These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Popping Incursions, making a point or greifing.

First post
Author
PopplerRo
#21 - 2014-09-18 12:41:15 UTC  |  Edited by: PopplerRo
Doc J wrote:
...

I have a feeling this is more to do with TVP having enough of Noble acting like a spoilt child.

It's a game, the only community I have ever seen be aggressive in it's desire to "own" incursions has been Noble and his sheep. Referring back to contesting and following TVP fleets around incursion focuses. This has been the story for the last 24 months. It's funny how I remember having a conversation with Noble and told him that if he continued to contest TVP he would turn incursions into a toxic river. Karma mate, it's all within the game mechanics, funny how that was your answer to TVP when you deliberately targeted them so that you could make ISK quicker. TVP adapted, can ISN?


With the spawn timer mechanic change they saw it as an opportunity. When your strength is quanity over quality ofc you use that to your advantage, "you either join us or die opposing us"

As to the contesting claim "following", ISN's use of contesting is no different than TVP's use of it, be it isk/hr or just for fun. Actual following has only occured once or twice after having been provoked be it a fc from another group preloading the sites ISN were in warp to or generally being a twit.

I also remember you trying to gank an ISN fleet and failing horribly. P
Doc J
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#22 - 2014-09-18 13:53:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc J
PopplerRo wrote:
Doc J wrote:
...

I have a feeling this is more to do with TVP having enough of Noble acting like a spoilt child.

It's a game, the only community I have ever seen be aggressive in it's desire to "own" incursions has been Noble and his sheep. Referring back to contesting and following TVP fleets around incursion focuses. This has been the story for the last 24 months. It's funny how I remember having a conversation with Noble and told him that if he continued to contest TVP he would turn incursions into a toxic river. Karma mate, it's all within the game mechanics, funny how that was your answer to TVP when you deliberately targeted them so that you could make ISK quicker. TVP adapted, can ISN?


With the spawn timer mechanic change they saw it as an opportunity. When your strength is quanity over quality ofc you use that to your advantage, "you either join us or die opposing us"

As to the contesting claim "following", ISN's use of contesting is no different than TVP's use of it, be it isk/hr or just for fun. Actual following has only occured once or twice after having been provoked be it a fc from another group preloading the sites ISN were in warp to or generally being a twit.

I also remember you trying to gank an ISN fleet and failing horribly. P


It's same for both communities, TVP did that, ISN did this. I will assure you for as long as I can remember, and I will make this point again, the only community that acted aggressively in HQ's has always been ISN and that comes from using both communities to make ISK.

PS: I've never tried ganking a fleet in all honesty I like both TVP and ISN communities but the drama between you lot is like watching two kids in a playground fight over who did what first and why.
Marc Callan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2014-09-18 15:15:28 UTC
Maybe the parties to the arguments could find a nice quiet corner of a nice quiet system, declare some duels, and whoever wins the ISK war wins the argument? Like someone somewhere once may have said, approximately, there's a unsubtle difference between a sandbox and a litter box.

"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be." - Kurt Vonnegurt

James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#24 - 2014-09-18 18:10:04 UTC
Marc Callan wrote:
Maybe the parties to the arguments could find a nice quiet corner of a nice quiet system, declare some duels, and whoever wins the ISK war wins the argument? Like someone somewhere once may have said, approximately, there's a unsubtle difference between a sandbox and a litter box.

But where is the fun in that? So much fun watching TVP cause everyone to cry and get mad and generally self destruct, while ISN flies all the sites left when they get an HQ fleet up, and TVP whines.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

Tarpedo
Incursionista
#25 - 2014-09-18 18:26:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarpedo
Marc Callan wrote:
Maybe the parties to the arguments could find a nice quiet corner of a nice quiet system, declare some duels, and whoever wins the ISK war wins the argument?

Won't work because ISN cannot follow any reasonable rules. Well, "couldn't follow": I doubt we should use present or future forms to talk about ISN.

As for litter box - HQ systems turned into litter box two years ago, thanks to ISN. Almost nobody popped moms prematurely for like 7-8 months before their appearance, fleets didn't contest each other outside of vanguard systems (and they did it in vanguards only because it was really necessary due to heavy competition). Right now TVP is just cleaning the sand which accumulated a lot of waste.
Doc J
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#26 - 2014-09-18 23:02:58 UTC
James Baboli wrote:
Marc Callan wrote:
Maybe the parties to the arguments could find a nice quiet corner of a nice quiet system, declare some duels, and whoever wins the ISK war wins the argument? Like someone somewhere once may have said, approximately, there's a unsubtle difference between a sandbox and a litter box.

