These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

New Ship Idea: Sub Capital Carrier(can enter Empire)

Author
Palademikus
Karpat Vallalat
#1 - 2014-08-24 11:38:18 UTC
Hello,
Every faction have own drone in all size, but only gallente have drone specialized ships in all size, so why not have sub capital carriers for example Medium Ship size Drone Carrier Ship or Large size Escort Carrier Ship?

Medium size drone carrier could receive
Gallente:
get bonus for gallente drone hp/damage/speed/tracking/optimal
Caldari:
get bonus for caldari drone hp/damage/speed/tracking/optimal
and so on

and Large size Escort Carrier (larger than BS but smaller than Orca) could receive
+1drone from ship skill + boost for drons but would not be able to use the Drone Control Unit I modul
(max 10drone control and only use small/medium/heavy and sentry drone)
?+(some team support ability like remote repairer range) and and could Ship Mainteance Bay

sorry for my bad english,

Talrath
Wasted Drugs
#2 - 2014-08-24 11:43:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Talrath
You do know carriers are mainly logistics ships??
And you do know that the reason gallente has the most drone boats its cause drones are their preffered weapon system along with blasters?
Other races have very little if any need for drones and drones boats...its just not part of its lore and current function.
and just giving every race a drone boat would remove their uniqueness, and they would need a drone boat of every class (frig, cruiser,etc) to give new players linear advancement or wtv they call it
Fer'isam K'ahn
SAS Veterinarians
#3 - 2014-08-24 11:44:46 UTC
Sub Cap carriers have been suggested before. They usually fail due to the point that fighters (bombers) would be too op for Sub Caps and that by using drones, which are only supported by 2 factions would be a must have for all 4 factions. (fighters avoid a lot of skills drone boats need). This would lead to an unbalance for the 4 factions and weapon systems.

If you want to fly done boots = they exist.
If you are unhappy with them = Nestor for example there are threads up to fix them ...

Palademikus
Karpat Vallalat
#4 - 2014-08-24 13:47:12 UTC
I not say how the new carrier use fighter/bomber..
new carrier use only normal drone (example hobgoblin/hammerhead/ogre/garde drone and these ew variant)
and you can fly matar/caldari/caldari drone ship in highsec and get new support ship in low sec where capital class carrier too expensive,

you say nestor.... you can buy capital class carrier the nestor price... lol

would still be the Gallente king of the drones, other race just get one drone ship
w3ak3stl1nk
Hedion University
#5 - 2014-08-24 15:25:11 UTC
Dominix for everyone... I guess that is original... Not a good idea though

Is that my two cents or yours?

Ghaustyl Kathix
Rising Thunder
#6 - 2014-08-24 15:57:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Ghaustyl Kathix
Palademikus wrote:
Every faction have own drone in all size, but only gallente have drone specialized ships in all size
Amarr have the Dragoon, Arbitrator, Prophecy and Armageddon. They're only missing a frigate-size, which would be almost exactly like the Tristan anyway so there isn't much reason for it to exist.

Quote:
you say nestor.... you can buy capital class carrier the nestor price... lol
I guess you missed the upcoming changes that should help with that. P
Barton Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2014-08-24 17:46:05 UTC
Fer'isam K'ahn wrote:
Sub Cap carriers have been suggested before. They usually fail due to the point that fighters (bombers) would be too op for Sub Caps and that by using drones, which are only supported by 2 factions would be a must have for all 4 factions. (fighters avoid a lot of skills drone boats need). This would lead to an unbalance for the 4 factions and weapon systems.

If you want to fly done boots = they exist.
If you are unhappy with them = Nestor for example there are threads up to fix them ...



Read Kronos patch notes.

Sub cap carrier proposals usually fail, apart from not being read by anyone, for several reasons, neither of those being the supposed faction imbalance:

- they always suggest 10+ drones, when the current trend is to reduce the number of drones in space for performance reasons
- the end result usually comes to ~1500dps, which is major no-no for CCP spreadsheet developers
- they try to fill a niche that carriers already fill in low and null, which is major no-no for CCP spreadsheet developers
- noone really wants to be roflstomped by a orca with 10 sentrys in a high-sec war
- there is no drone marauder so get yourself a clue
Fer'isam K'ahn
SAS Veterinarians
#8 - 2014-08-24 17:55:13 UTC
Barton Breau wrote:
Read Kronos patch notes.

