These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Friend is quitting Eve after he is caught out with Bonus room scam

First post
Author
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#101 - 2014-09-17 10:30:39 UTC
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:
Admits friend is an idiot. Calls it cyberbullying anyway. Eve = Competitive environment. Idiots do not fare well. Working as intended.



One thing eve needs although is a warning when you log in that whenever you even read something in local you are already under attack of some other player in some form.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#102 - 2014-09-17 10:32:42 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:
Arkus Kane wrote:
If you're a pirate who demands singing ransoms, that usually lasts about 2 minutes, and if you're a decent pirate you then let your victim go. Even if you blow them up they lose ISK and that's it. It's, at worst, light-hearted short-lived mockery of your victim. That's fine.

If you're a standard scammer, you steal a large amount of ISK and perhaps even mock your victim in-game briefly, but that's it. That's fine.

If you're Erotica 1 you take everything your victim owns (including their character) and make all your profit...

...then you spend 2 solid, excruciating hours making fun of their real life speech impediment, making fun of their wife with your buddies, openly mocking them when they get upset and then threatening them with action from the developers when they start understandably insulting you for all the stuff you've subjected them to. Then you post it online to mock your mark even further.



If the victim has already surrendered his assets, what's the ransom? Why does he try to recover his pixel assets with his RL dignity?

Why do you think someone can forcefully take your adult friend's dignity over teamspeak which he voluntarily joined and can voluntarily quit at any time? How much stuff was it?

Should your friend be treated as a minor and thus receive all the consideration and benefits of one?


the catch part is EXPOSING that later in the internet. That is even ilegal in several countries without that person consent.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#103 - 2014-09-17 12:23:16 UTC
hetty B wrote:
lost all his isk mostly paid for with real cash
One of my favourite sequences of words to see on these forums.

Arkus Kane wrote:
But I did note that you said that the Erotica 1 scammer and his buds didn't try to drag RL into things...this isn't true. The first thing they do on the recording, before the guy even says anything much at all, is get him to read huge lumps of mindless text out.

They then pick out all the words he struggles to pronounce due to a speech impediment and tell him to make a list at the end and repeat them all over and over again. That doesn't happen because he gets upset before then - but still, it was entirely their intention to make fun of his personal attributes outside of the game.
Lordy, even banning the involved parties isn't enough to get people to stop making up stories. RL was never brought into it and he was never made fun of. It's ok, E1 won't suddenly appear and take your ISK if you admit no harassment occurred.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Black Pedro
Mine.
#104 - 2014-09-17 13:15:33 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:

the catch part is EXPOSING that later in the internet. That is even ilegal in several countries without that person consent.


I'm not an expert on the legal systems of every country on the planet, but this isn't commonly true especially since no identifying information (real name, place of residence etc.) of the supposed victim was ever released and there appears to be no reasonable expectation of privacy for a conversation held in a random internet voice group chat channel anyway. But that is for the lawyers and space lawyers to debate I guess.

You are right though in that the "EXPOSING" did ultimately result in the fuss that embarrassed CCP, who then selectively enforced their "real-life harassment" policies to stamp out the source of the bad press - Erotica 1 and the Bonus Room. Things would likely have proceeded much differently if Ripard Teg didn't have a recording with which to spark his witch hunt.
Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#105 - 2014-09-17 15:42:17 UTC
Arkus Kane wrote:


*Spits SimTobacco into bin* Lady, I got this here head plate in a bar fight on Inaro II with a Minmatar scumbag whose carefree neo-libertarian dreadlocks inflamed my suspicions that he was an escaped slave. I was correct. When you've had a rich, golden bottle of Amarrian ale smashed into the back of your noggin the staunch expression comes naturally.

And in any case, I think the pose showing off my classical Amarrian combination of good looks and rabid religious fanaticism is far more alluring than that of the OP, who frankly looks like he's had far too much Mindflood and not read the Pax Amarria for a few years.


