These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

TVP Propaganda Machine Hoodwinks Incursion Runners in Recent Drama?

First post
Author
n2cthe1
HQ MATO
#1 - 2014-09-27 13:28:21 UTC  |  Edited by: n2cthe1
TVP have finally produced a counter( http://thevalhallaproject.info/news.html ) to the ISN proposal. Neither crosses the divide between the two differing incursion philosophies and are probably doomed to fail.

However, could this be what TVP are aiming for? Strange thing to say, you might think, but read on and judge for yourself.

The none-to-subtle approach by the TVP team shows a classic approach to propaganda and manipulation. Will the other communities realise this or will they just see the chance to get back to making iskies? Will they care?

There is nothing new in the recent TVP proposal, it is a rehash of the old differences that have been splitting incursion unity for over 2 years. What is interesting, though, is its insidious nature that seeks to enable TVP to ”control” incursions by restricting freedom of other incursion communities. Who do you think will want to lead this expansion of control of incursions? There may be much denial of this but history shows this to be a classic approach.

TVP have been pretty canny with this proposal. I believe they have set it up to fail. Clear in knowledge that it will probably be unacceptable to ISN, TVP are banking on the other incursion communities believing it is a reasonable proposal (dangling the isk-making carrot in front of them, again?).

Why is this important? Well, TVP are desperate to maintain the claim to have the support of the entire incursion community (excluding ISN of course). This is line they constantly repeat in their channel. However, this does not seem to reflect reality.

What is actually behind all of this? Well, more than one of the other incursion communities has indicated that TVP have strived, but ultimately failed, to match ISN. They theorise that this inferiority seems to be at the core of the problem. One suggested that TVP see ISN as their nemesis and this was the ultimate reason for their collective psychosis (his words, not mine).

Have TVP engaged in a great piece of propaganda manipulation to finally make themselves look better than ISN? They must know their proposal will be unpalatable to ISN but they must be hoping that the other incursion communities will not see this.

If they succeed they may be scratching that itch that is their nemesis. If they fail in this attempt, their psychosis could worsen.
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#2 - 2014-09-27 20:01:30 UTC
n2cthe1 wrote:
TVP have finally produced a counter( http://thevalhallaproject.info/news.html ) to the ISN proposal. Neither crosses the divide between the two differing incursion philosophies and are probably doomed to fail.

However, could this be what TVP are aiming for? Strange thing to say, you might think, but read on and judge for yourself.

The none-to-subtle approach by the TVP team shows a classic approach to propaganda and manipulation. Will the other communities realise this or will they just see the chance to get back to making iskies? Will they care?

There is nothing new in the recent TVP proposal, it is a rehash of the old differences that have been splitting incursion unity for over 2 years. What is interesting, though, is its insidious nature that seeks to enable TVP to ”control” incursions by restricting freedom of other incursion communities. Who do you think will want to lead this expansion of control of incursions? There may be much denial of this but history shows this to be a classic approach.

TVP have been pretty canny with this proposal. I believe they have set it up to fail. Clear in knowledge that it will probably be unacceptable to ISN, TVP are banking on the other incursion communities believing it is a reasonable proposal (dangling the isk-making carrot in front of them, again?).

Why is this important? Well, TVP are desperate to maintain the claim to have the support of the entire incursion community (excluding ISN of course). This is line they constantly repeat in their channel. However, this does not seem to reflect reality.

What is actually behind all of this? Well, more than one of the other incursion communities has indicated that TVP have strived, but ultimately failed, to match ISN. They theorise that this inferiority seems to be at the core of the problem. One suggested that TVP see ISN as their nemesis and this was the ultimate reason for their collective psychosis (his words, not mine).

Have TVP engaged in a great piece of propaganda manipulation to finally make themselves look better than ISN? They must know their proposal will be unpalatable to ISN but they must be hoping that the other incursion communities will not see this.

If they succeed they may be scratching that itch that is their nemesis. If they fail in this attempt, their psychosis could worsen.


When ISN started griefing Inncursion runners I wardec'ed them multiple times only to have them swap corps multiple times. TVP didn't want in on it and wasn't strong enough to win the contests. I was already flying with Summer most of the time, who was wining the contests Vs. ISN half of the time anyway, so ISN focused their griefing on TVP.

