These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink

First post First post
Author
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#161 - 2014-08-19 08:10:32 UTC
Man, if only gambling was integrated with the game and players didn't need third party sites for it.
Derrick Miles
Death Rabbit Ky Oneida
#162 - 2014-08-19 08:11:53 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Except for Chribba's brief remarks, I see that most web hosts are strangely quiet on this. And for good reason.

If the more mouth frothing anger management deficient among you get your way and CCP decides you are right that any income is RMT, say goodbye to your kill boards, news sites, blogs, market sites and character sheets. Anything that relies on click-throughs and affiliates to cover hosting costs. Be careful what you wish for, people. You might just get it.

Mr Epeen Cool

There is a huge difference between having an affiliate link on a fansite and giving players an isk reward for using that link. The difference is RMT, and it is what separates what other sites do from what SOMERblink did.
Derrick Miles
Death Rabbit Ky Oneida
#163 - 2014-08-19 08:16:33 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Out of curiosity.

For all you folks gathering the pitchforks and torches and learning to tie ropes into nooses. Do you expect a single or mass execution? Just Somer or Somer and staff or Somer staff and anybody who has ever done business with them?

damn, that includes me.

Or if you are heading the mob towards CCP are you looking for the one person mentioned in the 'email leak' or their entire staff or (as some of you love to ask for) the entire senior management team of CCP for allowing this to take place? Community and CSM thrown in for good measure, no doubt.

damn I made the list again

How much blood, how many bodies do you need to satisfy your craving for justice?

After all, as the queen once said . . . `Sentence first--verdict afterwards.'

I am not apologizing for CCP, just reminding some that this is not an instantaneous kind of thing. But some of you want to skip sentence, verdict, and leap straight to the execution(s) so anything I say to delay that must be stonewalling and sucking up to my masters.


I'm not quite sure where you're getting all that from, but it's not a verdict or judgement I'm more interested in at the moment. I think most people understand that this will take some time to resolve, but I would very much like to know what CCP's stance on it was in the first place. Did they give permission to SOMER as claimed on the site, or is this something that CCP definitely still does classify as RMT?
Mike Azariah
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#164 - 2014-08-19 08:17:08 UTC
KaRa DaVuT wrote:

I just want to hear from the real people, the people who involved that to explain what really happened. From The decision makers. Not from the people that just learned this 24 hour ago.

There are people out there really know whats happenning in CCP. I want them to go out public and explain to me that, why some pople are treated differently than the others in this game when it comes to EULA? As legally both me and somer are subcribers. So both are bound to the EULA rules.


Fair enough.

But just to point out one small detail. Falcon IS the Community Dev. It is his task to talk to you and get the information needed.

I and the rest of the CSM were elected to represent the players, not CCP. We have been doing that, this past day and will continue to do so. Yes, we have our NDA and yes, that gets irritating. I am going through this thread looking for new details, new ideas or requests.

But some see it as trolling or whatever.

Look to out website and see how many of us have written things in the past 36 hours about this. Talk to the people who you think best represent you on the CSM (whether you voted or not). Keep posting here, I will keep reading.

m

Mike Azariah  ┬──┬ ¯|(ツ)

Arkady Romanov
Whole Squid
#165 - 2014-08-19 08:17:50 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Out of curiosity.

For all you folks gathering the pitchforks and torches and learning to tie ropes into nooses. Do you expect a single or mass execution? Just Somer or Somer and staff or Somer staff and anybody who has ever done business with them?

damn, that includes me.

Or if you are heading the mob towards CCP are you looking for the one person mentioned in the 'email leak' or their entire staff or (as some of you love to ask for) the entire senior management team of CCP for allowing this to take place? Community and CSM thrown in for good measure, no doubt.

damn I made the list again

How much blood, how many bodies do you need to satisfy your craving for justice?

After all, as the queen once said . . . `Sentence first--verdict afterwards.'

I am not apologizing for CCP, just reminding some that this is not an instantaneous kind of thing. But some of you want to skip sentence, verdict, and leap straight to the execution(s) so anything I say to delay that must be stonewalling and sucking up to my masters.



Calm yourself.

You know how this sort of thing goes. Momentum is what it is. Some people love a good witch hunt.

