These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Towards a Positive Argument For Investing

Author
RAW23
#1 - 2011-09-11 14:26:38 UTC
Towards a Positive Argument for Investing
About a week ago I was engaged in a discussion with Elise Darkstar about the viability of MD investing. Amongst a range of claims thrown out was the charge that investing in MD is simply not worthwhile since even if it is possible to make isk returns from investing are not going to be high enough to make it a worthwhile pursuit when compared to other activities. I'm going to try here to make a start towards taking up Elise's challenge to provide a properly formatted argument in favour of investing (I'll respond to the various negative arguments in another). Many of the details in the following posts are somewhat sketchy and need sharpening up. If anyone can help with more precise figures or additional pieces of data that would be greatly appreciated.

The first thing I'll do is attempt to provide a list of activities that can reasonably be thought of as comparable in terms of time and effort expenditure. I'll then insert some figures for likely returns, although many of these will be place-holders and I don't vouch for the accuracy of them in all cases. Finally, I'll offer some comments on reasonable investment strategies and the likely returns these would yield so we have something to compare to the alternatives (I may not have time to post these today as I'm working from a net-cafe while my wife is shopping Smile). All the data is subject to revision and I doubt we will ever be able to get beyond approximations given the difficulty involved in compiling truly accurate data for all cases. But hopefully this will provide a starting point for discussion.

Alternative Activities According to Minimal Time and Effort Expenditure
The first thing we need to do, I think, is to identify all (or as many as possible) productive uses for isk that can be compared to investing in terms of the time and effort required – that is, the alternatives that the investment market is in competition with. Let's take a sample investor, to begin with, and ask what options he or she has. For the sake of argument I'll take someone who only has 20 minutes a day to spend on financial business in eve, either because this is the total game time they have available or because this is the time they have left after using the rest of their game time for other pursuits. Even if the other pursuits are financially based someone might still have an excess of isk and a little time left over to use it but be unable to fit the excess into any of their other business plans (a position I have been in quite a few times). Now, in recent months I have had probably 20 minutes a day but in a fractured distribution such that I've had a few five minute slots to fill but for the sake of this argument lets not restrict the time distribution in this way, saying instead that it can be distributed in any number of possible ways, including a single 20 minute slot (the fractured distribution will, I think, make investing more attractive but we may as well examine what other things can be done with this time as a single period as well). I don't think 20mins per day is unnecessarilly restrictive as I'm confident that there are a good few people who only want to spend this much time on financial matters and if there is such a group and investing is a viable isk making method for them then this will be enough, I think, to show the viability of investing for at least some people even if it encounters stiffer opposition in the alternatives that would arise with double this time, triple this time, or more.

On the basis of this time allowance we can rule out running incursions and for me at least all the other PvE options due to the issue of psychological ramping. It may well be that other people can happily log on and mission for 20 mins and have that as their sole eve activity. However, for at least some people that will not be the case. I would also want to rule out mining on the same grounds.

So, having ruled out the PvE options,what others do we have? I'll leave aside the question of entry barriers for the moment. Please feel free to add in any others that I have missed.


1) Running a fairly small number of trade orders on a once daily update or an even smaller number updating twice daily.
2) A small T1 production operation, with the mats purchased from sell orders should be possible as long as the logistics distances and the materials volumes are not too high.
3) A smaller T2 invention/production or T3 RE/production operation (smaller because of the additional steps involved in the production process).
4) A T2 BPO production operation of virtually any size.
5) Some amount of contract trading (someone else will have to fill in the details as to how large since I have no experience on this front).
6) A research/copy farm of quite a large size.
7) MD investing.
8) Private investing/loans.
9) Short term commodity speculation – i.e. trading on the regular cycles.
10) Long term speculation.
11) Cap ship construction (combat or industrial).
12) Supercap construction.

Now, some of these have other factors to consider. Let's assume that MD investing can be reasonably carried out through a diversified strategy with a very low risk of taking an overall loss (as per the strategy of investing equal amounts in every offer that launches, or some improved version of this strategy). And let's further assume that our sample financier wants a strategy that is not in the medium to high risk range. On these grounds we can rule out supercap construction and long term speculation as not really being comparable. Both offer much greater rewards but both come with significant risks of considerable losses.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

RAW23
#2 - 2011-09-11 14:29:03 UTC  |  Edited by: RAW23
Entry Barriers
Another factor is barriers to entry. High-tech invention and production will not be options for a considerable portion of the eve population who a) don't already have characters with the relevant skills and b) don't have sufficient isk to immediately purchase the requisite characters as well as pay for the start-up of an industrial operation. There is no point leaving these out, though, as many people will have the skills and/or the isk. But we need to note that these will be non-viable for a very significant portion of eve's population. T2 BPO production has some skill and capital barriers as well, so these remain in contention but again for only some players.

