These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Make protection of Hisec easier by adding in-game item: Mining Permit

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Nitetime Video
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#1 - 2014-08-12 00:39:59 UTC
It is a well known fact that players need to have a permit to operate within the territory of the New Order. However, there has been much confusion in the game about what a valid New Order Mining Permit looks like.

I would propose the addition of an in-game item called "Mining Permit" that would be issued to Code agents to sell to players who wish to become compliant with the New Halaima Code of Conduct.

This topic is to be used for the discussion of what the "Mining Permit" should look like and how many should be seeded into the game.

-Nitetime Video, Agent of the New Order
Anal Canal
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#2 - 2014-08-12 00:43:57 UTC
I would suggest a CLEX!

The Artist Formerly Known As AC. 

The terminal end of the digestive system. 

The Best CSM Candidate
James Nikolas Tesla
Tesla Holdings
#3 - 2014-08-12 00:46:28 UTC
Might make a good trophy.

CODE is just a bunch of pirates; smart, organized pirates. It doesn't help to rage at them because that is exactly what they want. Dust yourself off and get back on your feet, you don't even have to talk to them.
Rennseslear X
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#4 - 2014-08-12 00:48:20 UTC
New Order Permit

Id like to see one in the hands of every miner.
complete with purchase receipt.

EWE OAR SOFA KING WE TALL DID
Agnes K Webb
Doomheim
#5 - 2014-08-12 00:49:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Agnes K Webb
Ok forgive me for my ignorance but I was under the assumption that CODE was a player owned and operated alliance and not affiliated with CCP.

If so why do you come the assumption that your "mining permit" in-game item will be added to Eve Online.

I would also like to bring up a small issue reguarding this idea, your code states that you can revoke a miners permit at any time, if a player owned one of your in-game item permits would it not make it near impossible for you to revoke said permit?
Nitetime Video
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#6 - 2014-08-12 00:53:33 UTC
Guys.. Please.. keep this within the defined parameters..

We are supposed to be discussing the look and function of the new in-game item "Mining Permit".. not it's validity.
Agnes K Webb
Doomheim
#7 - 2014-08-12 00:55:45 UTC
As this is the only thread on this subject I believe that my question is indeed a valid one.
Christopher Mabata
Northern Accounts and Systems
#8 - 2014-08-12 01:04:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Christopher Mabata
I fully support the idea of this becoming an item, its no different than how we got a piece of steve or Jove bits when that ambassador died.

I think the actions of CODE. are well known enough and renowned to warrant CCP giving this serious* thought

♣ Small Gang PVP, Large Fleet PVP, Black Ops, Incursions, Trade, and Industry ♣ 70% Lethal / 30% Super-Snuggly / 110% No idea what im doing ♣

This Message Brought to you by a sweet and sour bittervet
Greg Valanti
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2014-08-12 01:24:49 UTC
I will support the introduction of mining permits if you will support the introduction of a Carebear Batphone module that when activated allows helpless miners to instantly spawn a CONCORD fleet that includes NPC logistics for the person about to be ganked.
Agnes K Webb
Doomheim
#10 - 2014-08-12 01:31:35 UTC
Quote:
I think the actions of CODE. are well known enough and renowned to warrant CCP giving this serious* thought


This does not make you a affiliate of CCP.
If you would please give evidence as to why your actions would "warrant CCP" to consider this "Mining Permit" and further assist you in targeting certain members of the Eve Online community?
Nitetime Video
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#11 - 2014-08-12 01:33:33 UTC
Greg Valanti wrote:
I will support the introduction of mining permits if you will support the introduction of a Carebear Batphone module that when activated allows helpless miners to instantly spawn a CONCORD fleet that includes NPC logistics for the person about to be ganked.


Please keep things realistic, here.
Agnes K Webb
Doomheim
#12 - 2014-08-12 01:40:20 UTC
Nitetime Video wrote:

[quote=Please keep things realistic, here.


But that is as valid a request as a "Mining Permit" that will assist CODE in forcing players to purchase the right to mine, which as i recall is not a activity that a player must be granted permission in order to participate in.
Jessica Danikov
Network Danikov
#13 - 2014-08-12 01:43:07 UTC
Please don't feed the trolls.
Christopher Mabata
Northern Accounts and Systems
#14 - 2014-08-12 01:53:06 UTC
Greg Valanti wrote:
I will support the introduction of mining permits if you will support the introduction of a Carebear Batphone module that when activated allows helpless miners to instantly spawn a CONCORD fleet that includes NPC logistics for the person about to be ganked.


Do you want the short answer or the long answer? Oh wait theyre the same

NOPE

♣ Small Gang PVP, Large Fleet PVP, Black Ops, Incursions, Trade, and Industry ♣ 70% Lethal / 30% Super-Snuggly / 110% No idea what im doing ♣

This Message Brought to you by a sweet and sour bittervet
Christopher Mabata
Northern Accounts and Systems
#15 - 2014-08-12 01:55:33 UTC
Agnes K Webb wrote:
Nitetime Video wrote:

[quote=Please keep things realistic, here.


But that is as valid a request as a "Mining Permit" that will assist CODE in forcing players to purchase the right to mine, which as i recall is not a activity that a player must be granted permission in order to participate in.



In truth it was really a request for vanity items, much like the Piece of Steve or the Jove ambassador bone bits, or even the BOB Director Key. All of these mark big moments for EVE Online that had a change on the universe. As i said above I believe CODE. Should recieve this same Vanity item as we have mad many contributions to the game, to the point where there is a new post or 4 about us every day.

♣ Small Gang PVP, Large Fleet PVP, Black Ops, Incursions, Trade, and Industry ♣ 70% Lethal / 30% Super-Snuggly / 110% No idea what im doing ♣

This Message Brought to you by a sweet and sour bittervet
Agnes K Webb
Doomheim
#16 - 2014-08-12 02:04:50 UTC
Christopher Mabata wrote:


In truth it was really a request for vanity items, much like the Piece of Steve or the Jove ambassador bone bits, or even the BOB Director Key. All of these mark big moments for EVE Online that had a change on the universe. As i said above I believe CODE. Should recieve this same Vanity item as we have mad many contributions to the game, to the point where there is a new post or 4 about us every day.


In this context the "Mining Permit" seems like a good idea but according to the original post this item will not be as a "vanity item" but as a more literal item used to enforce your alliances beliefs upon others.
Christopher Mabata
Northern Accounts and Systems
#17 - 2014-08-12 02:11:37 UTC
Eh im fine either way really, i think CODE. Deserves it after almost 3 years of doing this

♣ Small Gang PVP, Large Fleet PVP, Black Ops, Incursions, Trade, and Industry ♣ 70% Lethal / 30% Super-Snuggly / 110% No idea what im doing ♣

This Message Brought to you by a sweet and sour bittervet
Agnes K Webb
Doomheim
#18 - 2014-08-12 02:19:16 UTC
Christopher Mabata wrote:
Eh im fine either way really, i think CODE. Deserves it after almost 3 years of doing this


for some reason I think a great many people will be opposed your point of view.
Owen Levanth
Sagittarius Unlimited Exploration
#19 - 2014-08-12 10:10:31 UTC
I suggest this, complete with soundeffect when sold.
Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#20 - 2014-08-12 11:11:40 UTC
What is this "paper" you speak about? And who the **** is CODE anyway?

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.
12Next page