These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A Reminder Regarding Real Life Harassment

First post First post First post
Author
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#241 - 2014-09-11 11:55:37 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I'm pretty sure he's trying to say that, he's blown stuff up and been blown up and never once been threatened for it or whatever, so for it to happen to someone else, they must have provoked it in some other way to begin with. That's how I understood it.


Yes thats what i meant.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#242 - 2014-09-11 11:56:53 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I'm pretty sure he's trying to say that, he's blown stuff up and been blown up and never once been threatened for it or whatever, so for it to happen to someone else, they must have provoked it in some other way to begin with. That's how I understood it.


Yes thats what i meant.


Well, you're wrong, and I explained my experience: I was doxed without said RL provocation.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#243 - 2014-09-11 11:59:25 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I'm pretty sure he's trying to say that, he's blown stuff up and been blown up and never once been threatened for it or whatever, so for it to happen to someone else, they must have provoked it in some other way to begin with. That's how I understood it.


Yes thats what i meant.


If that's what you meant, you are dead wrong.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Miles Parabellum
Core Collapse Inc
#244 - 2014-09-11 11:59:33 UTC
Ahhh, spring cleaning.
Nice to see that some trash has been taken out.
Well done, CCP.
For those who were needlessly banned, I hope you get back your playing priviledges soon. As for the rest... Good riddance.
Cismet
Silent Knights.
LinkNet
#245 - 2014-09-11 11:59:54 UTC
Decian Cor wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Titus Tallang wrote:
can we expect some clear-cut rules on what you would classify as 'real life harassment'?


It isn't our job to dictate to people how to maintain a base standard of human decency toward one another, and we're not going to do so.
...
Cut and dried, that's all we have to say on the matter.

No, it kind of is your job to do this.

Case in point: if I am ransoming someone, and they tell me that while they're going to pay the ransom, this will also cause them to cut back on their food expenditures for the month and/or skip meals, does this constitute as harassing someone out of the game? Is this something that can get me punished, were my victim to make such a claim in a support petition?

Because I don't see any better example of affecting someone's real-life well-being than this. Causing someone to do something detrimental to their health as a result of my in-game actions appears to be as much of a real-life effect as something can be.


That is idiotic. If a person would forego RL expenditures that are as basic a need as sustenance to supply an internet spaceship ransom, that person is neither reasonable or prudent, definitely not mature, and needs a wake up. Yes i realize that is an opinion.

But even if they did, that is their real life choice that has real life reprecussions, that THEY made. Choosing not to pay an internet spaceship ransom has no pertinent reprecussions except you lose pixels (which you acknowledged you had the risk of losing without compensation the moment you undocked anyways).

Your house is awarded no points.


And if said person advised that they suffered online gaming addiction and being treated for it, would that allow the original argument to stand? Technically that's even worse as they would then be taking advantage of a potentially mentally ill human being. It's not as clear cut as that, and that's why rules should be defined.

I risk my ships every time I undock, yes. I know where the line is drawn and when to step back from the game. Other people do not have that capacity and instead of mocking them, we should be protecting them. That's one example where your carefully constructed argument falls apart. It took me thirty seconds. No doubt there will be others.
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#246 - 2014-09-11 12:01:04 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
La Rynx wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I'm pretty sure he's trying to say that, he's blown stuff up and been blown up and never once been threatened for it or whatever, so for it to happen to someone else, they must have provoked it in some other way to begin with. That's how I understood it.


Yes thats what i meant.


Well, you're wrong, and I explained my experience: I was doxed without said RL provocation.
[/quote]

Please lets be clear:
I am wrong in your case,
if you feel offended, i am sorry.

but still those mentioned people exist.


Adrie Atticus wrote:

4) If you live in a civilized country, aiding and abetting is reality; if it's a group activity you need to understand that this will leave you vulnerable to enforcement via proxy unless you can prove that you have nothing to do with the activity other people are accused of. If you are not sure about this, contact CCP when you see something which could be seen as a breach of EULA/ToS.

On the topic of social behaviour: if you can discuss and act around total strangers in the middle of the street in a way these alleged violators have, then the behaviour should be accepted and shouldn't be enforceable. If this behaviour cannot be done to a total stranger on the street and it would cause someone to contact the authorities, then the alleged violations are not part of human social interaction and shouldn't be projected towards a player.


I think this is quite clear and not very hard to understand. Something like the bonus room would not work.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

FleetWarp Ichoriya
#247 - 2014-09-11 12:02:50 UTC
I find it kinda funny how people are still trying to sell this psychopatic behavior as the regular scam.
He had no assets, no point in mocking him any further. Let him sing a song or two afterwards, fine.
However dragging on for hours is outright psychopathic and doesnt add anything to the game.

I am actually amused that so many people are like "hurr durr but nao game is not many worth of time for me, I fell of so unattracted towarish" and I am actually thinking if it might be better for eve to just have them leave. I mean scammers will be there forever, sure, and thats cool. Just a bit less people with problems distinguishing between in character harrassment and real life harassment when everything in-game wise is taken.
Some people obviously can not fathom the difference between destroying a ship in combat, a suicide gank,the regular scam and the teasing and harassment of the player behind the avatar for hours long when the scam is already over (all assets and ISK taken).

I find people asking for "the line" kinda creepy tbh. I am not sure if it is intentional trolling or the attitude for morality has gone downhill that far that they are really not able to tell the difference where the game starts to fade into reallife.

Nothing sweeter than tears of tearcollectors. mhh yummy!

Clara Pond
Never Not Snazzy
#248 - 2014-09-11 12:03:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Clara Pond
Adrie Atticus wrote:
EULA


We all know that CCP can ban us at any time without reason according to the EULA. Please don't pretend though that if you were permabanned without explanation you wouldn't wonder why, and if it was fair, reasonable and proportional. Especially when the rules are being applied arbitrarily and others who are blatantly flouting the EULA are let off with warnings and temp bans if that.
Decian Cor
Stronghelm Corporation
Solyaris Chtonium
#249 - 2014-09-11 12:03:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Decian Cor
Cismet wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Titus Tallang wrote:
can we expect some clear-cut rules on what you would classify as 'real life harassment'?


It isn't our job to dictate to people how to maintain a base standard of human decency toward one another, and we're not going to do so.

The bottom line is that it's down to members of the community to know where the line crosses from common decency to harassment. We will not draw a line in the sand so that people can skirt on the edge of it and bend the rules as much as possible.

This isn't a debate about what constitutes "harassment". If you're not familiar with the word, find the definition in a dictionary and that will satisfy your question.

What we will do, is continue to use best judgement on a case by case basis to ensure that real life harassment is kept out of the game, and ensure that those who choose to involve themselves in such activities are no longer permitted to be part of our community.

Cut and dried, that's all we have to say on the matter.


I'm sorry Falcon, but I disagree with you almost entirely. It's absolutely not cut and dried. You have a game where an unofficial motto is "Harden the f*** up" (or derivatives), I have heard and seen CCP employees using this phrase several times. Others state that you should "trust noone".

This game is a game where what would be considered griefing by almost any other multiplayer game is not only accepted, but it is encouraged. This is a game where people are allowed to lie, cheat, steal, gank and destroy thousands of hours or more of peoples hard worked time and "harvesting tears" is an alliance past time. A game with events like hulkageddon, burn jita and countless other examples of griefing and harassment. By any definition many of these constitute harassment. If you are banning people for it in a game where you allow and encourage these things to happen, then you'd better bet that it IS your job to dictate what you constitute human decency.

All of the above are savage examples of a lack of human decency that you ENCOURAGE. I find every single one of them disgusting, as do many other people. There are other examples that I would find completely lacking in human decency as well. You cannot turn around and tell people they should know what constitutes human decency, while encouraging and permitting the lack of same.

You want it to be cut and dry, but it's not. You are now in a situation where noone has any idea what the line is because actions taken for some griefing are inconsistent with actions taken years ago. It's time CCP stopped hotfooting around this issue and trying to avoid the issue. You created this situation directly, or indirectly and it's unacceptable to try and skirt responsibility on the grounds that everyone should be aware of what human decency is. Most of the acts in the game wouldn't happen if people actually followed your human decency credo that you're spouting now that something truly awful has happened (I'm inferring based on the reaction, as of course transparency only goes so far and there's little information on what actually happened).

Let me be clear, I love the game and it's one with a unique community found nowhere else and that these actions are allowed is partly what makes it what it is.

That being said, you can't say, well we're going to allow you to not bother with human decency for the most part, excepting where we think you've gone too far. It just doesn't work and is the coward's way around. Yes people will skirt the rules, that's what people do. But by having rules you actually set a standard that if broken you can take action.

It's also worth bearing in mind that the concept of "human decency" fluctuates based on culture, country and over time. One hundred years ago, racism, homophobia and women's rights were very different than today. As little as a few years ago marriage for homosexuals was a pipe dream. In parts of Africa, homosexuals are punished harshly by society. In the Middle East, women have much fewer rights. You can't just claim human decency as a blanket coverall and hope that absolves CCP of responsibility.

I might well get banned for this post depending on how CCP are feeling at the moment, this post might get removed. If one of those things happen then it was a fun time, but I wouldn't want to be part of a game who refuses to take responsibility for the world it created.



CCP didn't create the cesspit of the sand castle that is New Eden. They filled the metaphorical box with sand, gave a bunch of players some pails and shovels, and said "Here, do what you want." I don't remember CCP ever endorsing harassment, saying "Hey guys, go grief the hell out of everybody night and day. Go be a sociopathic ******* because that is what we want."

Players at that point could have made it like every other MMO by dictation of THEIR OWN ACTIONS. They could of made it a blossoming Utopia by dictation of THEIR OWN ACTIONS. Or they could have made it a sometimes disgusting quagmire of a wild west (that you see now) by dictation of THEIR OWN ACTIONS.

Nothing sickens me more than people not taking responsibility for their OWN DEEDS. CCP didn't force anybody's hand to do anything. They gave us the tools, we used them how we saw fit. Own up.

Riddling, isn't it?

[u]Unfiltered for the masses.[/u]

http://imgur.com/mzSl1Ie

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#250 - 2014-09-11 12:05:25 UTC
Would CCP like to comment on the practice of banning the wrong people?

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#251 - 2014-09-11 12:06:20 UTC
Adrie Atticus wrote:
If this behaviour cannot be done to a total stranger on the street and it would cause someone to contact the authorities, then the alleged violations are not part of human social interaction
First response: LOL

Second response (after composing myself): This standard would damn far more carebears than gankers, see: minerbumping.com.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Black Pedro
Mine.
#252 - 2014-09-11 12:06:52 UTC
Adrie Atticus wrote:
So this thread is back again, let's see:

1) CCP has rules and guidelines set in line of the EULA which are on purpose left as wide as possible in the case they need to act on it. Remember, the purposed victim is the one contacting CCP and seeing if they will enact on those rules and guidelines to see if they were crossed or not.

2) EULA dictates that

"B. By CCP for Breach or Misconduct
(1) Suspension of Account

Without limiting CCP's rights or remedies, CCP may immediately, and without notice, discontinue or suspend access to the System through your Account, and any and all other Accounts that share the name, phone number, e-mail address, internet protocol address or credit card number with the discontinued or suspended Account, in the event of (i) a breach of the EULA (including the Rules of Conduct) by you or any user under your Account; or (ii) unauthorized access to the System or use of the Game by you or any user under your Account."

This is being done here. CCP has to notify the affected party but they are not required to explain themselves outside of "Breach of EULA and/or ToS". In this case, CCP Falcon has explained the situation further in this thread. Is it a line in the sand and is it blurry? Yes, by design.

3) If you are not sure on if the conduct is within reason or EULA/ToS, you should stop and take a second look instead of pushing on. Your account is your responsibility and it can be denied access by sole dicretion of CCP.

4) If you live in a civilized country, aiding and abetting is reality; if it's a group activity you need to understand that this will leave you vulnerable to enforcement via proxy unless you can prove that you have nothing to do with the activity other people are accused of. If you are not sure about this, contact CCP when you see something which could be seen as a breach of EULA/ToS.

On the topic of social behaviour: if you can discuss and act around total strangers in the middle of the street in a way these alleged violators have, then the behaviour should be accepted and shouldn't be enforceable. If this behaviour cannot be done to a total stranger on the street and it would cause someone to contact the authorities, then the alleged violations are not part of human social interaction and shouldn't be projected towards a player.

Disclaimer: PLAYER does not equal CHARACTER as one player can have more than one character, but one character cannot have more than one player.


I am not sure what your point here is. No one he is arguing that CCP can't do whatever it wants, define harassment however it wants, as well as ban anyone for any reason. The current discussion in this thread is that the way these rules are being enforced now is not clear, appears to be internally inconsistent, and is causing confusion, especially for those who have just been banned without even knowing which of their actions have crossed CCP's line.

You can take a look at Erotica 1's commentary if you need to get up to speed on the current discussion:

https://imgur.com/EtfsmXj
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#253 - 2014-09-11 12:07:02 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
La Rynx wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I'm pretty sure he's trying to say that, he's blown stuff up and been blown up and never once been threatened for it or whatever, so for it to happen to someone else, they must have provoked it in some other way to begin with. That's how I understood it.


Yes thats what i meant.


Well, you're wrong, and I explained my experience: I was doxed without said RL provocation.


Wait a moment...
I did not say -RL- provokation. I am talking of in-game provokation, other than shooting the ships.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

Cismet
Silent Knights.
LinkNet
#254 - 2014-09-11 12:07:56 UTC
Decian Cor wrote:
Cismet wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Titus Tallang wrote:
can we expect some clear-cut rules on what you would classify as 'real life harassment'?


It isn't our job to dictate to people how to maintain a base standard of human decency toward one another, and we're not going to do so.

The bottom line is that it's down to members of the community to know where the line crosses from common decency to harassment. We will not draw a line in the sand so that people can skirt on the edge of it and bend the rules as much as possible.

This isn't a debate about what constitutes "harassment". If you're not familiar with the word, find the definition in a dictionary and that will satisfy your question.

What we will do, is continue to use best judgement on a case by case basis to ensure that real life harassment is kept out of the game, and ensure that those who choose to involve themselves in such activities are no longer permitted to be part of our community.

Cut and dried, that's all we have to say on the matter.


I'm sorry Falcon, but I disagree with you almost entirely. It's absolutely not cut and dried. You have a game where an unofficial motto is "Harden the f*** up" (or derivatives), I have heard and seen CCP employees using this phrase several times. Others state that you should "trust noone".

This game is a game where what would be considered griefing by almost any other multiplayer game is not only accepted, but it is encouraged. This is a game where people are allowed to lie, cheat, steal, gank and destroy thousands of hours or more of peoples hard worked time and "harvesting tears" is an alliance past time. A game with events like hulkageddon, burn jita and countless other examples of griefing and harassment. By any definition many of these constitute harassment. If you are banning people for it in a game where you allow and encourage these things to happen, then you'd better bet that it IS your job to dictate what you constitute human decency.

All of the above are savage examples of a lack of human decency that you ENCOURAGE. I find every single one of them disgusting, as do many other people. There are other examples that I would find completely lacking in human decency as well. You cannot turn around and tell people they should know what constitutes human decency, while encouraging and permitting the lack of same.

You want it to be cut and dry, but it's not. You are now in a situation where noone has any idea what the line is because actions taken for some griefing are inconsistent with actions taken years ago. It's time CCP stopped hotfooting around this issue and trying to avoid the issue. You created this situation directly, or indirectly and it's unacceptable to try and skirt responsibility on the grounds that everyone should be aware of what human decency is. Most of the acts in the game wouldn't happen if people actually followed your human decency credo that you're spouting now that something truly awful has happened (I'm inferring based on the reaction, as of course transparency only goes so far and there's little information on what actually happened).

Let me be clear, I love the game and it's one with a unique community found nowhere else and that these actions are allowed is partly what makes it what it is.

That being said, you can't say, well we're going to allow you to not bother with human decency for the most part, excepting where we think you've gone too far. It just doesn't work and is the coward's way around. Yes people will skirt the rules, that's what people do. But by having rules you actually set a standard that if broken you can take action.

It's also worth bearing in mind that the concept of "human decency" fluctuates based on culture, country and over time. One hundred years ago, racism, homophobia and women's rights were very different than today. As little as a few years ago marriage for homosexuals was a pipe dream. In parts of Africa, homosexuals are punished harshly by society. In the Middle East, women have much fewer rights. You can't just claim human decency as a blanket coverall and hope that absolves CCP of responsibility.

I might well get banned for this post depending on how CCP are feeling at the moment, this post might get removed. If one of those things happen then it was a fun time, but I wouldn't want to be part of a game who refuses to take responsibility for the world it created.



CCP didn't create the cesspit of the sand castle that is New Eden. They filled the metaphorical box with sand, gave a bunch of players some pails and shovels, and said "Here, do what you want." I don't remember CCP ever endorsing harassment, saying "Hey guys, go grief the hell out of everybody night and day. Go be a sociopathic ******* because that is what we want."

Players at that point could have made it like every other MMO by dictation of THEIR OWN ACTIONS. They could of made it a blossoming Utopia by dictation of THEIR OWN ACTIONS. Or they could have made it a sometimes disgusting quagmire of a wild west (that you see now) by dictation of THEIR OWN ACTIONS.

Nothing sickens me more than people not taking responsibility for their OWN DEEDS. CCP didn't force anybody's hand to do anything. They gave us the tools, we used them how we saw fit. Own up.

Riddling, isn't it?


I'm just going to leave this here as someone else was kind enough to post it a littler earlier:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvM7av1o1Q
Drago Shouna
Doomheim
#255 - 2014-09-11 12:08:55 UTC
CCP should be applauded by their stance.

It's all well and good players screaming that they don't know why the players involved had been banned, but i'll bet that the guys banned know exactly why it happened. Regardless of whether they tell anyone.

CCP have already stated that nobody is going to get a clear and exact definition simply because the second they did that, one of the forum lawyers would find a way around it within five minutes.

That may, or may not be the reason the players haven't been told, the second it's defined a workaround will be found.

Some of you push push and then push some more the boundaries of the game in a bad way, so much so that in 99.9% of other games you'd be banned.

It looks to me that the reins are being tightened on some peoples behaviour, and about time too.

Well done CCP.

Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..." " They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."

Welcome to EVE.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#256 - 2014-09-11 12:09:30 UTC
Crumplecorn wrote:
Adrie Atticus wrote:
If this behaviour cannot be done to a total stranger on the street and it would cause someone to contact the authorities, then the alleged violations are not part of human social interaction
First response: LOL

Second response (after composing myself): This standard would damn far more carebears than gankers, see: minerbumping.com.


You forgot, they are held to a different set of rules, though.

That's why Guy I Bumped #9 last month can get away with telling me "I am going to find you and cut your brakes, and laugh when I hear about how you died."

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#257 - 2014-09-11 12:12:10 UTC
Miles Parabellum wrote:
Ahhh, spring cleaning.
Nice to see that some trash has been taken out.
Well done, [].
Begging for a Godwin.

FleetWarp Ichoriya wrote:
I find it kinda funny how people are still trying to sell this psychopatic behavior as the regular scam.
He had no assets, no point in mocking him any further. Let him sing a song or two afterwards, fine.
However dragging on for hours is outright psychopathic and doesnt add anything to the game.
And now we go from the above "I don't like them so ban them" to "they have crossed a line I made up so ban them".

The pro-ban crowd are true quality posters, just like last time.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#258 - 2014-09-11 12:12:11 UTC
Drago Shouna wrote:
CCP should be applauded by their stance.


their "stance" is a farce because they won't act on these discretionary policies unless there's a public outcry over it

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#259 - 2014-09-11 12:12:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Mallak Azaria
Drago Shouna wrote:
CCP should be applauded by their stance.



Stance, maybe (or not). Poor investigation practices, no. This is the third time this year that a bunch of people were banned for something they had absolutely nothing to do with. CCP should not be applauded for this.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

CALDARI CITIZEN 14330909
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#260 - 2014-09-11 12:13:35 UTC
Quote:
We're CCP! We march on fearlessly!
Excellent is what we strive to be!
If you're going to follow us to the top
HARDEN THE **** UP!

via CCP

The Artist Formerly Known As AC. 

The terminal end of the digestive system. 

The Best CSM Candidate