These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dodging Wardecs

First post
Author
Celly S
Neutin Local LLC
#621 - 2014-09-12 15:20:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Celly S
Steppa Musana wrote:
Celly S wrote:

If someone doesn't want to PvP, then they can make a decision to be in that NPC corp and there's not a darn thing that you. or anyone else can do about it

Wrong. They can still be ganked.



except the discussion is about dodging wardecs and my statement was made within that context.

that has nothing to do with ganking folks...



o/
Celly

Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator.

malcovas Henderson
THoF
#622 - 2014-09-12 15:26:02 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
malcovas Henderson wrote:
Hang on. Did you just say..........

You are willing to tell people to run and hide....... Then go on to tell someone else to HTFU?

Double standards at it's absolute finest.
How is that double standards? A carebear who carebears every single day, then gets blown up, accepts it and moves on, he doesn't need to HTFU. A ganker who ganks every day, finds a handful of people who can avoid him then comes on the forum whining that CCP need to change the system so he has an easier time ganking, yes, he needs to HTFU.

It has nothing to do with how you choose to play, it has to do with how much you whine about it when you don't get what you want.


Wait what????

When did we start talking about ganking? Who is talking about Pilots that get blown up and moves on? Are you reading the right thread even?

You tell some one to run and hide....... Then tell someone else to HTFU


That's double standards. pure and simple. end off. no discussion. period.
Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#623 - 2014-09-12 15:26:22 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
I disagree that neither is likely to happen. Once upon a time I was in one of those "potential victim" corps. I pissed somebody off in the mining channel and her 1-person corp wardecced us. At the time, the most isk I had ever had was about 500M. One day as we all sat in station with our T1 frigs and mining boats, I asked her in local if I could pay to end the war. She agreed. So, for 300M isk (coming from a guy that had never had more than 500m) we surrendered and that was that. I know it happens because I was there when it happened to me.

Also, see my previous post. The "fling it all at the wall and see what sticks" is a proven method.


So you were dumb and paid someone off, thereby setting a precedent that you pay people off. There are plenty of dumb people out there, sure, and they will pay.


I dont consider it dumb at all, just like I dont think paying CODE a lousy 10m just to avoid their headaches is dumb. At it's core, this game is about ISK. Yes it's a hardcore PVP sandbox, but it takes ISK to keep yourself in decent ships. ISK is a tool, a means to an end. It was well worth 300M to get the enemy to back off.

And as you say above, there are plenty of people who will pay.

Quote:
But those people are the people who would already pay right now. People who actively dodge the dec would still do so even if their method to do so was changed.


How do you know that? You cant predict what people are going to do, especially when in a situation with so many variable, such as size of corp, assets, fighting ships, POSs, etc. Stop using predictions of the future as arguments.

Quote:

And yes, fling it at the wall, see what sticks, that already works. When it doesn't stick, deal with it. Don't come on the forum whining that CCP need to make it harder for people to avoid.


Now you need to go back through the thread and find an example of me "whining" as well as "crying." And FYI, what do you think these forums are for? Surely you are aware that Im not the only person here who is giving an opinion. In fact, looks to me like damn near everyone, including you, is giving their opinions, making suggestions, etc. That you don't like my opinion certainly gives you the right to argue against it, and I for it, but for you to tell me NOT to come to the forums and share my opinions because they differ from yours says a lot about your personality and maturity, and I'll leave it at that.


\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#624 - 2014-09-12 15:29:55 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
I dont think paying CODE a lousy 10m just to avoid their headaches is dumb.


Thinking thats what a permit represents is dumb

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Celly S
Neutin Local LLC
#625 - 2014-09-12 15:31:17 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Celly S wrote:

"if a player doesn't want to fight, or pay, they will find a way within the game's mechanics to not do it"


Then they belong in an NPC corp, paying 20% taxes.


Or out in null as part of a blue doughnut that owns half the map.


That too is an option since null sec in most places is in fact safer than high sec...

Sadly, I spent years living in high sec thinking that high sec was safer, it is to my own dismay that I have wasted so many years being wrong about that.
But I digress, that's a topic for a different thread.

o/
Celly

Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator.

Celly S
Neutin Local LLC
#626 - 2014-09-12 15:53:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Celly S
Ramona McCandless wrote:
The best avoidance tactics dont involve dropping corp at all.


^^this^^


1000 times this
All you need to do to counter any wardec if you don't want to fight is simply use your brain, there are many ways to continue playing without the need to drop corp, or log off for the duration.

o/
Celly

Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator.

Commentus Nolen
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#627 - 2014-09-12 16:45:38 UTC
I am a new player only been playing for a little over a month. I have 2 active accounts and plan to add a third after upgrading the memory in my PC. Putting this information out there to let people know where I am coming from. Also this is just a forum alt.

So far, for me this game has been about not becoming a target worth ganking, at least that is what all the online quides tell me. Don’t equip level 5 rigs or implants, don’t use this ship for mining because it does not have enough tank or don’t use that ship because it is too valuable a target. So far most of my game play has been mining in HighSec so I can afford to lose ships later in LowSec .

So I am sure you are now asking what does this have to do with this topic, well let me tell you from my perspective.
Risk vs Reward: So far to me this game is about reducing risk and not taking chances because you have too much to lose. Why are so many players staying in HighSec mining ore and not participating in PVP the answer is Risk vs Reward.

Mining Ore: I created a spreadsheet to track how much ISK I would earn per load of ore using the ore hold capacity of my Miasmose which right now is 54,600 M3. I could not believe the results. I could make more ISK with very little risk mining for HS ore rather than mining LS ore.

Examples:
R Plagioclase = 10,386,480.00
Gneiss = 10,920,000.00
P Arkonor = 9,384,375.00
Mercoxit = 20,135,115.00

As you can see with the above numbers why should I risk LS space when the return is not there. From what I have been reading in this topic Wardeccing is trying to make HS less desirable and have more people engage in PVP or at least in more risky ventures. But the problem is the imbalance between risk and rewards and until that is fixed half measures such as Wardeccing are nothing more than a band aid covering the cancer underneath.

Please understand I know I am new and have a lot to learn but I am just putting out my view as I see it right now. I have some ideals on things CCP could do to make LS mining and PVP more appealing but I will wait until I see if anyone is even interested.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#628 - 2014-09-12 16:57:29 UTC
malcovas Henderson wrote:
Wait what????

When did we start talking about ganking? Who is talking about Pilots that get blown up and moves on? Are you reading the right thread even?
The wardeccers complaining are ganker too risk averse for concord.

malcovas Henderson wrote:
You tell some one to run and hide....... Then tell someone else to HTFU

That's double standards. pure and simple. end off. no discussion. period.
No, it really isn't. You clearly have some trouble understanding. Someone running away from a fight they can't win does not need to HTFU. Someone complaining that they got outsmarted by someone running away and asking for mechanics to be changed so they can't, they definitely need to HTFU.

It's really not a hard concept to grasp, and in it's simplest form it is: If you are whining that you need the mechanics changed because it's too hard for you, then you need to HTFU.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#629 - 2014-09-12 17:03:50 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
I dont consider it dumb at all, just like I dont think paying CODE a lousy 10m just to avoid their headaches is dumb. At it's core, this game is about ISK. Yes it's a hardcore PVP sandbox, but it takes ISK to keep yourself in decent ships. ISK is a tool, a means to an end. It was well worth 300M to get the enemy to back off.

And as you say above, there are plenty of people who will pay.
Well it is pretty dumb. First off it's money your paying with no guarantees, which is pretty terrible anyway, but mainly it's that you are setting a precedent that says "if you wardec me I will pay you to stop", thus encouraging more people to wardec you. To avoid wardecs you make sure the deccers know they will get nothing, no kills, no isk, no tears, nothing from the wardec.

Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
How do you know that? You cant predict what people are going to do, especially when in a situation with so many variable, such as size of corp, assets, fighting ships, POSs, etc. Stop using predictions of the future as arguments.
It's not a prediction. They currently avoid wardecs with no payout. You want to take away ONE of the mechanics that allows that. Why would they then suddenly start paying when they can still dec dodge in other ways?

Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
Now you need to go back through the thread and find an example of me "whining" as well as "crying." And FYI, what do you think these forums are for? Surely you are aware that Im not the only person here who is giving an opinion. In fact, looks to me like damn near everyone, including you, is giving their opinions, making suggestions, etc. That you don't like my opinion certainly gives you the right to argue against it, and I for it, but for you to tell me NOT to come to the forums and share my opinions because they differ from yours says a lot about your personality and maturity, and I'll leave it at that.
Most of your posts appear to be whining and crying, about a mechanic you don't even use!

And this forum, it's for general discussions. For people chewing the fat and the like. Ideas belong in F&I and serious well constructed ideas to be put forward though the CSM belong in Assembly Hall.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#630 - 2014-09-12 17:06:51 UTC
Commentus Nolen wrote:
Mining Ore: I created a spreadsheet to track how much ISK I would earn per load of ore using the ore hold capacity of my Miasmose which right now is 54,600 M3. I could not believe the results. I could make more ISK with very little risk mining for HS ore rather than mining LS ore.

Examples:
R Plagioclase = 10,386,480.00
Gneiss = 10,920,000.00
P Arkonor = 9,384,375.00
Mercoxit = 20,135,115.00
Don't forget that Mercoxit has a different pull rate to the others, so it needs to be adjusted as pulling a ore hold full will take a different amount of time.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Celly S
Neutin Local LLC
#631 - 2014-09-12 17:16:42 UTC
Commentus Nolen wrote:
I am a new player only been playing for a little over a month.



Welcome to EvE :)

and you've got a good grasp of things so far...

there are more rewards in null, and the risk are actually less once you get into the right spot, but with that said, I still think you've got a good handle on things from a new player's perspective.

best of luck to you.
o/
Celly Smunt

Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator.

Steppa Musana
Doomheim
#632 - 2014-09-12 20:30:17 UTC
Commentus Nolen wrote:
I am a new player only been playing for a little over a month. I have 2 active...

...As you can see with the above numbers why should I risk LS space when the return is not there. From what I have been reading in this topic Wardeccing is trying to make HS less desirable and have more people engage in PVP or at least in more risky ventures. But the problem is the imbalance between risk and rewards and until that is fixed half measures such as Wardeccing are nothing more than a band aid covering the cancer underneath.

You are absolutely correct. Surprising post from a new player, kudos.

Lowsec is riskier than all other forms of space in regards to PVE. The rewards do not reflect this. 11 years later too, it is quite shameful.

Hey guys.

Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#633 - 2014-09-12 21:05:05 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Most of your posts appear to be whining and crying, about a mechanic you don't even use![quote]

Example of whining and crying, plz. (second attempt)

[quote]
And this forum, it's for general discussions. For people chewing the fat and the like. Ideas belong in F&I and serious well constructed ideas to be put forward though the CSM belong in Assembly Hall.


I didn't start this thread, go tell whoever did. Apparently our ever-vigilant ISD moderators haven't seen fit to lock or moveit. vOv


\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#634 - 2014-09-12 21:21:11 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:


In the end, you're the one looking for "meaningful PvP" in hi sec. Just keep wardeccing until you find someone willing to fight.



No Im not. Maybe youve missed me saying this a few times, but a wardec for the purposes of extortion is NOT "looking for meaningful PVP in hisec." It's far less hassle if they don't fight at all. For the umpteenth time, it's about MONEY. It's not about being risk-adverse, it's not about wanting easy killmails, or anything of the sort. It's about being a pain in someone's arse to the point that they pay you to just go away. Put a different way, it's about bullying the little guy out of his milk money in lieu of beating him up.


Well if you're not risk-averse, stop complaining about the risk of wardecs not leading to successful extortion. Pick your targets carefully, and don't be surprised when a single-person corp simply closes up shop.

In the meantime, make sure you're familiar with the term "harassment". Your desire to lock people in one-person corps and take away their freedom of choice is and indicator that what you are doing is crossing the line from "villainy" into "bullying". You even said that much yourself.

Perhaps you need to find something else to do?
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#635 - 2014-09-12 21:30:22 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:


In the end, you're the one looking for "meaningful PvP" in hi sec. Just keep wardeccing until you find someone willing to fight.



No Im not. Maybe youve missed me saying this a few times, but a wardec for the purposes of extortion is NOT "looking for meaningful PVP in hisec." It's far less hassle if they don't fight at all. For the umpteenth time, it's about MONEY. It's not about being risk-adverse, it's not about wanting easy killmails, or anything of the sort. It's about being a pain in someone's arse to the point that they pay you to just go away. Put a different way, it's about bullying the little guy out of his milk money in lieu of beating him up.


Well if you're not risk-averse, stop complaining about the risk of wardecs not leading to successful extortion. Pick your targets carefully, and don't be surprised when a single-person corp simply closes up shop.

In the meantime, make sure you're familiar with the term "harassment". Your desire to lock people in one-person corps and take away their freedom of choice is and indicator that what you are doing is crossing the line from "villainy" into "bullying". You even said that much yourself.

Perhaps you need to find something else to do?


And we're back to trotting out this tired old lie again, I see.

Do you people actually have an original argument, or do you all read from the same playbook?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#636 - 2014-09-12 21:41:27 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:


In the meantime, make sure you're familiar with the term "harassment". Your desire to lock people in one-person corps and take away their freedom of choice is and indicator that what you are doing is crossing the line from "villainy" into "bullying". You even said that much yourself.

Perhaps you need to find something else to do?


If someone corners you and says "Everyday Im going to find you and beat you up until you pay me protection money"

And Instead

You stalk them, their family, leave notes on their car, slash their tires, stare at them through their bedroom windows at night and kill their little runners and mules

Who is the harrasser then?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#637 - 2014-09-13 01:00:27 UTC
Quote:
Well if you're not risk-averse, stop complaining about the risk of wardecs not leading to successful extortion. Pick your targets carefully, and don't be surprised when a single-person corp simply closes up shop.


For one thing, I would never attempt to extort a single-person corp. That 1 guy probably doesnt have the budget to pay protection money, anyway. Now 5 or 6 guys, each chipping in, say 50M is more feasible.

Also, the connotation of "risk-averse" as it's used in this game does not = "it might not go my way." Risk-averse means trying to run from and/or avoid any confrontation.

Quote:

In the meantime, make sure you're familiar with the term "harassment".


Well, if you look around the forums here, there's a LOT of people asking what, exactly, constitutes harassment in CCP's eyes. Unfortunately CCP apparently refuses to give an answer. So you're taking your "life" (your account) in your hands when you endeavor to extort someone. How's that for NOT being "risk-averse?"

Quote:

Your desire to lock people in one-person corps and take away their freedom of choice is and indicator that what you are doing is crossing the line from "villainy" into "bullying". You even said that much yourself.


I have never once suggested that people be locked into 1 man corps. If you'd like to debate the merits and/or faults of my position, please familiarize yourself with my position first.

\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

malcovas Henderson
THoF
#638 - 2014-09-13 06:20:07 UTC
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:


I have never once suggested that people be locked into 1 man corps. If you'd like to debate the merits and/or faults of my position, please familiarize yourself with my position first.



With the possibility of KA, no one has actually suggested players being locked to a WD'd corp. It is their inability to actually read what is being said, that causes their confusion
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#639 - 2014-09-13 06:22:38 UTC
Celly S wrote:


That too is an option since null sec in most places is in fact safer than high sec...



No its not.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#640 - 2014-09-13 11:02:54 UTC
malcovas Henderson wrote:
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:


I have never once suggested that people be locked into 1 man corps. If you'd like to debate the merits and/or faults of my position, please familiarize yourself with my position first.



With the possibility of KA, no one has actually suggested players being locked to a WD'd corp. It is their inability to actually read what is being said, that causes their confusion


My suggestion is, and remains, the generation of killrights on anyone who leaves a corp during a war. Not making the war follow them for the duration, just a one time kill.

Anything else is just me throwing out random thoughts for discussion purposes.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.