Sub cap carrier proposals usually fail, apart from not being read by anyone, for several reasons, neither of those being the supposed faction imbalance:

- they always suggest 10+ drones, when the current trend is to reduce the number of drones in space for performance reasons
- the end result usually comes to ~1500dps, which is major no-no for CCP spreadsheet developers
- they try to fill a niche that carriers already fill in low and null, which is major no-no for CCP spreadsheet developers
- noone really wants to be roflstomped by a orca with 10 sentrys in a high-sec war
- there is no drone marauder so get yourself a clue

Whats that got to do with the Kronos patch notes ?
And nothing you said invalidates what I said, and the other way around.. so we good ?

The one thing I like to mention is, that the cut on drone bandwidth and bay had nothing to do with server issues as was stated somewhere, so that doesn't really count, why there should not be a (a=1) 10 drone ship, the dps is up to balance (as I suggested once, damage could be -33% but hp bonus +50%). But Id rather want that on the RS, but that is another thing.

Don't need a sub cap carrier other then that 8).
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
#9 - 2014-08-24 18:35:05 UTC
If I had a dollar for everytime these freakin broken-record ideas come up, I'd be able to retire buy as much plex as I want and even get all the clan mechs in MWO. Why clan mechs, because 6 UAC5 Dire Wolf says so.

"Tomahawks?"

"----in' A, right?"

"Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each."

"----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."

Celthric Kanerian
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2014-08-24 19:49:05 UTC
Read some lore about the Caldari-Gallente war, then you'll see why only the Gallente got bonuses.

Amarr got the superior armor and has higher low slots while the Gallente get an additional mid slot.
Barton Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2014-08-25 09:58:01 UTC
Fer'isam K'ahn wrote:
Barton Breau wrote:
Read Kronos patch notes.

Sub cap carrier proposals usually fail, apart from not being read by anyone, for several reasons, neither of those being the supposed faction imbalance:

- they always suggest 10+ drones, when the current trend is to reduce the number of drones in space for performance reasons
- the end result usually comes to ~1500dps, which is major no-no for CCP spreadsheet developers
- they try to fill a niche that carriers already fill in low and null, which is major no-no for CCP spreadsheet developers
- noone really wants to be roflstomped by a orca with 10 sentrys in a high-sec war
- there is no drone marauder so get yourself a clue

Whats that got to do with the Kronos patch notes ?
And nothing you said invalidates what I said, and the other way around.. so we good ?

The one thing I like to mention is, that the cut on drone bandwidth and bay had nothing to do with server issues as was stated somewhere, so that doesn't really count, why there should not be a (a=1) 10 drone ship, the dps is up to balance (as I suggested once, damage could be -33% but hp bonus +50%). But Id rather want that on the RS, but that is another thing.

Don't need a sub cap carrier other then that 8).


Kronos patch notes wrote:
All universal drone skills and modules now affect Fighters and Fighter bombers


Rubicon Balance Round Up dev blog wrote:
The second big incentive to make a change is that drones are relatively taxing for our hardware when compared to other weapon systems. That means the recent surge in popularity of drone assist has had a tangible, negative impact on server performance in some of the battles of late.


But if you have some newer info, lets hear it.
Duchess Starbuckington
Doomheim
#12 - 2014-08-25 10:19:34 UTC
Oh look it's this thread yet again.
Aursentris
Council of Stellar Erections
#13 - 2014-08-25 11:39:28 UTC
*burp* Dominix *burp*
Bimmerman
Penumbra Heavy Industries
#14 - 2014-08-25 12:48:33 UTC
Did we forget the days when Drone Interfacing gave +1 drone per level and drone ships also got +1 per level of their ship skill where Vexors and Dominixs could field 15 Medium / Heavy drones at a time. Remember the lag that **** used to cause, granted it was a while back and the servers have much improved since then but then again the player population was also much smaller. Plus increasing the amount of drone control AND giving them boosts would make for some pretty stupid damage output.

Oxide Ammar
#15 - 2014-08-25 13:33:45 UTC
I for one want to fly capitals every where, but if you think about it ..there are no activity available to hi sec that can't be accomplished by any subcap ship, so why we need them ?

Lady Areola Fappington:  Solo PVP isn't dead!  You just need to make sure you have your booster, remote rep, cyno, and emergency Falcon alts logged in and ready before you do any solo PVPing.

Altirius Saldiaro
Doomheim
#16 - 2014-08-25 13:46:43 UTC
This idea has been suggested before on here. I've always liked the idea of it. Though it would be too OP in HS unless balanced right. Look at how much bitching and whining there is over the Ishtar.

Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#17 - 2014-08-25 16:06:45 UTC
Barton Breau wrote:

- there is no drone marauder so get yourself a clue


drone marauder needs to be a thing
Fer'isam K'ahn
SAS Veterinarians
#18 - 2014-08-25 16:27:20 UTC
Kronos patch notes wrote:
All universal drone skills and modules now affect Fighters and Fighter bombers

I know, and again, this does nothing towards my arguments. F&B profit from general Drone skills sure, didn't deny that. I said you can go to F&B by avoiding some drone skills, like all the requirements for medium, heavy and sentry drones as well as all specializations, which means any faction has the same presets to get to them, independent of them being a drone faction or not. Support skills are independent from 'unlock' skills - you should knwo that.

Rubicon Balance Round Up dev blog wrote:
The second big incentive to make a change is that drones are relatively taxing for our hardware when compared to other weapon systems. That means the recent surge in popularity of drone assist has had a tangible, negative impact on server performance in some of the battles of late.

This came up and if you read the patch ntoes, they addressed this by reducing the numbers which can be assigned. Now you can conclude it is an issue with drone numbers in general or as mentioned an issue with numbers assisted, but I take my hint from the changes made. And in regards to the cut of drones to the Guristas line it was mentioned that it had nothing to do with reducing drones in general to ease server load. And they introduced 3 new SoE drone boats, which also speaks against it being true.

Quote:
But if you have some newer info, lets hear it..

No, no newer info... just different conclusions I guess.

Barton Breau
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2014-08-25 22:20:12 UTC
Fer'isam K'ahn wrote:
Kronos patch notes wrote:
All universal drone skills and modules now affect Fighters and Fighter bombers

I know, and again, this does nothing towards my arguments. F&B profit from general Drone skills sure, didn't deny that. I said you can go to F&B by avoiding some drone skills, like all the requirements for medium, heavy and sentry drones as well as all specializations, which means any faction has the same presets to get to them, independent of them being a drone faction or not. Support skills are independent from 'unlock' skills - you should knwo that.

Rubicon Balance Round Up dev blog wrote:
The second big incentive to make a change is that drones are relatively taxing for our hardware when compared to other weapon systems. That means the recent surge in popularity of drone assist has had a tangible, negative impact on server performance in some of the battles of late.

This came up and if you read the patch ntoes, they addressed this by reducing the numbers which can be assigned. Now you can conclude it is an issue with drone numbers in general or as mentioned an issue with numbers assisted, but I take my hint from the changes made. And in regards to the cut of drones to the Guristas line it was mentioned that it had nothing to do with reducing drones in general to ease server load. And they introduced 3 new SoE drone boats, which also speaks against it being true.

Quote:
But if you have some newer info, lets hear it..

No, no newer info... just different conclusions I guess.



Where you see a difference in unlocks skills? I dont see specializations anywhere.

As for assist, if you want to relativize to this extent, you could simply conclude that i agree and be happy...
Christopher Mabata
Northern Accounts and Systems
#20 - 2014-08-26 05:10:53 UTC
Sub cap carriers are a no-go in my book the entire point is only carriers and Guardian Vexors can deploy more than 5 drones at a time.

Its sort of your reward for training for the better part of a year or two to fly them ( or in the GV's case for winning the AT ) And thats not even mentioning how carriers are largely utility ships not combat ships, outside of triage the tank is great sure and you can crank 2K DPS in a thanny with ease but in triage they become something else, the ship you spent all that time training for.

If you want mini-carriers fly a navy domi or normal domi you have plenty of drone space and Good DPS for a subcap, empire mini carriers would be a step in the wrong direction.

♣ Small Gang PVP, Large Fleet PVP, Black Ops, Incursions, Trade, and Industry ♣ 70% Lethal / 30% Super-Snuggly / 110% No idea what im doing ♣

This Message Brought to you by a sweet and sour bittervet

12Next page