These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink

First post First post
Author
KaRa DaVuT
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#201 - 2014-08-19 10:49:12 UTC  |  Edited by: KaRa DaVuT
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:


The point is, I can easily understand how some or all of these people might be a bit pissed if/when CCP's rules for making some money out of EVE-related services aren't clear and fair for all. So I'm simply throwing my voice in (fwiw, obviously) to support clear and fair rules for all third-party service providers.


Yes I agree with you but not only this. This game not only runs with the currency or pure money. This game not only has a symbiotic relationship with its resellers or third party service providers. This game runs with people who feels good with this game and trusts that being in here means they will be treated equally above the EULA.

Think a second what will happen when peope stops trusting CCP and feel unsafe, mistreated, or simply lets say being taken advantage of. Last time this happened, people get in rage and shoot down monuments in jita, they get all riot, that ends up with CCP getting in loss at the end of fiscal year.

I am not a walking wallet. and I deamnd euqality. These rigts come to me with EULA itself as it clearly states that everyone will be treated equally.

I only demand what is just and right.

Holiness is in right action and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. What God desires is in your heart and on your mind... And what you decide to do every day, makes you - not your race - a good man - or not.

Dilligafmofo
3WAYFOUNDATIONS
New Miner's Union
#202 - 2014-08-19 10:51:35 UTC
KaRa DaVuT wrote:
Dilligafmofo wrote:
How many eve players are there?

CCP now into 2nd day of investigations to pander to 50 -60 butthurt whiners on this subject.

Ya'll need to get a life.

Who is getting hurt here? how many have and continue to benefit from Somer's donations and sponsorship?


Band waggon jumpers the lot of you



Are you insane or just trolling I don know but, I dont want any perosn to think hes above me in terms of EULA.

If RMT is not a go for CCP, and against the rules, then they should do it accordingly. Rules must be applied to everyone equally.

You asked "who is getting hurt here?" then you really did not understand the topic.

This is not related with someone getting money through eve.

This is all about CCP not making its rules to apply anyone. If we say this ok, then in future, they can accept "some" bots that they "favour", and after that maybe they can apply the EULA at their will.

When a day comes and you lost your ship becaose of server issue and when you petitioned, they can answer you " you are not favoured for us so we wont reimburse it even if its reason is our bad servers". Who will getting hurt then?

There is no difference.


Equality? in Eve? are you real?

Server shut downs to save fleets? The Goon string puller mittani is making more RL cash from his website advertisements than I bet Somer ever could.

And yet people scream equality - are you awake? can you even smell those roses?
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#203 - 2014-08-19 10:56:32 UTC
Dilligafmofo wrote:
Server shut downs to save fleets? The Goon string puller mittani is making more RL cash from his website advertisements than I bet Somer ever could.

Even if that's true, and I don't know if it is or not, so what?
How is that relevant at all?

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#204 - 2014-08-19 10:58:12 UTC
Dilligafmofo wrote:
Equality? in Eve? are you real?

Server shut downs to save fleets? The Goon string puller mittani is making more RL cash from his website advertisements than I bet Somer ever could.

And yet people scream equality - are you awake? can you even smell those roses?
Server shutdowns aren't really any form of inequality, as they are usually pretty unavoidable and some have been external. As for TMC, whats not equal about advertising on websites? There's nothing illegal about having paid advertising, nor is there anything CCP could say against it. And anyone can do it. Go ahead, make a website right now and chuck ads on it, you're free to do that whenever you wish. The problem isn't making cash, the problem is RMT.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#205 - 2014-08-19 10:58:19 UTC
KaRa DaVuT wrote:
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:


The point is, I can easily understand how some or all of these people might be a bit pissed if/when CCP's rules for making some money out of EVE-related services aren't clear and fair for all. So I'm simply throwing my voice in (fwiw, obviously) to support clear and fair rules for all third-party service providers.


Yes I agree with you but not only this. This game not only runs with the currency or pure money. This game not only has a symbiotic relationship with its resellers or third party service providers. This game runs with people who feels good with this game and trusts that being in here means they will be treated equally above the EULA.

