These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

T2 versions of:

Author
The Sinister
Interbellum
#1 - 2014-09-22 20:25:24 UTC
I would really like to see CCP introduce T2 version or these following items:

1. Reactive Armor Hardener
2. Ancillary Shield Boosters
3. Ancillary Armor Repairers
4. Micro Jump Drive

Suggestions for these modules may be the following:

T2 Reactive Armor Hardener
Base resistances 17.5% on all, 35%/35% on two, 70% on one.

T2 Ancillary Shield Booster and Ancillary Armor Repairer
Increase their Capacity so they can have 2 extra cycles

T2 Micro Jump Drive
Reactivation Delay 120 seconds

Ofcorse the power grid/CPU and activation energy requirements will increase as well!
The Sinister
Interbellum
#2 - 2014-09-22 20:45:47 UTC
T2 version of all warfare drones and Utility drones are wellcome too!

T2 Electronic Warfare and Combat Utility drones, its really time for them to appear in game.
Chimpface Holocaust
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2014-09-22 21:37:09 UTC
T2 combat battleships and destroyers
Zmikund
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2014-09-22 21:45:02 UTC
T2 capital modules ... so reve pilots can stop crying
Eridon Hermetz
Diplomatie Rapide
Wreckflix and chill
#5 - 2014-09-22 21:46:10 UTC
Chimpface Holocaust wrote:
T2 combat battleships and destroyers


T2 BS : Black Ops
T2 Destroyer : Interdictor


Done :p
Lyra Gerie
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2014-09-23 00:09:48 UTC
For T2 shield and armor ancillary it would probably be better to keep the same boosts but raise the overall boosted amount making them either stronger in the case of shield or more useful once charges are gone for armor.
Verdis deMosays
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2014-09-23 00:45:35 UTC
Eridon Hermetz wrote:
Chimpface Holocaust wrote:
T2 combat battleships and destroyers


T2 BS : Black Ops
T2 Destroyer : Interdictor


Done :p


I believe you mean Marauders
Sales Alt negrodamus
Sanctuary of Shadows
#8 - 2014-09-23 02:08:13 UTC
Agreed on the RAH. I'd love to see a T2 / meta variant of it.
FireFrenzy
Cynosural Samurai
#9 - 2014-09-23 09:08:24 UTC
Any module that currenlty only has one or one and a meta version, so capital stuff and any unmentioned inferno modules go here...
Valkin Mordirc
#10 - 2014-09-23 09:31:51 UTC
A T2 ASB would be op asss fuuuuuuuuuuck.


ASB's don't need a tech two because the T1 is on the level of T2's as they stand.
#DeleteTheWeak
Voxinian
#11 - 2014-09-23 09:41:59 UTC
Big yes for TII MJD with shorter activation cycle that is now 10 seconds... which is long for hit and run engagements.
big miker
Frogleap Factories
#12 - 2014-09-23 11:51:26 UTC
The Sinister wrote:
T2 version of all warfare drones and Utility drones are wellcome too!

T2 Electronic Warfare and Combat Utility drones, its really time for them to appear in game.



Please 1000000x no for t2 ecm drones...
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#13 - 2014-09-23 12:07:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Arya Regnar
t2 titans t2 bombs t2 stupidity t3 hulk t4 strategical cruisar

oh yeah we also need t2 subsystems

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Jur Tissant
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2014-09-23 12:10:00 UTC
Eridon Hermetz wrote:
Chimpface Holocaust wrote:
T2 combat battleships and destroyers


T2 BS : Black Ops
T2 Destroyer : Interdictor


Done :p


Except interdictors are pretty lame outside of null. Destroyers in general are sort of a lost generation outside of ganks, I'd like to see one or two more T2 varieties to roam low-sec with.
Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#15 - 2014-09-23 12:36:38 UTC
Jur Tissant wrote:
Eridon Hermetz wrote:
Chimpface Holocaust wrote:
T2 combat battleships and destroyers


T2 BS : Black Ops
T2 Destroyer : Interdictor


Done :p


Except interdictors are pretty lame outside of null. Destroyers in general are sort of a lost generation outside of ganks, I'd like to see one or two more T2 varieties to roam low-sec with.



I know a few sabre pilots who would argue with that statement. Take off the bubbles they can take on whole new direction. And looking over the dictor changes....others are showing some fun potential bubble less.

It be these bubble less dics that make this an issue. If ccp gave another t2 dessie I am not seeing how they would not be carbon copies of the bubble less dictor in game atm. Which creates an issue for ccp....how to put a new ship in game when it can already exist (if you think outside the box anyway).
Chimpface Holocaust
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#16 - 2014-09-23 13:27:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Chimpface Holocaust
black ops and marauters are T2 attack battleships and interdictors are T2 "attack" destroyers

what I was requesting was T2 variants of the combat battleships IE the abbadon, rohk, hypreion, and maelstrom; and the "combat" destroyers IE the dragoon, corax, algos, and talwar
Anthar Thebess
#17 - 2014-09-23 13:40:44 UTC
T2 micro doomsday , mountable on a noobship, and having 1500% bonus to damage when hitting super capitals.
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#18 - 2014-09-23 13:44:40 UTC
Arya Regnar wrote:
t2 titans t2 bombs t2 stupidity t3 hulk t4 strategical cruisar

oh yeah we also need t2 subsystems

I see what you did there.

Also...aren't subsystems already T3? Why the downgrade? Blink

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs

Catherine Laartii
Doomheim
#19 - 2014-09-23 17:18:02 UTC
t2 cap guns because XL scorch would be lols.
Bullet Therapist
FT Cold Corporation
#20 - 2014-09-23 18:08:36 UTC
Chimpface Holocaust wrote:
black ops and marauters are T2 attack battleships and interdictors are T2 "attack" destroyers

what I was requesting was T2 variants of the combat battleships IE the abbadon, rohk, hypreion, and maelstrom; and the "combat" destroyers IE the dragoon, corax, algos, and talwar


A t2 hyperion would be pretty brutal.
12Next page