A similar consideration will apply to cap ship construction with its requirement for freighter pilot skills and freighter ownership (iirc the actual production skills are fairly low level so we can allow that anyone could pick these up quickly; similarly we could allow T1 in-station production to be universally), although these might be mitigated for highsec production of freighters and Orcas by using courier contracts. For the sake of the argument lets allow highsec construction for everyone but limit lowsec construction to just some people (also noting the minor additional risks involved).

A research/copy farm also has barriers to entry in terms of needing the standings to put up a tower but we can probably assume that most people with enough isk going spare to consider investing would probably have, or be able to rapidly get, the requisite standings for at least a low-level system highsec system (I leave out the much riskier option of running a farm in lowsec). So lets say that this one is available to everyone as well. However, running more than 20 slots is unlikely to be available to most people so we'll put large farms in the other group.

The trade options (small number of orders, short-term speculation, and contract trading) have entry barriers in the form of knowledge but probably only minimally as far as skills are concerned. More experienced people will have to tell me whether or not high level trade skills and standings are really essential for the short term spec but I'll assume for the moment that they are not. The knowledge barrier for short-term spec and contract trading seems to be enough to keep most people away although it may be that the barrier can be easily overcome (again, I'll have to appeal for help as I don't have experience in these areas) so I'll put these in the non-universally available group for the moment, whilst I would think that some successful slow trading on a small number of orders is open to everyone, although using this strategy for better returns probably has a quite considerable knowledge barrier.

MD investing, I would claim, has a minimal knowledge barrier that can be overcome in an hour or two simply by adopting successful strategies by rote and obviously has no skill barrier, so I'll assign it to the universally available group. Private investing / collateralised loan businesses, on the other hand, have social and reputational barriers to entry so these can be assigned to the non-universally available group.

So, having trimmed out the higher risk options we have two groups of activities that are comparable to MD investing in terms of expenditure of time and effort and our appropriate for the profile of our example individual.

Universally available activities

1) Running a fairly small number of trade orders on a once daily update or an even smaller number updating twice daily.
2) A small T1 production operation, with the mats purchased from sell orders should be possible as long as the logistics distances and the materials volumes are not too high.
3) MD investing.
4) Cap ship construction (industrial).
5) A small research/copy farm.

Non-universally available activities

1) A small T2 invention/production or T3 RE/production operation (smaller than the T1 alternative because of the additional steps involved in the production process).
2) A T2 BPO production operation of virtually any size.
3) Some amount of contract trading (someone else will have to fill in the details as to how large since I have no experience on this front).
4) A research/copy farm of a large size.
5) Private investing/loans.
6) Short term commodity speculation – i.e. trading on the regular cycles.
7) Cap ship construction (combat).
8) Datacore farming.


Which entry barriers in the second group an individual will be able to overcome will vary from person to person, so for any individual there will be a pool of activities consisting of all of the first group plus, possibly, some of the second group. In addition, individual circumstances will probably rule out some activities on the basis of tolerance for the activities involved. Some people just won't want to trade and others won't want to carry out industrial activities, regardless of whether or not they are optimal. In addition, for some people fitting our profile they may already be doing as much industry or trade as they want or as their market knowledge will bear and will be looking for something else to do with their remaining 20 min time-slot and any excess cash they have. Obviously, some people will also not want to get involved in MD investing for any one of a range of reasons. But since we are comparing alternatives to investing, let's assume that our sample person/people don't mind MD.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

RAW23
#3 - 2011-09-11 14:36:37 UTC
Effort
One thing worth noting before proceeding is that whilst it may be possible to pursue any of these activities in the time available each day, some of them will have much higher effort burdens than others in terms of the number of discrete tasks to manage and/or implement. At the highest level of effort will be high-tech invention and production with a whole gamut of tasks including buying mats, running the logistics, queuing the orders and keeping abreast of mat and finished product market movements. This could be run on a daily basis for maximum efficiency or in tranches that will lower the monthly returns but make any individual day less hectic. Cap ship construction will have different effort profiles on different days with a lot of tasks involved in getting each cycle going but then lots of low effort days while the cycles complete. Various degrees of efficiency can be achieved here as well. It will, thus be quite tricky to give a single figure for monthly returns on these kinds of activity.