This was great, thank you. I feel bad for making the mistake, but it was fun to see your (quite) pleasant response to it.


Quote:

But I did note that you said that the Erotica 1 scammer and his buds didn't try to drag RL into things...this isn't true. The first thing they do on the recording, before the guy even says anything much at all, is get him to read huge lumps of mindless text out.

They then pick out all the words he struggles to pronounce due to a speech impediment and tell him to make a list at the end and repeat them all over and over again. That doesn't happen because he gets upset before then - but still, it was entirely their intention to make fun of his personal attributes outside of the game.


No comment on how wise it was for the fellow who declares his own speech impediment to a bunch of strangers on the internet who also happened to be withholding all of his game assets as part of a scam of which he is 100% aware?

(1) it's not a particularly intelligent thing to do for an adult to do
(2) it's not harassment of any kind as we qualify it in RL (I'm free to make fun of any number of your speech impediments. It's rude.. but harassment it is not)
(3) he was free to extricate himself from that situation at any time. I disagree that $20 of assets justifies him not pressing the disconnect button


Quote:
making fun of their wife with your buddies, openly mocking them when they get upset and then threatening them with action from the developers


There was nothing at all said about his significant other which was not a reference to talking points she brought up herself. She actually placed herself in the situation and starting spouting off her RL credentials and threats to complete strangers on the internet.


Do you think she had any authority to make those threats?


Don't you think her threats sounded utterly ridiculous?

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#106 - 2014-09-17 15:46:32 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:


the catch part is EXPOSING that later in the internet. That is even ilegal in several countries without that person consent.


I think a lot of people didn't actually listen to the whole recording and instead went with Ripard's abbreviated take on the matter.


I'm not sure what the legal implications are, tbh.

I think the primary objection in this case was that recordings of the same kind were released publicly over and over and over and over and over and over and over. Please don't tell me that the public outcry over the 200th release excuses their apathy for the 199 previous.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Joshua Milton Blahyi
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#107 - 2014-09-17 17:50:48 UTC
Higgs Foton wrote:


This is how i feel as well. One of the things i like about EVE online is that it punishes the stupid and guillable. Retards should go play retards games.


Like Goon grab ass in null?

Seriously, the level of snobbery in this thread is hilarious. Keep thinking eve is a smart persons game. It really isn't but I do love watching you guys pat yourselves on the back for keeping playing.

A little bit of math and people think that the game is mouth breather proof.
Amyclas Amatin
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#108 - 2014-09-17 19:46:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Amyclas Amatin
I love these rumours spread by anonymous forum alts about nameless friends.

It is funny, until CCP swings the banhammer all over the place. Because third party information must be true.

For more information on the New Order of High-Sec, please visit: http://www.minerbumping.com/

Remember that whenever you have a bad day in EVE, the correct reponse is "Thank you CCP, may I please have another?"

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#109 - 2014-09-18 00:04:49 UTC
eve isn't for the weak

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Lugia3
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#110 - 2014-09-18 00:58:53 UTC
Much necro.

"CCP Dolan is full of shit." - CCP Bettik

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#111 - 2014-09-18 09:52:41 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:


the catch part is EXPOSING that later in the internet. That is even ilegal in several countries without that person consent.


I think a lot of people didn't actually listen to the whole recording and instead went with Ripard's abbreviated take on the matter.


I'm not sure what the legal implications are, tbh.

I think the primary objection in this case was that recordings of the same kind were released publicly over and over and over and over and over and over and over. Please don't tell me that the public outcry over the 200th release excuses their apathy for the 199 previous.




If someone violates your civil rights and you do not prosecute them legally , that does nto exclude my rights to prosecute that person legally when later he/she violate my own rights.

When you are doing something wrong, the fact taht other people in past did not care is not a license that makes it suddenly less wrong on future instances.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

CALDARI CITIZEN 14330909
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#112 - 2014-09-18 13:11:11 UTC
I thought I was in a Bonus Room last night. But then I realized it was just a chamber of secrets.

The Artist Formerly Known As AC. 

The terminal end of the digestive system. 

The Best CSM Candidate

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#113 - 2014-09-18 15:48:25 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:



If someone violates your civil rights and you do not prosecute them legally , that does nto exclude my rights to prosecute that person legally when later he/she violate my own rights.

When you are doing something wrong, the fact taht other people in past did not care is not a license that makes it suddenly less wrong on future instances.



Read this again.


There is a difference between being wronged and being offended for somebody else who doesn't want you white knighting them.

Your statement doesn't reflect anything that actually happened.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#114 - 2014-09-19 09:55:42 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:



If someone violates your civil rights and you do not prosecute them legally , that does nto exclude my rights to prosecute that person legally when later he/she violate my own rights.

When you are doing something wrong, the fact taht other people in past did not care is not a license that makes it suddenly less wrong on future instances.



Read this again.


There is a difference between being wronged and being offended for somebody else who doesn't want you white knighting them.

Your statement doesn't reflect anything that actually happened.



The definition of civil rights change from culture to culture. Where I live, the recordings of that event, and Yes I heard a good bit of it, not all but enough, would be enough for you to get legal prosecution if the other part was living in the same country. Blackmailing someone into an humiliation is specifically stated as violation of civil rights were I live. So some people WILL get offended and will demand what they see as justice. The world is not a tiny sphere where everybody think the same.

If you are wise you shall be extra careful when dealing with people from other cultures because their definition of OK might not be the same as yours.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Mike Adoulin
Happys Happy Hamster Hunting Club
#115 - 2014-09-19 12:26:32 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
stupid garbage



No one cares.

As for where you live, no one cares.

tldr no one cares

Roll

Everything in EVE is a trap.

And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)

You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.

Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.

Haedonism Bot
People for the Ethical Treatment of Rogue Drones
#116 - 2014-09-19 12:48:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Haedonism Bot
Kagura Nikon wrote:

The definition of civil rights change from culture to culture. Where I live, the recordings of that event, and Yes I heard a good bit of it, not all but enough, would be enough for you to get legal prosecution if the other part was living in the same country. Blackmailing someone into an humiliation is specifically stated as violation of civil rights were I live. So some people WILL get offended and will demand what they see as justice. The world is not a tiny sphere where everybody think the same.

If you are wise you shall be extra careful when dealing with people from other cultures because their definition of OK might not be the same as yours.


I don't think that anything that happened in the bonus room would qualify as blackmail in any court of law in any country except perhaps for a country like Cameroon, where you can simply pay the judge for the verdict you want. Blackmail generally only is considered to have occurred in situations where the people involved know each other's identities and where more is at stake than imaginary video game property and virtual bragging rights in anonymous internet chat rooms.

I accept the possibility that there may be some oddball country in the world where this situation may have violated some law. There are a lot of countries in the world, after all, and some of them have legal codes which seem bizarre to those of us who live in North America or Europe. However, you can't really consult the laws of every country on earth before you open your mouth on your private TS server or an EVE Online chat channel, nor should you.

The point being - whatever you may think of the practice of bonusrooming, or of any bonus room in particular, the argument that it is illegal is a huge stretch from reality. You may not like it, CCP obviously doesn't like it, but that doesn't make it a literal crime.

www.everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com

Vote Sabriz Adoudel and Tora Bushido for CSMX. Keep the Evil in EVE!

Black Pedro
Mine.
#117 - 2014-09-19 13:09:28 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:

The definition of civil rights change from culture to culture. Where I live, the recordings of that event, and Yes I heard a good bit of it, not all but enough, would be enough for you to get legal prosecution if the other part was living in the same country. Blackmailing someone into an humiliation is specifically stated as violation of civil rights were I live. So some people WILL get offended and will demand what they see as justice. The world is not a tiny sphere where everybody think the same.

If you are wise you shall be extra careful when dealing with people from other cultures because their definition of OK might not be the same as yours.


I have no idea where you live, but I can comfortably say that asking a person to sing songs and read from Wikipedia or the minerbumping web site is not going to result in "legal prosecution" anywhere in the free world, especially when the "victim" is on record as saying he did not feel harassed or tortured.

Further, if such a place exists, there is no onus on me to be "extra careful" because some tiny jurisdiction I have never heard of or visited decides something is a crime - I only should be reasonably required to understand the laws of where I live, and perhaps Iceland in this case. It would be crazy to expect me to know all the laws of every place on the planet, much like it is crazy for CCP to expect everyone to magically know what their definition of "real-life harassment" is without telling us.
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#118 - 2014-09-19 14:50:44 UTC
Black Pedro wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:

The definition of civil rights change from culture to culture. Where I live, the recordings of that event, and Yes I heard a good bit of it, not all but enough, would be enough for you to get legal prosecution if the other part was living in the same country. Blackmailing someone into an humiliation is specifically stated as violation of civil rights were I live. So some people WILL get offended and will demand what they see as justice. The world is not a tiny sphere where everybody think the same.

If you are wise you shall be extra careful when dealing with people from other cultures because their definition of OK might not be the same as yours.


I have no idea where you live, but I can comfortably say that asking a person to sing songs and read from Wikipedia or the minerbumping web site is not going to result in "legal prosecution" anywhere in the free world, especially when the "victim" is on record as saying he did not feel harassed or tortured.

Further, if such a place exists, there is no onus on me to be "extra careful" because some tiny jurisdiction I have never heard of or visited decides something is a crime - I only should be reasonably required to understand the laws of where I live, and perhaps Iceland in this case. It would be crazy to expect me to know all the laws of every place on the planet, much like it is crazy for CCP to expect everyone to magically know what their definition of "real-life harassment" is without telling us.



you are VERY mistaken. There is similar cases (not on games, but on social networks) that were went to court here and the offending part was forced to pay restitution. In some countries humiliation is considered as damaging as physical damage.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Black Pedro
Mine.
#119 - 2014-09-19 15:55:26 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:

you are VERY mistaken. There is similar cases (not on games, but on social networks) that were went to court here and the offending part was forced to pay restitution. In some countries humiliation is considered as damaging as physical damage.


I am pretty sure I am not. I never said that there weren't harassment laws on the books of many countries. What I am saying is that there is no country where you would face legal prosecution for asking an adult to do silly things on an internet group chat for in-game virtual items, where the "victim" says he did not feel bullied, harassed, tortured or blackmailed, and where the "victim's" real identity remains anonymous.

There is no criminal prosecutor that would pursue a case with those facts by choice anywhere on the planet, presumably including the jurisdiction in which you live.
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#120 - 2014-09-20 09:48:54 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:

I think a lot of people didn't actually listen to the whole recording and instead went with Ripard's abbreviated take on the matter.


Of course want want to think this.
But you have no prove that this is true. I petitioned it before Ripard mentioned it on his blog and a lot of people that usually dont care for the forums, came and asked for actions of CCP.

That sokhar says he wasn't tortured, may be. Still the audio exists and proofs, that he was humiliated over and over.
I do not say this was the "silent majority" but still more people were upset over that, than people where OK, with it.

The "Ripard" case is some propaganda that what made up, to project the "guilt" to someone else than e1.
E1 was hit by the ban-hammer and is gone for good. Not many people are crying after him.

However, that still does not change anything for the OP.
Falling for this "bonus room" is quite stupid and shows that one throws all caution and common sense over board cause of greed. I do not expect a special warning of this bonus room, since there are times, when all inner alert bells have to ring on 1000 dezibel.
If the "friend" can not proof that he was humiliated, there is no chance ever for actions of CCP.

It does not matter what some griefers whined a short time ago, CCP does NOT swing the ban-hammer lightly.

Your friend has to HTFU.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."