I don't believe in Karma but poetic justice prevails IMHO. Now they are all crying and making less money.

Oreos dipped in tears for the win.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

n2cthe1
HQ MATO
#3 - 2014-09-27 20:26:51 UTC  |  Edited by: n2cthe1
Ciper Jones: Your language strongly points to you being from the TVP channel. That is not a problem but there is a bias showing.

I have no doubt that any ISN input would be just as biased from their perspective.

Really, it is the independent view that would be the most informative here. In reality, I doubt there are any truly independent views, but c'est la vie.

Just as an example of some differing perspectives:

TVP's view of griefing = ISN's view of contesting

TVPs' view of tears = ISN's view of discussions

Although,

TVP trolling = ISN trolling Smile

Both communities are convinced the other is suffering most and losing more people.
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2014-09-27 20:37:00 UTC
Would have helped a lot if you had just posted a brief summary of the proposal and the reason why you don't like it instead of going off on a long winded rant.

My personal opinion - ISN has always seemed shady to me, going back to when they first posted in this sub-forum asking for bling ship fits to join when griefer Logistic ships were infiltrating fleets and not repping it's members. Due to the timing and current events, it definitely appeared to be a set up, a trap to lure in unsuspecting players.

What I find interesting now is the fact that during the DDoS attacks, ISN didn't get disconnected and used the attacks to steal a bunch of loot from destroyed player ships, then when everyone came back on line, gloated and bragged about it in local chat.

A far as I'm concerned, if TVP is now giving ISN trouble, then I say more power to TVP.

Also I see nothing wrong with the TVP Proposal.


DMC



Quote:
Proposal for fellow Incursion Runners to consider
26.9.2014
TVP Leadership and the FC team

TVP would like to thank our pilots and the communities at large who helped us along in this long and hard road taken by us. We also would like to apologize to people who were drastically affected by this stance. We hope that this agreement establishes an honorable code of conduct for incursions to ensure a better future for all incursion communities. As history has taught us progress and evolution can't be made without strife. We also would like to thank the people who assisted our fleets during the DDoS attacks and helped in recovering the loot.

Moving forward we would like to present the agreement that we fervently hope will be acceptable for all the incursion communities.

1. The Kundalini Manifest is to be off limits to all groups until the time that the incursion hits withdrawal, unless all communities unanimously agree to kill the incursion to ensure a better spawn spread.

2. Following the previous line of thought we hope all the HQ capable communities are willing to accept a MOM rotation so that everyone gets a fair share. In the event that a community is not able to form up at withdrawal they can request help from other communities with the MOM loot going to the community who’s turn it is.

3. To try and prevent overcrowding in HQ's nowadays it would help for communities to split themselves into 2 groups and farm those incursions separately. For example: communities that have been historically at odds separate themselves from each other to alleviate tension.

4. Expanding the currently existing channel from just leadership and diplomats to all fleet commanders from all the communities. This will help clear away a lot of confusion and misinformation with a much more open line of communication. In the event of a mass disconnect, this will also help with getting the necessary help to pilots who have lost their ship.

5. With the current contest-driven environment it is desired that contests be given a fair chance. But no community may follow a fleet around after winning a contest. The winning fleet will chose the next site and head out to it. The losing fleet may head to the same site with the understanding that they agree to be re-contested.

We at TVP hope that this agreement is deemed acceptable for all communities as it addresses most of the points that, historically, issues have stemmed from. We will strife to work together with all other communities in the future with a more open dialogue so that such misunderstandings do not reoccur.


n2cthe1
HQ MATO
#5 - 2014-09-27 20:48:49 UTC
Valid points all.

A subject that certainly polarises opinion, for those that care about incursions anyway.

It must be said that most of the other incursion communities hold little love for ISN. However, equally important to note is that whatever support for this action TVP thought they had, from other communities, appears to fast be evaporating.

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2014-09-27 21:00:38 UTC
n2cthe1 wrote:

It must be said that most of the other incursion communities hold little love for ISN. However, equally important to note is that whatever support for this action TVP thought they had, from other communities, appears to fast be evaporating.


You sure about that?