Somewhere in the middle will be the trade options, with a fairly standard set of daily tasks that will all be largely similar (check markets, update orders), whilst at the lower end of the effort spectrum will be T2 BPO production, investing and research/copy (ordered from least to most overall effort on my estimate). So in some cases an activity might be reasonably selected over another available activity on the grounds of effort involved even if the more intense activity offers better returns.


Returns
This will, in many ways, be the critical criterion for determining the viability of MD investing for our example profile. However, as I have suggested above other factors such as tolerance for certain areas of the game and relative intensity of effort may modify the attractiveness of investing. A further consideration is capital absorption insofar as one might already have a full set of trade orders and/or a maxed out industrial/research base (either absolutely or by tolerance) but still have some cash left. In this case MD investing would only be competing with private investing or possibly a focussed industrial base expansion into ultra low effort T2 BPO production. However, before going on to debate the situations wherein one might take up investing even as a sub-optimal option, let's see if we can get some figures on the table for returns.

In most cases the figures I offer will be merely place-holders based on my own limited knowledge and/or second hand data or even guestimates (guesses informed by at least some limited data). In a few cases I will have to leave the returns completely blank due to a total lack of knowledge, first- or second-hand (contract trading will be an example). I will also try to offer a place-holding figure for capital absorption in each case and possibly a spread of returns where appropriate. For instance, a research copy farm will be able to generate considerably higher monthly returns on 2bil worth of BPOs than it will on 200bil.

My personal knowledge deficit for some of these activities is more than likely mirrored by almost everyone else's except those who have been around the longest and this factor is also worth considering. One might make a perfectly rational choice to invest rather than doing something more optimal simply because one does not know that there are better options available. Hopefully as this thread develops it will also serve as a resource for people to help them choose where to put their isk.


Universally available activities

1) Running a fairly small number of trade orders on a once daily update or an even smaller number updating twice daily.
Returns: I'll have to appeal for help on this one as I have only ever traded on a fast turnover 0.01 war basis.

2) A small T1 production operation, with the mats purchased from sell orders should be possible as long as the logistics distances and the materials volumes are not too high.
Capital Absorption and returns: Based loosely on my memory of battleship construction, the placeholding figure here will be something like 2.5%-3.9% per month scaling inversely with a capital absorption of between 2.63 and 29.6bil (the extreme upper ends of returns and capital absorption being generously unrealistic, I think – the upper end of capital absorption is based on producing and selling 70 BS per day and using courier contracts for all the logistics).

3) MD investing.
TO BE DETERMINED

4) Cap ship construction (industrial).
Capital absorption and returns: I'm going to lift figures from the BSAC Orca/Freighter building offering at the start of the year and say 3-4% on 50bil. If anyone in the business knows better please let me know. Also, if this return would take a greater time investment also let me know.

5) A small research/copy farm.
My own experience in this field combined with the, now slightly old, data from the One Stop offering suggest 3-4% returns on a low effort seems like a reasonable figure. For a small farm capital absorption could still be quite high (Titan prints) but with a considerably lower returns.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

RAW23
#4 - 2011-09-11 14:39:30 UTC  |  Edited by: RAW23
Non-universally available activities

1) A small T2 invention/production or T3 RE/production operation (smaller than the T1 alternative because of the additional steps involved in the production process).
Capital absorption and returns: God, the pain! There are so many possible permutations here that I don't even know where to begin. Any suggestions?

2) A T2 BPO production operation of virtually any size.
Capital absorption and returns: Capital absorption here seems practically unlimited (certainly into the trillions). Returns vary from 1-4% with far fewer opportunities at the higher end. Anecdotal evidence suggests c. 2% to be the current norm

3) Some amount of contract trading (someone else will have to fill in the details as to how large since I have no experience on this front).
Capital absorption and returns: I have no idea about either for this one. Anyone with experience please let me know.

4) A research/copy farm of a large size.
Capital absorption and returns: As above for the small copy farm but with potential greater capital absorption at the higher rate of 3-4% due to greater number of slots.

5) Private investing/loans.
Capital absorption and returns: 3-5% returns plus the occasional bonus when an overcollateralised loan defaults. Personally I have had a maximum of 70 billion out at any one time but more is certainly possible with lower rates to stay competitive. BMBE seems to average something in the region of 3-4% on 200bil according to their reports.

