These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Stormcrows: Killers of 2034 Slaves

Author
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#121 - 2014-08-15 15:00:16 UTC
Jinari Otsito wrote:
Painlessly? Have you ever seen the corpses left behind by explosive decompression? There's no flash. There's no painless death. Unless they take a blaster charge directly, it's one of the worst conceivable ways to die, with several dozen horrible things happening to you all at once. If you are really lucky, you get knocked out during the event. If you're not..


I was once trapped in a Caracal class vessel that suffered an engineering casualty mid-warp and became part of the Oort cloud in one of the Caldari low-sec systems. As part of the incident there was a considerable loss of structural integrity in the hull and several compartments were opened to vacuum. The rest of us lived on in a ship with barely any functioning systems. For a month. Some compartments lost their emergency supplies and I'm sorry to say that some members of the crew were unable to face their fate with Caldari stoicism. Violence. Madness. Cannibalism.

So, yes, there are worse things that can happen to you than explosive decompression.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#122 - 2014-08-15 15:03:56 UTC
Stitcher wrote:

Quote:
You lose nothing by holding him a bit


Sorry Jinari, but you're completely wrong there. You lose a LOT by holding him a bit, while he gains. He gains time to stall, to plan, to act. Hesitation is an opportunity for the target to come up with wiggle room, vent atmo from the hold, call in third party remote-rep, you name it. What happens if he starts fitting guns on his ship and, once webbed and scrambled, ejects the slaves and then blows up the jetcan? What happens if he pays a bystander to shoot his wreck the second his ship pops?

Hesitation is a loss all by itself. Pressure and seconds are valuable resources, to be spent as efficiently as possible. You DON'T allow fanatics to stall you.



"Stall and plan"? The man is floating in space in a transport vessel. If you know how to circumvent the capsule interface protocols to vent the hold, I'd love to see it. If you can't identify weapons on the hull of his ship, you're too terrible to be allowed out of dock to begin with. You don't allow fanatics to stall you, but you don't slaughter a hold full of slaves when there's nothing to be lost by holding off a while first.

Really, are you people so removed from your humanity that it's acceptable to trade thousands of lives just to stave off a few minutes of having to watch d-scan or watch out for potentially dangerous neuts? Thousands. Of. Lives. What conceivable risk do you consider so great that you can't make that little extra effort?

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Anslo
Scope Works
#123 - 2014-08-15 15:05:08 UTC
Jinari Otsito wrote:
Stitcher wrote:

Quote:
You lose nothing by holding him a bit


Sorry Jinari, but you're completely wrong there. You lose a LOT by holding him a bit, while he gains. He gains time to stall, to plan, to act. Hesitation is an opportunity for the target to come up with wiggle room, vent atmo from the hold, call in third party remote-rep, you name it. What happens if he starts fitting guns on his ship and, once webbed and scrambled, ejects the slaves and then blows up the jetcan? What happens if he pays a bystander to shoot his wreck the second his ship pops?

Hesitation is a loss all by itself. Pressure and seconds are valuable resources, to be spent as efficiently as possible. You DON'T allow fanatics to stall you.



"Stall and plan"? The man is floating in space in a transport vessel. If you know how to circumvent the capsule interface protocols to vent the hold, I'd love to see it. If you can't identify weapons on the hull of his ship, you're too terrible to be allowed out of dock to begin with. You don't allow fanatics to stall you, but you don't slaughter a hold full of slaves when there's nothing to be lost by holding off a while first.

Really, are you people so removed from your humanity that it's acceptable to trade thousands of lives just to stave off a few minutes of having to watch d-scan or watch out for potentially dangerous neuts? Thousands. Of. Lives. What conceivable risk do you consider so great that you can't make that little extra effort?


Why should we care about your morals?

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#124 - 2014-08-15 15:07:01 UTC
Watch SWAT training included unprotected hard vacuum training. That was NOT fun. You can augment human skin and tissues with all the cunning biotechnology you want, but the void still hurts, even if you're twice as able to survive it as an ordinary man. It's not the way I'd choose to go, Jinari's got that right.

But certain death is still worse than possible death, however relatively nasty thse deaths might be. We've all got to go sometime, so any opportunity you can claw back to feel Dark Wind blow past you rather than through you is worth taking.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#125 - 2014-08-15 15:07:20 UTC
Verin, what points have Morwen or Kohiko made? One says "trying doesn't work because we think it doesn't work" and the other just says "Oh, because reasons. Nope, not going to say what reasons, but reasons.". Your arguments actually had a little weight to them but I really disagree with your assessment that there's any kind of time pressure involved here.