DMC
n2cthe1
HQ MATO
#7 - 2014-09-27 21:19:50 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
n2cthe1 wrote:

It must be said that most of the other incursion communities hold little love for ISN. However, equally important to note is that whatever support for this action TVP thought they had, from other communities, appears to fast be evaporating.


You sure about that?


DMC


Sure? of course not. There are no concrete answers in this. What has been postulated could be wildly inaccurate. Conversely, it could be completely accurate. After all, people put different interpretations on the same events, depending on their viewpoint.

Nevertheless, what appears to be clear is that the individuals outside of TVP and ISN are becoming tired of the situation.
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#8 - 2014-09-27 23:43:25 UTC
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay.

The Rules:
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.

Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Caleidascope
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#9 - 2014-09-27 23:58:17 UTC
n2cthe1 wrote:
Valid points all.

A subject that certainly polarises opinion, for those that care about incursions anyway.

It must be said that most of the other incursion communities hold little love for ISN. However, equally important to note is that whatever support for this action TVP thought they had, from other communities, appears to fast be evaporating.


From Imperial Shipment... IS... Where are you hiding N?

Life is short and dinner time is chancy

Eat dessert first!

Durzo Hard
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2014-09-28 03:06:08 UTC
My take on it is this.

Let them continue to try and get one up on each other. I'm tired of their bullshit and I'm going back to other things to make isk. It's not worth the hassle.
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#11 - 2014-09-28 05:33:19 UTC
Quote:
Ciper Jones: Your language strongly points to you being from the TVP channel. That is not a problem but there is a bias showing.


Perhaps, but not mine. I don't hang out with any of them anymore.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

n2cthe1
HQ MATO
#12 - 2014-09-28 07:54:59 UTC  |  Edited by: n2cthe1
Caleidascope wrote:
n2cthe1 wrote:
Valid points all.

A subject that certainly polarises opinion, for those that care about incursions anyway.

It must be said that most of the other incursion communities hold little love for ISN. However, equally important to note is that whatever support for this action TVP thought they had, from other communities, appears to fast be evaporating.


From Imperial Shipment... IS... Where are you hiding N?



lol, nice one, I hadn't made that connection Big smile
Dato Koppla
Balls Deep Inc.
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#13 - 2014-09-28 11:58:03 UTC
Wow the drama never ends.
PopplerRo
#14 - 2014-09-28 13:30:02 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:


When ISN started griefing Inncursion runners I wardec'ed them multiple times only to have them swap corps multiple times. TVP didn't want in on it and wasn't strong enough to win the contests. I was already flying with Summer most of the time, who was wining the contests Vs. ISN half of the time anyway, so ISN focused their griefing on TVP.

I don't believe in Karma but poetic justice prevails IMHO. Now they are all crying and making less money.

Oreos dipped in tears for the win.


Summer community was actually dead before ISN began doing HQ sites

DeMichael Crimson wrote:
..

What I find interesting now is the fact that during the DDoS attacks, ISN didn't get disconnected and used the attacks to steal a bunch of loot from destroyed player ships, then when everyone came back on line, gloated and bragged about it in local chat.


ISN did lose ships, substantially more valuable than tvp's. And yes ISN must be devs how else could they log in if no one else could.
T20 mk2
Estella Osoka
Cranky Bitches Who PMS
#15 - 2014-09-28 18:28:18 UTC
PopplerRo wrote:

DeMichael Crimson wrote:
..

What I find interesting now is the fact that during the DDoS attacks, ISN didn't get disconnected and used the attacks to steal a bunch of loot from destroyed player ships, then when everyone came back on line, gloated and bragged about it in local chat.


ISN did lose ships, substantially more valuable than tvp's. And yes ISN must be devs how else could they log in if no one else could.
T20 mk2


You do realize how a DDoS attack works right? Just because one group of players got DC'd doesn't mean all players get DC'd. It all depends on how the DDoS attack was orchestrated and what it targeted on the network. I've seen players DC during these while I was fine, and then have the situation reverse during the next event. Put the tinfoil hattery away.

All ISN did was take advantage of a bad situation. Was it right? Maybe, maybe not. Who cares? It is just spaceship pixels. Once you start taking this game too seriously, then maybe it is time to step away from it for awhile.
PopplerRo
#16 - 2014-09-28 21:36:20 UTC
Estella Osoka wrote:
PopplerRo wrote:

DeMichael Crimson wrote:
..