6) Short term commodity speculation – i.e. trading on the regular cycles.
Capital absorption and returns: Not something I know about but anecdotal evidence suggests c. 3%. I take this figure from previous comments by people who do trade in this way (or at least claim to). As to capital absorption it looks like this could take at least several tens of billions if not into the hundreds.

7) Cap ship construction (combat).
Capital absorption and returns: Based on Atima's figures it looks like this is in the 3-4% range with a high level of capital absorption. It may be that this degree of efficiency would fall outside the 20 minute boundary I have been using for my example profile though.

8) Datacore Farming.
Capital absorption and returns: To be determined.


One point worth noting for at least some of these activities is that higher returns will be possible in at least some market segments even if these returns will not be the norm. For instance, I know from past experience that some areas of the high-tech market will provide much higher returns than most other areas. But it is also the case that these returns will only ever be available to a few people at a time since if more people move into these areas profitability will plummet. I suspect the same will be true of running a small number of trade orders and higher returns will also likely be available to a handful of people who are able to manipulate the commodity markets. However, these are special cases and by their nature will not be available to most people.

Whilst the place-holding figures I have given above are more or less secure to varying degrees based on my personal knowledge and may change a bit when more informed people chime in it is unsurprising that these comparable activities all seem, so far, to provide returns within a similar range. I say unsurprising because this is precisely what one would expect given their comparability and the large numbers of players involved. If one of these areas provided vastly superior returns then we would expect most people to gravitate towards it, increasing competition until returns fell to what appears to be the generally accepted level of c. 2-4% per month, a range that appears to correlate roughly with relative capital absorption capacities (with high capital absorption activities at the low end and low capital absorption at the high end).

The big question now (assuming these rough figures are not far out of line) is whether returns from rational strategies for investing in MD fall within the same general range, and thus, represent a reasonable alternative to activities requiring a similar commitment of time and effort, or whether, as some have contended, MD investments represent an aberration and the failure of the wisdom of crowds insofar as people have been drawn into an activity that does not provide returns that compare to the other available options.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

RAW23
#5 - 2011-09-11 14:53:48 UTC
I don't think I have time to post a lot more today so I'll just offer a few figures that may give an idea of why I think a properly worked out strategy will provide comparable returns to the 2-4% range that appears above. As far as I can tell, the total cost of scams on MD in the 12 month period Oct. 2009-Sept. 2010 (inclusive) was 519.37bil, distributed over 10 scams:

1. Stevea/Troy Industries - 2bil

2. Lui Kai - 11.37bil

3. Liberty Eternal - 2bil
(LE came back to the game and paid this off but since this happened outside the sample period I'm leaving it in as a scam/default)

4. ITSAssassin – 5bil

5. ShipRep/Katiana Swann – 3bil
(Katiana has recently returned but, again, this is outside the sample period)

6. Commercant Epique – 2bil

7. Yih - 4bil

8. Curzon Dax - 50bil

9. T4U/BB - c. 400bil

10. Bad Bobby Refinance – 40bil (?)

It will be immediately apparent that the vast majority of these losses come from BB and Curzon Dax. Any rational strategy able to exclude theses two scams would only have had to deal with a scam volume over this twelve month period of 29.37bil.

Against this my incomplete figures for returns in this period show interest, dividends and share value increases totalling between 330bil and 440bil (the lower figure excludes BSAC returns and a couple of others that I'm not sure about whilst the higher figure pegs the uncertain returns at 3% and guesses BSAC's starting capital for the period at 300bil).

The question, then, is whether basic strategies could avoid most of the volume of scams without also ruling out most of the offerings that paid out, or at least leaving enough offerings for investors to sink a decent chunk of cash into. I'll leave the details of possible strategies for another day (although if anyone wants to start the ball rolling on this, please do – just bear in mind that reverse engineering strategies specifically to exclude BB will not be a good idea as such strategies may have very significant weaknesses when applied to data from any other year). Given that nearly all offering pay out 3% returns or more it does seem likely to me that any strategies that are successful in this regard will probably provide returns comparable to the other activities noted above. But whether or not this will actually be borne out by the data will have to wait.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#6 - 2011-09-11 18:10:53 UTC
Nice reading.

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Companion Trollin
Doomheim
#7 - 2011-09-11 20:33:18 UTC
Raw, I'd like a 20b loan - in the name of science, to help you build some more empirical data.

(sorry Cyniac, I couldn't resist)
Cyniac
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2011-09-11 20:38:23 UTC
Companion Trollin wrote:
Raw, I'd like a 20b loan - in the name of science, to help you build some more empirical data.

(sorry Cyniac, I couldn't resist)


I endorse this, and any other attempts to advance science.


Disclaimer: I do not in any way vouch for this investment. And decline all responsibility related to the outcome. My involvement is purely of a philosophical nature which seems to fit in with the whole discussion here.


AureoLion
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2011-09-11 20:45:38 UTC
Was gonna write something like "This forums needs a Like button" before i actually found it. Oops
I suspected that for quite long, that general investing is isk-positive, i mean.
You're counting the "smallish" scams, though? I tought some 0.2-1b defaults happened in that period.
RAW23
#10 - 2011-09-11 20:57:19 UTC
Found a spot in the house where I can get a signal on my phone!

Sadly the data does not include any offerings that were under 1 bill as collecting that data didn't seem worth the effort.

Qube and cyniac - my spider sense detects mockery in the scc-lounge. It's a shame I don't have access to the client or I would drown you both with my Walls of Text +5.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

Claire Voyant
#11 - 2011-09-12 03:45:15 UTC
Tutskii - 30 bil?
Tekota
The Freighter Factory
#12 - 2011-09-12 07:42:07 UTC
I think Tuts would likely fall outside of the Sept 09/Oct 10 window. Newbold might come in there dependent upon whether one goes for date of launch or date scam becomes apparent but that was in the 1-6bill range (dependent upon how many shills were "investors"). Ji Sama could also possibly fall just outside or just inside.


Do like threads like this though. Directly addressing the original proposition I'd suggest one further variable however - trying to think how to succinctly wording it but it boils down to this:
Most of the the other comparable activities you suggest will allow one to mitigate losses mid venture. If a market changes / competition increases / impending nerfage becomes apparent then generally one can wind down operations and liquidate at a break-even point (or say 5%-10% loss). With investing one can only perform this mitigation of losses before investing, once capital is committed it will either make you the 5-10% profit anticipated or will lose you 100%.

Now, this doesn't affect the maths of relative profitabilty as we're not comparing the merits of sinking 10b into manufacturing waffles versus investing 10b into Waffles4U - rather we're talking investing 1b chunks into ten seperate Waffles4U ventures.

However, I would argue it raises the entry bar to profitable investing (in so far as that front loading of risk mitigation requiring not just different skills but *better* skills than a "suck it and see, liquidate if it doesn't pan out, approach), and potentially increases the workload (in finding the number of diverse investments) - this latter point however I'm completely unqualified to call, given my grand total of 7 public investments over the last three years.
flakeys
Doomheim
#13 - 2011-09-12 09:40:49 UTC
RAW23 wrote:
Found a spot in the house where I can get a signal on my phone!

Sadly the data does not include any offerings that were under 1 bill as collecting that data didn't seem worth the effort.

Qube and cyniac - my spider sense detects mockery in the scc-lounge. It's a shame I don't have access to the client or I would drown you both with my Walls of Text +5.



Someone who IS OBVIOUSLY NOT GAY asked in the scc if you where having posting lessons from VV .Dunno who it was though .... Roll

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Companion Trollin
Doomheim
#14 - 2011-09-12 11:12:31 UTC
flakeys wrote:
RAW23 wrote:
Found a spot in the house where I can get a signal on my phone!

Sadly the data does not include any offerings that were under 1 bill as collecting that data didn't seem worth the effort.

Qube and cyniac - my spider sense detects mockery in the scc-lounge. It's a shame I don't have access to the client or I would drown you both with my Walls of Text +5.



Someone who IS OBVIOUSLY NOT GAY asked in the scc if you where having posting lessons from VV .Dunno who it was though .... Roll

Someone's not bitter Blink
flakeys
Doomheim
#15 - 2011-09-12 11:25:54 UTC
Companion Trollin wrote:
flakeys wrote:
RAW23 wrote:
Found a spot in the house where I can get a signal on my phone!

Sadly the data does not include any offerings that were under 1 bill as collecting that data didn't seem worth the effort.

Qube and cyniac - my spider sense detects mockery in the scc-lounge. It's a shame I don't have access to the client or I would drown you both with my Walls of Text +5.



Someone who IS OBVIOUSLY NOT GAY asked in the scc if you where having posting lessons from VV .Dunno who it was though .... Roll

Someone's not bitter Blink



Bitter in a gay way? .... look just saying Blink

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Companion Trollin
Doomheim
#16 - 2011-09-12 11:33:54 UTC
flakeys wrote:
Companion Trollin wrote:
flakeys wrote:
RAW23 wrote:
Found a spot in the house where I can get a signal on my phone!

Sadly the data does not include any offerings that were under 1 bill as collecting that data didn't seem worth the effort.

Qube and cyniac - my spider sense detects mockery in the scc-lounge. It's a shame I don't have access to the client or I would drown you both with my Walls of Text +5.



Someone who IS OBVIOUSLY NOT GAY asked in the scc if you where having posting lessons from VV .Dunno who it was though .... Roll

Someone's not bitter Blink



Bitter in a gay way? .... look just saying Blink


I have no comment.
Lord Wickham
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2011-09-12 12:52:37 UTC
i didn't quite get the aim of this 100%, but there are a few markets that i know well research and BPO's being the major 1. i also t2 manufacture and T1 manufacture. if you want finer figures on the profits i'll be happy to contribute.


also your definately missing scams, but the MD old forums are so full of stuff it will be hard to find a majority of them. though im not sure what that matters compared to the BB scam.


Also your projected returns seem very low, on a majority of available activities you've stated a return of 2-4%, which imo is very low and not even worth getting out of bed for.

you could buy a research alt for 1-1.5 bil and earn that % a month from datacores alone without doing anything at all.
flakeys
Doomheim
#18 - 2011-09-12 13:27:07 UTC
Lord Wickham wrote:


Also your projected returns seem very low, on a majority of available activities you've stated a return of 2-4%, which imo is very low and not even worth getting out of bed for.

you could buy a research alt for 1-1.5 bil and earn that % a month from datacores alone without doing anything at all.



If you calculate that with a 1B investment i agree , however if you have a 50B going on at 3% it still gives a nice extra a month.Not saying it's better returns then dabbling in trade a bit yourself with the same amount of isk but for some the isk that goes into investing is isk they themselves can't find or want to use in the general market.

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Zagam
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#19 - 2011-09-12 13:57:25 UTC
In regards to the return rate on small-scale market trading (updating once per day), I will normally pull between 25% and 35% monthly profit overall. The sheer number of trades is small, but the value is decently large (I average 3-8% per trade profit).

Also, EXCELLENT post.
RAW23
#20 - 2011-09-12 14:14:54 UTC
Lord Wickham wrote:
i didn't quite get the aim of this 100%, but there are a few markets that i know well research and BPO's being the major 1. i also t2 manufacture and T1 manufacture. if you want finer figures on the profits i'll be happy to contribute.


also your definately missing scams, but the MD old forums are so full of stuff it will be hard to find a majority of them. though im not sure what that matters compared to the BB scam.


Also your projected returns seem very low, on a majority of available activities you've stated a return of 2-4%, which imo is very low and not even worth getting out of bed for.

you could buy a research alt for 1-1.5 bil and earn that % a month from datacores alone without doing anything at all.



Any figures you can offer to sharpen up those that are currently being used as place-holders would be gratefully received. The main aim is to see what other options investing is in competition with and what returns they offer (based on a max of 20mins of activity per day), as well as what amount of capital they absorb. A secondary aim (although possibly more useful) is to build up a list of things people can do with their isk when they have very little time available.

As to missing scams (that actually launched rather than just being attempted), if you can think of any for that period that were over one bil please let me know and I will include them. I tried to take more care in searching for scams than for the positive outcomes but it is very likely that at least some slipped by. However, the frequency of scams is not as high as it often seems (I remember discussing with Taram the fact that we hadn't had a scam for over three months at one point - this of course jinxed the run and we got a new one with a week or so :-)) so I would be surprised if I had missed a lot of them.

Datacore farming definitely needs to be added to the list and I will do so as soon as someone provides some precise figures. I would guess it would need to be divided into two activities, though: subsidiary datacore farming, involving buying characters to fillout spare slots on already active accounts, and datacore farming as a full-on business activity, which would need to subtract the plex cost of running any extra accounts. I take it that datacore farming as a side activity will be able to absorb a much smaller amount of capital than running it as a business but if you can provide a range of monthly per character returns for the 1-1.5bil investment in the character then we can workout figures for both set-ups from these.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

123Next pageLast page