The potential problems arising from holding him a bit are so miniscule compared to the potentially thousands of lives that can be saved that it's staggering to see those lives being dismissed out of hand.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#126 - 2014-08-15 15:09:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Jinari Otsito wrote:
Really, are you people so removed from your humanity that it's acceptable to trade thousands of lives just to stave off a few minutes of having to watch d-scan or watch out for potentially dangerous neuts? Thousands. Of. Lives. What conceivable risk do you consider so great that you can't make that little extra effort?


The loss of thousands more.

Look, this is an argument that's been bashed out time and again. Weighing the risk of action versus the risk of inaction is an equation that untold... millions, probably, of field officers have had to make throughout history. The consensus, that I happen to agree with for the reasons I've already given, is that it's better to save the ones you KNOW you can save, than gamble them all on all-or-nothing.

In the end, the blood is on the hostage-taker's hands, not on the SWAT team's.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#127 - 2014-08-15 15:13:04 UTC
And what added danger are they in that they're not already in danger of with your guns trained on the hull separating them from space?

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Anslo
Scope Works
#128 - 2014-08-15 15:14:50 UTC
The guns aren't assured death for all the hostages.
Nauplius taking them away IS assured death for all the hostages.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#129 - 2014-08-15 15:15:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Never, EVER underestimate a cornered fanatic's capacity to out-think you in their desperation, or to just plain get lucky.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Kohiko Sun
Stormcrows
#130 - 2014-08-15 15:16:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Kohiko Sun
Mail sent.
Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#131 - 2014-08-15 15:16:56 UTC
You could always privately mail it to her?

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#132 - 2014-08-15 15:19:57 UTC
What I question is the actual existence of your "nine methods". If you actually have any, feel free to send them privately and I'll take them into account. If not, I'll just have to conclude you don't actually have any.

Verin, I usually would agree but not when there's thousands of lives at stake. You can't guarantee a single rescued slave if you start by opening fire. The option to open fire remains for however long you hold him but the possibility of getting them all without gunfire disappears the second you open fire.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Anslo
Scope Works
#133 - 2014-08-15 15:21:25 UTC
I like the part where she ignores my point that shooting the ship offers some chance of some survivors when letting Nauppy take them is assured death for all of them.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#134 - 2014-08-15 15:25:40 UTC
Jinari Otsito wrote:
Verin, I usually would agree but not when there's thousands of lives at stake. You can't guarantee a single rescued slave if you start by opening fire.


You can, actually. Those ships are well engineered: you're looking at, statistically speaking, about a fifty percent survival rate. Those internal bulkheads, forcefields and emergency enclosure systems mean that having some survivors is all but a certainty.

Quote:
The option to open fire remains for however long you hold him but the possibility of getting them all without gunfire disappears the second you open fire.


With some people, the possibility of rescuing them all without gunfire simply does not exist in the first place. Nauplius is one such person.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#135 - 2014-08-15 15:25:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Jinari Otsito
Anslo wrote:
I like the part where she ignores my point that shooting the ship offers some chance of some survivors when letting Nauppy take them is assured death for all of them.


No one would let him take them anywhere. If you'd followed the discussion you should by now have noticed this is a discussion about when he's immobilized and his options are limited to giving up his goods, redocking (if at station) or self-destruct. This is a situation where the option used so far - indiscriminate gunfire - is permanently available and less than a thought away.

ETA Verin:

Good point on the vessel's safety systems. They are quite well engineered as far as my perusals show but I have little desire to see such systems tested with potentially thousands of lives at stake unless it actually is an emergency. Dismissing the lives of the other fifty percent is bone chilling though.

I still don't see how you can claim that making the attempt is somehow an impossibility merely because "he's such a person". No matter what person he is, he's locked in an egg in a ship held by others in this situation. His options are severely limited and should he do the expected the end result is exactly the same as if you simply shot him out of the sky anyway.

The difference is, an attempt was made. With those thousands of lives in question, I really think that attempt is vital. It scares me so much that so many are advocating the flat out killing of these people without making that attempt.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#136 - 2014-08-15 15:37:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Option 1 - Giving up his goods: NOT going to happen. It never has before and his personality profile renders such a scenario impossibly remote. This option would only be considered by a sane individual, which Nauplius demonstrably is not.

Option 2 - Redocking: constitutes mission failure for the rescue party. The hostages remain held and at Nauplius' "mercy" and are removed completely from any possibility of rescue. Their murder has at best only been delayed, not prevented.

Option 3 - Self-destruct: effectively the same as being shot up, with the added downside from the rescue party's perspective that it buys time for third-party interference or some last "frak you" contingency.

The attempt you're talking about WON'T succeed in rescuing anybody, and COULD result in mission failure. You never underestimate the competence that can be born from desperation or defiance.

It's cold, yes. It's sickeningly cold. But cold saves lives. "A bird in the hand", you know?

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
#137 - 2014-08-15 15:43:52 UTC
While in some ways I can see where you're coming from, I simply can't agree. Option 1 may be highly unlikely but as you say he is a madman and can't be perfectly predictable. This means his refusal to give them over is not a certainty. Unlikely, but even the smallest chance here makes the attempt worth it. Option 2 constitutes a failure to kill him. It certainly ensures those people aren't killed yet. Delaying their murder allows for rescuing them later. Killing them removes that possibility entirely.

Option 3, well. It's the same as just opening fire. The result is the same, with the difference of having tried.

Perhaps I simply am not capable of getting into the mindset that thousands of dead are acceptable simply to avoid a negligible risk of Nappy pulling a miracle out of his exhaust port.

Prime Node. Ask me about augmentation.

Valerie Valate
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#138 - 2014-08-15 15:47:11 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
Valerie Valate wrote:
So.

Did Stormcrows cargoscan the Bestower first ? Or did they engage without the information that there were a number of slaves on board ?


It wouldn't make a blind bit of difference whether they had or hadn't.



Actually, it would.

You see, and this is something not mentioned thus far, do you know why it is, that 2000 individuals survived this incident, while 2034 did not ?

It is because they were in separate compartments. A cargoscanner would have revealed this.

If the individuals were in one compartment, there is a good chance that Stormcrows attack would have pierced that compartment, and killed all of them, and we'd be arguing about the morality of 4034 dead individuals vs letting Nauplius's Bestower go unmolested and thus, probably, kill all 4034 eventually.

But, since they were in separate compartments, some survived, some did not. The more compartments that the people are in, the greater the chance of some of them surviving.

That comes at a price, which is, that the more compartments are inhabited, the smaller the chance of all of the people surviving.

So, it does make a difference.

Doctor V. Valate, Professor of Archaeology at Kaztropolis Imperial University.

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#139 - 2014-08-15 15:57:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Jinari Otsito wrote:
And what added danger are they in that they're not already in danger of with your guns trained on the hull separating them from space?


They are in danger for as long as they are in his possession. This is what you do not ******* get. Their lives are not spared if he docks. He is planning on killing them all. Each and every Minmatar that he has dies. If their lives are in his hands he will ruin them, period.

Yeah. You should try to scram and web him and bump him off station and all of that. It won't do a lot of good since it relies on him actually caring about losing the ship, but that was the plan if he tried that again. I know because I was sitting there in a cruiser with a microwarpdrive ready to smash him away from the station while the Stormcrows were waiting outside with scrams and webs to hold him down. But we didn't get the chance since the next time he undocked one he just warped it off with instant undock coordinates and blew it up himself a minute later. And before you try more accusations of how people don't care, we immediately tried to scan it down before he could do it, even though we would have been too late anyway, because unlike you in your armchair some of us actually care so much about those lives that we are actually putting ourselves out there and trying even if there's really nothing we can do.

Even if we'd gotten him and he was out of docking range and everything had gone perfectly, all we could do would have been to pray to God that he would jettison the slaves. Which he won't, because he doesn't care. He's got so much ******* money that he destroys his own freighters as part of his sacrifices, what do you ******* think a bestower is worth to him? He's going to blow it up anyway. He won't jettison them because he has no desire for that ******* ship to survive in the first place, he just wants the sick ******* glee in watching other people do the killing for him while they're trying to stop him. He'll self-destruct it if he can't dock, he'll dock it if he can and then blow it up an hour or a day or a week or a month later. The people in it will die, period, because he's a ******* monster.



The one thing that could stop him, is the thing that no one will ever admit to, because all of you love your cloning so damn much. His pod was destroyed. His pod was destroyed but it doesn't matter. He is still out there, still killing slaves, because a new copy of him came off the assembly line. He'll go on and on and keep killing and it doesn't matter if you rescue some or none because he'll just get more and he'll keep killing more until there aren't any left.
Morwen Lagann
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#140 - 2014-08-15 15:58:47 UTC
And what we've been trying to tell you is that that so-called "possibility" of getting all of them without gunfire is in reality not just close to zero, but actually zero. Those people cannot be saved as long as they are in his possession, and he will not give them up willingly. Either you leave them to die at his leisure, or you attempt to forcibly pry them from his grasp. It is that simple, no matter how loudly or how frequently you protest that it is not the case.

There is a chance to save some or all of them, by opening fire.
There is a guarantee to save none by not opening fire.

As a self-professed non-combat pilot who is unwilling to do anything but play at armchair analyst - and poorly, at that - you have no business telling people who are actually putting their crews and ships on the line that they are doing it wrong when they are the ones who are in possession of the facts and reality of the situation, and you are consistently refusing to accept that you are wrong.

I might not be involved in this mess because I am personally too busy with other matters, but at least I'm able to see the situation for what it is: a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't scenario where people are going to die no matter what you do.

Morwen Lagann

CEO, Tyrathlion Interstellar

Coordinator, Arataka Research Consortium

Owner, The Golden Masque