These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Null Sec System ratings?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Paranoid Loyd
#21 - 2014-10-22 23:29:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Welp, you would certainly be good at the isk doubling game. Roll

Did you know that -0.07 falls between 0.0 and -0.1?


FYP
OP thinks truesec is a metric of danger, there's the misunderstanding.
TV makes sarcasm look brave and clever, explaining why the thread turned to pure ****.





Oh look, it's Chopper failing at reading comprehension again. Roll

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!
Cancel Align NOW
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2014-10-23 00:41:00 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Azobé, Sharp Manual Mill retrofitted with a DRO, 1/2" Titanium-coated drill bit, Ø.500 (±.030) x ↓.93 (+0.000,-0.030)


Ok.. NOW we can math this thing out. Seeing as that Azobé is a dense hardwood, we can assume that we wont have any hole splintering or tearout as we approach the end of the hole. Ill go ahead and assume that the bit is a quality American manufactured piece and not a cheap one, so we can assume that the flutes are true and centered. If we take into account the tolerances specified above, and a small margin for error due to stacking of tolerances and the quality of the retrofitting, tolerances in programming and general skill of the programmer, we can safely assume that a system with -0.07 is indeed ******* Nullsec.



You are Marisa Tomei and Paranoid Loyd is Joe Pesci. I am watching this movie for the first time and am wondering if you are going to take your top off.
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#23 - 2014-10-23 01:53:32 UTC
Cancel Align NOW wrote:
You are Marisa Tomei and Paranoid Loyd is Joe Pesci. I am watching this movie for the first time and am wondering if you are going to take your top off.


Probably not, but I can almost guarantee ill win an academy award that many will argue was a mistake by the presenter.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Cancel Align NOW
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#24 - 2014-10-23 06:41:32 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Cancel Align NOW wrote:
You are Marisa Tomei and Paranoid Loyd is Joe Pesci. I am watching this movie for the first time and am wondering if you are going to take your top off.


Probably not, but I can almost guarantee ill win an academy award that many will argue was a mistake by the presenter.


That was because she took her top off for him.
Burl en Daire
M.O.M.S. Corp
#25 - 2014-10-23 06:46:31 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Welp, you would certainly be good at the isk doubling game. Roll

Did you know that -0.07 falls between 0.0 and -1.0?



Its players like these that are the reason we cant use "The Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch" in Eve.



You may not count to two unless you are counting to three.

Yesterday's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. Hunter S. Thompson
Burl en Daire
M.O.M.S. Corp
#26 - 2014-10-23 06:50:17 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Azobé, Sharp Manual Mill retrofitted with a DRO, 1/2" Titanium-coated drill bit, Ø.500 (±.030) x ↓.93 (+0.000,-0.030)


Ok.. NOW we can math this thing out. Seeing as that Azobé is a dense hardwood, we can assume that we wont have any hole splintering or tearout as we approach the end of the hole. Ill go ahead and assume that the bit is a quality American manufactured piece and not a cheap one, so we can assume that the flutes are true and centered. If we take into account the tolerances specified above, and a small margin for error due to stacking of tolerances and the quality of the retrofitting, tolerances in programming and general skill of the programmer, we can safely assume that a system with -0.07 is indeed ******* Nullsec.



If one of us was a woman I would ask you to space marry me.

Yesterday's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. Hunter S. Thompson
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#27 - 2014-10-23 09:00:39 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Adela Talvanen wrote:
I was good at woodwork though. Big smile


If you have a 5/4 board milled to 1" and take .93" off what do you have left besides a bunch of saw dust? Blink
1.77mm of veneer.


If my dad was any good at typing, this would be the first conversation he ever gave a **** about in Eve.
Adela Talvanen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#28 - 2014-10-23 12:41:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Adela Talvanen
As it has now been confirmed that a -0.07 system is in null space, is a -0.09 system more dangerous? Cool
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#29 - 2014-10-23 14:31:33 UTC
Adela Talvanen wrote:
As it has now been confirmed that a -0.07 system is in null space, is a -0.09 system more dangerous? Cool


That depends entirely upon how you define "dangerous".

If it was elitely dangerous, more than likely you would be spending a **** load of money just to be a glorified beta tester.

But if you define danger by the actual amount of danger you are in at any given moment, seeing as that I routinely fly into null in nothing but fresh characters in unfit noobships and are able to routinely shut down entire systems full of ratters simply by being in local, and have yet to this date suffered a loss at the hands of a vengeful prober or angry industrialist with d-scan skills and the ability to warp to a planet, id say enjoy your time in harmless **** talking fluffy bunny land.

Seeing that both -.07 and -.09 will both be rounded up in the system to -.1, one could safely say that both are equally "dangerous".

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
Chopper Rollins
hahahlolspycorp
#30 - 2014-10-23 14:42:56 UTC
OP, sec status is not a measure of danger, so you gotta be trolling or not reading replies.
-1.0 is safer than 1.0 under some circumstances.


Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#31 - 2014-10-23 16:09:54 UTC
Adela Talvanen wrote:
As it has now been confirmed that a -0.07 system is in null space, is a -0.09 system more dangerous? Cool


It depends on whether I'm in that system with you or not.

Mr Epeen Cool
Baneken
Arctic Light Inc.
Arctic Light
#32 - 2014-10-23 16:22:11 UTC
Am I only one who notices that next from -0.09 with 0.01 negative incerements should be -0.10 not -1.0 Big smile
Ava Ella
Doomheim
#33 - 2014-10-23 18:11:20 UTC
Adela Talvanen wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Sec status

Dangerous is a relative term with many variables. So, maybe.


Thanks for the link, but it doesn't really give me any answers.

System B-R5RB where I am heading for has a security rating of -0.07, and several of the surrounding systems also have security ratings of -0.0n.




Really? No one? B-R5RB has a security rating of -0.71 and I can't understand why you keep typing it as -0.07.

Not to mention why are you even going to B-R5RB? Titanomachy? Be sure and show up in something pretty blingy in honor of all those titans lost.
Desimus Maximus
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#34 - 2014-10-24 01:19:34 UTC
Wherever you are ratting in null, if u use capitals gtfo now cuz in a few weeks u aint goin ANYWHERE. :)
Adela Talvanen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#35 - 2014-10-24 13:55:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Adela Talvanen
Mr Epeen wrote:
Adela Talvanen wrote:
As it has now been confirmed that a -0.07 system is in null space, is a -0.09 system more dangerous? Cool


It depends on whether I'm in that system with you or not.

Mr Epeen Cool


Why, you think you're hard enough to take me on? Cool



Ava Ella wrote:
Adela Talvanen wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Sec status

Dangerous is a relative term with many variables. So, maybe.


Thanks for the link, but it doesn't really give me any answers.

System B-R5RB where I am heading for has a security rating of -0.07, and several of the surrounding systems also have security ratings of -0.0n.




Really? No one? B-R5RB has a security rating of -0.71 and I can't understand why you keep typing it as -0.07.

Not to mention why are you even going to B-R5RB? Titanomachy? Be sure and show up in something pretty blingy in honor of all those titans lost.


1, I've never been there before.

2, I've never seen a Titan before.

3, I want to see where the biggest Eve battle to date took place.

I currently fly a Corax. Is that 'blingy' enough?
Ava Ella
Doomheim
#36 - 2014-10-24 18:10:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Ava Ella
Adela Talvanen
Ava Ella wrote:
Adela Talvanen wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
[url=http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/System_Security wrote:
Sec status[/url]

Dangerous is a relative term with many variables. So, maybe.


Thanks for the link, but it doesn't really give me any answers.

System B-R5RB where I am heading for has a security rating of -0.07, and several of the surrounding systems also have security ratings of -0.0n.




Really? No one? B-R5RB has a security rating of -0.71 and I can't understand why you keep typing it as -0.07.

Not to mention why are you even going to B-R5RB? Titanomachy? Be sure and show up in something pretty blingy in honor of all those titans lost.


1, I've never been there before.

2, I've never seen a Titan before.

3, I want to see where the biggest Eve battle to date took place.

I currently fly a Corax. Is that 'blingy' enough?


If you plex tank it, I'm sure it would be enough to honor all those fallen titans.
Notorious Fellon
#37 - 2014-10-24 18:54:37 UTC
Baneken wrote:
Am I only one who notices that next from -0.09 with 0.01 negative incerements should be -0.10 not -1.0 Big smile


Which explains why we have been getting "excel updates" for years; devs are still fixing basic math errors made since the turn of the century.

Crime, it is not a "career", it is a lifestyle.
Hadrian Blackstone
Yamato Holdings
#38 - 2014-10-24 23:33:22 UTC
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Everything wants to kill you. Literally Space Austrailia.


Don't you know Cannibal Kane will wardec you and then sit in his station for a week for saying that?
Mikkal Rune
Doomheim
#39 - 2014-10-25 00:18:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Mikkal Rune
I went to B-R5RB not long after the battle, before the monument was put in place. I flew a Probe fitted with a microwarpdrive and an improved cloaking device. Eluded three gate camps going through Catch and Immensea. Got caught by one on the way back. Was an interesting trip; I'm not often in the southwest. If you fly Caldari ships, I'd suggest a Heron rather than a Corax.
Adela Talvanen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#40 - 2014-10-28 17:35:30 UTC
Mikkal Rune wrote:
I went to B-R5RB not long after the battle, before the monument was put in place. I flew a Probe fitted with a microwarpdrive and an improved cloaking device. Eluded three gate camps going through Catch and Immensea. Got caught by one on the way back. Was an interesting trip; I'm not often in the southwest. If you fly Caldari ships, I'd suggest a Heron rather than a Corax.


Why, so I look harmless and non threatening?
Previous page123Next page