But where is the fun in that? So much fun watching TVP cause everyone to cry and get mad and generally self destruct, while ISN flies all the sites left when they get an HQ fleet up, and TVP whines.


muhahaha thats complete and utter BS.
Alpha Dominus
Ante Dominae
#27 - 2014-09-19 02:54:34 UTC
I say this is one of the things that make this game great. Another page in Eve's vibrant history tome.
RonPaul Rox
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2014-09-19 04:09:34 UTC
you'd have better luck secretly paying marmite to suicide gank them.

9 tornados will alpha a vindi, WAY less will alpha a logi. unfortunately CODE. cant at the moment, they dont have enough nado pilots. Plus a positive sec status would be highly desirable for this

http://imgur.com/EGjYLSL

James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#29 - 2014-09-20 07:16:11 UTC
Here's the thing about "rules" and eve. The only people who can set absolute rules for EVE are CCP. Anything else is a player agreement. ISN has a history of being screwed over in the process of making such things, and protesting at the time the agreement is being made, and then the rest of the community agrees and expects ISN to comply against their own best interests and without having actually agreed to anything. If you don't know the history, going back into BTL, TDF and the early formation of TVP as "the HQ channel" and the drama that caused, you probably don't have enough of the backstory to make a reasonable comment.

Now, if we got a summit of leadership of major channels to agree publicly to a set of standards for when to run the motherships, and when it is acceptable to deviate and so on, and got people to agree that this standard was binding and anyone who violated it was in the wrong, this would be a different story.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

Blizzaro
Vahalla La
Rainbow Knights
#30 - 2014-09-20 07:42:31 UTC
James Baboli wrote:
Here's the thing about "rules" and eve. The only people who can set absolute rules for EVE are CCP. Anything else is a player agreement. ISN has a history of being screwed over in the process of making such things, and protesting at the time the agreement is being made, and then the rest of the community agrees and expects ISN to comply against their own best interests and without having actually agreed to anything. If you don't know the history, going back into BTL, TDF and the early formation of TVP as "the HQ channel" and the drama that caused, you probably don't have enough of the backstory to make a reasonable comment.

Now, if we got a summit of leadership of major channels to agree publicly to a set of standards for when to run the motherships, and when it is acceptable to deviate and so on, and got people to agree that this standard was binding and anyone who violated it was in the wrong, this would be a different story.


Highsec = Gentlemen's agreements only.

There is literally nothing you can do to enforce them hence things being the way they are.
Doc J
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#31 - 2014-09-20 10:42:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc J
James Baboli wrote:
Here's the thing about "rules" and eve. The only people who can set absolute rules for EVE are CCP. Anything else is a player agreement. ISN has a history of being screwed over in the process of making such things, and protesting at the time the agreement is being made, and then the rest of the community agrees and expects ISN to comply against their own best interests and without having actually agreed to anything. If you don't know the history, going back into BTL, TDF and the early formation of TVP as "the HQ channel" and the drama that caused, you probably don't have enough of the backstory to make a reasonable comment.

Now, if we got a summit of leadership of major channels to agree publicly to a set of standards for when to run the motherships, and when it is acceptable to deviate and so on, and got people to agree that this standard was binding and anyone who violated it was in the wrong, this would be a different story.


"Against their own best interests" - could have sworn the whole point of running incursions is to make ISK. It's just a shame ISN can't see that.

PS: Ask Noble about said agreement, we tried that and Noble threw his toys out the pram like a spoilt child.
Unezka Turigahl
Det Som Engang Var
#32 - 2014-09-20 23:55:20 UTC
Doc J wrote:

It's a game, the only community I have ever seen be aggressive in it's desire to "own" incursions has been Noble and his sheep.


Own it how? By contesting sites? Sites don't belong to anybody. It is TVP and other fleets that think they own sites. Its like running exploration sites in hisec... Just because you are there first or have cleared out most of the site doesn't mean anything. I will swoop in and take the site from you if you let me. This is a competitive multiplayer game, not a single player game. If you can't compete, don't blame other people. Blame yourself. Incursion sites go to whoever can do the most damage in the site. That is how the mechanics work, that is how CCP designed it. Even following fleets around isn't "grieving" in my eyes. Learn to compete, or quit and go do something else.

Doc J wrote:

TVP adapted, can ISN?


TVP obviously can not adapt. With all those pilots you'd think TVP could find enough to set up a fleet that can compete with ISN. But they can't. So they throw a fit and kill incursions for everyone. Noble's module theft is just being used as a convenient excuse. Scooping up modules has nothing to do with anything. When people swoop in and steal the mothership loot, does TVP throw a fit and close down all incursions then too?

I haven't flown incursions for years but I see nothing has changed. No one wants to put in the effort to match ISN, they'd rather just cry about it.

As for agreements, that may have worked most of the time when there was one main shield fleet and one main armor fleet. Now there are countless communities, many of which have the pilots required to pop a mom. There can never be agreements regarding the mothership like there used to be. It has nothing to do with ISN or TVP or any one group. There are too many entities in play now. Just another excuse for TVP to try to justify popping the mom.

No excuses are needed TVP. Nobody cares about your agreements and rules. Its a free for all as soon as the mom spawns now. So get with the times and get a scout on gate and be prepared to contest any fleets that may show up before withdraw status. If TVP wants to rush the mom as soon as it shows up, fine. Perfectly fine. Encouraged by lore and game mechanics even. Just don't try to blame ISN or anyone else for it.
Ginger Barbarella
#33 - 2014-09-21 02:01:10 UTC
Or better yet, they can take their panzy asses to low or null and fight over the Incursions there.

But no, that might involve actual peeveepee. Can't have 'leet high seccers actually FIGHTING.

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

Anya Klibor
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2014-09-21 22:22:23 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Or better yet, they can take their panzy asses to low or null and fight over the Incursions there.

But no, that might involve actual peeveepee. Can't have 'leet high seccers actually FIGHTING.


I PvP in low and null. I mission and Incursion in high sec (though I've been doing missions in low sec more lately) because I don't want the hassle of a bunch of ******* trying to break stuff to look tough. We get it, you don't get a lot of PvP. That's your fault, no one else's. Stop whining.

Leadership is something you learn. Maybe one day, you'll learn that.

James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#35 - 2014-09-21 23:19:22 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Or better yet, they can take their panzy asses to low or null and fight over the Incursions there.

But no, that might involve actual peeveepee. Can't have 'leet high seccers actually FIGHTING.

So what was ISN doing in NEO 1 and 2?
And TDF proved that they didn't know much in NEO 2. But hey, at least they signed up.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

Doc J
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#36 - 2014-09-22 00:40:31 UTC
Unezka Turigahl wrote:
Doc J wrote:

It's a game, the only community I have ever seen be aggressive in it's desire to "own" incursions has been Noble and his sheep.


Own it how? By contesting sites? Sites don't belong to anybody. It is TVP and other fleets that think they own sites. Its like running exploration sites in hisec... Just because you are there first or have cleared out most of the site doesn't mean anything. I will swoop in and take the site from you if you let me. This is a competitive multiplayer game, not a single player game. If you can't compete, don't blame other people. Blame yourself. Incursion sites go to whoever can do the most damage in the site. That is how the mechanics work, that is how CCP designed it. Even following fleets around isn't "grieving" in my eyes. Learn to compete, or quit and go do something else.

Doc J wrote:

TVP adapted, can ISN?


TVP obviously can not adapt. With all those pilots you'd think TVP could find enough to set up a fleet that can compete with ISN. But they can't. So they throw a fit and kill incursions for everyone. Noble's module theft is just being used as a convenient excuse. Scooping up modules has nothing to do with anything. When people swoop in and steal the mothership loot, does TVP throw a fit and close down all incursions then too?

I haven't flown incursions for years but I see nothing has changed. No one wants to put in the effort to match ISN, they'd rather just cry about it.

As for agreements, that may have worked most of the time when there was one main shield fleet and one main armor fleet. Now there are countless communities, many of which have the pilots required to pop a mom. There can never be agreements regarding the mothership like there used to be. It has nothing to do with ISN or TVP or any one group. There are too many entities in play now. Just another excuse for TVP to try to justify popping the mom.

No excuses are needed TVP. Nobody cares about your agreements and rules. Its a free for all as soon as the mom spawns now. So get with the times and get a scout on gate and be prepared to contest any fleets that may show up before withdraw status. If TVP wants to rush the mom as soon as it shows up, fine. Perfectly fine. Encouraged by lore and game mechanics even. Just don't try to blame ISN or anyone else for it.


Your argument is bent. On one hand you say Game Mechanics allows ISN to compete.... but you missed one important factor, TVP are competing with ISN, by popping moms to stop them from doing HQ's. In my eyes this is no different then going sitting a cloaky in a ratting/mining system out in null sec.

Another flaw in your argument is that agreements were in place to protect the incursion runners who go from focus to focus and may not actually get chance to run a HQ/incursion fleet and obviously so they can farm the focus for days on end. They were in place to promote incursions and let people make ISK.

