These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns

First post First post First post
Author
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#301 - 2014-08-20 23:47:59 UTC
So are you guys also researching (or have already done) the connection to Markee Dragon? I mean, the guy has been involved in multiple RMT schemes over the years for many different games. All of which got shut down, all for which he got banned for. And now here's another MMO money making scheme, low and behold Markee Dragon is tied directly to it.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Rroff
Antagonistic Tendencies
#302 - 2014-08-20 23:50:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Rroff
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Niko Lorenzio wrote:
I'm confused. If all his accounts are banned immediately, how are you going to "allow" him to return the ISK to anyone?
It's called delegation, you pass all the work off to your minions while taking all of the credit and raking in the cash. It's a fairly common business practice.


Which if Somer was involved in RMTing "by the book" should ostensibly mean confiscating or locking of all those assets (obviously actually tracking them, etc. is another matter), otherwise if its just for the publishing of internal memos and other sideline EULA breaches, which have mostly come about due to marginalisation even if Somer was in the wrong, this has taken a step in a very dubious direction.

EDIT: This is assuming that the correspondence Somer published isn't faked and the proposal is word for word as submitted to CCP.
HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#303 - 2014-08-20 23:55:08 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
HarlyQ wrote:
I am waiting to see more requests about what items got banned with somers accounts. I'm not sure if CCP releases that type of info but look for prices on assumed banned ships to jump.


We don't release information of this nature Smile


Thank you for the quick response keep up the good work. Btw loved the fifty shades if Grey response.
Derrick Miles
Death Rabbit Ky Oneida
#304 - 2014-08-20 23:56:22 UTC
CCP Falcon, is there any chance this might inspire a clearer definition of the third party rules and guidelines going forward? As it stands it seems that they are spread all over the place in articles, blogs, and years of forum posts. A big incident like this one can be kind of intimidating for first-time developers when the rules aren't exactly clearly laid out, especially when the result is a ban and the exact cause of the ban is unknown.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#305 - 2014-08-20 23:58:04 UTC
Rroff wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Niko Lorenzio wrote:
I'm confused. If all his accounts are banned immediately, how are you going to "allow" him to return the ISK to anyone?
It's called delegation, you pass all the work off to your minions while taking all of the credit and raking in the cash. It's a fairly common business practice.


Which if Somer was involved in RMTing "by the book" should ostensibly mean confiscating or locking of all those assets (obviously actually tracking them, etc. is another matter), otherwise if its just for the publishing of internal memos and other sideline EULA breaches, which have mostly come about due to marginalisation even if Somer was in the wrong, this has taken a step in a very dubious direction.
Much of the isk will be held in the corporate wallet, which "employees" of SomerBlink will have access to, not Somers personal wallet which is probably locked.

Somer and his/her alts are banned, not the "employees" of his corporation, or the corporation itself.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Frantico
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#306 - 2014-08-20 23:58:45 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
Frantico wrote:
"We do not remove ISK or assets from banned accounts to re-distribute them into the game, regardless of their rarity or value."

well actualy you do you did it with Plexes, So there is presidence for this action beeing taken

*edited*
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=336609

feels dumb i have tell ccp what ccp has done but sure


I don't really count ISK and Assets (meaning incredibly rare ships that are potentially worth hundreds of billions of ISK) as even remotely the same as a stack of PLEX.






This makes no sence at all.
CCP has done this before and taken this action Except now its about Eve history and ships that have been around since the begining and not a small amount of them.
These are worth more to people because they are a part of our game. instead of a stack of plexes.
what makes me think you dont actualy play the game you work for is that you dont understand the importance of history in this game and what people feel about it. i will never be ablet o afford these ships in question but i like the idea there are these rare 1 of a kind ships out there that people have and not that all of them are sitting on banned accounts.

But if you can humor me to explain why a part of eve history is less important than a stack of plexes
Febreeze
Roush 5.0
#307 - 2014-08-21 00:00:37 UTC
Frantico wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Frantico wrote:
"We do not remove ISK or assets from banned accounts to re-distribute them into the game, regardless of their rarity or value."

well actualy you do you did it with Plexes, So there is presidence for this action beeing taken

*edited*
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=336609

feels dumb i have tell ccp what ccp has done but sure


I don't really count ISK and Assets (meaning incredibly rare ships that are potentially worth hundreds of billions of ISK) as even remotely the same as a stack of PLEX.






This makes no sence at all.
CCP has done this before and taken this action Except now its about Eve history and ships that have been around since the begining and not a small amount of them.
These are worth more to people because they are a part of our game. instead of a stack of plexes.
what makes me think you dont actualy play the game you work for is that you dont understand the importance of history in this game and what people feel about it. i will never be ablet o afford these ships in question but i like the idea there are these rare 1 of a kind ships out there that people have and not that all of them are sitting on banned accounts.

