EVE General Discussion

Forum Index

EVE Forums » EVE Communication Center » EVE General Discussion » Whatever happened to the planned corporation forums?

Topic is locked indefinitely.

Whatever happened to the planned corporation forums?
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

Sable Blitzmann

24th Imperial Crusade

Amarr Empire

Likes received: 254

#1 - 2011-12-09 01:47:22 UTC

I remember when these new forums were starting to make their debut, one of the planned features were for corporations to have their own personal forums accessible from EVE gate. This would be a great tool for smaller corps to plan and keep in touch out of game (and the possibilities of being integrated with tools such as the calendar are pretty neat).

But it was pushed back if I remember correctly. Can we get an update on this feature? =)

Section 8. 1,421
KrakizBad Section 8. Likes received: 1,421	#2 - 2011-12-09 01:50:40 UTC Spacebook got back-burnered along with space barbie, thank god.


Sable Blitzmann 24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire Likes received: 254	#3 - 2011-12-09 01:54:41 UTC KrakizBad wrote: Spacebook got back-burnered along with space barbie, thank god. Yeah, cause we all know the web developers can contribute to the code behind EVE. Think man! And further iteration on the forums and it's functions is always welcome.


KrakizBad Section 8. Likes received: 1,421	#4 - 2011-12-09 01:58:02 UTC Sable Blitzmann wrote: KrakizBad wrote: Spacebook got back-burnered along with space barbie, thank god. Yeah, cause we all know the web developers can contribute to the code behind EVE. Think man! And further iteration on the forums and it's functions is always welcome. If they want to iterate, they can stop ganking posts.

Pere Madeleine

The Gentlemen of Low Moral Fibre

Likes received: 44

#5 - 2011-12-09 02:00:09 UTC

Sable Blitzmann wrote:

KrakizBad wrote:

Spacebook got back-burnered along with space barbie, thank god.

Yeah, cause we all know the web developers can contribute to the code behind EVE.

Think man!

And further iteration on the forums and it's functions is always welcome.

I'm willing to bet CCP's web backend devs are the same guys that write the server code.

Sable Blitzmann

24th Imperial Crusade

Amarr Empire

Likes received: 254

#6 - 2011-12-09 02:01:42 UTC

KrakizBad wrote:

Sable Blitzmann wrote:

KrakizBad wrote:

Spacebook got back-burnered along with space barbie, thank god.

Yeah, cause we all know the web developers can contribute to the code behind EVE.

Think man!

And further iteration on the forums and it's functions is always welcome.

If they want to iterate, they can stop ganking posts.

I would love for them to fix that.

But I thought you were thanking a higher power for them putting the forums on the back burner. =P

Sable Blitzmann

24th Imperial Crusade

Amarr Empire

Likes received: 254

#7 - 2011-12-09 02:03:19 UTC | Edited by: Sable Blitzmann

Pere Madeleine wrote:

Sable Blitzmann wrote:

KrakizBad wrote:

Spacebook got back-burnered along with space barbie, thank god.

Yeah, cause we all know the web developers can contribute to the code behind EVE.

Think man!

And further iteration on the forums and it's functions is always welcome.

I'm willing to bet CCP's web backend devs are the same guys that write the server code.

Probably not. I hobby in web development, and web code =/= program code. Besides linking the web to TQ (fetching skill training and writing mails), which is probably done through some sort of API, they are probably NOT the ones who wrote the EVE server software.

1,080
Selinate Likes received: 1,080	#8 - 2011-12-09 02:03:34 UTC 5 KrakizBad wrote: Spacebook got back-burnered along with space barbie, thank god. ....ironic that the person hating on "Space Barbie" has donned a monocle...

LowKey Ops Shadow Cartel 41
Mirana Niranne LowKey Ops Shadow Cartel Likes received: 41	#9 - 2011-12-09 02:10:05 UTC Selinate wrote: KrakizBad wrote: Spacebook got back-burnered along with space barbie, thank god. ....ironic that the person hating on "Space Barbie" has donned a monocle... Ouch. That might have been a boot to the head. More forum iteration would be good, though.