...


ISN did lose ships, substantially more valuable than tvp's. And yes ISN must be devs how else could they log in if no one else could.
T20 mk2


You do realize how a DDoS attack works right? Just because one group of players got DC'd doesn't mean all players get DC'd. It all depends on how the DDoS attack was orchestrated and what it targeted on the network. I've seen players DC during these while I was fine, and then have the situation reverse during the next event. Put the tinfoil hattery away.

..


I had assumed it was obvious I was being facetious, I guess not
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2014-09-29 02:45:29 UTC
Estella Osoka wrote:
PopplerRo wrote:

DeMichael Crimson wrote:
..

What I find interesting now is the fact that during the DDoS attacks, ISN didn't get disconnected and used the attacks to steal a bunch of loot from destroyed player ships, then when everyone came back on line, gloated and bragged about it in local chat.


ISN did lose ships, substantially more valuable than tvp's. And yes ISN must be devs how else could they log in if no one else could.
T20 mk2


You do realize how a DDoS attack works right? Just because one group of players got DC'd doesn't mean all players get DC'd. It all depends on how the DDoS attack was orchestrated and what it targeted on the network. I've seen players DC during these while I was fine, and then have the situation reverse during the next event. Put the tinfoil hattery away.

All ISN did was take advantage of a bad situation. Was it right? Maybe, maybe not. Who cares? It is just spaceship pixels. Once you start taking this game too seriously, then maybe it is time to step away from it for awhile.
First of all, if the situation was reversed both of you would obviously care and probably be demanding restitution.

Secondly, how do you know ISN suffered a lot more loss than TVP did from the DDoS attacks? The statements seem to indicate differently. Please link your proof.

Anyway it doesn't really matter. Obviously the server wasn't operating correctly so consequently that should negate any loss or gains acquired during that time for everyone game wide. Yes I agree this is a game. Games have rules and this one has rules against exploitation. Plain and simple, ISN exploited the situation when the server was under DDoS attack.

Personally I don't give a rats arse what either of you say. There's been way too many shady backroom deals done in this game to ignore so don't tell me to put the tinfoil hattery away. Now if you believe otherwise, then you're really naive. Seems to me you're the ones who need to step back from the game for a while.


DMC
RonPaul Rox
Prime Directive.
United Caldari Space Command.
#18 - 2014-09-29 02:46:30 UTC
n2cthe1 wrote:
Ciper Jones: Your language strongly points to you being from the TVP channel. That is not a problem but there is a bias showing.

I have no doubt that any ISN input would be just as biased from their perspective.

Really, it is the independent view that would be the most informative here. In reality, I doubt there are any truly independent views, but c'est la vie.

Just as an example of some differing perspectives:

TVP's view of griefing = ISN's view of contesting

TVPs' view of tears = ISN's view of discussions

Although,

TVP trolling = ISN trolling Smile

Both communities are convinced the other is suffering most and losing more people.


you sound a lot like an ISN member.

http://imgur.com/EGjYLSL

n2cthe1
HQ MATO
#19 - 2014-09-29 06:35:46 UTC  |  Edited by: n2cthe1
RonPaul Rox wrote:
n2cthe1 wrote:
Ciper Jones: Your language strongly points to you being from the TVP channel. That is not a problem but there is a bias showing.

I have no doubt that any ISN input would be just as biased from their perspective.

Really, it is the independent view that would be the most informative here. In reality, I doubt there are any truly independent views, but c'est la vie.

Just as an example of some differing perspectives:

TVP's view of griefing = ISN's view of contesting

TVPs' view of tears = ISN's view of discussions

Although,

TVP trolling = ISN trolling Smile

Both communities are convinced the other is suffering most and losing more people.


you sound a lot like an ISN member.


Really? That's disappointing. You don't think this is a centre view of what's happened?

I have carefully avoided using the emotive language of either party, merely looking at the motivation.

Do you not think the examples of the perspectives above are correct? It is only what I have heard in both channels.

In answer to your question: I PvP; although, I haven't been active very much lately. Blink
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#20 - 2014-09-29 08:39:59 UTC
Quote:
Summer community was actually dead before ISN began doing HQ sites


They were quite alive when ISN started contesting every site and popping moms.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

123Next pageLast page