But if you can humor me to explain why a part of eve history is less important than a stack of plexes



I have to agree, its too bad CCP doesn't understand the importance of history or the impact of their actions.
Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#308 - 2014-08-21 00:03:35 UTC
Frantico wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Frantico wrote:
"We do not remove ISK or assets from banned accounts to re-distribute them into the game, regardless of their rarity or value."

well actualy you do you did it with Plexes, So there is presidence for this action beeing taken

*edited*
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=336609

feels dumb i have tell ccp what ccp has done but sure


I don't really count ISK and Assets (meaning incredibly rare ships that are potentially worth hundreds of billions of ISK) as even remotely the same as a stack of PLEX.






This makes no sence at all.
CCP has done this before and taken this action Except now its about Eve history and ships that have been around since the begining and not a small amount of them.
These are worth more to people because they are a part of our game. instead of a stack of plexes.
what makes me think you dont actualy play the game you work for is that you dont understand the importance of history in this game and what people feel about it. i will never be ablet o afford these ships in question but i like the idea there are these rare 1 of a kind ships out there that people have and not that all of them are sitting on banned accounts.

But if you can humor me to explain why a part of eve history is less important than a stack of plexes
Hint: one of them also exists in the real world.

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#309 - 2014-08-21 00:04:30 UTC
Frantico wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Frantico wrote:
"We do not remove ISK or assets from banned accounts to re-distribute them into the game, regardless of their rarity or value."

well actualy you do you did it with Plexes, So there is presidence for this action beeing taken

*edited*
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=336609

feels dumb i have tell ccp what ccp has done but sure


I don't really count ISK and Assets (meaning incredibly rare ships that are potentially worth hundreds of billions of ISK) as even remotely the same as a stack of PLEX.






This makes no sence at all.
CCP has done this before and taken this action Except now its about Eve history and ships that have been around since the begining and not a small amount of them.
These are worth more to people because they are a part of our game. instead of a stack of plexes.
what makes me think you dont actualy play the game you work for is that you dont understand the importance of history in this game and what people feel about it. i will never be ablet o afford these ships in question but i like the idea there are these rare 1 of a kind ships out there that people have and not that all of them are sitting on banned accounts.

But if you can humor me to explain why a part of eve history is less important than a stack of plexes

Because it was banned out of the game. If you really want to see one of these rare ships try google search ;)
Frantico
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#310 - 2014-08-21 00:05:31 UTC
HarlyQ wrote:
Frantico wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Frantico wrote:
"We do not remove ISK or assets from banned accounts to re-distribute them into the game, regardless of their rarity or value."

well actualy you do you did it with Plexes, So there is presidence for this action beeing taken

*edited*
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=336609

feels dumb i have tell ccp what ccp has done but sure


I don't really count ISK and Assets (meaning incredibly rare ships that are potentially worth hundreds of billions of ISK) as even remotely the same as a stack of PLEX.






This makes no sence at all.
CCP has done this before and taken this action Except now its about Eve history and ships that have been around since the begining and not a small amount of them.
These are worth more to people because they are a part of our game. instead of a stack of plexes.
what makes me think you dont actualy play the game you work for is that you dont understand the importance of history in this game and what people feel about it. i will never be ablet o afford these ships in question but i like the idea there are these rare 1 of a kind ships out there that people have and not that all of them are sitting on banned accounts.

But if you can humor me to explain why a part of eve history is less important than a stack of plexes

Because it was banned out of the game. If you really want to see one of these rare ships try google search ;)


So were the plexes they returned and gave out as prizes :) thats my point
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#311 - 2014-08-21 00:07:41 UTC
"I'm mad that this ship which was going to sit in a player's hangar forever is now sitting in a banned player's hangar forever."

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Cryo Kool
Tax Holiday
#312 - 2014-08-21 00:08:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Cryo Kool
CCP Falcon wrote:
Frantico wrote:
"We do not remove ISK or assets from banned accounts to re-distribute them into the game, regardless of their rarity or value."

well actualy you do you did it with Plexes, So there is presidence for this action beeing taken

*edited*
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=336609

feels dumb i have tell ccp what ccp has done but sure


I don't really count ISK and Assets (meaning incredibly rare ships that are potentially worth hundreds of billions of ISK) as even remotely the same as a stack of PLEX.




I would like to see an in space, flight museum added where we can go to view these ships. Place a beacon in amarr or something and put a model of each rare ship out there.

Better yet, place a model of each ship ever made by each faction in the appropriate empire region. (include the pirate faction ones that relate to the empire ones in that area).
HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#313 - 2014-08-21 00:09:56 UTC
Frantico wrote:
HarlyQ wrote:
Frantico wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Frantico wrote:
"We do not remove ISK or assets from banned accounts to re-distribute them into the game, regardless of their rarity or value."

well actualy you do you did it with Plexes, So there is presidence for this action beeing taken

*edited*
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=336609

feels dumb i have tell ccp what ccp has done but sure


I don't really count ISK and Assets (meaning incredibly rare ships that are potentially worth hundreds of billions of ISK) as even remotely the same as a stack of PLEX.






This makes no sence at all.
CCP has done this before and taken this action Except now its about Eve history and ships that have been around since the begining and not a small amount of them.
These are worth more to people because they are a part of our game. instead of a stack of plexes.
what makes me think you dont actualy play the game you work for is that you dont understand the importance of history in this game and what people feel about it. i will never be ablet o afford these ships in question but i like the idea there are these rare 1 of a kind ships out there that people have and not that all of them are sitting on banned accounts.

But if you can humor me to explain why a part of eve history is less important than a stack of plexes

Because it was banned out of the game. If you really want to see one of these rare ships try google search ;)


So were the plexes they returned and gave out as prizes :) thats my point

Well I guess I have to spoon feed you. The PLEX cost real money the ships cost isk. Easy :)
Sniper Smith
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#314 - 2014-08-21 00:10:25 UTC
Cryo Kool wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Frantico wrote:
"We do not remove ISK or assets from banned accounts to re-distribute them into the game, regardless of their rarity or value."

well actualy you do you did it with Plexes, So there is presidence for this action beeing taken

*edited*
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=336609

feels dumb i have tell ccp what ccp has done but sure


I don't really count ISK and Assets (meaning incredibly rare ships that are potentially worth hundreds of billions of ISK) as even remotely the same as a stack of PLEX.




I would like to see an in space, flight museum added where we can go to view these ships. Place a beacon in amarr or something and put a model of each rare ship out there.

Better yet, CCP should auction them off next time there's a PLEX4Good.
Geenemen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#315 - 2014-08-21 00:11:17 UTC
Febreeze wrote:
Frantico wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Frantico wrote:
*edit* incredibly rare ships that are potentially worth hundreds of billions of ISK) as even remotely the same as a stack of PLEX.

But if you can humor me to explain why a part of eve history is less important than a stack of plexes



I have to agree, its too bad CCP doesn't understand the importance of history or the impact of their actions.



Like my grandfather used to say. Everyone and everything has a price. You just have to know what it is, and be willing to pay it.
HarlyQ
harlyq syrokos investment station
#316 - 2014-08-21 00:11:36 UTC
Cryo Kool wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:
Frantico wrote:
"We do not remove ISK or assets from banned accounts to re-distribute them into the game, regardless of their rarity or value."

well actualy you do you did it with Plexes, So there is presidence for this action beeing taken

*edited*
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=336609

feels dumb i have tell ccp what ccp has done but sure


I don't really count ISK and Assets (meaning incredibly rare ships that are potentially worth hundreds of billions of ISK) as even remotely the same as a stack of PLEX.




I would like to see an in space, flight museum added where we can go to view these ships. Place a beacon in amarr or something and put a model of each rare ship out there.

I think that's called sisi or Google images
Garai Nolen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#317 - 2014-08-21 00:15:59 UTC
Febreeze wrote:
I have to agree, its too bad CCP doesn't understand the importance of history or the impact of their actions.


Quite the opposite... the fact that these ships were banned out of the game via Somer's actions is a new part of EVE history that will likely be mentioned for years to come. "History" doesn't mean everything shiny sticks around so you can look at it in a museum.
Xander Phoena
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#318 - 2014-08-21 00:16:49 UTC
I am late to this particular thread but I wanted to say that I think CCP's (in particular, Falcon and Leeloo's) response to this situation has been exemplary. They have communicated with the community throughout, they have constantly coordinated with CSM9 and the final outcome was entirely justified. There was one particular part of the final statement posted in the OP of this thread I disagreed with though:

CCP Falcon wrote:
CCP was involved in discussions with SOMER Blink to address our concerns about their products, which included several different ideas for promotions, but none of them had been fully authorized by a CCP representative (notably the legal department).

(emphasis mine)

Whilst I believe Somer utilised some pretty vague and tricksy wording in his original proposal and clearly carried out a final execution of the proposal that was very different to that submitted, it is clear that a submitted proposal was given authorisation by a member of CCP. Whether that person had jurisdiction to sign off on it or not isn't down to Somer but the individual themselves.

To be clear, I believe the final judgement made by CCP in regards to Somer was entirely fair but I also believe that that key point in Falcon's OP is incorrect. That shouldn't take away from their superb handling of this situation overall and I hope this is a benchmark and template should a similar situation arise in the future.

I wanted to bring this up because I have been utterly impressed by Falcon and Leeloo's handling of this situation but this one particular point doesn't ring true for me and having seen others point out the fact on this thread, I felt it important that you heard what this particular CSM representative was thinking. A CSM where all 14 individuals think the same thing all of the time is ultimately pointless after all.

www.crossingzebras.com

CCP Falcon
#319 - 2014-08-21 00:17:20 UTC
Derrick Miles wrote:
CCP Falcon, is there any chance this might inspire a clearer definition of the third party rules and guidelines going forward? As it stands it seems that they are spread all over the place in articles, blogs, and years of forum posts. A big incident like this one can be kind of intimidating for first-time developers when the rules aren't exactly clearly laid out, especially when the result is a ban and the exact cause of the ban is unknown.


This is still to be determined, but something that I'll be pushing for.

Smile

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#320 - 2014-08-21 00:17:30 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Andski wrote:
don't forget passing down all the blame

that is absolutely crucial
True true, credit flows up, blame flows down.


That's really where Somer went wrong. Never allow **** to flow uphill when you're anywhere near the top.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon