These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Looking for Amarr FW corp

Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ryu Sake
Black Powder Ballistics
Hole Control
#1 - 2014-08-13 22:27:02 UTC
Hoping to chat with an Amarr FW corp. Add me in game, very active
Paranoid Loyd
#2 - 2014-08-13 23:23:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Street fighter and booze, what a wonderful combination. Lol


Check this out if you haven't already https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=365657&find=unread

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!
Deacon Abox
Black Eagle5
#3 - 2014-08-14 02:42:23 UTC
I believe this is what you are looking for.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=342520&find=unread

Don't know why it isn't stickied.Straight

CCP, there are off buttons for ship explosions, missile effects, turret effects, etc. "Immersion" does not seem to be harmed by those. So, [u]please[/u] give us a persisting off button for the jump gate and autoscan visuals.

Stalking Mantis
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#4 - 2014-08-14 11:29:10 UTC
Dolce & Gabbana

AKA

Dirt 'n' Glitter

Amarr Liason Officer Extraordinare -->Check Out Amarrian Vengeance/Amarr FW History from 2011 to 2014 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=352629&find=unread
Master Sergeant MacRobert
Red Sky Morning
The Amarr Militia.
#5 - 2014-08-14 11:35:58 UTC
Stalking Mantis wrote:
Dolce & Gabbana

AKA

Dirt 'n' Glitter



Ahh good to see Stalking has found a good home.


To the Op:

We are also, ahem, recruiting a few good fellows.

S-B-A Recruitment thread

"Remedy this situation or you shall live out the rest of your life in a pain amplifier"
Nameira Vanis-Tor
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2014-08-14 14:36:44 UTC
Ryu Sake wrote:
Hoping to chat with an Amarr FW corp. Add me in game, very active


Out of curiosity why did you pick Amarr FW?
Shaklu
State War Academy
Caldari State
#7 - 2014-08-14 18:51:13 UTC
I was considering Amarr, but I was told it is totally dead and awful right now, and if I wanted to be an underdog then to go with Caldari. Not sure how accurate this is.. and I would still like to join Amarr because I want the ships and LP stuff for them, but if they are dead and lame, then I wouldn't want to.
Cainan Amaro Cathak
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2014-08-14 23:22:47 UTC
Shaklu wrote:
I was considering Amarr, but I was told it is totally dead and awful right now, and if I wanted to be an underdog then to go with Caldari. Not sure how accurate this is.. and I would still like to join Amarr because I want the ships and LP stuff for them, but if they are dead and lame, then I wouldn't want to.


I certainly hope this isn't the truth; my main's Caldari and I've too much pride to take him elsewhere, so I rolled an Amarr instead because I wanted to actually feel like I was participating in something other than a hopeless situation.

"Here we are, born to be kings/We're the Princes of the Universe!"
Shaklu
State War Academy
Caldari State
#9 - 2014-08-15 00:02:38 UTC
Cainan Amaro Cathak wrote:

I certainly hope this isn't the truth; my main's Caldari and I've too much pride to take him elsewhere, so I rolled an Amarr instead because I wanted to actually feel like I was participating in something other than a hopeless situation.

Honestly, I don't know what to think anymore. Caldari currently owns 9 systems, and is at like 2% overall victory.. Amarr at least is tier 2 and is holding onto it's own territory. I can't make up my mind what faction to join, it is all very confusing at the moment.
Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#10 - 2014-08-15 03:01:30 UTC
Each militia will bash the other in this forum because making you not join one is a win for another.

Right now caldari is probably best to join for pvp oppurtunity against a decent foe. Isk wise it doesn't matter, just roll and alt when you need isk for the militia thats opposite your pvp char when it can't make isk by itself. To stay on ogood side of your pvp militia just don't plex with your alt and stick to missions. Job done, you get isk and you get pvp :)
Master Sergeant MacRobert
Red Sky Morning
The Amarr Militia.
#11 - 2014-08-15 20:59:33 UTC
Shaklu wrote:
Cainan Amaro Cathak wrote:

I certainly hope this isn't the truth; my main's Caldari and I've too much pride to take him elsewhere, so I rolled an Amarr instead because I wanted to actually feel like I was participating in something other than a hopeless situation.

Honestly, I don't know what to think anymore. Caldari currently owns 9 systems, and is at like 2% overall victory.. Amarr at least is tier 2 and is holding onto it's own territory. I can't make up my mind what faction to join, it is all very confusing at the moment.


Some of the most fun current Amarrian Militia pilots remember was when Amarr held sovereignty only in Sahtogas as the last remaining system.

What you want, ideally is to join a corp that is active, flies fleets when it is important to do so, let's you tinker, solo, capsule, fly and chooses a system that they treat as home base and defend to the last breath.

This gives gravitas and fun in equal measure - a result that I'd expect to appeal

"Remedy this situation or you shall live out the rest of your life in a pain amplifier"
Crosi Wesdo
War and Order
#12 - 2014-08-16 08:28:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Crosi Wesdo
Shaklu wrote:
Cainan Amaro Cathak wrote:

I certainly hope this isn't the truth; my main's Caldari and I've too much pride to take him elsewhere, so I rolled an Amarr instead because I wanted to actually feel like I was participating in something other than a hopeless situation.

Honestly, I don't know what to think anymore. Caldari currently owns 9 systems, and is at like 2% overall victory.. Amarr at least is tier 2 and is holding onto it's own territory. I can't make up my mind what faction to join, it is all very confusing at the moment.



It really isnt. Doesnt matter which militia you join. Success in militia amounts to bragging rights and income potential.

Though it has to be said the earning potential for the losing side is still good in general eve terms.

Beyond that, objectives and lines in the sand are drawn by your associates and fun is had succeeding or failing to achieve them.
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#13 - 2014-08-16 11:57:43 UTC
Crosi Wesdo wrote:
Shaklu wrote:
Cainan Amaro Cathak wrote:

I certainly hope this isn't the truth; my main's Caldari and I've too much pride to take him elsewhere, so I rolled an Amarr instead because I wanted to actually feel like I was participating in something other than a hopeless situation.

Honestly, I don't know what to think anymore. Caldari currently owns 9 systems, and is at like 2% overall victory.. Amarr at least is tier 2 and is holding onto it's own territory. I can't make up my mind what faction to join, it is all very confusing at the moment.



It really isnt. Doesnt matter which militia you join. Success in militia amounts to bragging rights and income potential.

Though it has to be said the earning potential for the losing side is still good in general eve terms.

Beyond that, objectives and lines in the sand are drawn by your associates and fun is had succeeding or failing to achieve them.


Actually failing is never good option, it just indicates that goals are set too high. Goals should always be challenging but doable so people keep up high morale and keep going for ever.
Cromwell Savage
The Screaming Seagulls
#14 - 2014-08-16 13:24:54 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:


Actually failing is never good option, it just indicates that goals are set too high. Goals should always be challenging but doable so people keep up high morale and keep going for ever.


Yep...why strive for higher success when you can settle for secure mediocrity...

Risk everything, or gain nothing.
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#15 - 2014-08-16 17:09:45 UTC
Cromwell Savage wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:


Actually failing is never good option, it just indicates that goals are set too high. Goals should always be challenging but doable so people keep up high morale and keep going for ever.


Yep...why strive for higher success when you can settle for secure mediocrity...

Risk everything, or gain nothing.


that is just not option for long time progress.