Now, as you rightly put this is the game, if you want to take a site when its practically finished by someone then this is the "sandbox" at play. But consider this too, ISN can play in the sandbox, it's just now the sandbox is full of pissed off people who are from a number of communities, playing styles and loyalties. Incursions were never meant for elitist communities hence the VG nerf. This and a number of childish FC's from all communities where in my eyes ISN having taking the lead, means that very sandbox, the sandbox that ISN came into and were quite happy to stamp on time after time is now being stamped on by those pissed off people. I believe that's Karma!
Anya Klibor
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#37 - 2014-09-22 07:24:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Anya Klibor
Doc J wrote:

Your argument is bent. On one hand you say Game Mechanics allows ISN to compete.... but you missed one important factor, TVP are competing with ISN, by popping moms to stop them from doing HQ's. In my eyes this is no different then going sitting a cloaky in a ratting/mining system out in null sec.

Another flaw in your argument is that agreements were in place to protect the incursion runners who go from focus to focus and may not actually get chance to run a HQ/incursion fleet and obviously so they can farm the focus for days on end. They were in place to promote incursions and let people make ISK.

Now, as you rightly put this is the game, if you want to take a site when its practically finished by someone then this is the "sandbox" at play. But consider this too, ISN can play in the sandbox, it's just now the sandbox is full of pissed off people who are from a number of communities, playing styles and loyalties. Incursions were never meant for elitist communities hence the VG nerf. This and a number of childish FC's from all communities where in my eyes ISN having taking the lead, means that very sandbox, the sandbox that ISN came into and were quite happy to stamp on time after time is now being stamped on by those pissed off people. I believe that's Karma!


Except TVP has deluded itself into thinking that there is some large mass of players that is upset with ISN, that TVP is on some "righteous crusade" to save the "soul" of Incursioning, and that in the end they will "prevail".

Let's be honest, here: this entire thing only affected TVP and ISN. Instead of acting mature about it, you decided to throw a tantrum after reimbursing the pilots who lost stuff from your coalition's SRP. You could have drawn attention to Noble's duplicitous nature and the fact that he's an idiot, but you decided to punish everyone because of the actions of one person, and the vast majority of us aren't even around him.

TVP knows that the majority of people don't support them. This was evidenced by the fact that during the little butthurt session on your comms, you kicked/banned players who raised objections to your plans until you had a handful of people who just wanted to sit there and listen to you guys cry. You kicked roughly 80% of the people from your comms in order to make yourself feel good, and then you started this propaganda machine to paint yourselves as some type of "white knight". You are the opposite of it. You are taking out your aggressions on the entire Incursion community because you lost some blue stuff from your ships. And the best part is that any of us would have done it, because that is free ISK. Don't lie about it: you're just as greedy and selfish as the rest of us, hence TVP's actions.

Last week, the constellation of Sibu (I believe). ISN sent out a mail to their members and the leaders of the entire Incursion community, saying that they would not be moving there to pop the mothership. ISN's "tactic" then changed form popping the mothership of the Incursion that TVP was in officially to outright popping all the motherships that were in high sec if TVP decided to form any type of HQ fleet. You got called out and told that you'd have no reason to pop the Sibu mothership, and you did anyways because you are a bunch of spoiled brats.

You are not as important as you think, and this is the first time that I will say I support ISN on something. I, too, had stuff stolen by Noble. My repsonse was to get a few buddies together and camp him in for a few weeks until he returned it, or paid for it. he realized VERY quickly that it would not be a good idea to try to outsmart me, because I knew his alts. I could hurt him plenty and there was nothing he could do about it. I made it all back, plus interest.

I didn't throw a tantrum and close down Incursions for everyone, and I wouldn't do so. ISN, maybe. Not the entire community.

I think it's time TVP came to realize what a collosal ****-up they've made. I think it's time to dust off the arty Tornadoes and remove TVP fleets from Incursions for a bit. Maybe then the entire community can get back to having fun.

Leadership is something you learn. Maybe one day, you'll learn that.

Dsparil Mal
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#38 - 2014-09-22 07:45:21 UTC
So how many nados to alpha a machariel? =D

Erotica 1 for CSM 9!

Morpheus Blues
F.I.G.S.
#39 - 2014-09-22 08:47:56 UTC
Dsparil Mal wrote:
So how many nados to alpha a machariel? =D



Why would you bother to alpha machariel ? Leave that to sanshas when logis go down :)
Doc J
Space Wolves ind.
Solyaris Chtonium
#40 - 2014-09-22 08:49:19 UTC
Anya Klibor dear boy, you make it sound like somehow ISN do not ban pilots in comms and chat channels for exactly the same thing. Let me tell you having flown with BOTH communities ISN are just as shallow.

I couldn't care less if ISN sent out emails or what ever else they've been doing, fact is ISN created this and have in the passed forced fleets to stand down with their following of fleets around the focus, thats all game with these mechanics. BUT When you open your eyes and realize that TVP et al. are just doing the same as what ISN have done to other HQ fleets for years, stopping people from earning ISK via HQ's, then perhaps you may have another perspective.