These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

"How Highsec miners threaten EVE, and how we can stop them."

First post
Author
Velicitia
XS Tech
#61 - 2014-08-28 09:40:26 UTC
Renegade Heart wrote:
Well I just listened to the manifesto, and it sounds a bit like James 315 is scared that the miners are going to wreck the game for everyone. It's pretty amusing stuff really, but I cannot see it happening.

Miners are pretty easy to kill for a start... [more stuff]


Thing is, while the ships are easy to kill (etc. etc.), it's not the ~ships~ that they're really talking about, but rather the player with entitlement issues behind the screen at the other end.

Go look in GD, and you'll see two (if not more) threads started by that type of player --> they believe that "hisec should be [100%] safe" and that "CCP should protect them". Pretty much they're calling to make EvE less like EvE and more like "every other MMO out there".

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#62 - 2014-08-28 09:57:39 UTC
Syssa Binchiette wrote:


Full quote: still hypocritical

EVE is NOT a PVP only game. Don't like it? COD is calling. Or for an MMO try Aion, that has tons of PvP.

CCP created a supposed "sandbox" game where players could do what they liked.
In that sandbox they threw toys other then just PvP.

Miners are going to mine (don't know why, it's boring as hell).
Explorers are going to explorer.
industrialist are going to make stuff
Traders are going to trade.
Haulers are going to haul.
PvP people are going to shoot each other.
PvE people are going to shoot rats.
Gankers are going to be idiots.

Groups that don't like what other groups do just have to get over it.

As arguing on a forum is as useful as banging your head into a brick wall (which is not useful at all and I speak from personal experience) I'll just fade out and let the usual suspects fight amongst yourselves.

P.S. Bumping in it's current form is a bug they never fixed. Watching someone get "bumped" is like watching the messed up physics in Goat Simulator, but I digress

i was going to adress this but i can see you have been thoroughly beaten about the head with your own words so instead ill just say ,
HA!
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#63 - 2014-08-28 17:42:19 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
You got me.

It is mostly not only.

In fact freighters are "fair game".


If you have evidence to show that CODE is targeting rookies, you should report them to CCP.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Charax Bouclier
Silvershield Universal
#64 - 2014-08-28 20:03:13 UTC
That audio clip was hilarious. Loved the wording and tone of it.
Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#65 - 2014-08-29 11:19:19 UTC
Highsec miners you say. Interesting.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#66 - 2014-08-29 12:22:26 UTC
Helicity Boson wrote:
Highsec miners you say. Interesting.
Are you hatching a cunning plan? I hope so, they're usually amusing as hell.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#67 - 2014-08-29 12:28:10 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Helicity Boson wrote:
Highsec miners you say. Interesting.
Are you hatching a cunning plan? I hope so, they're usually amusing as hell.


I already have a cunning plan. What I need is:
a) free time
b) resources in the form of coders
c) donations
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#68 - 2014-08-29 12:34:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Helicity Boson wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Helicity Boson wrote:
Highsec miners you say. Interesting.
Are you hatching a cunning plan? I hope so, they're usually amusing as hell.


I already have a cunning plan. What I need is:
a) free time
b) resources in the form of coders
c) donations
I can't help with a or b, I'm assuming something similar to your past endeavours, when you're ready to proceed feel free to contact me about donating a prize or two.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#69 - 2014-08-29 12:40:14 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Helicity Boson wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Helicity Boson wrote:
Highsec miners you say. Interesting.
Are you hatching a cunning plan? I hope so, they're usually amusing as hell.


I already have a cunning plan. What I need is:
a) free time
b) resources in the form of coders
c) donations
I can't help with a or b, I'm assuming something similar to your past endeavours, when you're ready to proceed feel free to contact me about donating a prize or two.


You will know when the time comes :3
Lilly Naari
Enclave Security Forces
#70 - 2014-08-29 14:00:07 UTC
Highsec miners are no threat to eve, 40+ Man ISboxing Mining Fleets are the real threat.
Lilly Naari
Enclave Security Forces
#71 - 2014-08-29 14:02:14 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
Renegade Heart wrote:
Well I just listened to the manifesto, and it sounds a bit like James 315 is scared that the miners are going to wreck the game for everyone. It's pretty amusing stuff really, but I cannot see it happening.

Miners are pretty easy to kill for a start... [more stuff]


Thing is, while the ships are easy to kill (etc. etc.), it's not the ~ships~ that they're really talking about, but rather the player with entitlement issues behind the screen at the other end.

Go look in GD, and you'll see two (if not more) threads started by that type of player --> they believe that "hisec should be [100%] safe" and that "CCP should protect them". Pretty much they're calling to make EvE less like EvE and more like "every other MMO out there".



Actually they are calling to make highsec like very other MMO, not "EvE"

I honestly do not understand what your issue is with HIghsec when you live in 0.0. Worry about your own space instead of somewhere light years away you have nothing to do with. There are plenty of things wrong with 0.0 also.
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#72 - 2014-08-29 23:35:59 UTC
Helicity Boson wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Helicity Boson wrote:
Highsec miners you say. Interesting.
Are you hatching a cunning plan? I hope so, they're usually amusing as hell.


I already have a cunning plan. What I need is:
a) free time
b) resources in the form of coders
c) donations


I endorse this plan and/or service.

And killing miners.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Sasha Nyemtsov
Doomheim
#73 - 2014-08-30 06:05:18 UTC
Lilly Naari wrote:
Velicitia wrote:
Renegade Heart wrote:
Well I just listened to the manifesto, and it sounds a bit like James 315 is scared that the miners are going to wreck the game for everyone. It's pretty amusing stuff really, but I cannot see it happening.

Miners are pretty easy to kill for a start... [more stuff]


Thing is, while the ships are easy to kill (etc. etc.), it's not the ~ships~ that they're really talking about, but rather the player with entitlement issues behind the screen at the other end.

Go look in GD, and you'll see two (if not more) threads started by that type of player --> they believe that "hisec should be [100%] safe" and that "CCP should protect them". Pretty much they're calling to make EvE less like EvE and more like "every other MMO out there".



Actually they are calling to make highsec like very other MMO, not "EvE"

I honestly do not understand what your issue is with HIghsec when you live in 0.0. Worry about your own space instead of somewhere light years away you have nothing to do with. There are plenty of things wrong with 0.0 also.


Hi Lilly, can I just place before you a telling quote from James 315?

"everything in EVE is connected. What happens in highsec influences nullsec."

It's taken from his Manifesto II: Part 2 - 'The Carebears Killed Nullsec PvP'.

As luck would have it, that's the very next slice of audio-cake to be released to SouncCloud early to-morrow morning (BST). Drop in and have a listen. I'll introduce it properly at that time.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#74 - 2014-08-30 06:53:09 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Helicity Boson wrote:
b) resources in the form of coders


10 GOTO 30
20 PRINT "HELLO WORLD"
30 END

I am help?

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#75 - 2014-08-30 06:53:57 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
Sasha Nyemtsov wrote:
Hi Lilly, can I just place before you a telling quote from James 315?

"everything in EVE is connected.


Lord help us!
Ugh
Thats not Jimmy, thats a quote from a speech to said comming from Chief Seattle, but was written by Ted Perry.

Chief Seattle all things are connected

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."

Sasha Nyemtsov
Doomheim
#76 - 2014-08-30 07:32:49 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
Sasha Nyemtsov wrote:
Hi Lilly, can I just place before you a telling quote from James 315?

"everything in EVE is connected.


Lord help us!
Ugh
Thats not Jimmy, thats a quote from a speech to said comming from Chief Seattle, but was written by Ted Perry.

Chief Seattle all things are connected


Well-grabbed!

I did notice the spoiler beneath the quote: "The words Chief Seattle has become famous for were written by Ted Perry, the screenwriter for home, a 1972 film about ecology."

In the interests of honesty, I should say that, according to Wikipedia, the attribution of the content of the speech is disputed.

Perhaps it was James 315 who wrote the speech for Chief Seattle, then used one of his 4000 alts to ghost it as Ted Perry?

We shall never know.
Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#77 - 2014-08-30 07:48:20 UTC
Gadon Longstar wrote:
James 315 is the biggest threat to EVE. If you think about the situation properly without being delusional, it's the only conclusion to come to.

He is responsible for several dozen unsubscribed accounts, perhaps over 100. I got in one little fight and my mom got sacred, she said, "Youre moving with your antie and uncle in Bel Air.

How many people have subscribed because of him by comparison? A couple dozen? loyalanon himself admitted they couldn't find any extra bodies for the alliance tournament if it was needed, so clearly it's not much more than that.

The worst part about James 315 is that he's created a very "us vs us" culture within EVE. It used to be us vs them. Them being the non-EVE MMO gamers.

James 315 has turned high-sec into an elementary school playground and it's killing the game.

\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project

Lilly Naari
Enclave Security Forces
#78 - 2014-08-30 08:24:53 UTC
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
This was one of the finest threads on the EVE forums, and actually was one of the things that got me started playing (someone I knew from another online game linked it to me as a joke, 'hey check this out, best gamer forum rant ever', and it meant that I then tried EVE for a second time and now, a couple of years later, I have two accounts).

These voiceovers are pure gold.


A hot, Psychotic, Redhead... What more could you want in a woman? You got a phone number?
Lilly Naari
Enclave Security Forces
#79 - 2014-08-30 08:29:46 UTC
Tolkaz Khamsi wrote:
I think a more accurate way to state the problem is, "Mining is a broken mechanic, but it is so central to the economy of Eve that CCP doesn't dare fool with it much". In hindsight I think CCP understands that mining really needed to be a passive rather than active mechanic -- in fact, I think they applied the lessons they learned with mining to the PI mechanic.

Mining combines the worst aspects of all resource-gathering game mechanics: it is a mechanical, repetitive task that takes place at fixed points in the game world and requires little skill but much time to perform. Eve's mining mechanic cries out for automation -- extensive use of alts and outright botting are inevitable. Tedious, un-fun, but absolutely essential to the game: that's Eve's mining system for you.

Why has such a lousy gaming mechanic persisted for so long? After all, Eve's central mining mechanic is little changed since Eve's launch a decade ago. We've gotten better ships, but essentially the game is the same: warp to belt, point lasers at rocks, then stare with glazed eyes at the screen as your ore-hold fills up. Lather, rinse, repeat. Year after year people complain about how boring and dumb mining is, and year after year CCP does nothing about it. Why? Because Eve's economy would collapse without a daily influx of huge amounts of asteroid ore. Huge amounts. There aren't enough human miners in the game to keep up the flow of ore needed. So botting, while never actually sanctioned, has been more or less accepted as a necessary evil -- as long as the botters don't make it too obvious.

I'm not sure what to propose at this point. If CCP were going to fool with the mining mechanic, they'd have done it by now. I think they're afraid of totally wrecking the economy if they try to change mining too much; any substantial change to mining risks interrupting the flow of ore, which in turn risks interrupting the flow of minerals for ship-building. If I had my way, I'd make mining more like PI where you set up your arrays, turn them on, and let them run.

I dislike botting because it's actually an indicator of a broken game. I don't have any huge moral beef with it apart from the way it disadvantages players who don't bot. But Eve's mining mechanic is so dreadfully tedious and un-fun that automating the activity is the only way to engage in it without going insane.

tl;dr version: botting is the only sane way to deal with Eve's horribly broken mining mechanic. If CCP wants to end botting, they need to change how mining is done, at a fundamental level.


There is a simple fix to this CCP "Could" do. But they would need to refund all the SP for barges etc.

*** Add a Mobile Mining Depo which could be anchored in a belt, which would Mine any Asteroid (Including Ice) within a 50k Radious. Give it a 200,000k Ore Hold, and Put a restriction on it which stated no more then 2-5 Could be anchored at any give time by a single "Account".

How you would actually balance this.... "Shrugs". But it would work regardless.
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#80 - 2014-08-30 08:49:11 UTC  |  Edited by: La Rynx
Sasha Nyemtsov wrote:
La Rynx wrote:
Sasha Nyemtsov wrote:
Hi Lilly, can I just place before you a telling quote from James 315?

"everything in EVE is connected.


Lord help us!
Ugh
Thats not Jimmy, thats a quote from a speech to said comming from Chief Seattle, but was written by Ted Perry.

Chief Seattle all things are connected


Well-grabbed!

I did notice the spoiler beneath the quote: "The words Chief Seattle has become famous for were written by Ted Perry, the screenwriter for home, a 1972 film about ecology."

In the interests of honesty, I should say that, according to Wikipedia, the attribution of the content of the speech is disputed.

Perhaps it was James 315 who wrote the speech for Chief Seattle, then used one of his 4000 alts to ghost it as Ted Perry?


*facepalm*

You could have checked my link, there is more about the dispute. Since there are more then just one rewrite and all text depict or try to depict Chief Seattles thoughts, it would be hard for the likes of you to say CS could have been an alt of Jimmy.
Ugh

Oh and its not grabbed -> i noticed (as in knowing and recognising). Its allways important from what sources bad propaganda derives.
Jimmy isn't a great writer, he is just a thief.

Atomic Virulent : "You can't spell DOUCHE. without CODE."