These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Achuran Cultural Survey

Author
Gwen Ikiryo
Alexylva Paradox
#21 - 2014-10-30 14:23:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Gwen Ikiryo
Jace Sarice wrote:
Gwen Ikiryol wrote:
And unless your definition of "State Citizen" is extremely liberal, the term is only in reference to members of the megacorporations.


There is a difference between being a State citizen and being a State citizen with full benefits. It is a simple thing to be a citizen - be born in within the boundaries of the State. To have the full benefits, employment, education, and other elements possible is another matter. You have failed to distinguish between citizen and full citizen with equal standing. They are not the same thing.


Very well, fine! I'll accept your definition. The Achura in the client state are still "State Citizens".

I'm not exactly sure what point you're trying to make, however. You obviously acknowledge that there is a difference between the privileges enjoyed between citizens and citizens, so that does not alter what I am saying: That the State 1) Invaded another peoples planet, 2) Subjugated a number of said people using their considerable advantages in cultural and technological development and forced them to convert to their culture, and 3) Will still not accept the original culture as part of their mainstream society despite formally integrating the race ethnically. And will also not return the land it essentially stole to the local government.

I do not begrudge the State for it's original act of blatant colonialism on the homeworld. My objection is to the fact that it shows no paticular remorse in the present day, and is quite happy to restrict the cutlure that it half smothered in the crib from growing in any sense whatsoever, while at the same time constantly criticizing the Federation for doing the same thing.
Jace Sarice
#22 - 2014-10-30 14:35:58 UTC
You description of the events is so exaggerated that there is little point in continuing the discussion. This is why I said your 'cause' is nonexistent. You are attempting to create crisis, drama, and scandal where there is none. You cannot attempt to speak for or be offended on behalf of a group that itself does not share your concerns and expect yourself to be taken seriously.

Put simply, you do not speak for Achura and being Achura yourself does not give you the leeway to attempt to invent wrongs and division where it does not exist.
Ria Nieyli
Nieyli Enterprises
When Fleets Collide
#23 - 2014-10-30 14:36:34 UTC
I think you'd find that the Achura are a lot more similar to the Khanid than to the Caldari.
Anslo
Scope Works
#24 - 2014-10-30 14:36:59 UTC
She was asking a Gods damn question Jace, take a blue pill or something and cut the warrior mode posting crap.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Jace Sarice
#25 - 2014-10-30 14:41:59 UTC
Anslo wrote:
She was asking a Gods damn question Jace, take a blue pill or something and cut the warrior mode posting crap.


I answered the question regarding my opinion on the Achura culture. I was perfectly fine with leaving it at my very brief comment. It was she that turned it into this lengthy discussion. As per the norm, a thread was started with a question in the hopes that a very particular conversation could be had. She found that opportunity in my very brief comment. But do not worry, I am finished with the conversation.
Gwen Ikiryo
Alexylva Paradox
#26 - 2014-10-30 15:02:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Gwen Ikiryo
Jace Sarice wrote:
You description of the events is so exaggerated that there is little point in continuing the discussion. This is why I said your 'cause' is nonexistent. You are attempting to create crisis, drama, and scandal where there is none. You cannot attempt to speak for or be offended on behalf of a group that itself does not share your concerns and expect yourself to be taken seriously.

Put simply, you do not speak for Achura and being Achura yourself does not give you the leeway to attempt to invent wrongs and division where it does not exist.


Mister Sarice,

I will state once more that I do not paticularly have a cause - Or indeed, an interest to create any sort of scandal - simply an opinion, and that I also was not paticularly looking for a discussion to begin with. I percieved your original words to be stated due to lack of understanding of my intent, and not a fundemental objection as it has come to appear to be. I apologize if you feel I have dragged you into anything you did not wish for. (Though I will comment that it was you who escalated the conversation by attacking me personally.)

I also hope that I have never given the impression that I speak for all Achur, because I certainly do not - The Faith teaches passivity and acceptance in the face of conflict and change, and of the inherent transience of us all in the face of the cosmos and powers far greater then ourselves, to seek to understand rather then to subvert. With this is mind, it is completely understandable why there is very little fuss amongst the remanining independent Achur community, which is known for it's considerable spiritualism.

However, a pot being shattered and no one choosing to remark on it does not make the pot magically intact, and a brutish act that no one makes much noise over remains brutish all the same. I find it a little crude that you have chosen to simply dismiss me completely by speaking ad hominem, rather then addressing anything I have said, especially considering I do not believe I have said anything incorrect. Would you be interested in telling me what exactly I'm saying that is "so exaggerated"? I am unironically curious to know.

Consider before you speak that the following is historical fact, as we've gone over already:

1) The Sukuuvestaa corporation arrived at the homeworld during the secret colonization, deposed the Imperial government, and established itself as rulers of the Achur people.
2) The Sukuuvestaa corporation conducted industry on the planet in those early days, displacing many natives of the countryside.
3) The Sukuuvestaa corporation "uplifted" many of the Achur, and redesigned almost all major cities on the planet.
4) The Sukuuvestaa corporation continues to "own" these cities to the present day.

Of course, if you are quite done, that is also fine.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#27 - 2014-10-30 15:17:02 UTC
Perhaps this is cultural difference speaking, but you did appear to be speaking angrily to me as well, Gwen.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Gwen Ikiryo
Alexylva Paradox
#28 - 2014-10-30 15:28:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Gwen Ikiryo
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Perhaps this is cultural difference speaking, but you did appear to be speaking angrily to me as well, Gwen.


Pieter,

Unless you're talking about my very first repsonse to mister Sarice, I would ask if it would not also spoil your mood a little if someone were to dismiss an issue close to your heart as simply not existing, by using technical truths against you. For example, if I were to say, "There have been millions of Caldari living peacefully on Caldari prime for centuries. Your desire to return it to your people is meaningless.", that would make you rather annoyed, right?

...I don't actually believe that, just for the record. That's a completely terrible opinion.
Lunarisse Aspenstar
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#29 - 2014-10-30 16:07:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Lunarisse Aspenstar
Gwen Ikiryo wrote:


Please answer the following if you are not an ethnic Achur.

1. Were you, before reading this thread, aware of the existence of a distinct Achuran culture at all?
1A. If you were, would you describe it extremely akin to ethnic Caldari culture?

2. Have you been exposed to or researched much/any information about the Achura outside of our role in the State, including history or religion?

3. Have you encountered or worked alongside with any ethnic Achur who you would identify as foremostly Achuran, rather than Caldari?

4. Based on your own assessment, do you consider ethnic Caldari and overall State culture to be, overall, inherently superior to Achuran culture?

5. How do you personally perceive the Caldari and Achuran relationship in general?


I also need to confess to a cultural myopia.

1. Yes, I was aware in a very general sense of an Achuran people but not necessarily of a "culture" with any significance difference with Caldari culture as commonly known.

2. No, other than certain men and women, seem to find Achuran females to be particularly attractive. A former CEO of Pyre comes swiftly to mind. Whether it is due to appearance, or cultural traits, was never explained to me. Hmmph.

3. No. While I have had occasion to work with those whose Concord database identifies themselves as Achuran in origin, none identified themselves to be as Archuran in lieu of being Caldari. Pilot Diana Kim is an example.

4. I I lack sufficient information to make any assessment as, to me, visible physical differences are not sufficient to make such a determination.

5. I have no personal conception other than I thought the Achuran people were part and parcel of the over Caldari state and culture.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#30 - 2014-10-30 16:09:20 UTC
I never said that some asperity wasn't warranted, Gwen. Just that Sarice-haan's opinion is a legitimate mainstream opinion in the wider State (I'm fortunate enough to have grown up around both Native and State accultured Achurans) and that your response wasn't dispassionate.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Liam Antolliere
Doomheim
#31 - 2014-10-30 16:32:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Liam Antolliere
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I never said that some asperity wasn't warranted, Gwen. Just that Sarice-haan's opinion is a legitimate mainstream opinion in the wider State (I'm fortunate enough to have grown up around both Native and State accultured Achurans) and that your response wasn't dispassionate.


I apologize if my interjection is unwanted but I wished to make a small point here, with no offense intended to any party.

I would describe Mademoiselle Ikiryo's original response to Monsieur Sarice as emphatic but not angry. She took the time to state that she may have misunderstood the intent behind his post (and apologized in advance if that were the case) and then illustrated the reason behind the questionnaire to begin with. (That being the assumption that Achur culture has more-or-less been subverted through their assimilation into the State and a desire to discuss this belief).

In this point, she emphasized why she held that opinion. Furthermore, one can easily understand that she never sought to speak for all Achur by the very fact that she was asking for input from Achur in her original post.

Similarly, I can understand Monsieur Sarice's response as insistent on his original point (that being that Achur are State citizens by definition) but not belligerent. The escalation occurred when Monsieur Sarice ended with "your cause is nonexistent" because it implied that Mademoiselle Ikiryo was attempting to incite disharmony when the intent was not present, as the entire purpose of the thread was to gather opinions and information from others in order to have an open discussion.

"Though the people may hate me, that does not relieve me of my charge."

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#32 - 2014-10-30 17:28:03 UTC
That, actually, does help explain a lot. Thank you.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Deitra Vess
Non-Hostile Target
Wild Geese.
#33 - 2014-10-30 17:33:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Deitra Vess
I was born on Eram II, as part of the sebiestor tribe, spent a large part of my life in Annages and Arnon before coming back to the republic to enroll in the RMS.

1. I would imagine they had their own culture, no different than a thukker compared to a brutor.

1A. I would think they would be close,

2. I never really thought to look into it, never had a reason to.

3. Its never really come up in conversation, but most identified themselves as caldari

4. I don't know enough to make that assessment, that being the case I would default to thinking the caldari culture is stronger

5. I would imagine it is a strong relationship
Jelena Loustalainen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#34 - 2014-10-30 18:10:17 UTC
Capsuleer Ikiryo,

I welcome your attempt to improve the State's scientific body. I have therefore tried to answer your questions in an objective way below, doing my best to refrain from any personal opinions on you, your statements, or the questions themselves, in the interest of science and education only. My answers are often critical of some presumptions of the questions, that is true, but only because critical reading is a fundamental scientific endeavour, not because I am critical of you.


Please answer the following if you are an ethnic Achur or of mixed Achuran heritage.

1. When speaking in terms of your identity, would you foremostly describe yourself as an Achura, or a Caldari?

My education tells me that these are concepts of differing magnitudes. The Achura can be compared to the Deteis or the Civire, but not to the Caldari. I have not found any reason to question my education in this respect:

I am Achura and I am Caldari.



2. Were you born on our homeworld of Achura Prime/Saisio III, or elsewhere?

I was born on Kamokor V.



3. Were you raised in the Achuran client state or one of it's very few outposts, or under a megacorporation?

I was raised in an educational system organized and run by the Lai Dai megacorporation.



3B. If the latter, were you content with the necessity to comform to the Caldari cultural norms to be accepted? Did you feel you were provided with satisfactory education about your ethnic history?

Ethnicity and culture are treacherous concepts and one should not accept their use at face value.

My education tells me that there is no Caldari cultural norm as distinct from an Achuran one. Often, an attempt to define any cultural distinctiveness is an attempt by a group (often a population majority) to define another group as inferior to itself. The reason for doing so is in order to gain a competitive advantage for resources, positions of power etc.

That, of course, is not acceptable, and any Caldari citizen would see through that attempt and accept only products and people based on their quality and personal merit, not on any notion of ethnic heritage or based on origin of manufacture.



4. To whom would you say you hold the most loyalty: The Elder Visionaries - the provisional government of the homeworld, based around the remnants of the old empire - The Chief Executive Panel, or neither?

Actually a harder question to answer than it would be for me two months ago. As a planetside citizen I would say my loyalty was to the Lai Dai corporation and whatever entity that corporation would choose to lend its loyalty to, nominally the Patriot affiliation of the Caldari State.

As a capsuleer, however, I have been selected for immortality and work independent of the Lai Dai corporation. The School of Applied Knowledge has made it clear that I can join any corporation in the cluster, work for entities far outside the borders of the State and choose any direction in order to fulfill my individual potential. To achieve that true potential, I am no longer certain there is any need for any strict loyalties.

I believe I will spend more time meditating on the Kutuoto Miru in order to perceive how this situation best should be approached.



5. Do you follow one of the many sects of the Faith of the Achur, the Caldari Way, or neither/another religion?

As said above, I do not agree with comparing Achura and Caldari as concepts of the same magnitude. To exemplify, not to ridicule you, I have not heard of the sect or religion ”the Caldari Way” and suspect I do not agree with the presumptions of the question. I will not answer this.



