These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

SCC Set to increase prices on sleeper salvage

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#21 - 2014-10-29 22:59:38 UTC
I tole them a C2 static was essential. I tole them.

I, for one, welcome the hordes of Drakes about to clot the C2's. And FYI, anyone interested in getting their very own wormhole FOR FREE just get into Join W-Space channel in-game and I will link what empty holes I find. Comes with a Prolapse. "No Gank on Setup Guarantee".

~~ Localectomy Blog ~~
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#22 - 2014-10-29 23:03:18 UTC
Nice change.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Phoenix Jones
Small-Arms Fire
#23 - 2014-10-30 00:05:34 UTC
Trinkets friend wrote:
I tole them a C2 static was essential. I tole them.

I, for one, welcome the hordes of Drakes about to clot the C2's. And FYI, anyone interested in getting their very own wormhole FOR FREE just get into Join W-Space channel in-game and I will link what empty holes I find. Comes with a Prolapse. "No Gank on Setup Guarantee".


you know what as almost ridiculous as this sounds, this could be a comically efficient way to get people into wormhole space :-)

Now just need a way to consistently post it.

Yaay!!!!
Stavaria
Bald Mountain Trust
#24 - 2014-10-30 00:36:35 UTC
If there really was a no gank on setup guarantee I'd be down to poke into a c1 or c2 and setup shop. :P
Bjurn Akely
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2014-10-30 00:41:03 UTC
Stavaria wrote:
If there really was a no gank on setup guarantee I'd be down to poke into a c1 or c2 and setup shop. :P


I too find that a great idea. I'm prone to harassing people in holes, but I could give my word on after helping people in go out and not harass until I find that hole again. (As in NOT drop a scanning alt in there.... :) )
Ilaister
Binary Aesthetics
#26 - 2014-10-30 01:04:39 UTC
Thankyou Corbexx.

Now we just have to learn to gank all these newbros gently so they stick around.
Potamus Jenkins
eXceed Inc.
Plucky Adventurers
#27 - 2014-10-30 02:26:48 UTC
maybe its bias
maybe its just the truth


but Corbexx rocks
dhunpael
#28 - 2014-10-30 08:22:35 UTC
corbexx wrote:
Phoenix Jones wrote:

Do have a quick question after skimming the minutes. Did I miss the wormhole section of it. They were discussed in multiple areas but not in a whole, unless I missed the section (it's 140 pages).


The first half of general game design was set aside for wormholes (Huge thanks to CCP Affinity). Alot is also discussed behind the scenes (read at the pub) and thats not included in the minutes




To the pub ^^
Gospadin
Bastard Children of Poinen
#29 - 2014-10-30 10:31:22 UTC
MooMooDachshundCow wrote:
VERY interesting development. Doesn't change conflict generation, but should help with population/activity levels.


I disagree. population + activity = content
Steven Hackett
Overload This
Escalation Theory
#30 - 2014-10-30 12:00:14 UTC
MooMooDachshundCow wrote:
SCC != SSC

Maybe update the title for disambiguation?

I was like "Why does Sleeper Social Club want blue lootz?"

You can send all your blue lootz to me, I don't mind :)
Terrorfrodo
Interbus Universal
#31 - 2014-10-30 12:23:57 UTC
Great news, this is the significant buff to low-class that was so sorely needed.

.
Previous page12