Think a second what will happen when peope stops trusting CCP and feel unsafe, mistreated, or simply lets say being taken advantage of. Last time this happened, people get in rage and shoot down monuments in jita, they get all riot, that ends up with CCP getting in loss at the end of fiscal year.

I am not a walking wallet. and I deamnd euqality. These rigts come to me with EULA itself as it clearly states that everyone will be treated equally.

I only demand what is just and right.
^^ can't say I disagree with this either, but I'm probably just too cynical to really care. Lol

But I do have the greatest respect for people that put their own time and resourcefulness in developing and maintaining quality services for the EVE community.

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#206 - 2014-08-19 10:59:18 UTC
Derrick Miles wrote:
Tipa Riot wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
Tipa Riot wrote:
I read Somer's proposal text in full (linked on his site) and if you do, it's pretty obvious IMO that the wording and order of given information is intentionally misleading. Furthermore the claimed intention (provide a service to players to ease in game PLEX selling) makes no business sense in combination with a negative ISK fee unless you include the real money part.

BUT what if the scheme is altered to give out the Jita sell price -1 Mio in fees for the service?

Then it would become RMT with a bad exchange rate.

Somer is the receiver of the real money hence it's actually a better rate for them. ... and the benefit looks still strong enough to encourage people to buy PLEX through their affiliation program.

Yes...and it would still be RMT, and thus not allowed by CCP rules. Or so I would have thought a few days ago, at any rate.

Sure, but without a clear ISK-valued benefit for the consumer there would be not much difference anymore to any other 3rd party service being financed through CCP's affiliate program and player's ISK donations.

I'm my own NPC alt.

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#207 - 2014-08-19 10:59:48 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
If Somer are in the wrong, then I agree they should face the appropriate measures for bad behaviour. However, when I look down a street and see a swathe of pitchforks and torches, I only hope that whoever pissed them off gets away with it, regardless of what they've done, because that mindless crowd gives humanity a worse name than the perpetrator they are after.

You basically bring the same argument you did in the old thread. Here is my answer to you from the last one in case you missed it: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4924350#post4924350
Maeltstome
Ten Thousand Days
#208 - 2014-08-19 11:00:40 UTC
It's no doubt been pointed out numberous times: Marketting income from advertisements on a website is entirely different than offering in-game currency for out of game financial gain.

The Mittani, EN24 etc. offer opinions and insights on Eve in general, advertising is present on these pages as it is with all websites. They haven't out-right offered in-game currency in return for interacting with these advertisers as SB have.

This isn't a blurry line with subtle differences, it's Black and White. SomberBlink offered in-game currency in exchange for using there affiliated companies.
Derrick Miles
Death Rabbit Ky Oneida
#209 - 2014-08-19 11:10:41 UTC
Tipa Riot wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
Tipa Riot wrote:
...

Yes...and it would still be RMT, and thus not allowed by CCP rules. Or so I would have thought a few days ago, at any rate.

Sure, but without a clear ISK-valued benefit for the consumer there would be not much difference anymore to any other 3rd party service being financed through CCP's affiliate program and player's ISK donations.

You're missing the point. It is classified as RMT because SOMER is exchanging an in-game service (PLEX buying) for an out-of-game payment (using their referral link). This means they're trading in-game services for real-world currency which is the definition of RMT.
Moonlord
No.Mercy
Triumvirate.
#210 - 2014-08-19 11:24:04 UTC
"Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities. Business entities and anyone who is acting for or on behalf of a business or for business purposes may not establish an Account, access the System or play EVE. Accessing the System or using the Game for commercial, business or income-seeking purposes is strictly prohibited."

I guess the rules doesnt apply to everyone as long as they are big enough.
Viscis Breeze
Abrupt Decay
Deteriorated
#211 - 2014-08-19 11:27:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Viscis Breeze
Reading the proposal this quote strikes me:

Justification: Blink provides no extra ISK or bonus Blink credit for buying through the link.

This statement is clearly the exact opposite of what they are doing. Blink has tried to circumvent the problem by giving out PLEX credits which are directly redeemable for extra ISK than a PLEX is worth. I think someone at CCP had the wool pulled over their eyes by this extra step.

Edit: On a side note, I find it interesting that SOMER Blink is generally more transparent than CCP in its activities.

Recruitment: http://bit.ly/1r4G5Pv Website: http://www.no-vacancies.net/ Channel: No Vacancies

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#212 - 2014-08-19 11:27:21 UTC
Some people in this thread have serious issues focusing on the problem at hand.

This is not about SOMERs gambling service.

This is not about earning revenue with ads or other means outside of EVE who are completely isolated from the game.

This is not about PLEX which is indeed a form of CCP sanctioned RMT and is totally legit.

-

This is about SOMER incentivising their PLEX sells with ISK, which is in the end - and a lot of people have already explained why - illegal RMT outside of the normal PLEX mechanism.

Every other player in this game would face a permanent ban on the first offense, this are the rules. This is SOMERs second offense, they already got away the first time because of their good relationships with CCP. The "we asked a GM and it was OK" trick does not work and CCP have demonstrated this many times that they will turn on you anyway even if one GM said it was ok if it is an obvious breach of the EULA, at least for normal players that is.

CCP is of course free to do whatever they like with their game, but if they really go the way and favor one group of players over another this will have implications for the game. EVE is the only product they have that produces revenue and people purchase their PLEXes with or without SOMER Blink. It would be madness to risk this for an online casino a small part of the community uses.

-

On another note, I am impressed with CCP Falcons performance, he is really on top of this it seams and he really cares. For the first time in years (yes this is a new char) I feel the community is in good hands.
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#213 - 2014-08-19 11:28:23 UTC
Derrick Miles wrote:
Tipa Riot wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
Tipa Riot wrote:
...

Yes...and it would still be RMT, and thus not allowed by CCP rules. Or so I would have thought a few days ago, at any rate.

Sure, but without a clear ISK-valued benefit for the consumer there would be not much difference anymore to any other 3rd party service being financed through CCP's affiliate program and player's ISK donations.

You're missing the point. It is classified as RMT because SOMER is exchanging an in-game service (PLEX buying) for an out-of-game payment (using their referral link). This means they're trading in-game services for real-world currency which is the definition of RMT.

So does for example Dotlan ...it's an valuable in-game service financed also through a GTC/PLEX buying link. Although, as I stated earlier, this is a more indirect connection it still generates real money from an in-game service. To be clear, I'm not defending Somer/Markee, but I would consider it a challenge to formulate clear rules which do not harm all the other presumably non-profit services.

I'm my own NPC alt.

Tam Arai
Mi Pen Rai
#214 - 2014-08-19 11:34:56 UTC
Tipa Riot wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
Tipa Riot wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
Tipa Riot wrote:
...

Yes...and it would still be RMT, and thus not allowed by CCP rules. Or so I would have thought a few days ago, at any rate.

Sure, but without a clear ISK-valued benefit for the consumer there would be not much difference anymore to any other 3rd party service being financed through CCP's affiliate program and player's ISK donations.

You're missing the point. It is classified as RMT because SOMER is exchanging an in-game service (PLEX buying) for an out-of-game payment (using their referral link). This means they're trading in-game services for real-world currency which is the definition of RMT.

So does for example Dotlan ...it's an valuable in-game service financed also through a GTC/PLEX buying link. Although, as I stated earlier, this is a more indirect connection it still generates real money from an in-game service. To be clear, I'm not defending Somer/Markee, but I would consider it a challenge to formulate clear rules which do not harm all the other presumably non-profit services.


yes but dotlan does not give me isk for buying a plex through them.

Noone has a problem with 3rd party sites that serve the community earning some cash to help with server costs etc

what people are objecting to is that somer blink give isk as an inventive to use their plex buying service to generate real cash. Real Money Traded for isk
Derrick Miles
Death Rabbit Ky Oneida
#215 - 2014-08-19 11:40:07 UTC
Tipa Riot wrote:
Derrick Miles wrote:
Tipa Riot wrote:
...

You're missing the point. It is classified as RMT because SOMER is exchanging an in-game service (PLEX buying) for an out-of-game payment (using their referral link). This means they're trading in-game services for real-world currency which is the definition of RMT.

So does for example Dotlan ...it's an valuable in-game service financed also through a GTC/PLEX buying link. Although, as I stated earlier, this is a more indirect connection it still generates real money from an in-game service. To be clear, I'm not defending Somer/Markee, but I would consider it a challenge to formulate clear rules which do not harm all the other presumably non-profit services.

Again, you're missing the point. None of the services Dotlan provides are in return for clicking their link. Those referral links are not the problem, giving people isk for using them is.
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#216 - 2014-08-19 11:42:51 UTC
Tipa Riot wrote:
So does for example Dotlan ...it's an valuable in-game service financed also through a GTC/PLEX buying link. Although, as I stated earlier, this is a more indirect connection it still generates real money from an in-game service.


Except buying PLEX from Dotlan doesn't give you any in-game item or currency if you choose to use their referral link. Yes, you can plan your travel more efficiently than you would just with use of in-game map but that's only because CCP prefers to have bunch of half-assed features in-game and let the 3rd parties implement better versions (vide Dotlan, various fitting tools, market analyzers, etc.).

Dotlan gets RL money for PLEX sales and probably quite nice amount of ISK donations in-game but one has nothing to do with the other. In case of SOMER's latest scheme buying PLEX with their referral link is connected to rewarding you for that with ISK. And it doesn't matter whether you take that offer or just sell PLEX on in-game market, the fact alone that SOMER makes that offer is proposition of participation in RMT. Which according to common knowledge is bannable offense to both sides of a deal.

Invalid signature format

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#217 - 2014-08-19 11:49:51 UTC
Dilligafmofo wrote:
Equality? in Eve? are you real?

Server shut downs to save fleets? The Goon string puller mittani is making more RL cash from his website advertisements than I bet Somer ever could.

And yet people scream equality - are you awake? can you even smell those roses?


Even if Mittens was pulling millions from his website every year (he's not, and if he was, he wouldn't be paying hobbyist writers with ISK, but professional writers with RL $$) it wouldn't be a problem because there are no "pay RL money, get ISK from us in return" transactions involved.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

111010110
The Darwin Initiative
#218 - 2014-08-19 12:11:04 UTC
EULA
Section "Your Account"
Subsection "A. Establishing a New Account"
Paragraph 4:

"Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities. Business entities and anyone who is acting for or on behalf of a business or for business purposes may not establish an Account, access the System or play EVE. Accessing the System or using the Game for commercial, business or income-seeking purposes is strictly prohibited."
Maeltstome
Ten Thousand Days
#219 - 2014-08-19 12:17:47 UTC
Andski wrote:
Dilligafmofo wrote:
Equality? in Eve? are you real?

Server shut downs to save fleets? The Goon string puller mittani is making more RL cash from his website advertisements than I bet Somer ever could.

And yet people scream equality - are you awake? can you even smell those roses?


Even if Mittens was pulling millions from his website every year (he's not, and if he was, he wouldn't be paying hobbyist writers with ISK, but professional writers with RL $$) it wouldn't be a problem because there are no "pay RL money, get ISK from us in return" transactions involved.


It's off-topic, but why wouldn't he pay them with isk? It's cheaper and has less legal ramifications for him: Essentially they are doing the work voluntarily (from a legal perspective). The instant he pays RL cash he becomes an employer.
Ali Aras
Nobody in Local
Deepwater Hooligans
#220 - 2014-08-19 12:29:15 UTC
CSM just had another meeting with CCP, including the VP of Sales. It's great that CCP has kept us so involved and are actively seeking the input of us and the community. Mad props to Leeloo and Falcon for their hard work.

http://warp-to-sun.tumblr.com -- my blog