These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Should C6 wormholes have 2 statics?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
AssassinationsdoneWrong
Deep Core Mining Inc.
#21 - 2014-08-18 09:57:46 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:

Other than making it easier to get your stuff in and out there's no advantage for the W community as a whole other than enticing more victims to your eviction and extortion cycles.


What if the second static lead to null or (in the future) the new space CCP is building?


Why? C6 chains have so many null outlets I don't see the point.
There may be pilots with guns n stuff in those chains though so I kind of get it.

Also, what Trinks said.

The Nexus 7's

What we fall short of in numbers we more than make up for in stupidity
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2014-08-18 17:18:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:

Other than making it easier to get your stuff in and out there's no advantage for the W community as a whole other than enticing more victims to your eviction and extortion cycles.


What if the second static lead to null or (in the future) the new space CCP is building?


Why? C6 chains have so many null outlets I don't see the point.
There may be pilots with guns n stuff in those chains though so I kind of get it.


You don't see the advantage in having a rollable, guarantied exit to null or more importantly, the "new space"? Straight

I moved out of C6 wormholes a while ago because it was pretty boring and they didn't offer any real advantage over C5 space. In case i didn't make it clear enough in the OP, i think C6 should be better than C5 wormholes, which is why i suggested this change.

Does anyone have a real reason why this would be such a terrible idea other that "because C6 guys are mean to me."?

The wishlist is pretty much complete...
Agrippa Arkaral
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#23 - 2014-08-18 18:01:04 UTC
Would move into a C6/6/6.

Main reason to live in a C6, especially those with a C5 or lower static, is the site respawn rate. C5 when constantly farmed has about 1 or 2 sites on average. A C6 when constantly farmed has an average of 8 sites. In both of the C6's I have lived in, I have never seen that we had less than 4.

Reason to live in a C6 with a C6 static is, beside the sites you have, is that C6 space is generally a lot more crowded - you simply run into a lot less empty systems than compared with C5 space.

Why give two statics to a C6? Why do wormholes have a static? Why not make C6s have 3 statics? Right now they simply have one. Giving them an extra static "because 2 and 4 have it too, and 6 is an even number" seems a lacking reason.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2014-08-18 18:25:31 UTC
That's more or less the feedback that i was looking for and you make some good points.

I guess if isk is your only motivator then you do have an incentive to live in a C6.

Agrippa, do you live in a C6 now and if not, would your choose a duel static c6 over a single static c5?

The wishlist is pretty much complete...
Agrippa Arkaral
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#25 - 2014-08-18 18:53:06 UTC
Right now I do not live in a C6.

A C6/5 and a C5/5 are very similar, except that you have a lot more sites in a C6 and the fact that large entities can roll into you at inconvenient times.

Personally I prefer a C5/5 to any kind of C6. This is basically because large entities live in a C6, they have a lot of mouths to feed, and for :SRP: have to run sites everyday. Multiple hour grind sessions, every day (and sometimes even in primetime :cripes:), is not why I want to be in wormhole space - I want to shoot stuff, get capital killmails and have fun leading a fleet. That is why I dislike a C6. I would prefer a C5/5 because a C5 is a bit more secluded and you can rageroll to catch farmers from your C5 static).

I do not really see a reason to add a second static to a C6. It is not like C6s are not in a good place - I think they are, and I think most people that live in a C6 would agree with that. C6 also has enough connections to K-space, both HS, LS and 0.0 (always had). There are also quite a few C6s with a lower class static - people with a class 6 static can find systems of all classes in their chain, and can take part in all kinds of pvp that wormhole space has to offer.
Previous page12