These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Should Outposts be Destructable?

First post
Author
Satav
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2011-09-12 16:49:46 UTC
Anyone else think that outposts should be destructable? or at least have the consequences of having the Outpost RF'd much higher.

I understand that it maybe shouldn't be completely destructible since everything inside would be destroyed as well. (loot heaven!)

But perhaps make it so you have to rebuilt the platform from scratch with an egg.

Mainly looking for possible scenarios/outcomes from being for or against this from the eve community.

I thank you in advance for your opinions and constructive input.
Othran
Route One
#2 - 2011-09-12 16:53:32 UTC
Yes, but not under current sov rules.

Everything "player-built" should be destroyable by players IMHO.
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#3 - 2011-09-12 17:22:30 UTC
Destructable Outposts = Scorched Earth

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Othran
Route One
#4 - 2011-09-12 18:14:29 UTC
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:
Destructable Outposts = Scorched Earth


Under current sov rules yes I agree.

Players should be capable of destroying them though - mechanics can get sorted out before that (well assuming some competence in ccp).
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#5 - 2011-09-12 18:29:25 UTC
Yes, burn down all outposts.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn

Feligast
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2011-09-12 19:08:58 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
Yes, burn down all outposts.

whaynethepain
#7 - 2011-09-12 19:21:14 UTC
Excellent question.

Traditionally, PVP has included the destruction and acquisition of other players stuff.

And PVE tends to be re-spawning unimportant objects.

I fear to siege an Outpost, with the option of destruction, would honestly make some cry.

Having said that, if some Alliance took my Alliance Outpost, worked so hard to create, I would like to sneak in and destroy it.

Unfortunately, I believe this would seriously hinder an Alliance surging forward, taking many systems at once, because they would have hold back to defend their newly acquired assets.

Getting you on your feet.

So you've further to fall.

Mirima Thurander
#8 - 2011-09-12 21:52:57 UTC
whaynethepain wrote:


Unfortunately, I believe this would seriously hinder an Alliance surging forward, taking many systems at once, because they would have hold back to defend their newly acquired assets.





is this not the point? i mean should this not have been done this way it was done from the start.

All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#9 - 2011-09-12 22:22:03 UTC
In the days of castles, it was impractical to utterly destroy a castle. This would require practically dismantling the entire structure and scattering the stones so that it could not easily be rebuilt. For an army on the move, this would cost valuable time and all the enemy to regroup, reinforce, and attack while you were destroying one castle.

Instead, it became a common practice to "slight" a castle, rendering it indefensible. Walls would be breached, gates would be opened and rendered unable to close, moats would be bridged with dirt. While dismantling a castle could take months, slighting it could take just a couple of weeks (in a time of multi-year sieges, this was fast).

So I would suggest this:
At 25% structure, an outpost surrenders to the attacking alliance and is captured. This would be the same as 0% today.
At 10% structure, the outpost goes offline. At this point the outpost must be repaired to 25% and spend 24-72 hours returning to an online status before it can be used again. This way an attacking alliance can cripple outposts and return to them later.
At 0% structure, the outpost is destroyed.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

destiny2
Decaying Rocky Odious Non Evil Stupid Inane Nobody
Looking for Trouble
#10 - 2011-09-13 14:45:43 UTC
whaynethepain wrote:
Excellent question.

Traditionally, PVP has included the destruction and acquisition of other players stuff.

And PVE tends to be re-spawning unimportant objects.

I fear to siege an Outpost, with the option of destruction, would honestly make some cry.

Having said that, if some Alliance took my Alliance Outpost, worked so hard to create, I would like to sneak in and destroy it.

Unfortunately, I believe this would seriously hinder an Alliance surging forward, taking many systems at once, because they would have hold back to defend their newly acquired assets.




However. destroying a Outpost would take a frick ton of firepower and im sure if CCP allowed the destruction of Outposts they would give it bonuses to use towards its fleets protecting it. its bad enough killing a large tower with the amount of time it takes without risking titans on the field.
Satav
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2011-09-13 15:30:04 UTC
bump.
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#12 - 2011-09-13 15:34:09 UTC
destiny2 wrote:
whaynethepain wrote:
Excellent question.

Traditionally, PVP has included the destruction and acquisition of other players stuff.

And PVE tends to be re-spawning unimportant objects.

I fear to siege an Outpost, with the option of destruction, would honestly make some cry.

Having said that, if some Alliance took my Alliance Outpost, worked so hard to create, I would like to sneak in and destroy it.

Unfortunately, I believe this would seriously hinder an Alliance surging forward, taking many systems at once, because they would have hold back to defend their newly acquired assets.




However. destroying a Outpost would take a frick ton of firepower and im sure if CCP allowed the destruction of Outposts they would give it bonuses to use towards its fleets protecting it. its bad enough killing a large tower with the amount of time it takes without risking titans on the field.

No, please do not even suggest this. CCP has already included enough brick walls for us to waste hours upon hours shooting with multi-hundred man fleets. We do not need an other such static thing at which to shoot. As long as there is an advantage to bringing more guys to the fight (in this case, more guys eat through the effective hit points faster so we have to waste less time stabbing ourselves in the faces with this stupid mechanic), then there will always be huge blobs. People do not seem to like blobs. And yet the same people who post about hating blobs want the extra security that comes from their space stuff being hard to kill. As long as there are things in space with obnoxiously high effective hit point totals, then there will continue to be an incentive to bring huge fleets that lag the servers and make the Elite PVP crowd whinge about dishonorable blobs of unskilled newbies.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#13 - 2011-09-13 15:53:07 UTC
Would love for it to be possible, but it would have to very difficult and/or expensive to do and not be just another EHP sink that encourages blobbing.

Examples:
- Infiltration of owners corporation to disable nano-assembly array which keeps outpost from popping (ie. bypass the reinforcement mechanic). Spy is obviously burned by doing it so, consider the target carefully or have loads of spies in place!
- Sacrificing a bunch of SC's or one Titan to destroy the nano-assembly array (ex. Gallente's attack on Caldari station in runup to FW).

If the nano-assembly array is active the 'normal' reinforcement system is used and it rebuilds itself at DT.

To keep it fair:
Personal hangars get a sorting system similar to corporate hangars. Upon destruction items are ejected in locked freight containers (or similar) and scattered far grid wide, any ships are destroyed unless unassembled and in a hangar division.

Makes it a pinata fest but requiring freighters/JFs to pick up the loot without knowing which one is the golden egg .. no smash and grab possible and gives a second chance for outpost owners to recoup some losses or inflict some of their own as the case may be.
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#14 - 2011-09-13 16:02:56 UTC
Hirana Yoshida wrote:

Makes it a pinata fest but requiring freighters/JFs to pick up the loot without knowing which one is the golden egg .. no smash and grab possible and gives a second chance for outpost owners to recoup some losses or inflict some of their own as the case may be.

You have no idea how happy this would make every member of GSOL.

But to be fair you probably have no idea how much a large alliance already has need of Jump Freighters in everyday logistics.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn

Vio Geraci
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2011-09-13 18:54:57 UTC
While this doesn't exactly fit our party messaging, I think players should be able to cripple an outpost so that it cannot be docked in, nor used for any service at all. Players docked there, gear there, and jump clones would all remain. In this scenario outposts could be repaired through an industrial effort equal to perhaps 1/3rd or 1/2 of building an outpost. Perhaps you would make and transport a repair platform.

The point of this is area denial rather than loot, and players could retain their gear if they quit for a month and return to find that their space has changed hands or been destroyed. I think this would be a much gentler change than allowing wholesale destruction of stations, and be less brutal on the individual player that decided to take the risk of moving to 0.0. That said, I think there should be more ways to steal from other players and/or mess with them, but this does not seem to be it.
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#16 - 2011-09-13 19:05:56 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
You have no idea how happy this would make every member of GSOL.

Guiding Hand blokes, the ones who have made spying an assembly line job?
Yeah, I reckon their business would boom quite handily .. we already have "features" that allows a mole to do harm (theft, kicking, PW changes, alliance disband Roll etc.) this just adds an actual mechanic to the mix .. technically everything in Eve is easier to do using brute force or numbers and its quite tedious
Lyris Nairn wrote:
But to be fair you probably have no idea how much a large alliance already has need of Jump Freighters in everyday logistics.

What do you mean? That they don't have freighters to spare for scooping duty in potentially hostile space or that it will be "too easy" to do?
Just imagine how many cans we are talking about for a busy station system, hundreds of peoples stuff all in individual containers (one per division to be evil!) that can not be scanned or opened in space .. need to haul them to a station to repack/reproc it to get the contents.

Further thought: Might even be something for the hacking skill to do, get an inventory listing for cans in space without actually being able to open the things.
Vio Geraci
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2011-09-13 19:10:46 UTC
You bring up an interesting tangential point, in that spying is essentially an unsupported profession in EVE. A lot of the stuff spies do seems to happen despite CCP, rather than because of them. I'd love to see more ways to sabotage a corporation from within.
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#18 - 2011-09-13 19:30:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyris Nairn
Hirana Yoshida wrote:
Lyris Nairn wrote:
You have no idea how happy this would make every member of GSOL.

Guiding Hand blokes, the ones who have made spying an assembly line job?
Yeah, I reckon their business would boom quite handily .. we already have "features" that allows a mole to do harm (theft, kicking, PW changes, alliance disband Roll etc.) this just adds an actual mechanic to the mix .. technically everything in Eve is easier to do using brute force or numbers and its quite tedious.

I was actually referring to a group within Goonswarm whose abbreviation is GSOL, not the Guiding Hand Social Club run by Istvaan. They are the guys who go completely unnoticed as they fuel and configure POS, fuel jump bridges, move huge amounts of stuff around so that there is a cache at the front lines of a fighting force, and so on. They use Rorquals and Jump Freighters by the dozens to get these jobs done in something resembling a decent amount of time, which is to say that it is hours and hours of clicking buttons and being paranoid even with a fleet of such ships.


Quote:

What do you mean? That they don't have freighters to spare for scooping duty in potentially hostile space or that it will be "too easy" to do?
Just imagine how many cans we are talking about for a busy station system, hundreds of peoples stuff all in individual containers (one per division to be evil!) that can not be scanned or opened in space .. need to haul them to a station to repack/reproc it to get the contents.

I mean that in reference to what I just said above most large alliances already have a large fleet of Jump Freighters, Freighters, Rorquals and Carriers for the expressed purpose of moving huge amounts of ships. Consider if an alliance decides that it wants to switch from using an all-Maelstrom fleet doctrine to an all-Abbadon fleet doctrine; further, consider that the alliance can expect to field about 200-500 such ships in the course of a day, and lose about a quarter of them. That is 50-125 battleships per day, or 350-875 battleships per week, plus modules, rigs, ammunition, and variant modules for persons of various skill levels, that need to be imported to the staging area. Consider than in order to move a fleet of that size through a jump bridge network, or to bridge a fleet of that size through a Titan, and to fuel the POS that keeps those Titans safe and maintains the jump bridge networks, you need tens of millions of cubic meters worth of liquid ozone per week. Now consider the size of a jump-capable hauling fleet needed to maintain this. Now imagine how trivial it would be for an alliance of a size sufficient to field such a fleet to simply scoop up everything by cynoing in all of their logistical hauling ships.

Don't get me wrong—I love the idea. I just don't think you realize how "not hard at all" your difficult task is. And even if it truly was a difficult task, game design should not be balanced around the difficulty or tediousness of an action; if an action is the best, most efficient, or most profitable, or only thing to do in a certain situation, the difficulty or tediousness of that action will not at all balance it. People will do it. They will commit as many hours, as many people, and as many accounts as necessary to doing it.


Quote:
Further thought: Might even be something for the hacking skill to do, get an inventory listing for cans in space without actually being able to open the things.

I actually like that idea, which is probably evidence enough that it's a terrible idea. P

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
#19 - 2011-09-14 14:48:32 UTC
Short answer: yes.

Long answer: yes, they should.

AFK-cloaking in a system near you.

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#20 - 2011-09-14 15:32:47 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
...

Ahh, OK, so GSOL is the Goon logistics arm .. did not know that. Even if they are currently busy tending the needs of the hive, surely they will embrace the chance to boss around entire fleets as they need cover and warp-ins on cans scattered all over the place .. doubly so after December when the first changes towards making null industrially self-sufficient are made and a big chunk of their raison d'etre is removed .. no? Smile

As for the hard/tedious part, doesn't that apply to just about everything in Eve? Mining, missions, ratting et al.?

By scattering the goodies you essentially push it into the risk/reward part of the equation as the fatties are not exactly known for their defensive capabilities .. either way, if loot is to be on table for outpost destruction then it has to be an arduous task due to possible profit, hell even in the real world city sackings of old an army would spend days sifting through the rubble for the goodies.



123Next page