Player Features and Ideas Discussion

WRONG: High concentration of players in systems is bad for roaming. I killed hundreds of Ishtars in Deklein in past five months. Even Orcas, Tengus, Vidnicators... and believe me, the more people in system, the lower chance for a good kill, because defence is so easy when you have 30+ buddies on local. Some of worst systém to kill a ratter is JU-UWQ, where is permanently 40+ guys, often 20 or more farming at the same time. There are people in Deklein who live in one system for months and never feel the need to go to another systwm because anomalies would be occupied. If enemy comes, all they need to do is dock and reship. No effort, no coordination. Just dock,reship, warp to gate - piece of cake.

CCP should change the anomaly spawning so that no more than 6 good anoms are in system at the same time. Also, Forsaken Hubs should be bad anoms again, Havens and Sanctums should be the most sought anoms. The yield per anomaly could even be higher - just not for 20 dudes in one systém at the same time, just for the 6 who were lucky to be there first. Others would have to go looking elsewhere.

Decreasing number of anoms per system would force people spread across universe looking for unoccupied anomalies, there would be less empty system and roaming would be funnier. Also people who would want to join home defence fleet would have to travel to staging system.

NPC space in every region? No thanks. I like the idea of different regions with different advantages and disadvantages. We don't need to make all of nullsec rapidly accessible to non-sov null just like we don't need all of null to have tons of truesec systems.

Is that a bad thing? Lower density of farmers over larger area leads to more targets, err, "fights". Again, there seems to be a "Pay us or we'll hold 0.0 hostage" type of vibe going on here.

The reality is that null sec entities are going to hold as much turf as they can - whether or not the specific income of each system is ridiculously high or low. The specific income only sets the rental rate on the areas they choose not to farm for themselves.

That's exactly what we have now. So yea, its a very bad thing because that is what everyone wants to not happen.


We have something like 30k pilots in the CFC, with only 10% ratting at a time we would need 3000 systems under your plan to house them all. That leaves just 524 systems in null for everyone else out here.

They alted their plan to get new corp members out to where the corp is. Under 30 days old you can suicide pod jump to your new corp. Over 30 days old you get to do that once a year.

Under your plan it would be zero. All of that space would be needed for us alone and it most likely would not be enough.

Again, you are posting some sort of extortion threat to CCP. "Give us rich farms in null sec or we won't let anybody else use get in."

I hear McDonalds in iceland is adding tears to theirs.

If you had paid any attention over the last week you would know that the vast bulk of systems in sov null are so crappy that you can earn more isk running level 3 missions in high sec. It still doesn't change the fact that even if the systems were worth ratting in they could still only host at the very most 10 people. If you want to shrink the CFC down to just being able to hold Deklein then you are going to have to deal with the fact that you are going to have 30,000 trying to live in just 80-90 systems.

Maybe a simplistic question, but given the history of CFC itself, why would anyone assume that it is somehow immune to change?

I would note that I fly down through Goon space a lot, even right through the heart of Fountain from time to time, and 90% of those systems are empty, as in not a single pilot in local, 90% of the time. Your claim seems to have little factual basis based on simple observation.