These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Rank Anal Hypocrisy

First post First post
Author
Derrick Miles
Death Rabbit Ky Oneida
#161 - 2014-09-12 12:19:10 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
You've said that when someone takes offense at something it is meaningless if it does not ascribe to a set of values you are defining.


No I didnt. Thats the third time you have tried to make that erroneous assumption now and the third time I have denied it.

You obviously have no wish to have an adult conversation about this, and all you seem to do is try to insult anyone who disagrees with you.

I have asked you directly about what you think of the thread, the OP and what is being discussed in order to put it into the context of what Im explaining, and this, according to you is "trolling".

I cant possibly begin to imagine what you qualify as as actual discussion given that basis, and so I can only conclude this derailment on your part is the purpose of this discussion.

You say you've denied it, yet I haven't seen you give a single bit of reasoning for it. You consistently pick out a single sentence of my argument and use that as if it was all I said and argue against it. You asked for my opinion in an obviously baiting manner and in a way that wasn't relevant to anything I said. I could care less whether this thread is derailed, but it's obvious having a reasonable discussion with you isn't possible.
Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
#162 - 2014-09-12 12:28:05 UTC
In before the ...... Anal...

Tal
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#163 - 2014-09-12 12:32:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Ramona McCandless
Derrick Miles wrote:

You say you've denied it, yet I haven't seen you give a single bit of reasoning for it. You consistently pick out a single sentence of my argument and use that as if it was all I said and argue against it.

You mean the bit where you clearly havent understood what Ive said and get it backwards, then regurgitate it at me as if its what I said?

If I dont point that out, then Im hardly going to make a case based on what you think I said, am I?
Derrick Miles wrote:
You asked for my opinion in an obviously baiting manner

No, I asked for it so I could illustrate my point. Its what one does when you discuss things, you try to understand things from others point of view. You must have a persecution complex if you think people asking your opinion is baiting you or attempting to entrap you.
Derrick Miles wrote:
and in a way that wasn't relevant to anything I said.

It was relevant to the OP, the thread and the point I made that you disagreed with without understanding it.

Derrick Miles wrote:
I could care less whether this thread is derailed, but it's obvious having a reasonable discussion with you isn't possible.


You mean you couldnt care less.
And if you are admitting to attempting to derail it, then Ill be reporting you for it.
And dont try to throw what I have said about your inability to discuss things in a sensible manner back at me, as this rant from you has just shown me exactly how well you debate anything; like a ranting 16 year old who isnt allowed the keys to the car, apparently.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Grog Aftermath
Doomheim
#164 - 2014-09-12 12:35:02 UTC
Derrick Miles wrote:
I could care less whether this thread is derailed, but it's obvious having a reasonable discussion with you isn't possible.




Don't think it matters if the thread is derailed, it's already a bit of a train wreak.

Plus the topic is effectively talking about moderation. So I expect it'll get locked sooner or later.
Derrick Miles
Death Rabbit Ky Oneida
#165 - 2014-09-12 12:40:39 UTC
Grog Aftermath wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
I could care less whether this thread is derailed, but it's obvious having a reasonable discussion with you isn't possible.


Don't think it matters if the thread is derailed, it's already a bit of a train wreak.

Plus the topic is effectively talking about moderation. So I expect it'll get locked sooner or later.

Yeah, I'm a bit surprised that ISD hasn't locked this one already actually. The title does grab one's attention.Lol
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#166 - 2014-09-12 12:48:35 UTC
I had to literally like, unlike and then like the op again to show how much I liked.

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

Absolutely Not Analt
Carebears on Fire
#167 - 2014-09-12 12:53:25 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Ria Nieyli wrote:
Heavy Met4l Queen wrote:
This isn't a scenario where a week old character is reported with an offensive name, which i imagine happens fairly frequently. The individual here has had the same name for 7 years which, to put into perspective as others have mentioned, is longer than many employees have been working for CCP itself. This character has openly flown around and participated in new eden for over 85 months with no or minimum protest, objection, or grievance.


Just because nobody reported him for 7 years, doesn't mean that the wasn't offensive.


And what about the other 332 using the word 'anal' in their name?

How long have they been around?


Actually I petitioned myself and CCP told me my name doesn't break the rules.

Sad panda.

Eve is a multi player game. And you are the content. - Ralph King-Griffin Being meh at two things is not better than being great at one. - Lugh Crow-Slave

CALDARI CITIZEN 14330909
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#168 - 2014-09-12 12:55:11 UTC
Talon SilverHawk wrote:
In before the ...... Anal...

Tal


Let's talk.

Big Spoon, I be. <3

The Artist Formerly Known As AC. 

The terminal end of the digestive system. 

The Best CSM Candidate

CALDARI CITIZEN 14330909
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#169 - 2014-09-12 12:57:58 UTC
Absolutely Not Analt wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Ria Nieyli wrote:
Heavy Met4l Queen wrote:
This isn't a scenario where a week old character is reported with an offensive name, which i imagine happens fairly frequently. The individual here has had the same name for 7 years which, to put into perspective as others have mentioned, is longer than many employees have been working for CCP itself. This character has openly flown around and participated in new eden for over 85 months with no or minimum protest, objection, or grievance.


Just because nobody reported him for 7 years, doesn't mean that the wasn't offensive.


And what about the other 332 using the word 'anal' in their name?

How long have they been around?


Actually I petitioned myself and CCP told me my name doesn't break the rules.

Sad panda.


Of the roughly 500 that showed up, around 15oish were AnAlt. (of some form)

Made me laugh, but at I have no qualms about that. Just everyone else. WAIT! I think everyone needs to have whatever name they have pick to be reverted to a number & race! I can't wait to talk to CALDARI CITIZEN 11482952 about the show and or game last night!

The Artist Formerly Known As AC. 

The terminal end of the digestive system. 

The Best CSM Candidate

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#170 - 2014-09-12 13:02:08 UTC
Grog Aftermath wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
I could care less whether this thread is derailed, but it's obvious having a reasonable discussion with you isn't possible.




Don't think it matters if the thread is derailed, it's already a bit of a train wreak.

Plus the topic is effectively talking about moderation. So I expect it'll get locked sooner or later.


Dorrim did a sweep earlier and left this intact. There was some speculation as to why he might have done that... I don't think I'll be repeating my own suggestion just for the moment, not until I've decided whether I want to remain subbed or not. I'm on the fence at the moment. Been playing some Elite for a couple hours to check out the 1.4 Beta, which I realised I hadn't done yet.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#171 - 2014-09-12 13:03:44 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Been playing some Elite for a couple hours to check out the 1.4 Beta, which I realised I hadn't done yet.


Is it free yet?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Novice Dryden
Doomheim
#172 - 2014-09-12 13:51:16 UTC
Hi!

I don't want to open myself to discrimination.
I suffer from a diagnosed personality disorder (ICD-10 F60.5).
I suspect that with DSM V there are many diagnostic possibilities for me.

But now I am prepared to take a dictionary... and search every single maybe offensive character name... and submit an original, individual ticket.

Because the LAW is the LAW... and when one person can get in trouble for something... then everyone can get in trouble for it.

(Plus I saw a lot of people using "BOOBS" for their character name. Here in my mother's basement I don't have a lot of access to BOOBS... so that must be why the feminists are against me focussing too much on BOOBS! Praise Equality).

So this weekend will be spent petitioning offensive names.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#173 - 2014-09-12 13:56:15 UTC
MrHands Perforated Bowel

This is your new name.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#174 - 2014-09-12 14:22:01 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Not so sure about ISD Ezwal, though.
I always strive to be unbiased as can be, so I don't mind one way or the other. What I do mind is the fact this is in essence a blatant attack at a GM decision, something which is quite against the forum rules.

Thread locked.

11. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.

Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including support ticket responses and emails) received from any member of CCP staff.


12. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.

The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

CCP Falcon
#175 - 2014-09-13 00:31:23 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:
2. Its self-evident that our Community Leader, CCP Falcon, is a big fan of Anal.


Just saw this and had to chip in on this thread... that's a bit personal... Shocked

In after the lock. P

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3