provided with content at the meta level. People complaining about evictions being bad are ignorant. This is a game, and like in a game of Risk, I'm not going to be nice and friendly to keep a status-quo. I'm going to burn down all of my opponents to win (a game), if I can.

I think that, as said already, people should have fun with evictions and all player content for that matter. There should be no need for justifying anything. When Blued Union came for RCC, there was little reservation privately and publicly. Lhawks stated that they didn't like our alliance, members stated they didn't like RCC's gameplay and some members, just as groups have disliked other groups since the inception of wormhole politics. If someone doesn't like someone, that is justification enough to evict; if someone just feels like it, it's justification enough to evict. I don't see the call-out threads and political drama that spills onto the forums as "cesspool" material, and if people don't want to read it, you don't have to, but for some it's far more interesting than reading about someone's question about industry in a lower class wormhole or "WTB/WTS J-whatever"...

tl;dr - No reason needed for evictions. Evictions are content. Content is good.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe