These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

EVE 2.0 - The thought

Author
NFain
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2014-08-27 17:52:05 UTC  |  Edited by: NFain
I was very curious to how the DEVs and other eve players think about the idea of drastically rebuilding eve to fit in the with the other games that CCP is developing and the ideas players are formulating. I lot of these issues of combining Project Legion/Valkyrie and even a lot of cool ideas regarding FW/SOV/Expansion of space/WIS/game play in general seem to be met with "EVE and that just doesn't work well together".

Whether its legacy code issues, core game play mechanic that's so closed off they can't do it, or simply "no that's just wrong". It seems funny that our big open world is so handicapped when it comes to making it more open and content filled. I'm wondering about the time, effort, fthoughts, etc of possibly developing EVE 2.0, being a new building block for eve to sit on top of, while keeping the game/characters/data/etc the same.

My personal feelings:

CCP has this master plan that I think eve cannot fulfill in the state that it's in.

While it would take a great amount of time and effort, I think It would be worth the investment to tear down the old building and rebuild it from the ground up to support everything that may come..

inb4 stealth "eve is dying" Thread.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#2 - 2014-08-27 18:02:23 UTC
Setting aside for a moment that we're on something like EVE 22.5 already, rebuilding from scratch is a very good way of ensuring that you will end up with two useless products: the old one that you didn't maintain, and the new one that doesn't work.

Beyond that, what parts do you feel as if they can't fit in? No amount of recoding will make a game that requires 1Hz ticks to resolve the kind of massive scale of conflict on one tier work well with a game that requires 30Hz ticks to resolve its small-scale conflicts. Different types of gameplay require different back-ends.
Carmen Electra
AlcoDOTTE
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#3 - 2014-08-27 18:13:30 UTC
Aaaand I find myself agreeing w/ Tippia again.

::concerned::
Yarda Black
The Black Redemption
#4 - 2014-08-27 18:21:13 UTC
NFain wrote:
other eve players think about the idea of drastically redesigning eve


Kinda stopped reading there
NFain
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2014-08-27 18:23:55 UTC
Lol, completely understandable.

But I'm more or less talking about the core work. For example Valkyrie will never work in eve, ever. Dust has its minor roll but i still doubt that they would have the freedom to integrate it seamlessly into eve like Valkyrie would if it was, well, an option.

While considered taboo, no you cannot change the ticks/etc, but you can change the way players go about the content in the given area of space. Allowing for more smaller and larger conflicts to occur. How systems can be accessed, and in which future manner should they be allowed to be accessed by(other than a star gate or a wormhole). Space is very large and open, however in our submarine simulator it manages to feel cramped, bottle necked and static, versus a large open immersive non-static world.
Caviar Liberta
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2014-08-27 18:45:53 UTC
Yarda Black wrote:
NFain wrote:
other eve players think about the idea of drastically redesigning eve


Kinda stopped reading there


That would be more than I read after reading the title. I skipped to the first reply.
Leoric Firesword
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2014-08-27 18:51:23 UTC
NFain wrote:
Space is very large and open, however in our submarine simulator it manages to feel cramped, bottle necked and static, versus a large open immersive non-static world.


methinks you're doing something wrong. It could be because I've only been playing around a year, but eve is very much a large open immersive world to me.

sometimes you have to leave your comfort zone though, which I can see why some don't like to do.
Chandaris
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#8 - 2014-08-27 18:55:25 UTC
Tippia wins!

Fatality!
Themanfromdalmontee
EVE RADIO ARMY
#9 - 2014-08-27 18:57:54 UTC
I can trust Tippia to burn these down right away. Its when I don't agree with Tippa I think someone else is logged in :P
Ursula Thrace
Dreamland Augmented Consortium
#10 - 2014-08-27 21:21:01 UTC
Tippia ftw.

dunno OP, i'm sorta in love with eve 1.0.
NFain
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#11 - 2014-08-27 21:22:02 UTC
Ursula Thrace wrote:
Tippia ftw.

dunno OP, i'm sorta in love with eve 1.0.


I think this is quickly turning into a "**** im burned out of eve" thread..
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2014-08-27 21:25:19 UTC
Ursula Thrace wrote:
Tippia ftw.

dunno OP, i'm sorta in love with eve 1.0.

so you still play Gemini?Lol

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

BoBoZoBo
MGroup9
#13 - 2014-08-27 21:35:39 UTC
Carmen Electra wrote:
Aaaand I find myself agreeing w/ Tippia again.

::concerned::



Do not be, Tippa has made great strides in restraining the rhetoric and focusing on the facts. Credit where credit is due, not everyone can get cooler over the internet.

Primary Test Subject • SmackTalker Elite

Tikitina
Doomheim
#14 - 2014-08-28 00:24:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Tikitina
NFain wrote:
Ursula Thrace wrote:
Tippia ftw.

dunno OP, i'm sorta in love with eve 1.0.


I think this is quickly turning into a "**** im burned out of eve" thread..



To be honest, Eve 2.0 as you suggest it goes against what Eve Online is. Eve Online constantly evolves instead of being reinvented.

A reinvented Eve would divide the player base and spell the end for both games, as it has to other games in the past. A constantly evolving single game has much better chance of survival.

The most common reason people suggest an Eve 2.0 is because of "how long it takes to catch up" which shows how much they miss the point of Eve Online. Its not about catching up. Its about teamwork and being good enough to win.

You can be 80% capable of a vet in about 20% of the time. You can be par on a vet in a specific ship in probably 20% of the vets SP, but you don't need to be on par, just good enough with a few friends.

In regard to code, I think the majority of the Eve codebase has been rewritten a few times, but there are probably a few systems that haven't been touched since launch.

So, depending on how you view it, we could be on Eve 3.5 or Eve 7.5, depending on how you look at it. The work was simply done to update the existing game and codebase, not branch off into something else, that divides the players.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#15 - 2014-08-28 01:56:56 UTC
Leoric Firesword wrote:
NFain wrote:
Space is very large and open, however in our submarine simulator it manages to feel cramped, bottle necked and static, versus a large open immersive non-static world.


methinks you're doing something wrong. It could be because I've only been playing around a year, but eve is very much a large open immersive world to me.

sometimes you have to leave your comfort zone though, which I can see why some don't like to do.




I've seen people pod themselves 5 minutes into being stuck in a wormhole system even though one ship had a scanner installed.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

DaReaper
Net 7
Cannon.Fodder
#16 - 2014-08-28 03:07:40 UTC
You do realize op, that eve is already building eve 2.0 right?

This is why we are not 'getting new stuff' because old, incomplete and broken crap needs to be fixed first. Thats all.

Eve, Valk and Legion COULD all work together, but you won;t play them at the same time. Each can easily do different roles that effect the others. There is no need to start from scratch, as they are just redoing what they have currently. These treads are getting lame.

OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!

Eve For life.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2014-08-28 03:09:09 UTC
NFain wrote:
Valkyrie will never work in eve, ever

It's not meant to.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Grog Aftermath
Doomheim
#18 - 2014-08-28 03:44:25 UTC
NFain wrote:
Ursula Thrace wrote:
Tippia ftw.

dunno OP, i'm sorta in love with eve 1.0.


I think this is quickly turning into a "**** im burned out of eve" thread..



You weren't going to get very far from the start. This subject has been discussed several times in the past.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2014-08-28 04:53:22 UTC
"EVE 2.0"

Every time this is suggested, and it gets suggested often, I have to remind myself to stay cool, that the person posting it isn't clever enough to use the search function on the forum to see if their idea has come up before, and that they're not clever enough to put it in the proper forum to begin with, and on some level, it may not be their fault that they're not clever enough for those things. So there's no point in getting angry about it. It's difficult, but I can restrain myself when needed.

While the suggestion is as annoying this time around as it was the last 50 times it was suggested, because at worst it speaks to a lack of understanding of EVE Online as it is, I have to remind myself that the person posting it isn't clever enough for the things mentioned above, so they probably aren't clever enough for a proper understanding of EVE to begin with, and likely won't be around these parts for very long anyway. So I can take some measure of solace in your imminent departure.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Rastafarian God
#20 - 2014-08-28 05:35:15 UTC
These new offshoots need to comply with EVE, not the other way around.

Actually... Most of us would prefer that these other games did not exist at all and 100% of the effort was put into EVE.

I get wanting to grow a larger customer base.. but if EVE where to die, it all dies. Valkyrie can turn into a joke like dust pretty much is right now and no one will really give a damn that plays EVE for EVE.

Only thing that really needs changed in EVE is the removal of AUR and all related features. But the fact signs are showing that going the other way is really the only problem we are facing when it comes to keeping the game what we want.





12Next page