Having said that; we'd all be a helluvah lot less testy if we weren't addressing the issue of RMT and/or favortism in relation to the same organisation not even 18 months after the first incident. The fact that we are even having the conversation again says that the matter wasn't solved properly the first time.

Confidence in CCP has been damaged because of it. I hope they get it right this time, and set an appropriate precedent that we can feel confident in.

Whole Squid: Get Inked.

Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#166 - 2014-08-19 08:19:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Schmata Bastanold
Mike, do you know anything more about this than what was already posted in this and previous thread? Because from where I sit case is simple: either CCP agreed for SOMER's scheme or they didn't. Former makes it clear: all is cool, move along. Latter makes it even clearer: SOMER lied and it's plain old RMT which is bannable offense.

Nobody can deny real world currency is getting exchanged for ISK here, only thing "community" doesn't know is CCP role and stance about it. And how much "investigation" is needed to answer one simple question: did CCP allowed SOMER to put his idea in motion? Don't they know that?

Smoke and mirrors are fine, they can make torch light really breathtaking to observe.

Invalid signature format

Lord LazyGhost
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#167 - 2014-08-19 08:20:36 UTC
I got an idea to fix this bollox


Remove all 3rd party sellers...

Set up a 3rd party of their own....... then the % cut that normaly goes to the 3rd party and the affliiate. goes to charity.

then people can feel good about buying plex as a small cut of every plex that gets brought goes to a good cause.

end of every month the money generated goes to a random charity that the community votes for.

How does that sound



OOO PS and string up Somer :)
Jarnis McPieksu
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#168 - 2014-08-19 08:29:27 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Out of curiosity.

For all you folks gathering the pitchforks and torches and learning to tie ropes into nooses. Do you expect a single or mass execution? Just Somer or Somer and staff or Somer staff and anybody who has ever done business with them?

damn, that includes me.

Or if you are heading the mob towards CCP are you looking for the one person mentioned in the 'email leak' or their entire staff or (as some of you love to ask for) the entire senior management team of CCP for allowing this to take place? Community and CSM thrown in for good measure, no doubt.

damn I made the list again

How much blood, how many bodies do you need to satisfy your craving for justice?

After all, as the queen once said . . . `Sentence first--verdict afterwards.'

I am not apologizing for CCP, just reminding some that this is not an instantaneous kind of thing. But some of you want to skip sentence, verdict, and leap straight to the execution(s) so anything I say to delay that must be stonewalling and sucking up to my masters.



None of the above.

Yet.

I personally expect this to turn out to be a case of Somer misleading CCP, CCP not thinking things through (never happened before, shocker) and agreeing to something that may or may not exactly reflect what Somer is doing.

Once CCP figures out everything (they're in progress of doing it), most likely Somer's thing will be stopped, CCP will do mea culpa on the process that got it kinda-approved and the crowd is told to disperse.

(alternatively CCP gets really pissed that Somer is doing this and applies banhammer / severs business ties, but honestly I do not expect this to happen, no matter how many people call for it)

Remains to be seen what happens to PLEX referral systems. This is clearly abusing such a system, but once the cat is out of the bag, there is a big risk that such abuse will happen again, trying to fly under the radar...
Josef Djugashvilis
#169 - 2014-08-19 08:39:01 UTC
Had CCP dealt with this issue properly last year, there would be no need for this thread.

This is not a signature.

Annie Getyourgun
The Graduates
The Initiative.
#170 - 2014-08-19 08:41:33 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Tam Arai wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
Sentient Blade wrote:
Pitchforks, PITTTCHHHFOORRRKSSS!

This is quite simple and has only 3 outcomes:

1. CCP Legal were contacted about this and approved of it. In which case Somer deserves no penalties, even if the program is then stopped.

2. CCP Legal were contacted about this, refused permission, and they did it anyway. Somer will be shut down.

3. CCP Legal were not contacted. Somer gets hit for making false accusations of legal approval.

If CCP does allow it, then fair enough, just make it a level playing field.



Well it is looking like CCP Legal agreed with this and if that is the case then CCP could be in a lot of trouble if they try to stop him.

Also to those saying he lied, he didn't.

He is following what he agreed with CCP to the letter. The most important part of the agreement is that there was no set price for how much he pay for each plex.

That is what he needed to make this work and CCP amazingly agreed.

We all know that is nothing more then a clever way to RMT and that Somer has scammed CCP in the true nature of Eve.

The problem is for CCP that if they have legally agreed to this backing out could cost them.


"Blink provides no extra ISK or bonus Blink credit for buying through the link"

But they are doing exactly that. So It's blink that have broken the agreement already and should be in trouble



"Blink provides no extra ISK or bonus Blink credit for buying through the link" Correct, they don't. They are using the fact that they agreed no set price for what they would pay for plex as a way to make this work


Actually, everyone playing this game agreed to the TOS and the EULA, and they are pretty clear about not using the game for profit making purposes. CCP hf and all its shareholders are of course the ones trying to stay in the black here.

They chose to implement third party resellers (for various very obvious, and some not so obvious, reasons), that basically function as for-profit business partners. Qualifying as one of these resellers, as well as the restrictions placed upon them, are quite stringent.

Then there are the referral links, which are intended to help defray costs of things such as web hosting for community sites; players here can speak with their wallets with who they chose to support. It is in this same spirit of support for the game (which frankly all leads to increased advertising and exposure of CCP's product they are marketing) that certain real life services (such as artwork) can be exchanged for in game currency, as long as they are properly documented in the Sell Orders forum. This group of business partners fall into the nonprofit organization category.

Now perhaps the party in question is functioning like a NPO, and funds realized through these transactions will not be used to benefit any owners (if this type of scenario is what theoretically was approved by legal). It still falls short of meeting the EULA regarding income seeking, regardless of the intended purposes of said income. This is the crux of the situation that has to be dealt with. Regardless of what was approved, what was intended, or what was spoken (or lied about), this is the issue that has far reaching repercussions.

I know where my money goes when I pay for my subscription. I can choose, based on merit, who sees a percentage of the amount I spend on a PLEX. I can additionally choose when to stop supporting EVE, Valkyrie, and (theoretically) Legion, as soon as I don't agree with their business practices.

In the end, it is up to CCP hf to decide what to do with its product. If it chooses to alienate the customer base that has an interest in seeing their product thrive in order that individuals content to make a buck (even if they have to break every kettle and sink every boat) can continue to do so, so be it.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#171 - 2014-08-19 08:42:19 UTC
Arkady Romanov wrote:
Having said that; we'd all be a helluvah lot less testy if we weren't addressing the issue of RMT and/or favortism in relation to the same organisation not even 18 months after the first incident.


It hasn't even been a year.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Gully Alex Foyle
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#172 - 2014-08-19 08:45:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Gully Alex Foyle
Since people love to gamble, CCP should just make an in-game lottery system.

Letting a third-party manage so many trillions of ISK - and so many PLEX sales - is unhealthy for their business.


EDIT:
Rain6637 wrote:
Man, if only gambling was integrated with the game and players didn't need third party sites for it.
Great minds think alike. Lol +1

Make space glamorous! Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!

knobber Jobbler
State War Academy
Caldari State
#173 - 2014-08-19 08:50:57 UTC  |  Edited by: knobber Jobbler
Mike Azariah wrote:


For all you folks gathering the pitchforks and torches and learning to tie ropes into nooses. Do you expect a single or mass execution?



Mike, the issue isn't with somer, members of the legal, sales or marketing team (although they should all watch Bill Hicks, he has great advice for people in marketing), its the CCP exec team where the problem actually lies. They set the precedence for the companies culture and attitude. Heads don't need to roll, they're not going to anyway but some humility and action would be a good start.

CCP is famous for poor communication, poor community relations and making decisions which are polar opposite to what the players aka customers want. If I was Hillmar or the exec team I'd be ultra sensitive to issues which could upset the community aka customers on a large scale. RMT is a prime example of this. They know that there's certain boxes which, if ticked will cause rage. They also know what makes them happy.

Instead the exec team is completely disconnected from the player base. For 360 days a year they sit around , eating rotten shark and pickled fish, coming up with ideas the community - aka customers - either doesn't care about, doesn't want or terrible business ideas where they spunk millions of dollars on bad games. For 5 days a year they spend some time with players so they can feel ~connected~ before heading back up to their offices to spend another 360 days a year doing absolutely nothing in relation to their only source of income other than breaking it at worst, ignoring it at best.

I don't think anyone wants to see mass executions, however what I think people would like to see and would benefit CCP's image is genuine concern and action, with tangible results from the leaders of CCP. They have the ability and power to change a companies culture and prevent stuff like this repeating itself over and over.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#174 - 2014-08-19 08:51:38 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Dude, As much as I agree with what you are saying and would love Somer to get permanently banned and every single isk in any wallet he has access to removed if CCP have legally agreed this with him then they might not be able to do anything.

I have have always said nothing CCP does surprises me anymore.. boy was I wrong lol


CCP would be immensely stupid to make any legally binding agreements with any of their players beyond the EULA.

When an MMO developer regards any individual player as a "business partner" rather than a customer, they're effectively sending the rest of their playerbase down **** creek.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Lord LazyGhost
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#175 - 2014-08-19 08:53:13 UTC
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Since people love to gamble, CCP should just make an in-game lottery system.

Letting a third-party manage so many trillions of ISK - and so many PLEX sales - is unhealthy for their business.


EDIT:
Rain6637 wrote:
Man, if only gambling was integrated with the game and players didn't need third party sites for it.
Great minds think alike. Lol +1



I totaly agree

if they did the somer thing them self it is a very good way to make an isk sink and take extra isk out of the game.
Kename Fin
Strategic Exploration and Development Corp
Silent Company
#176 - 2014-08-19 08:55:24 UTC
Arkady Romanov wrote:
Mike Azariah wrote:
Out of curiosity.

For all you folks gathering the pitchforks and torches and learning to tie ropes into nooses. Do you expect a single or mass execution? Just Somer or Somer and staff or Somer staff and anybody who has ever done business with them?

damn, that includes me.

Or if you are heading the mob towards CCP are you looking for the one person mentioned in the 'email leak' or their entire staff or (as some of you love to ask for) the entire senior management team of CCP for allowing this to take place? Community and CSM thrown in for good measure, no doubt.

damn I made the list again

How much blood, how many bodies do you need to satisfy your craving for justice?

After all, as the queen once said . . . `Sentence first--verdict afterwards.'

I am not apologizing for CCP, just reminding some that this is not an instantaneous kind of thing. But some of you want to skip sentence, verdict, and leap straight to the execution(s) so anything I say to delay that must be stonewalling and sucking up to my masters.



Calm yourself.

You know how this sort of thing goes. Momentum is what it is. Some people love a good witch hunt.

Having said that; we'd all be a helluvah lot less testy if we weren't addressing the issue of RMT and/or favortism in relation to the same organisation not even 18 months after the first incident. The fact that we are even having the conversation again says that the matter wasn't solved properly the first time.

Confidence in CCP has been damaged because of it. I hope they get it right this time, and set an appropriate precedent that we can feel confident in.


First thing - I have flown with Mike, talked with him and know that he anything BUT a simple shill for the CCP Kool-aid™. He has always (even pre-CSM) been concerned with the improvement of the EVE universe and not just doing what he was told.

Second - This is not to say we have not been sold lines before or even drank deeply from the Reality Distortion Field fountain. We have all wanted to sincerely believe that the asset managers, the developers, the designers and their corporate overlords are all committed to making EVE enjoyable and lasting for ALL of us.

Third - This whole situation indeed tends to make one skittish of seeing old rumours, demons and ghost return to plague, bite and haunt us again. As Mike mentioned the verdict may seem foregone and the sentencing a formality, we do need them to avoid the reality that we are just the vindictive mob.

Given all of those, I have to give Mike (and begrudgingly most of the rest of the CSM [I reserve the right to hate individuals irrationally and without limit for perceived injustices however slight or imagined]) the benefit of the doubt that he is doing what he can to communicate those things he can to us and trying to move us toward understanding. It is a royal mess and I am fairly certain that none of us would like to have anything similar come to roost in our own business, and yet is has and needs to be dealt with.

tl:dr; Mike is good. CCP has not always been stirling. The mob is restless. Let's hold them to their promises without burning down their castle.

Yet.
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#177 - 2014-08-19 08:55:47 UTC
Lord LazyGhost wrote:
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Since people love to gamble, CCP should just make an in-game lottery system.

Letting a third-party manage so many trillions of ISK - and so many PLEX sales - is unhealthy for their business.


EDIT:
Rain6637 wrote:
Man, if only gambling was integrated with the game and players didn't need third party sites for it.
Great minds think alike. Lol +1



I totaly agree

if they did the somer thing them self it is a very good way to make an isk sink and take extra isk out of the game.

lack of creative vision and fashion sense. I'm taking bets on what percentage of monument shooters still wear cargo pants.
Anya Klibor
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#178 - 2014-08-19 09:05:49 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Completely Unaligned wrote:
So, you are all ganging up on Somer, nowhere do I see Eve-bet or Iwantisk.com mentioned. So many people are going to be affected by this witch hunt, Somer sponsors many groups with both isk and items.
I don't believe that thousands of $ are being made as mentioned, personally I don't have a problem with a few bucks to pay expenses being made. Isn't the real world full of enough haters for you, can't you leave it out of our games.
I joined Eve to have fun and get away from real life problems for a couple of hours a day, so thanks for merging the two worlds so very successfully. Bravo haters of the world.
They aren't being mentioned because they aren't engaging in RMT. Our issue isn't with running an eve gambling site, it's with them running an RMT scheme to run it as a business. I joined EVE for entertainment, and I'd like to continue being entertained, not watch the game go down the pan from RMTers wrecking it to make some quick cash. Somer clearly doesn't give a crap about the game, just about their bottom line, so CCP should smash that banhammer down with full force and be done with them.



Dude, As much as I agree with what you are saying and would love Somer to get permanently banned and every single isk in any wallet he has access to removed if CCP have legally agreed this with him then they might not be able to do anything.

I have have always said nothing CCP does surprises me anymore.. boy was I wrong lol


Except that Legal could never go along with this. That would invalidate the EULA in almost any future circumstance without a complete rewording. [u]You cannot make money off of the game.[/]u]

Leadership is something you learn. Maybe one day, you'll learn that.

Lord LazyGhost
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#179 - 2014-08-19 09:06:08 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
Lord LazyGhost wrote:
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Since people love to gamble, CCP should just make an in-game lottery system.

Letting a third-party manage so many trillions of ISK - and so many PLEX sales - is unhealthy for their business.


EDIT:
Rain6637 wrote:
Man, if only gambling was integrated with the game and players didn't need third party sites for it.
Great minds think alike. Lol +1



I totaly agree

if they did the somer thing them self it is a very good way to make an isk sink and take extra isk out of the game.

lack of creative vision and fashion sense. I'm taking bets on what percentage of monument shooters still wear cargo pants.



To add to this.

if ccp did this iam pretty sure a lot more people would run with it. Becasue they would trust that it is fair.

atm a lot of people dontplay somer becasue they dont trust it with shill accounts and all that jaz.

ccp running the show with transparancy it could be a great way for them to remove isk from the game in a steady and controlled and Honest way.

They could even use said isk to fund ingame events. instead of spawning supers and titains for events they could just buy them keeping the isk flowing in game and keeping titans off the market
Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#180 - 2014-08-19 09:08:37 UTC
Lord LazyGhost wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
Lord LazyGhost wrote:
Gully Alex Foyle wrote:
Since people love to gamble, CCP should just make an in-game lottery system.

Letting a third-party manage so many trillions of ISK - and so many PLEX sales - is unhealthy for their business.


EDIT:
Rain6637 wrote:
Man, if only gambling was integrated with the game and players didn't need third party sites for it.
Great minds think alike. Lol +1



I totaly agree

if they did the somer thing them self it is a very good way to make an isk sink and take extra isk out of the game.

lack of creative vision and fashion sense. I'm taking bets on what percentage of monument shooters still wear cargo pants.



To add to this.

if ccp did this iam pretty sure a lot more people would run with it. Becasue they would trust that it is fair.

atm a lot of people dontplay somer becasue they dont trust it with shill accounts and all that jaz.

ccp running the show with transparancy it could be a great way for them to remove isk from the game in a steady and controlled and Honest way.

They could even use said isk to fund ingame events. instead of spawning supers and titains for events they could just buy them keeping the isk flowing in game and keeping titans off the market

that and people could have kept their jobs while EVE appealed to new demographic(s).