6. Are you familar with Sukuuvestaa's early actions on our homeworld, where they demolished and replaced many of our major cities, deposed our native leadership, and assumed minority rule over the planet, enforcing Caldari culture in the process?

SuVee's general tendencies to sloppy workmanship leads me to believe that these statements may have some truth in them, even if I am not familiar with the details.



6A. Do you believe this was a good and justified action?

We Achura are strong and competent citizens of the State, often out-performing Deteis and Civire, especially in the fields of Research and Development. We work hard, we fulfill our duties, we invent quality equipment. We do not need anyone's pity or remorse pertaining to historical events in order to define ourselves.

The concept of "Good" or reasons of justification I believe are concepts of interest to Gallente professors at the University of Caille. The SuVee actions were successful. That is all that counts. Even if it was sloppy.


7. Would you consider native Achuran culture to have a great deal in common with native Caldari culture, as is often claimed, or to even be essentially one and the same?

Again. Deteis and Civire culture are no more Caldari culture than Achura culture is.

What enables a capsuleer to be successful? Two essential factors are usually singled out: talent and hard work. But it is not sufficient to be talented and hard-working. No less important is the ability to choose the direction such work should take.

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#35 - 2014-10-30 18:32:03 UTC
The Caldari Way is, actually, seperate from the faith known as Wayiism, which arose on Caldari Prime - with it's pantheon of Winds and the Maker.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Gwen Ikiryo
Alexylva Paradox
#36 - 2014-10-31 00:39:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Gwen Ikiryo
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
The Caldari Way is, actually, seperate from the faith known as Wayiism, which arose on Caldari Prime - with it's pantheon of Winds and the Maker.


I have corrected this error in the original post.

I don't want to speak up extensively again for fear of completely derailing the thread, but I'll briefly thank mister Antolliere for his defense of my intentions, and miss Loustalainen for her very honest and straightforward response. It was the sort of thing that I had hoped to see when I started this topic.

Actually, there is one thing I'd like to briefly ask, if you're still looking, miss Loustalainen: Since you obviously have a very practical and pragmatic mindset and little sentimentality - Which I'm not suggesting is a bad thing, mind you - How do you feel about how the States need to reclaim Caldari Prime has driven foreign and economic policy in recent years? If you find this question trite, then please feel free to ignore it.
Alvarez Akachi
CSR Star Command
Citizen's Star Republic
#37 - 2014-10-31 02:44:35 UTC
Gwen Ikiryo wrote:
Good day, pilots. I'll get straight to the point: During the sub-debate concerning the States attitude towards the Achura which some of you might've seen in Diana's recent, uh, conversationally stimulating thread, I made the claim that the majority of Achuran Capsuleers embrace Caldari culture above our own native customs, or I believe completely in place of them. My exact words were:

Gwen Ikiryo wrote:
You need only glance around the IGS to see what I mean. Almost all ethnic Achura have have Caldari names, follow Caldari customs, and talk about supplicating themselves before the "winds" rather then the Creator and the spirits.


I also commented that I believe that Sukuuvestaa, and indeed in many senses the wider State (though in a certainly less deliberate fashion), has worked to weaken the native Achuran identity, as well as erase from the public consciousness it's acts of hypocritical imperialism upon our people and society.

Since then, an individual has made it clear to me in private correspondence that they do not agree with either statement, and believe our native culture amongst Capsuleers is alive and well. Which is more then fair - After all, my evidence is completely anecdotal and mostly surface level on top of that, since I'm hardly the most outgoing person in the Cluster. It was crude of me to make the claim casually.

However, let it not be said that I am unwilling to test the weight of my own assertions, or else be proven happily incorrect. Thus, I'd like to conduct a brief survey regarding peoples attitudes towards Achuran culture, both internally and externally, to see what sort of attitudes come out, as well as what people are simply aware of at all. I've divided this into two seperate questionnaires: One for ethnic Achura, and a shorter one for everyone else. Please don't worry if you can't finish the whole thing. Fill out as many as you are comfortable with. And feel free to comment alongside your response if you wish.

Thank you in advance for any time you are willing to spare to appease my intellectual curiosity.

Please answer the following if you are an ethnic Achur or of mixed Achuran heritage.

1. When speaking in terms of your identity, would you foremostly describe yourself as an Achura, or a Caldari?

2. Were you born on our homeworld of Achura Prime/Saisio III, or elsewhere?

3. Were you raised in the Achuran client state or one of it's very few outposts, or under a megacorporation?
3A. If the former, have you ever felt uncomfortable with your position as a citizen of a tributary protectorate?
3B. If the latter, were you content with the necessity to comform to the Caldari cultural norms to be accepted? Did you feel you were provided with satisfactory education about your ethnic history?

4. To whom would you say you hold the most loyalty: The Elder Visionaries - the provisional government of the homeworld, based around the remnants of the old empire - The Chief Executive Panel, or neither?

5. Do you follow one of the many sects of the Faith of the Achur, the Caldari Wayist Faith, or neither/another religion?

6. Are you familar with Sukuuvestaa's early actions on our homeworld, where they demolished and replaced many of our major cities, deposed our native leadership, and assumed minority rule over the planet, enforcing Caldari culture in the process?
6A. Do you believe this was a good and justified action?

7. Would you consider native Achuran culture to have a great deal in common with native Caldari culture, as is often claimed, or to even be essentially one and the same?

8. How do you personally perceive the Caldari and Achuran relationship in general?


1.) I am both Achuran and Caldari, I am of Achuran descent, a Citizen of Saisio III, but first and foremost I am Caldari and currently beholden to STI, and lastly to my ethnic background.

2.) Where i was birthed at before choosing to become a Capsuleer is in my Biography.

3.) You could say it was an Achuran outpost, and also under a Mega-Corp control.
3a.) I was never with any want to my ethnic background
3b.) I was educated fairly well.

4.) I would say none and all

5.) Both are very similiar, one reason eagerness to have us join the State provided

6.) I am, but i would disagree with enforcing Caldari Culture upon us, you only need to look at the many monasteries and the Elders for confirmation. Also our leadership is pretty much intact and working as intended.

7.) Yes i would consider them fairly close....considering how intertwined these days they are, possible but nearly inconceivable to view indistinctly form another.

8.) Symbiotic
Jelena Loustalainen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#38 - 2014-10-31 13:00:51 UTC
Quote:
Actually, there is one thing I'd like to briefly ask, if you're still looking, miss Loustalainen: Since you obviously have a very practical and pragmatic mindset and little sentimentality - Which I'm not suggesting is a bad thing, mind you - How do you feel about how the States need to reclaim Caldari Prime has driven foreign and economic policy in recent years? If you find this question trite, then please feel free to ignore it.


It is well we are sometimes asked questions which challenge our abilities to analyze the circumstances and come to logical answers. Personally, I am not well versed in foreign policy, and do not often read news pertaining to non-scientific matters. Some bullet points come to mind, but I would call my thinking on the matter fragmented rather than conclusive.

Two months ago, I would leave answering questions about foreign policy to the Lai Dai corporation. My current status as a capsuleer however, seems to require of me to form an opinion.



I believe the attack on Caldari Prime was a successful large-scale test of the then-new clone soldier technology.

I believe that unless there is some urgent need of testing new military technology, we Caldari should refrain from symbolic wars and focus on developing our weapons and military strategies. What is the strategic value of Caldari Prime, an island within Federation Space? Low, I would say.



I believe the strengthening of central power and the Provists was detrimental to the internal competition between the mega-corporations.

Nationalism is a belief, not a skill, and power should be held by those who are most skillful, not by any right of blood. There are those who try to hide their inferiority behind a curtain of Nationalism. With my own eyes I saw skillful Gallente-expatriates being killed by less merited Civire during the riots of the Kamokor V Lai Dai facilities in YC110.

We Caldari are superior because our organization, education and training is superior, not because we are Caldari by blood. Our society's organization is fundamentally linked to internal competition between the mega-corporations and too much co-operation (voluntary or not) is not efficient in the long run.



I believe an unfortunate side-effect of the attack and the subsequent factional war seems to be that the Federation is now better armed, better prepared and better organized (especially its capsuleer forces) than it was before YC 110. The Federation should be left to self-destruct by means of its internal corruption, its degenerate educational system and its frequent celebration of random individual stupidity.

If left to itself, with time there would be scores of skillful Gallente migrating into Caldari space just to be able to fulfill their potential. Attacking the Federation directly, on the other hand, gives Federation citizens a reason to unify.



What enables a capsuleer to be successful? Two essential factors are usually singled out: talent and hard work. But it is not sufficient to be talented and hard-working. No less important is the ability to choose the direction such work should take.

Justi Pirkibo
Doomheim
#39 - 2014-10-31 16:33:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Justi Pirkibo
I am inexperienced, but I can provide you with an additional data point for your inquiry. Hopefully the information proves valuable to you.

Answers from one who is not an ethnic Achur.

1. I was aware of the culture of the people of Achur, to the extent of what was taught in undergraduate State history coursework.
1A. From my studies, the Achura were offered membership in the State not only because of some similarities between their cultural heritage and our own, but also for the ways in which they may complement the backbone of State culture. I believe that one of our key strengths and tactical advantages as a people is our skill at recognizing the strengths of others. I believe it is due thanks in part to this collective robustness that we attain equal economic and military footing while at a numerical disadvantage, and incorporating the Achura surely enhances the State's ability to respond in those capacities.

2. I have only heard of some basic customs of the Achur homeworld. I have yet to visit Saisio, though I would like to.

3. I believe the Achura to be fully Caldari, and I have yet to work with an ethnic Achur who has spoken otherwise.

4. Again, based on our inherent strengths as a people at building a robust, resilient, and responsive society, I believe Caldari culture continues to improve thanks to our recognition of the value the Achura provide to the State. It should be obvious by their incorporation that the Achura recognize this as well.

5. The relationship between the Deteis, Civire, and Achura is one of shared purpose and kinship. We are Caldari.
Gwen Ikiryo
Alexylva Paradox
#40 - 2014-10-31 16:47:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Gwen Ikiryo
Thank you for your candor and detail in answering my rather probing question, miss Loustalainen. I found your response to be informative and your logic to be consistant. I very much appreciate it, and won't inquire further.

I did want to clarify something, though. I got the impression from your original reply, though I might've been mistaken, that you feel I am being somewhat regressively minded in regard to expectations on a racial level with the undertones of this exercise - You know, saying, "It's such a pity that so many Achura have abandoned their true way of life to assimilate into a group of foreigners", or, "If you're not living like this, you're betraying your heritage/blood/ancestors/other guilt-tripping buzzwords and your identity is false", or something to that effect.

I wanted to make it clear this is not my intent. Race, as you said, deserves to be put on no pedestal as a concept, and the States actions towards the Achur in the now distant past should not have any meaning to you inherently if you do not wish them to. I only really based this around it because when evaluating the health of a culture, going to the ethnic root of it is a good place to start.

Though I will not call myself unbiased, I do not intend to be critical of you, or even, really, anyone. In many senses I respect, or even envy, your assimilation into wider State cutlure - Like most Achura currently alive outside of the homeworld - and your ability to distance yourself from these issues, and base your opinions completely on rational thinking rather then an emotional investment. My life would certainly have been a fair bit less complicated if I were born under a megacorporation rather then the client state, that is for certain. I would certainly not have posted this thread.

Though I will remark that I think you view the State - Or rather, "Being Caldari" as a higher concept - in a slightly idealized light, as I think Caldari culture carries a fair deal of cultural baggage specifically from Deteis and Civire culture that extend beyond the core ideals of meritocracy, pragmatism, and competitive unity, or occasionally even work against them. As a random example, you're probably aware of the Caldari custom of drinking tea from the Kresh leaves of their homeworld as part of a test of endurance or attempt to redeem oneself to ones peers. Kresh leaves are, with certain preparation, poisonous to most. But natural selection on the Caldari homeworld left their bloodlines immune to this, to an extent. So the idea is, if you drink it, and survive, you must be "strong", and therefore have merit. This is still sometimes practiced amongst the higher ranks of the megacorporate structure to resolve disputes.

However, if you were to drink Kresh tea at such a ceremony, you would, with complete certainty, fall quite dead. I'm not suggesting they'd ever put you in that position, but the fact that Deteis and Civire continue this custom rather the abolishing it to serve our peoples integration is one of the many small gulfs that exist between us, even in the context of us all as equal State citizens.

Alvarez Akachi wrote:
I am, but i would disagree with enforcing Caldari Culture upon us, you only need to look at the many monasteries and the Elders for confirmation. Also our leadership is pretty much intact and working as intended.


Mister Akachi,

I won't tie you up in debate again, but I just wanted to briefly comment that this is historically incorrect. While some of the government survived, before the State arrived, we used to have a monarchy.

We no longer have a monarchy.